正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

GPT 5.6 Has Trauma from Training 💀

Nerd Snipe

2,011 subscribers

16,734 次观看 • 1 天前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Meet the Wishingrads. A family running a cereal business from their dining room with GPT-5.6.

Meet the Wishingrads. A family running a cereal business from their dining room with GPT-5.6.

OpenAI

127,187 次观看 • 3 天前

The New GPT 5.6 Sol is insane. ❤️‍🔥Just recorded a 21-min Full Tutorial on How To Build Premium, Cinematic Websites with GPT 5.6 Sol!

The New GPT 5.6 Sol is insane. ❤️‍🔥Just recorded a 21-min Full Tutorial on How To Build Premium, Cinematic Websites with GPT 5.6 Sol!

Viktor Oddy

562,675 次观看 • 2 天前

From rough ideas to quality work. OpenAl's GPT-5.6 is rolling out across Microsoft 365 Copilot in Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Chat, and Copilot Cowork. Optimized with OpenAl for knowledge work, GPT-5.6 is the preferred model for Microsoft 365 Copilot.

From rough ideas to quality work. OpenAl's GPT-5.6 is rolling out across Microsoft 365 Copilot in Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Chat, and Copilot Cowork. Optimized with OpenAl for knowledge work, GPT-5.6 is the preferred model for Microsoft 365 Copilot.

Microsoft 365

33,111 次观看 • 2 天前

GPT-5.6 is here. I wish we could use it.

GPT-5.6 is here. I wish we could use it.

Theo - t3.gg

84,222 次观看 • 15 天前

📣 OpenAI Developers's GPT-5.6 family is now generally available and rolling out in GitHub Copilot. GPT-5.6 comes in three variants: ☀️ GPT-5.6 Sol: the highest reasoning ceiling in the family. Best for complex reasoning over large codebases and demanding, long-running agentic work. 🌎 GPT-5.6 Terra: the balanced default. A strong all-round choice for everyday interactive and agentic coding. 🌕 GPT-5.6 Luna: a lightweight, cost-efficient variant for smaller, faster tasks and the lowest-cost option in the family. Try one, two, or them all in Visual Studio Code or the GitHub Copilot app.

📣 OpenAI Developers's GPT-5.6 family is now generally available and rolling out in GitHub Copilot. GPT-5.6 comes in three variants: ☀️ GPT-5.6 Sol: the highest reasoning ceiling in the family. Best for complex reasoning over large codebases and demanding, long-running agentic work. 🌎 GPT-5.6 Terra: the balanced default. A strong all-round choice for everyday interactive and agentic coding. 🌕 GPT-5.6 Luna: a lightweight, cost-efficient variant for smaller, faster tasks and the lowest-cost option in the family. Try one, two, or them all in Visual Studio Code or the GitHub Copilot app.

GitHub

152,036 次观看 • 3 天前

Bro is not recovering from that trauma 🤣💀

Bro is not recovering from that trauma 🤣💀

ÍBÙKÛN

36,434 次观看 • 1 个月前

GPT 5.6 is out but you can't use it lol watch why

GPT 5.6 is out but you can't use it lol watch why

David Ondrej

17,449 次观看 • 15 天前

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua

Chris

228,126 次观看 • 23 天前

GPT-5.6 Terra and Sol are now available in Perplexity and Perplexity Computer.

GPT-5.6 Terra and Sol are now available in Perplexity and Perplexity Computer.

Perplexity

109,863 次观看 • 2 天前

GPT‑5.6 is helping Vercel’s internal data science agent tackle harder work Andrew Qu, Vercel’s Chief of Software, used GPT-5.6 and Codex to unblock an internal data science agent on work where earlier models got stuck.

GPT‑5.6 is helping Vercel’s internal data science agent tackle harder work Andrew Qu, Vercel’s Chief of Software, used GPT-5.6 and Codex to unblock an internal data science agent on work where earlier models got stuck.

OpenAI Developers

207,563 次观看 • 3 天前

Meet Bartosz (Bartosz Naskręcki). A mathematician solving previously unsolvable math problems with GPT-5.6

Meet Bartosz (Bartosz Naskręcki). A mathematician solving previously unsolvable math problems with GPT-5.6

OpenAI

350,055 次观看 • 3 天前

THEY FIXED FRONTEND FOR GPT-5.6 FINALLY!!! THIS IS NOT EVEN SOL THIS IS LUNA

THEY FIXED FRONTEND FOR GPT-5.6 FINALLY!!! THIS IS NOT EVEN SOL THIS IS LUNA

Hamza

87,405 次观看 • 3 天前

Well well well, I'm one of the lucky ones with early GPT-5.6 Pro access! One-shot pages from 5.5 Pro vs 5.6 Pro. Can you tell which is which? Looks like OpenAI's finally getting somewhere with design:

Well well well, I'm one of the lucky ones with early GPT-5.6 Pro access! One-shot pages from 5.5 Pro vs 5.6 Pro. Can you tell which is which? Looks like OpenAI's finally getting somewhere with design:

Anshu

94,488 次观看 • 23 天前

GPT-5.6 is a viable alternative to Fable for most knowledge work. GPT-5.6's writing is consistently well-structured and easy to read. Fable's prose can be exhausting. 5.6 also makes fresh design choices with clean hierarchy. Fable can struggle to maintain visual relationships and leans on worn-out AI tropes like eyebrow text. Examples in thread 👇 - Orbital objects explainer - Site plan for fitness resort - World Cup goals data viz GPT-5.6 is now available on Hyperagent

GPT-5.6 is a viable alternative to Fable for most knowledge work. GPT-5.6's writing is consistently well-structured and easy to read. Fable's prose can be exhausting. 5.6 also makes fresh design choices with clean hierarchy. Fable can struggle to maintain visual relationships and leans on worn-out AI tropes like eyebrow text. Examples in thread 👇 - Orbital objects explainer - Site plan for fitness resort - World Cup goals data viz GPT-5.6 is now available on Hyperagent

Hyperagent

226,080 次观看 • 3 天前

Did GPT-5.6 Sol beat Fable 5 for frontend work? GPT-5.5 got roasted for its frontend. Had to test the new one. Same challenge: one prompt + one reference image → Three.js 3D globe dashboard. Verdict: Fable 5 still edges it out. But at half the cost, GPT-5.6 Sol is a serious option now.

Did GPT-5.6 Sol beat Fable 5 for frontend work? GPT-5.5 got roasted for its frontend. Had to test the new one. Same challenge: one prompt + one reference image → Three.js 3D globe dashboard. Verdict: Fable 5 still edges it out. But at half the cost, GPT-5.6 Sol is a serious option now.

Kai

21,160 次观看 • 2 天前

gpt 5.6 with good frontend wen so i just fixed gpt's frontend problem through lazycodex and stitch

gpt 5.6 with good frontend wen so i just fixed gpt's frontend problem through lazycodex and stitch

Q

50,412 次观看 • 16 天前

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Fable 5. I put both through my hardest frontend test: a 3D globe dashboard. Same prompt. Same reference image. Sol on the left. Fable on the right. GPT-5.6 Sol is a major leap from 5.5. Fable 5 still wins on spacing, balance, and first-pass polish. For me, Sol comes close at half the cost.

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Fable 5. I put both through my hardest frontend test: a 3D globe dashboard. Same prompt. Same reference image. Sol on the left. Fable on the right. GPT-5.6 Sol is a major leap from 5.5. Fable 5 still wins on spacing, balance, and first-pass polish. For me, Sol comes close at half the cost.

Kai

181,100 次观看 • 2 天前

We are officially in the era where one prompt can ship a complete playable game in <50 bucks! Asked Claude Fable 5 and GPT 5.6 Sol to clone Terraria, max effort level Both are playable and offer a smooth experience GPT 5.6 Sol did it at roughly 1/4 the cost and in 2/3 the runtime: - GPT 5.6 Sol: ~$35, ~1h 20m - Claude Fable 5: ~$120, ~2h Tho Fable still produced the strongest results 🥲

We are officially in the era where one prompt can ship a complete playable game in <50 bucks! Asked Claude Fable 5 and GPT 5.6 Sol to clone Terraria, max effort level Both are playable and offer a smooth experience GPT 5.6 Sol did it at roughly 1/4 the cost and in 2/3 the runtime: - GPT 5.6 Sol: ~$35, ~1h 20m - Claude Fable 5: ~$120, ~2h Tho Fable still produced the strongest results 🥲

GMI Cloud

118,805 次观看 • 2 天前

Instant trauma 💀

Instant trauma 💀

Retro Anime

142,209 次观看 • 5 个月前

i think carlos has some box box trauma from ferrari

i think carlos has some box box trauma from ferrari

nyes

35,851 次观看 • 1 年前