Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🚨 GPT 5.6 Pro first output on the same prompt we are getting started > frontend/ webdev is not solved or improved yet > but understanding increased a lot > it started to take 20-40 mins again like it used to do before 5.5 pro

chetaslua's profile picture

Chetaslua

27,333 subscribers

437,099 Aufrufe • vor 24 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

BildungWissenschaft & Technologie
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🚨GPT 5.6 Pro vs Fable 5 this is the first real competition that cover game logic , ui , 3d aspects Fable 5 mogs 5.6 pro in every aspects watch video same prompt different results , no external assets used Thanks to pozitiv4ik for the prompt and test , follow him everyone😾
0:47

🚨GPT 5.6 Pro vs Fable 5 this is the first real competition that cover game logic , ui , 3d aspects Fable 5 mogs 5.6 pro in every aspects watch video same prompt different results , no external assets used Thanks to pozitiv4ik for the prompt and test , follow him everyone😾

Chetaslua

191,587 Aufrufe • vor 19 Tagen

🚨 Gemini 3.5 Pro Google is trying their best for these checkpoints > Laziness is not solved for pro models > Continue iteration will come , so we can expect better things We will continue to test keep you guys updated: DevMode™
0:44

🚨 Gemini 3.5 Pro Google is trying their best for these checkpoints > Laziness is not solved for pro models > Continue iteration will come , so we can expect better things We will continue to test keep you guys updated: DevMode™

Chetaslua

71,260 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Fable 5 vs GPT 5.5 tested both on High settings with the same prompt > Fable one shotted everything in 15 minutes and used 3% of weekly limits > GPT 5.5 took 20 minutes and used 3% of weekly limits 5.5 is not looking good here at all which one do you think won?
0:29

Fable 5 vs GPT 5.5 tested both on High settings with the same prompt > Fable one shotted everything in 15 minutes and used 3% of weekly limits > GPT 5.5 took 20 minutes and used 3% of weekly limits 5.5 is not looking good here at all which one do you think won?

J A Z I I

104,994 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🚨 GPT 5.6 on medium reasoning no skill used , straight out of api and one more point prompt was also short not lengthy one Prompted by ASI in Dev Mode > keep following us we will provide info before everyone and drop your hardest prompt we will run few prompts
0:35

🚨 GPT 5.6 on medium reasoning no skill used , straight out of api and one more point prompt was also short not lengthy one Prompted by ASI in Dev Mode > keep following us we will provide info before everyone and drop your hardest prompt we will run few prompts

Chetaslua

120,138 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua
0:42

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua

Chris

228,126 Aufrufe • vor 23 Tagen

Did GPT-5.6 Sol beat Fable 5 for frontend work? GPT-5.5 got roasted for its frontend. Had to test the new one. Same challenge: one prompt + one reference image → Three.js 3D globe dashboard. Verdict: Fable 5 still edges it out. But at half the cost, GPT-5.6 Sol is a serious option now.
0:26

Did GPT-5.6 Sol beat Fable 5 for frontend work? GPT-5.5 got roasted for its frontend. Had to test the new one. Same challenge: one prompt + one reference image → Three.js 3D globe dashboard. Verdict: Fable 5 still edges it out. But at half the cost, GPT-5.6 Sol is a serious option now.

Kai

21,160 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen

GPT 5.6 Pro continues to mogs Fable in 3d test working on games one shot too , for comment check quote post and also share your prompts and fable output i will tag you with 5.6 pro results credit : Mirochill
0:45

GPT 5.6 Pro continues to mogs Fable in 3d test working on games one shot too , for comment check quote post and also share your prompts and fable output i will tag you with 5.6 pro results credit : Mirochill

Chetaslua

200,605 Aufrufe • vor 24 Tagen

🚨 Gemini 3.5 Pro < old checkpoint > Gojo Satoru Aura Farming > Cursed technique simulation coded by it one shot Gemini as always surprise with insane results when it comes to taste and world knowledge < just solve laziness and bring back personality of 2.5 pro >
0:53

🚨 Gemini 3.5 Pro < old checkpoint > Gojo Satoru Aura Farming > Cursed technique simulation coded by it one shot Gemini as always surprise with insane results when it comes to taste and world knowledge < just solve laziness and bring back personality of 2.5 pro >

Chetaslua

14,882 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Got an output from the strongest pre-release Gemini 3.5 Pro checkpoint 👀 I compared it to Claude Fable 5 and GPT-5.5 on the same exact prompt Yeah... This model is mostly dead on arrival (tried it on other prompts too ofc). It will likely be the "poor man's model" next to 3.5 flash. 1st video: Gemini 3.5 Pro (pre-release) 2nd video: GPT-5.5 3rd video: Claude Fable 5
1:08

Got an output from the strongest pre-release Gemini 3.5 Pro checkpoint 👀 I compared it to Claude Fable 5 and GPT-5.5 on the same exact prompt Yeah... This model is mostly dead on arrival (tried it on other prompts too ofc). It will likely be the "poor man's model" next to 3.5 flash. 1st video: Gemini 3.5 Pro (pre-release) 2nd video: GPT-5.5 3rd video: Claude Fable 5

Lentils

50,395 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🚨Gemini 3.0 Pro - One shotted i asked it for retro nintendo sims with games and no external assets used , it takes 1 min to output no other model have this level of consistency Prompt and Proof of one shot in Thread and this is not the best shot , there is one more cooking with slightly different prompt
1:25

🚨Gemini 3.0 Pro - One shotted i asked it for retro nintendo sims with games and no external assets used , it takes 1 min to output no other model have this level of consistency Prompt and Proof of one shot in Thread and this is not the best shot , there is one more cooking with slightly different prompt

Chetaslua

184,195 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Another complex build from GPT-5.5-Pro. > a high-quality kitchen oven
0:27

Another complex build from GPT-5.5-Pro. > a high-quality kitchen oven

Ruben Kostandyan

79,308 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨 BREAKING: OpenAI o3 Alpha >#2 in the world’s hardest coding comp 🧠 (just behind legend Psyho) >Best coding & physics model to date >Beats o3 Pro. >Creates Minecraft & GTA& Flappy Bird from one prompt! >Let’s dive into the wild demos + what this means 👇🧵
0:25

🚨 BREAKING: OpenAI o3 Alpha >#2 in the world’s hardest coding comp 🧠 (just behind legend Psyho) >Best coding & physics model to date >Beats o3 Pro. >Creates Minecraft & GTA& Flappy Bird from one prompt! >Let’s dive into the wild demos + what this means 👇🧵

Chetaslua

63,846 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Seedance 2.5 is mythos moment of Video Models > more than 30 seconds > 4k resolution > prompt adherence is on another level that we never seen before > our reports was right , this is why follow us and join our server > July will be do much fun
2:36

Seedance 2.5 is mythos moment of Video Models > more than 30 seconds > 4k resolution > prompt adherence is on another level that we never seen before > our reports was right , this is why follow us and join our server > July will be do much fun

Chetaslua

199,060 Aufrufe • vor 19 Tagen

Grok should be praised a lot , this is one of the biggest launch > priced way less than even kimi k2.7 , glm 5.2 > on artificial code analysis only behind fable 5 and gpt 5.5 xhigh > this is well rounded launch i will showcase a 3d test that will blow everyone mind
0:44

Grok should be praised a lot , this is one of the biggest launch > priced way less than even kimi k2.7 , glm 5.2 > on artificial code analysis only behind fable 5 and gpt 5.5 xhigh > this is well rounded launch i will showcase a 3d test that will blow everyone mind

Chetaslua

25,644 Aufrufe • vor 3 Tagen

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Fable 5. I put both through my hardest frontend test: a 3D globe dashboard. Same prompt. Same reference image. Sol on the left. Fable on the right. GPT-5.6 Sol is a major leap from 5.5. Fable 5 still wins on spacing, balance, and first-pass polish. For me, Sol comes close at half the cost.
0:29

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Fable 5. I put both through my hardest frontend test: a 3D globe dashboard. Same prompt. Same reference image. Sol on the left. Fable on the right. GPT-5.6 Sol is a major leap from 5.5. Fable 5 still wins on spacing, balance, and first-pass polish. For me, Sol comes close at half the cost.

Kai

181,100 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen

With ChatGPT Images 2.0 we can now create an image from prompt, then with GPT 5.4 Pro convert it to a CAD model using ForgeCAD. > Prompt: Make a detailed wood gong fu tea tray.
0:45

With ChatGPT Images 2.0 we can now create an image from prompt, then with GPT 5.4 Pro convert it to a CAD model using ForgeCAD. > Prompt: Make a detailed wood gong fu tea tray.

Ruben Kostandyan

747,748 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Had early access to GPT-5.4 and Pro. They are very good. One fun illustration of progress, this is the same prompt I used in GPT-4 below (making a 3D space inspired by Piranesi) now in GPT-5.4 Pro. There were no errors, made in a single prompt plus one to "make it better."
0:28

Had early access to GPT-5.4 and Pro. They are very good. One fun illustration of progress, this is the same prompt I used in GPT-4 below (making a 3D space inspired by Piranesi) now in GPT-5.4 Pro. There were no errors, made in a single prompt plus one to "make it better."

Ethan Mollick

188,387 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Well well well, I'm one of the lucky ones with early GPT-5.6 Pro access! One-shot pages from 5.5 Pro vs 5.6 Pro. Can you tell which is which? Looks like OpenAI's finally getting somewhere with design:
0:35

Well well well, I'm one of the lucky ones with early GPT-5.6 Pro access! One-shot pages from 5.5 Pro vs 5.6 Pro. Can you tell which is which? Looks like OpenAI's finally getting somewhere with design:

Anshu

94,488 Aufrufe • vor 23 Tagen

>ryuko matoi >have the ability to view people's thoughts >never used it again later on
0:27

>ryuko matoi >have the ability to view people's thoughts >never used it again later on

Vintage Stuff n Art

40,166 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🚨 ChatGPT is the best frontend model of the world They pretty much solved it this generation , we need one extra step 1. generate a image of the ui 2. clone pixel to pixel 3. best frontend of the world 😼
1:02

🚨 ChatGPT is the best frontend model of the world They pretty much solved it this generation , we need one extra step 1. generate a image of the ui 2. clone pixel to pixel 3. best frontend of the world 😼

Chetaslua

130,571 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten