🚨 GPT 5.6 Pro first output on the same prompt we are getting started > frontend/ webdev is not solved or improved yet > but understanding increased a lot > it started to take 20-40 mins again like it used to do before 5.5 pro

Damn, it does not look like they solved UI at all. Hopefully this is fake

Even Glm 5.2 looks way better… really disappointed

Thanks @mirochill for running prompts and join our server we are cooking there

who tf writes all these community notes??

disgusting

Frontend isn't solved

Where is 5.6 available

seems like the anthropic drama had delayed 5.6. i’m not even sure they can release it now. I think it would need to go through that 90 day approval first.

holy shit thats garbage

@chetaslua sounds like progress! curious if you've noticed any specific parts of the frontend that are still super annoying or time-consuming?

maybe they can distill glm 5.2

Oh this means they focused on engineering

I pitted Deepseek v4 flash against the glm 5.2 model for this 3D clock coding task, and strangely enough, Deepseek performed better. I used a simple prompt, and I didn't even write it in English; I wrote it in my own native language.

svg of ancient clock in 17th century From GPT-5.6 Pro

we've seen similar backsliding with other large models too, it's as if they need to relearn the basics every few iterations

A Pelican Riding a Bicycle Output from GPT-5.6 Pro SVGs are not so Good from this model.

This would be a good one to compare to fable

It’s always been very strange to me that the models can be incredibly intelligent at back-end, but piss poor on front-end. Like, yes taste is involved, but there’s a lot of logic involved with front-end too.

damn gpt 5.6 ugly at UI

so not even close to fable

looks that fable >>>

It looks nice. I didn't like the GLM-5.2 design because it was too bright and unrealistic, but this one is cleaner and works more smoothly.

> it started to take 20-40 mins again like it used to do before 5.5 pro @R2Cdev_ Could it be that the one I used that day was GPT 5.6 Pro?

okay sorry to be one of the people on anthropics side, but 20-40 min for a better result in the low percentages that you can get the same or similar with high fable 5 for a higher price, nothing to use on codex, and still bad ui??? im sorry but fable still my favorite .

sure, understanding improved. but for frontend coding, you traded it for latency. 20-40 min wait and you've forgotten what you were building. was the understanding worth the wait?

I hope its true

Garbage for real bro taking hours for serious project task to be done

Wow this is clean bro

Why is this case? Why is it now taking same time as previous models? It shouldn't.

If it takes significantly longer, that's proof that 5.6 is a new pre-train

Oh, THAT'S why they said they would solve UI only by the END of the year... 💀

Yeah, that’s my read too. Better understanding, but frontend still not there. And 20-40 mins is a proper tax.

Glm is way better OpenAI should not release this dumb model

But 5.6 models isn't released yet!?

looks same but GPT 5.6 one is better