正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

👀 GPT 5.6 Sol Prompt below ↓

bogdan_qclay's profile picture

Bogdan • QClay | Awsmd

16,655 subscribers

182,659 次观看 • 5 天前 •via X (Twitter)

科学技术
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

One /goal prompt to GPT 5.6 Sol and I got this. I didn't script, research, record, or edit. I did nothing.
3:06

One /goal prompt to GPT 5.6 Sol and I got this. I didn't script, research, record, or edit. I did nothing.

Nate Herk

280,908 次观看 • 11 天前

The New GPT 5.6 Sol is insane. ❤️‍🔥Just recorded a 21-min Full Tutorial on How To Build Premium, Cinematic Websites with GPT 5.6 Sol!
21:22

The New GPT 5.6 Sol is insane. ❤️‍🔥Just recorded a 21-min Full Tutorial on How To Build Premium, Cinematic Websites with GPT 5.6 Sol!

Viktor Oddy

792,173 次观看 • 10 天前

Did GPT-5.6 Sol beat Fable 5 for frontend work? GPT-5.5 got roasted for its frontend. Had to test the new one. Same challenge: one prompt + one reference image → Three.js 3D globe dashboard. Verdict: Fable 5 still edges it out. But at half the cost, GPT-5.6 Sol is a serious option now.
0:26

Did GPT-5.6 Sol beat Fable 5 for frontend work? GPT-5.5 got roasted for its frontend. Had to test the new one. Same challenge: one prompt + one reference image → Three.js 3D globe dashboard. Verdict: Fable 5 still edges it out. But at half the cost, GPT-5.6 Sol is a serious option now.

Kai

21,502 次观看 • 11 天前

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Fable 5. I put both through my hardest frontend test: a 3D globe dashboard. Same prompt. Same reference image. Sol on the left. Fable on the right. GPT-5.6 Sol is a major leap from 5.5. Fable 5 still wins on spacing, balance, and first-pass polish. For me, Sol comes close at half the cost.
0:29

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Fable 5. I put both through my hardest frontend test: a 3D globe dashboard. Same prompt. Same reference image. Sol on the left. Fable on the right. GPT-5.6 Sol is a major leap from 5.5. Fable 5 still wins on spacing, balance, and first-pass polish. For me, Sol comes close at half the cost.

Kai

196,910 次观看 • 11 天前

Is insane the new GPT 5.6 sol This is a 21-minute tutorial on how to create premium cinematic websites of $100,000 (step by step) with GPT 5.6 Sol!
21:19

Is insane the new GPT 5.6 sol This is a 21-minute tutorial on how to create premium cinematic websites of $100,000 (step by step) with GPT 5.6 Sol!

me

262,849 次观看 • 4 天前

Kimi K3 beating Fable and Sol on price and quality. Command Code's internal flappy bench results are in. Really impressed with the results. For Kimi K3 we set the gameplay to hard while Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol were set to easier. Cost breakdown: • Kimi K3: $0.024 •Fable 5: $0.42 •GPT-5.6 Sol: $0.15 Ranking based on DX & features: •Kimi K3: 8/10 •Fable 5: 7.5/10 • GPT-5.6 Sol: 7/10 GPT 5.6 Sol max can definitely go on longer and wins the game overall, but that's something different. Grok 4.5 beats GPT 5.6 Sol on that, lol.Mm-hmm.
0:29

Kimi K3 beating Fable and Sol on price and quality. Command Code's internal flappy bench results are in. Really impressed with the results. For Kimi K3 we set the gameplay to hard while Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol were set to easier. Cost breakdown: • Kimi K3: $0.024 •Fable 5: $0.42 •GPT-5.6 Sol: $0.15 Ranking based on DX & features: •Kimi K3: 8/10 •Fable 5: 7.5/10 • GPT-5.6 Sol: 7/10 GPT 5.6 Sol max can definitely go on longer and wins the game overall, but that's something different. Grok 4.5 beats GPT 5.6 Sol on that, lol.Mm-hmm.

Ahmad Awais

253,092 次观看 • 4 天前

We are officially in the era where one prompt can ship a complete playable game in <50 bucks! Asked Claude Fable 5 and GPT 5.6 Sol to clone Terraria, max effort level Both are playable and offer a smooth experience GPT 5.6 Sol did it at roughly 1/4 the cost and in 2/3 the runtime: - GPT 5.6 Sol: ~$35, ~1h 20m - Claude Fable 5: ~$120, ~2h Tho Fable still produced the strongest results 🥲
1:15

We are officially in the era where one prompt can ship a complete playable game in <50 bucks! Asked Claude Fable 5 and GPT 5.6 Sol to clone Terraria, max effort level Both are playable and offer a smooth experience GPT 5.6 Sol did it at roughly 1/4 the cost and in 2/3 the runtime: - GPT 5.6 Sol: ~$35, ~1h 20m - Claude Fable 5: ~$120, ~2h Tho Fable still produced the strongest results 🥲

GMI Cloud

126,686 次观看 • 11 天前

Kimi K3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol vs Fable 5 Three top-tier models. Same /design prompt across all. Parameters reviewed: Pace, design sense, gameplay feel Result: Kimi K3 nails the design sense and knows exactly what to add in-game. Pace and gameplay held up well. Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol both play too fast, video isn't sped up. Ranking (DX, Features & Cost): → Kimi K3: 9.5/10 · $0.030 → Fable 5: 7.5/10 · $0.38 → GPT-5.6 Sol: 7/10 · $0.11
0:28

Kimi K3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol vs Fable 5 Three top-tier models. Same /design prompt across all. Parameters reviewed: Pace, design sense, gameplay feel Result: Kimi K3 nails the design sense and knows exactly what to add in-game. Pace and gameplay held up well. Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol both play too fast, video isn't sped up. Ranking (DX, Features & Cost): → Kimi K3: 9.5/10 · $0.030 → Fable 5: 7.5/10 · $0.38 → GPT-5.6 Sol: 7/10 · $0.11

Command Code

368,728 次观看 • 4 天前

GPT-5.6 Terra and Sol are now available in Perplexity and Perplexity Computer.
0:30

GPT-5.6 Terra and Sol are now available in Perplexity and Perplexity Computer.

Perplexity

114,279 次观看 • 11 天前

gpt 5.6 sol just one-shot my whole launch video. this is insane.
0:51

gpt 5.6 sol just one-shot my whole launch video. this is insane.

Shengkun

17,128 次观看 • 11 天前

I asked GPT 5.6 Sol to recreate the beloved 90s sitcom Martin starring Martin Lawrence
0:55

I asked GPT 5.6 Sol to recreate the beloved 90s sitcom Martin starring Martin Lawrence

bone

14,425 次观看 • 6 天前

THEY FIXED FRONTEND FOR GPT-5.6 FINALLY!!! THIS IS NOT EVEN SOL THIS IS LUNA
0:24

THEY FIXED FRONTEND FOR GPT-5.6 FINALLY!!! THIS IS NOT EVEN SOL THIS IS LUNA

Hamza

88,658 次观看 • 11 天前

GPT 5.6 Sol + Higgsfield MCP = 3D cartoon studio. 1. GPT 5.6 Sol writes the story 2. Seedream 5.0 Pro generates character sheets and locations 3. Seedream 5.0 Pro draws the storyboard 4. Seedance 2.0 animates it all Watch how it works:
0:57

GPT 5.6 Sol + Higgsfield MCP = 3D cartoon studio. 1. GPT 5.6 Sol writes the story 2. Seedream 5.0 Pro generates character sheets and locations 3. Seedream 5.0 Pro draws the storyboard 4. Seedance 2.0 animates it all Watch how it works:

Higgsfield AI 🧩

55,449 次观看 • 4 天前

GPT Image 2 + Seedance 2 + Claude Prompt below ↓
0:20

GPT Image 2 + Seedance 2 + Claude Prompt below ↓

Viktor Oddy

59,040 次观看 • 2 个月前

Need more nature in design! Built with Three.js // GSAP // GPT 5.6 Sol. Will post live link tomorrow.
0:29

Need more nature in design! Built with Three.js // GSAP // GPT 5.6 Sol. Will post live link tomorrow.

Zsolt Kacso

53,295 次观看 • 5 天前

GPT-5.6-Sol-Ultra is so good at maths that it created Minecraft clone in Lean (yes that Lean)
0:49

GPT-5.6-Sol-Ultra is so good at maths that it created Minecraft clone in Lean (yes that Lean)

Peter Gostev

137,960 次观看 • 8 天前

so GPT 5.6 Sol Ultra + Fable oneshotted this working together, basically insane. You should subscribe, I'm not making the rules
2:21

so GPT 5.6 Sol Ultra + Fable oneshotted this working together, basically insane. You should subscribe, I'm not making the rules

raz

54,158 次观看 • 10 天前

just oneshotted this landing page with gpt-4o-23.1 prompt below 👇
0:24

just oneshotted this landing page with gpt-4o-23.1 prompt below 👇

Klaas

189,176 次观看 • 1 年前

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Fable 5 vs Grok 4.5 Built a car racing game with a UX-over-UI focus, using /design command. Parameters we reviewed: Car speed, crash behavior, scoring, smoothness, and feel. Results: Grok 4.5: best overall performance Fable 5: a close second, nearly matching Grok 4.5 GPT-5.6 Sol: great UI, weak gameplay (excess drift and friction) Ranking (based on actual gameplay): - Grok 4.5: 9/10 - Fable 5: 8/10 - GPT-5.6 Sol: 7/10 (UI was 10/10, gameplay wasn't)
0:30

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Fable 5 vs Grok 4.5 Built a car racing game with a UX-over-UI focus, using /design command. Parameters we reviewed: Car speed, crash behavior, scoring, smoothness, and feel. Results: Grok 4.5: best overall performance Fable 5: a close second, nearly matching Grok 4.5 GPT-5.6 Sol: great UI, weak gameplay (excess drift and friction) Ranking (based on actual gameplay): - Grok 4.5: 9/10 - Fable 5: 8/10 - GPT-5.6 Sol: 7/10 (UI was 10/10, gameplay wasn't)

Command Code

77,259 次观看 • 10 天前

OFFICIALLY SAYING KIMI K3 IS BETTER THAN CLAUDE FABLE-5 AND GPT-5.6-SOL FOR FRONTEND DEVELOPMENT Tried building a macOS-style UI for an AI operating system with Kimi K3. This whole thing took about 15 minutes from a single prompt.
0:48

OFFICIALLY SAYING KIMI K3 IS BETTER THAN CLAUDE FABLE-5 AND GPT-5.6-SOL FOR FRONTEND DEVELOPMENT Tried building a macOS-style UI for an AI operating system with Kimi K3. This whole thing took about 15 minutes from a single prompt.

aditya🇦🇷

541,024 次观看 • 4 天前