Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Kimi K3 beating Fable and Sol on price and quality. Command Code's internal flappy bench results are in. Really impressed with the results. For Kimi K3 we set the gameplay to hard while Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol were set to easier. Cost breakdown: • Kimi K3: $0.024 •Fable... show more

Ahmad Awais

51,595 subscribers

243,534 görüntüleme • 1 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

Bilim & Teknoloji Oyun

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Kimi K3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol vs Fable 5 Three top-tier models. Same /design prompt across all. Parameters reviewed: Pace, design sense, gameplay feel Result: Kimi K3 nails the design sense and knows exactly what to add in-game. Pace and gameplay held up well. Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol both play too fast, video isn't sped up. Ranking (DX, Features & Cost): → Kimi K3: 9.5/10 · $0.030 → Fable 5: 7.5/10 · $0.38 → GPT-5.6 Sol: 7/10 · $0.11

Kimi K3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol vs Fable 5 Three top-tier models. Same /design prompt across all. Parameters reviewed: Pace, design sense, gameplay feel Result: Kimi K3 nails the design sense and knows exactly what to add in-game. Pace and gameplay held up well. Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol both play too fast, video isn't sped up. Ranking (DX, Features & Cost): → Kimi K3: 9.5/10 · $0.030 → Fable 5: 7.5/10 · $0.38 → GPT-5.6 Sol: 7/10 · $0.11

Command Code

362,037 görüntüleme • 1 gün önce

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Fable 5 vs Grok 4.5 Built a car racing game with a UX-over-UI focus, using /design command. Parameters we reviewed: Car speed, crash behavior, scoring, smoothness, and feel. Results: Grok 4.5: best overall performance Fable 5: a close second, nearly matching Grok 4.5 GPT-5.6 Sol: great UI, weak gameplay (excess drift and friction) Ranking (based on actual gameplay): - Grok 4.5: 9/10 - Fable 5: 8/10 - GPT-5.6 Sol: 7/10 (UI was 10/10, gameplay wasn't)

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Fable 5 vs Grok 4.5 Built a car racing game with a UX-over-UI focus, using /design command. Parameters we reviewed: Car speed, crash behavior, scoring, smoothness, and feel. Results: Grok 4.5: best overall performance Fable 5: a close second, nearly matching Grok 4.5 GPT-5.6 Sol: great UI, weak gameplay (excess drift and friction) Ranking (based on actual gameplay): - Grok 4.5: 9/10 - Fable 5: 8/10 - GPT-5.6 Sol: 7/10 (UI was 10/10, gameplay wasn't)

Command Code

77,259 görüntüleme • 7 gün önce

OFFICIALLY SAYING KIMI K3 IS BETTER THAN CLAUDE FABLE-5 AND GPT-5.6-SOL FOR FRONTEND DEVELOPMENT Tried building a macOS-style UI for an AI operating system with Kimi K3. This whole thing took about 15 minutes from a single prompt.

OFFICIALLY SAYING KIMI K3 IS BETTER THAN CLAUDE FABLE-5 AND GPT-5.6-SOL FOR FRONTEND DEVELOPMENT Tried building a macOS-style UI for an AI operating system with Kimi K3. This whole thing took about 15 minutes from a single prompt.

aditya🇦🇷

528,763 görüntüleme • 2 gün önce

We are officially in the era where one prompt can ship a complete playable game in <50 bucks! Asked Claude Fable 5 and GPT 5.6 Sol to clone Terraria, max effort level Both are playable and offer a smooth experience GPT 5.6 Sol did it at roughly 1/4 the cost and in 2/3 the runtime: - GPT 5.6 Sol: ~$35, ~1h 20m - Claude Fable 5: ~$120, ~2h Tho Fable still produced the strongest results 🥲

We are officially in the era where one prompt can ship a complete playable game in <50 bucks! Asked Claude Fable 5 and GPT 5.6 Sol to clone Terraria, max effort level Both are playable and offer a smooth experience GPT 5.6 Sol did it at roughly 1/4 the cost and in 2/3 the runtime: - GPT 5.6 Sol: ~$35, ~1h 20m - Claude Fable 5: ~$120, ~2h Tho Fable still produced the strongest results 🥲

GMI Cloud

126,499 görüntüleme • 8 gün önce

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Fable 5. I put both through my hardest frontend test: a 3D globe dashboard. Same prompt. Same reference image. Sol on the left. Fable on the right. GPT-5.6 Sol is a major leap from 5.5. Fable 5 still wins on spacing, balance, and first-pass polish. For me, Sol comes close at half the cost.

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Fable 5. I put both through my hardest frontend test: a 3D globe dashboard. Same prompt. Same reference image. Sol on the left. Fable on the right. GPT-5.6 Sol is a major leap from 5.5. Fable 5 still wins on spacing, balance, and first-pass polish. For me, Sol comes close at half the cost.

Kai

196,910 görüntüleme • 8 gün önce

Did GPT-5.6 Sol beat Fable 5 for frontend work? GPT-5.5 got roasted for its frontend. Had to test the new one. Same challenge: one prompt + one reference image → Three.js 3D globe dashboard. Verdict: Fable 5 still edges it out. But at half the cost, GPT-5.6 Sol is a serious option now.

Did GPT-5.6 Sol beat Fable 5 for frontend work? GPT-5.5 got roasted for its frontend. Had to test the new one. Same challenge: one prompt + one reference image → Three.js 3D globe dashboard. Verdict: Fable 5 still edges it out. But at half the cost, GPT-5.6 Sol is a serious option now.

Kai

21,502 görüntüleme • 8 gün önce

Kimi K3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol Difference in taste is so stark , like if i swap kimi k 3 name with fable 5 people will trust it but this is not only about visuals , its also about function , you can see both achieve same result but the way to achieve is different kimi is more creative

Kimi K3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol Difference in taste is so stark , like if i swap kimi k 3 name with fable 5 people will trust it but this is not only about visuals , its also about function , you can see both achieve same result but the way to achieve is different kimi is more creative

Chetaslua

383,732 görüntüleme • 2 gün önce

🚨Kimi K3 just one-shotted this 3D paper plane game. I’m genuinely shocked. This is Fable 5 / GPT-5.6-level output. Chinese AI labs are not 8 months behind the frontier anymore. They’re right there.

🚨Kimi K3 just one-shotted this 3D paper plane game. I’m genuinely shocked. This is Fable 5 / GPT-5.6-level output. Chinese AI labs are not 8 months behind the frontier anymore. They’re right there.

red 📌

34,186 görüntüleme • 3 gün önce

Fable 5 vs Grok 4.5 vs GPT 5.5 We put three top-tier models to build a same game challenge. Used Command Code /design, and the exact same prompt. Result: Grok 4.5 genuinely plays like a polished mobile game. Fable 5 and GPT 5.5 feel too fast. Everything feels rushed, lacks finish. Ranking based on DX & Features: → Grok 4.5: 9/10 → Fable 5: 7.5/10 → GPT 5.5: 7/10

Fable 5 vs Grok 4.5 vs GPT 5.5 We put three top-tier models to build a same game challenge. Used Command Code /design, and the exact same prompt. Result: Grok 4.5 genuinely plays like a polished mobile game. Fable 5 and GPT 5.5 feel too fast. Everything feels rushed, lacks finish. Ranking based on DX & Features: → Grok 4.5: 9/10 → Fable 5: 7.5/10 → GPT 5.5: 7/10

Command Code

896,013 görüntüleme • 8 gün önce

I was wrong about Kimi K3 Just tried it in Claude Code and it is Fable 5 level for sure Far better than GPT-5.6 Sol at least at front-end It is really slow and consumes a lot of tokens but it is so good at completing its task, I like what I see here Kimi.ai

I was wrong about Kimi K3 Just tried it in Claude Code and it is Fable 5 level for sure Far better than GPT-5.6 Sol at least at front-end It is really slow and consumes a lot of tokens but it is so good at completing its task, I like what I see here Kimi.ai

Hamza

196,876 görüntüleme • 2 gün önce

We tested Kimi K3 against Claude Fable 5 on 3D modeling and animation Asked both to recreate the Millennium Falcon from Star Wars in 1) pixel style 2) original style. Both are on Max effort. Kimi K3 took a bit longer than Fable 5 to generate, but came in ~1/3 cheaper on the 1st test, and less than half the cost on the 2nd. Interestingly, Kimi K3 handled the details at the same level as Fable 5 on the original creation, yet it wasn't at Fable's level for the pixel style. Test 1 (Pixel) Kimi K3: 1hr 11min · $14.5 Fable 5: 49min · $21 Test 2 (Original) Kimi K3: 1hr 17min · $19.3 Fable 5: 1hr 5min · $47.2

We tested Kimi K3 against Claude Fable 5 on 3D modeling and animation Asked both to recreate the Millennium Falcon from Star Wars in 1) pixel style 2) original style. Both are on Max effort. Kimi K3 took a bit longer than Fable 5 to generate, but came in ~1/3 cheaper on the 1st test, and less than half the cost on the 2nd. Interestingly, Kimi K3 handled the details at the same level as Fable 5 on the original creation, yet it wasn't at Fable's level for the pixel style. Test 1 (Pixel) Kimi K3: 1hr 11min · $14.5 Fable 5: 49min · $21 Test 2 (Original) Kimi K3: 1hr 17min · $19.3 Fable 5: 1hr 5min · $47.2

GMI Cloud

67,212 görüntüleme • 1 gün önce

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua

Chris

249,587 görüntüleme • 29 gün önce

Today, we’re introducing [schema]: a harness reaching 99% RHAE with Opus 4.8 + Fable 5 and 95.35% with GPT-5.6 Sol on ARC-AGI-3 Public set. [schema] makes an LLM think like a physicist. 🧵

Today, we’re introducing [schema]: a harness reaching 99% RHAE with Opus 4.8 + Fable 5 and 95.35% with GPT-5.6 Sol on ARC-AGI-3 Public set. [schema] makes an LLM think like a physicist. 🧵

Haven Feng

793,220 görüntüleme • 2 gün önce

Introducing autoresearch with GPT 5.6 We had GPT 5.6 Sol reproduce the key findings from “Towards Mechanistically Understanding Why Memorized Knowledge Fails to Generalize in LLM Finetuning” Compared to GPT-5.5 and even Fable 5, GPT-5.6 stayed more focused on a few, critical experiments and spent less time on peripheral details. It also asked fewer “clarification” questions and independently resolved ambiguities instead of pushing them back to us OpenAI pushing the boundaries of the automated research loop with models that don’t have handcuffs

Introducing autoresearch with GPT 5.6 We had GPT 5.6 Sol reproduce the key findings from “Towards Mechanistically Understanding Why Memorized Knowledge Fails to Generalize in LLM Finetuning” Compared to GPT-5.5 and even Fable 5, GPT-5.6 stayed more focused on a few, critical experiments and spent less time on peripheral details. It also asked fewer “clarification” questions and independently resolved ambiguities instead of pushing them back to us OpenAI pushing the boundaries of the automated research loop with models that don’t have handcuffs

alphaXiv

83,327 görüntüleme • 5 gün önce

🚨 Create Your Own Custom Coding Agent - Mix Fable 5, GPT 5.6 sol and Grok 4.5! Our newest feature allows you to mix and match your favorite LLMs and create your custom coding agent Create your favorite cocktail such as - Fable 5 for hard coding - 5.6 sol for backend - Opus 4.8 for frontend - Grok 4.5 for easy coding You can also only choose cheap LLMs for a cost optimized experience. Your use custom agent in API, chat or our agent platform

🚨 Create Your Own Custom Coding Agent - Mix Fable 5, GPT 5.6 sol and Grok 4.5! Our newest feature allows you to mix and match your favorite LLMs and create your custom coding agent Create your favorite cocktail such as - Fable 5 for hard coding - 5.6 sol for backend - Opus 4.8 for frontend - Grok 4.5 for easy coding You can also only choose cheap LLMs for a cost optimized experience. Your use custom agent in API, chat or our agent platform

Bindu Reddy

4,032,251 görüntüleme • 6 gün önce

Rockstar spent 7 years, 2,000+ developers, and $500 million to build Red Dead Redemption 2. Kimi K3 rebuilt the same scene in 10 hours. One prompt. 4 million tokens. It's open source. 2.8 trillion parameters. A 1 million token context window. It beats Claude Opus 4.8 and GPT-5.6. It sits on par with Fable 5. Fable 5 results, at Sonnet pricing. The wall between you and a AAA game used to be a studio. Now it's a prompt.

Rockstar spent 7 years, 2,000+ developers, and $500 million to build Red Dead Redemption 2. Kimi K3 rebuilt the same scene in 10 hours. One prompt. 4 million tokens. It's open source. 2.8 trillion parameters. A 1 million token context window. It beats Claude Opus 4.8 and GPT-5.6. It sits on par with Fable 5. Fable 5 results, at Sonnet pricing. The wall between you and a AAA game used to be a studio. Now it's a prompt.

Dep

85,238 görüntüleme • 2 gün önce

this is f**king insane Fable 5 goes away in 24 hours from Claude Code and someone just figured out how to get fable 5 reasoning in GPT 5.6 Sol with one prompt you have less than 24 hours to set this up as this takes away 20% of your usage limit here is how: 1) Paste the prompt and ask it to "make an operating manual" 2) Go the Codex App > Settings > Personalisation > Custom Instructions 3) Use GPT 5.5 / GPT 5.6 and now you have Fable 5 reasoning at 1/3 th the price save and bookmark it no matter what

this is f**king insane Fable 5 goes away in 24 hours from Claude Code and someone just figured out how to get fable 5 reasoning in GPT 5.6 Sol with one prompt you have less than 24 hours to set this up as this takes away 20% of your usage limit here is how: 1) Paste the prompt and ask it to "make an operating manual" 2) Go the Codex App > Settings > Personalisation > Custom Instructions 3) Use GPT 5.5 / GPT 5.6 and now you have Fable 5 reasoning at 1/3 th the price save and bookmark it no matter what

Avid

51,393 görüntüleme • 6 gün önce

Battle Mode : Kimi K3 vs GPT-5.6 Prompt : Please devote your efforts to creating a large-scale 3D photorealistic procedural visualization of meteor hitting the city in one html code block if anyone can share fable-5 i will run that in parallel for comparison

Battle Mode : Kimi K3 vs GPT-5.6 Prompt : Please devote your efforts to creating a large-scale 3D photorealistic procedural visualization of meteor hitting the city in one html code block if anyone can share fable-5 i will run that in parallel for comparison

Chetaslua

57,022 görüntüleme • 2 gün önce

Kimi K3 just beat Fable 5 on the BridgeBench Horror House game test. I did not expect this at all. Kimi K3 is better than Fable 5 at game development and UI design. The two things Fable 5 was supposed to own. The 5x price increase suddenly makes sense.

Kimi K3 just beat Fable 5 on the BridgeBench Horror House game test. I did not expect this at all. Kimi K3 is better than Fable 5 at game development and UI design. The two things Fable 5 was supposed to own. The 5x price increase suddenly makes sense.

BridgeMind

140,198 görüntüleme • 2 gün önce

🚨GPT 5.6 Pro vs Fable 5 this is the first real competition that cover game logic , ui , 3d aspects Fable 5 mogs 5.6 pro in every aspects watch video same prompt different results , no external assets used Thanks to pozitiv4ik for the prompt and test , follow him everyone😾

🚨GPT 5.6 Pro vs Fable 5 this is the first real competition that cover game logic , ui , 3d aspects Fable 5 mogs 5.6 pro in every aspects watch video same prompt different results , no external assets used Thanks to pozitiv4ik for the prompt and test , follow him everyone😾

Chetaslua

197,156 görüntüleme • 25 gün önce