Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Governor Jeff Landry’s comments on LSU’s next coaching hire were the second most ridiculous comments he’s made this week. There’s far more to be concerned about from that office. Scott Woodward has done an amazing job as AD and I fully believe that the failure was on Brian Kelly,... show more

Ryan Clark

528,620 subscribers

1,366,370 views • 11 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Education Sports

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

27 Comments

Chuck11 months ago

Trump won Louisiana by 22+ points You don’t represent Louisiana or its people 🤣🫵🏻🤡

Kyle Becker11 months ago

Be SPECIFIC about why you think Charlie Kirk doesn't represent Louisianans. Go on the record and tell us all IN CONTEXT why Charlie Kirk was so 'racist' or 'bigoted' or 'homophobic' or whatever word that's in your Woke grab bag of smears. Just realize — Erika Kirk has lawyers.

sg24 🇺🇸11 months ago

The audacity to think that you speak for an entire state 🤣🤣🤣

Benny🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🦅🦅11 months ago

Ryan can talk politics but Landry can’t talk sports. This shows what a dumb person you are. DEI hire and they are scared to fire you.

DrippyTiger11 months ago

As a fellow LSU alumni, you don’t speak for Louisiana 🤡. Your takes are embarrassing and you should have been canned a long time ago.

Gain of Fauci11 months ago

You are one of the dumbest racists alive.

Matt Smith11 months ago

Stop moving politics into sports. You do not speak for a fanbase. And that is why Stephen A Smith gave you that look. Sports is amoral and now you are going to force people to choice political sides for their fanbase. You are not very wise in speaking today.

the Ultimate Rookie11 months ago

wHy Is DuHH GovERNOR conCERneD WitH the HIGhest paid StaTE EmploYEE

Luke “Hi-Jack” Trickle11 months ago

At it again

Devyn11 months ago

You don't speak for us.

Pasteythe2nd11 months ago

you're a f'n idiot. Charlie Kirk 100x the man you are.

Mar11 months ago

If that statue is built on that campus..every black athlete needs to transfer immediately...they dont need to play on a campus that support white supremacists

For Love of the Games11 months ago

Keep Charlie Kirk's name out of your mouth you scumbag

Bear Bryant’s Burner11 months ago

1. Charlie Kirk is a better man than you could ever dream of being 2. You sold your house in Louisiana to get away from the state. You don’t care about Louisiana. 3. No one “deserves” to pick the coach. 4. Gov. Landry didn’t fire him a board at the university did. 5. It wasn’t about who he hired it was about the contract he gave him.

MKL11 months ago

Time to apologize for the 453rd time this year Ryan! Get your PR team ready!

ERIC ANDREW SIMON11 months ago

The fact that a Charlie Kirk statue bothers you that much says a lot about you. You are a rich, sad man.

T11 months ago

This is where Louisiana ranks and he’s worried about football 😂 fix your state.

RTR11 months ago

Trashing Charlie Kirk, really man?

minneauxTx11 months ago

as an LSU alumni..I agree with Governor Landry.. @ScottwoodLSU has made two incredibly costly and horrible picks..... Brian Kelly should never have been hired at LSU and giving an unproven HC a 54M buyout was stupid.

Integrityworks11 months ago

And this…

Big Rob11 months ago

For the love of God, shut the fuck up dude

MAGA4511 months ago

Go away you racist retard.

Kyle Winn11 months ago

Once again, you’re making an ass out of yourself. Over 35% of registered voters in Louisiana are republicans. Your racist takes are beyond old and I cannot wait until @stephenasmith fires you.

Benny🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🦅🦅11 months ago

You are a racist scum bag and a fucking moron. You only lasted this long on ESPN because of your skin color. Anyone else would have been fired.

Chris Hanover11 months ago

As what? The Governor of Louisiana can't say something on sports? Why not? ESPN has idiots like Ryan Clarke making stupid comments all the time. How many apologies has he given in the last 2 months alone. Scott Woodward is also responsible for two of the biggest buyouts. Ouch.

Doug Keegan11 months ago

I wonder if the private donors picking up the tab on Kelly's eight-figure buyout, due to an outrageous guaranteed contract offered by Scott Woodward, agree with that "amazing job" appraisal of Woodward's performance as AD?

Scott Salmons11 months ago

Jemele Hills twin. Race baiting is all they have.

Related Videos

The guy who made this used to be a director for Jimmy Kimmel Live. Here it is on IG. He thinks it’s funny and it is but not for the reasons intended.🤣 Look at the comments. I’m afraid to say that the divide in this country may be too far, there may not be a way to repair this.

The guy who made this used to be a director for Jimmy Kimmel Live. Here it is on IG. He thinks it’s funny and it is but not for the reasons intended.🤣 Look at the comments. I’m afraid to say that the divide in this country may be too far, there may not be a way to repair this.

Champagne Joshi

117,695 views • 2 years ago

You must either be extremely dumb or biased to believe Izzy is the one who made it about race You’re allowed to think that what Izzy did yesterday was kinda cringe (I know I do) but he’s in no way shape or form a racist and he’s not the one that started this whole thing

You must either be extremely dumb or biased to believe Izzy is the one who made it about race You’re allowed to think that what Izzy did yesterday was kinda cringe (I know I do) but he’s in no way shape or form a racist and he’s not the one that started this whole thing

MMA News Africa

3,203,227 views • 3 years ago

🚨 “THIS IS ROMANIA RIGHT NOW” “We are about to be shamed on the international stage… by our own president. And yes — I will say it clearly: He is illegitimate. He is the product of cancelled elections in 2024. A by-product of a system that operated under constant pressure from Brussels. And this is not speculation… This has already been referenced in reporting from the U.S. House Judiciary Committee. This is the reality we are living in. An illegitimate president… taking a position as an observer on the global stage — a role that, in truth, means nothing. No authority. No strength. No sovereignty. It shows something far deeper: A lack of political spine A failure of foreign policy A leadership that does not represent its people And now… He goes there to influence perception — to challenge findings that stated clearly: There was NO evidence of Russian interference. And since then? Nothing. No new proof. No transparency. No accountability. Only silence. Iosefina Pascal

🚨 “THIS IS ROMANIA RIGHT NOW” “We are about to be shamed on the international stage… by our own president. And yes — I will say it clearly: He is illegitimate. He is the product of cancelled elections in 2024. A by-product of a system that operated under constant pressure from Brussels. And this is not speculation… This has already been referenced in reporting from the U.S. House Judiciary Committee. This is the reality we are living in. An illegitimate president… taking a position as an observer on the global stage — a role that, in truth, means nothing. No authority. No strength. No sovereignty. It shows something far deeper: A lack of political spine A failure of foreign policy A leadership that does not represent its people And now… He goes there to influence perception — to challenge findings that stated clearly: There was NO evidence of Russian interference. And since then? Nothing. No new proof. No transparency. No accountability. Only silence. Iosefina Pascal

Jim Ferguson

13,373 views • 5 months ago

Giorgia Meloni on Greenland: As far as I am concerned, I continue to insist on the role of NATO: NATO is the place in which we must seek to jointly organize instruments of deterrence against interferences that may be hostile in a territory that is clearly strategic. I believe that the fact that NATO has begun to work on this is a good initiative, and all the more so for this reason - because NATO has begun to do this work - I believe it is a mistake today to impose new sanctions.

Giorgia Meloni on Greenland: As far as I am concerned, I continue to insist on the role of NATO: NATO is the place in which we must seek to jointly organize instruments of deterrence against interferences that may be hostile in a territory that is clearly strategic. I believe that the fact that NATO has begun to work on this is a good initiative, and all the more so for this reason - because NATO has begun to do this work - I believe it is a mistake today to impose new sanctions.

Anton Gerashchenko

302,541 views • 8 months ago

🚨 CANDACE OWENS: “CHARLIE CAME TO ME AND SAID HE WAS BETRAYED.” 🚨 “I had a vivid dream this weekend. Charlie came to me and he told me that he was betrayed. I don’t know who exactly it is that betrayed him, but I felt in the dream that it is soon going to be revealed. It's inevitable. There’s nothing and no one that’s going to stop the truth from coming out. And it’s going to have international consequences. Take that to the bank. Quote me on that.” ~ Candace Owens She said this on camera, describing it as a prophetic dream, that souls can communicate “on their way in and on their way out of this world.” If Candace is right, who betrayed Charlie and what “international consequences” was she warning about?

🚨 CANDACE OWENS: “CHARLIE CAME TO ME AND SAID HE WAS BETRAYED.” 🚨 “I had a vivid dream this weekend. Charlie came to me and he told me that he was betrayed. I don’t know who exactly it is that betrayed him, but I felt in the dream that it is soon going to be revealed. It's inevitable. There’s nothing and no one that’s going to stop the truth from coming out. And it’s going to have international consequences. Take that to the bank. Quote me on that.” ~ Candace Owens She said this on camera, describing it as a prophetic dream, that souls can communicate “on their way in and on their way out of this world.” If Candace is right, who betrayed Charlie and what “international consequences” was she warning about?

HustleBitch

166,607 views • 11 months ago

Rep. Boebert says she’s working on legislation to fund the White House Ballroom: I’m working on legislation to ensure we are getting the ballroom funded. There’s obviously a national security element to that, and it needs to be done. Reporter: Is there any better use for taxpayer dollars? Boebert: Are you kidding? There’s hardly any money here that is going to that. He has it funded.

Rep. Boebert says she’s working on legislation to fund the White House Ballroom: I’m working on legislation to ensure we are getting the ballroom funded. There’s obviously a national security element to that, and it needs to be done. Reporter: Is there any better use for taxpayer dollars? Boebert: Are you kidding? There’s hardly any money here that is going to that. He has it funded.

Acyn

296,269 views • 5 months ago

Senator Tim Scott to the hosts of The View: "I’m on the show because of the comments made frankly on this show...the only way for a young African American kid to be successful in this country is to be the exception...? That is a dangerous, offensive, disgusting message..."

Senator Tim Scott to the hosts of The View: "I’m on the show because of the comments made frankly on this show...the only way for a young African American kid to be successful in this country is to be the exception...? That is a dangerous, offensive, disgusting message..."

Townhall.com

4,319,105 views • 3 years ago

“The president was trying to back channel and invite us. And we were like no because we know that moment is gonna be co opted. Let’s not pretend that we don’t know who this person is.” Megan Rapinoe on why the USWNT turned down a White House visit in 2019 from Donald Trump

“The president was trying to back channel and invite us. And we were like no because we know that moment is gonna be co opted. Let’s not pretend that we don’t know who this person is.” Megan Rapinoe on why the USWNT turned down a White House visit in 2019 from Donald Trump

Samantha Dudley

19,340 views • 7 months ago

Scott on why conviction in an idea is dangerous as an investor but required as a founder: "From the investor seat, I don't think you want to be in love with an idea. That's a risky thing because you'll find a way to express that by investing and make some compromises on the team because you know this idea is just so good, its time has come. But if the team isn't there, 90% of the time it doesn't work. Then there's a whole thing can you swap out the team? But the whole Founders Fund thesis was always no, you need the founder to run the company. But on the company side, you have to be in love with the idea. It's not that rational to start a company. There's a lot easier, more comfortable ways to make money if that's the goal. So it's got to be about what the company is doing specifically. If you want to actually start a company, it better be something that you're really passionate about, or you think that the problem is really important."

Scott on why conviction in an idea is dangerous as an investor but required as a founder: "From the investor seat, I don't think you want to be in love with an idea. That's a risky thing because you'll find a way to express that by investing and make some compromises on the team because you know this idea is just so good, its time has come. But if the team isn't there, 90% of the time it doesn't work. Then there's a whole thing can you swap out the team? But the whole Founders Fund thesis was always no, you need the founder to run the company. But on the company side, you have to be in love with the idea. It's not that rational to start a company. There's a lot easier, more comfortable ways to make money if that's the goal. So it's got to be about what the company is doing specifically. If you want to actually start a company, it better be something that you're really passionate about, or you think that the problem is really important."

Patrick OShaughnessy

33,016 views • 5 months ago

Konstantin Kisin: “One thing that no one really talks about, it’s an issue close to my heart, with Ukrainian family, and the conflict there is something that’s very important to me, is that one of the hopes I had for Trump presidency was that he would find a way to bring that conflict to a close. This [Iran war] has only made things better for Russia. The fact that they’ve had to lift sanctions on Russian oil, for example, in order to compensate for the lack of supply is allowing Russia to continue this war and to fund its war. And so, it’s been a disastrous intervention, and really, really unfortunate in the way that it’s been done.”

Konstantin Kisin: “One thing that no one really talks about, it’s an issue close to my heart, with Ukrainian family, and the conflict there is something that’s very important to me, is that one of the hopes I had for Trump presidency was that he would find a way to bring that conflict to a close. This [Iran war] has only made things better for Russia. The fact that they’ve had to lift sanctions on Russian oil, for example, in order to compensate for the lack of supply is allowing Russia to continue this war and to fund its war. And so, it’s been a disastrous intervention, and really, really unfortunate in the way that it’s been done.”

Kate from Kharkiv

12,931 views • 1 month ago

"Wish there were more fans in the stands, but for the fans that were here I'm glad I was able to put on a show." Is there convincing that needs to be done for the fans to show up in a big way? "Something we strive for. Hopefully we can bring that back." #Reds FOX19 NOW

"Wish there were more fans in the stands, but for the fans that were here I'm glad I was able to put on a show." Is there convincing that needs to be done for the fans to show up in a big way? "Something we strive for. Hopefully we can bring that back." #Reds FOX19 NOW

Jeremy Rauch

178,223 views • 1 year ago

🚨 NEW: Fox’s Brit Hume SPEAKS OUT on White House ban of CNN and MS Now: “I think the president has a case. Some of the coverage that’s been done by the organizations that have now been banned from the White House has been almost comically unbalanced.” “And they’ve pursued all kinds of stories — the Russia collusion matter being chief among them — that have ended up dead ends. It seems clearly motivated by a belief that Donald Trump’s presence in the White House is a national emergency and that their job was to somehow take him down.” “Having said that, however, you’ve got to also ask this question: Will this be effective in any way the president wants? After all, being banned and sharply criticized by the president, to these people that we’re talking about here at these organizations, is likely to be seen as a badge of honor. It will do them no professional harm.” “They’re not accountable to the president in our country because we do indeed have a free press. So I don’t — and the idea that the coverage will become more balanced because of this, I think is fanciful. I just don’t think it’s going to have that effect.” “And in political terms, Bret, this will rally the base. I’ve seen by the reactions on social media that people who were MAGA, who were for Trump, think this is great. Right on, brother. But I don’t think it’s going to do much for him beyond that base.” “And at this point, with this midterm election coming, he needs to get people who may not have been part of his base but voted for him in 2024 and may not this time to come back his way. And I don’t think this advances that cause at all,” he tells Bret Baier.

🚨 NEW: Fox’s Brit Hume SPEAKS OUT on White House ban of CNN and MS Now: “I think the president has a case. Some of the coverage that’s been done by the organizations that have now been banned from the White House has been almost comically unbalanced.” “And they’ve pursued all kinds of stories — the Russia collusion matter being chief among them — that have ended up dead ends. It seems clearly motivated by a belief that Donald Trump’s presence in the White House is a national emergency and that their job was to somehow take him down.” “Having said that, however, you’ve got to also ask this question: Will this be effective in any way the president wants? After all, being banned and sharply criticized by the president, to these people that we’re talking about here at these organizations, is likely to be seen as a badge of honor. It will do them no professional harm.” “They’re not accountable to the president in our country because we do indeed have a free press. So I don’t — and the idea that the coverage will become more balanced because of this, I think is fanciful. I just don’t think it’s going to have that effect.” “And in political terms, Bret, this will rally the base. I’ve seen by the reactions on social media that people who were MAGA, who were for Trump, think this is great. Right on, brother. But I don’t think it’s going to do much for him beyond that base.” “And at this point, with this midterm election coming, he needs to get people who may not have been part of his base but voted for him in 2024 and may not this time to come back his way. And I don’t think this advances that cause at all,” he tells Bret Baier.

TV News Now

215,174 views • 10 days ago

🚨 🗣 Mikel Arteta on the decision to award Sunderland a penalty: "Look, the first question we have to discuss is that this is NOT ACCEPTABLE at this level. "It was a beautiful game of football, with two teams and an atmosphere in the stadium that was unbelievable, with Sunderland they are so organised; they are so good in so many phases, they have great players, they created a lot of issues we had to cope with. "We had to cope with all of that, it was a lot in a really difficult week after Chelsea and Napoli, and on top of that we have to go through what we've done today that in my opinion is NOT ACCEPTABLE. "I watched it 20 times, and I CANNOT find a way to understand how they even think to give a penalty in that situation, or the way the VAR has to intervene. "So I don't know what to think, but I'm SAD that we have to discuss in such a beautiful game something at this level that has the gravity of that, because that CHANGES the course of the season and can cost you the championship. "At this level, with all the work that we put in, this cannot happen. I cannot find an explanation - that's why I'm going to try and find an explanation now. "I want to be talking about how good we were, how good Sunderland were, and the level of the league and how beautiful this is - we should not be talking about that. "I cannot find an explanation - that's why I'm going to try and find an explanation now." 🗣️ On a very important victory: "I want to be talking about how good we were, how good Sunderland were, and the level of the league and how beautiful this is - we should not be talking about [refereeing decisions]." 🗣️ on whether the referee gave an explanation: No! (shakes head)

🚨 🗣 Mikel Arteta on the decision to award Sunderland a penalty: "Look, the first question we have to discuss is that this is NOT ACCEPTABLE at this level. "It was a beautiful game of football, with two teams and an atmosphere in the stadium that was unbelievable, with Sunderland they are so organised; they are so good in so many phases, they have great players, they created a lot of issues we had to cope with. "We had to cope with all of that, it was a lot in a really difficult week after Chelsea and Napoli, and on top of that we have to go through what we've done today that in my opinion is NOT ACCEPTABLE. "I watched it 20 times, and I CANNOT find a way to understand how they even think to give a penalty in that situation, or the way the VAR has to intervene. "So I don't know what to think, but I'm SAD that we have to discuss in such a beautiful game something at this level that has the gravity of that, because that CHANGES the course of the season and can cost you the championship. "At this level, with all the work that we put in, this cannot happen. I cannot find an explanation - that's why I'm going to try and find an explanation now. "I want to be talking about how good we were, how good Sunderland were, and the level of the league and how beautiful this is - we should not be talking about that. "I cannot find an explanation - that's why I'm going to try and find an explanation now." 🗣️ On a very important victory: "I want to be talking about how good we were, how good Sunderland were, and the level of the league and how beautiful this is - we should not be talking about [refereeing decisions]." 🗣️ on whether the referee gave an explanation: No! (shakes head)

Connor Humm

129,720 views • 19 days ago

#WATCH | Srinagar, J&K: On the Pahalgam attack, CM Omar Abdullah says, "... Who is responsible for this failure? If it is an intelligence failure, then who is responsible for this? It is not possible that 26 people lost their lives and there is no response from our side. Now that we know that there has been a failure in security and intelligence, someone has to be held responsible."

#WATCH | Srinagar, J&K: On the Pahalgam attack, CM Omar Abdullah says, "... Who is responsible for this failure? If it is an intelligence failure, then who is responsible for this? It is not possible that 26 people lost their lives and there is no response from our side. Now that we know that there has been a failure in security and intelligence, someone has to be held responsible."

ANI

16,624 views • 1 year ago

.Real America's Voice (RAV)’s Brian Glenn: “Does the White House have a comment on a letter that was sent from Congressman Raskin to the DOJ alleging that the DOJ recklessly released damning information in regards to President Trump’s documents?” Karoline Leavitt Karoline Leavitt: “Yes, I saw that letter from Congressman Raskin this morning, who I would add, has zero credibility, and this letter was clearly a cheap political stunt. What the congressman did here, Brian, and for everyone in the room who’s hopefully not reporting on this as fact, is that he took untrue and salacious claims in a memo that was produced by Jack Smith, who has been completely discredited for his lawfare and his witch hunts against this President, and that information was unverified. It never even made it into the indictment because it was so unverified. And what happened to that indictment, anyway? It was thrown out. And Jack Smith has been proven again to be a prosecutor on a witch hunt against President Trump. He tried to throw him in jail ahead of the 2024 election. The Biden Department of Justice was fully on board with this lawfare campaign. And in fact, this story that was concocted by Congressman Raskin was so ridiculous I understand his communications team reached out to some outlets in this room who responsibly said, we’re not going to write this because this is just too much. However, of course, MS NOW did write that story this morning because they continue to be left wing propaganda for the Democrat Party. But I think Jack Smith has been proven to be a liar and a fraud. And this is, again, a cheap political stunt from a Democrat on Capitol Hill who I think wants to get himself on cable television.”

.Real America's Voice (RAV)’s Brian Glenn: “Does the White House have a comment on a letter that was sent from Congressman Raskin to the DOJ alleging that the DOJ recklessly released damning information in regards to President Trump’s documents?” Karoline Leavitt Karoline Leavitt: “Yes, I saw that letter from Congressman Raskin this morning, who I would add, has zero credibility, and this letter was clearly a cheap political stunt. What the congressman did here, Brian, and for everyone in the room who’s hopefully not reporting on this as fact, is that he took untrue and salacious claims in a memo that was produced by Jack Smith, who has been completely discredited for his lawfare and his witch hunts against this President, and that information was unverified. It never even made it into the indictment because it was so unverified. And what happened to that indictment, anyway? It was thrown out. And Jack Smith has been proven again to be a prosecutor on a witch hunt against President Trump. He tried to throw him in jail ahead of the 2024 election. The Biden Department of Justice was fully on board with this lawfare campaign. And in fact, this story that was concocted by Congressman Raskin was so ridiculous I understand his communications team reached out to some outlets in this room who responsibly said, we’re not going to write this because this is just too much. However, of course, MS NOW did write that story this morning because they continue to be left wing propaganda for the Democrat Party. But I think Jack Smith has been proven to be a liar and a fraud. And this is, again, a cheap political stunt from a Democrat on Capitol Hill who I think wants to get himself on cable television.”

Curtis Houck

217,363 views • 6 months ago

🇬🇧🇺🇦 Boris Johnson: This is fundamentally an imperial war. This is about Russia’s sense of its history. It’s about Russia’s sense that there’s no possibility of a Russian future or a Russian empire or Russian dignity without Ukraine. And that is an absolute disaster. And the only way to fix the problem of Ukraine is for the West to be clear about the future of Ukraine, and we’re still not doing that.

🇬🇧🇺🇦 Boris Johnson: This is fundamentally an imperial war. This is about Russia’s sense of its history. It’s about Russia’s sense that there’s no possibility of a Russian future or a Russian empire or Russian dignity without Ukraine. And that is an absolute disaster. And the only way to fix the problem of Ukraine is for the West to be clear about the future of Ukraine, and we’re still not doing that.

MAKS 26 🇺🇦👀

31,018 views • 16 days ago

Parsi: There is no doubt that we have now, after 20 years of hearing from the hawks, that the only solution is to go to war, we tried it. One third of the U.S. Navy was there in the region. This was not a small operation. This was a major operation short of an actual invasion, and it failed. There is just no doubt that the military operation was not a success. And hopefully, at a minimum, we will not be having that debate again. It has now been settled. It's no longer a theoretical or academic topic. It has been tried, proven to be a failure.

Parsi: There is no doubt that we have now, after 20 years of hearing from the hawks, that the only solution is to go to war, we tried it. One third of the U.S. Navy was there in the region. This was not a small operation. This was a major operation short of an actual invasion, and it failed. There is just no doubt that the military operation was not a success. And hopefully, at a minimum, we will not be having that debate again. It has now been settled. It's no longer a theoretical or academic topic. It has been tried, proven to be a failure.

Acyn

133,670 views • 3 months ago