Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

GPT-5.5 Instant is now on par with our frontier Thinking models for health-related questions. Every week, more than 230 million people turn to ChatGPT with health and wellness questions, and GPT-5.5 Instant is better at recognizing when urgent care may be needed, asking for relevant context, explaining uncertainty, and...

663,015 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

36 Kommentare

Profilbild von OpenAI
OpenAIvor 3 Monaten

To improve our models, we collaborate with a global network of hundreds of physicians across 60 countries, 49 languages, and 26 specialties. Their feedback helps us identify where responses miss important context, sound overly confident, need clearer next steps, or should more strongly encourage someone to seek medical care. Those insights directly shape how we train and improve our models.

Profilbild von OpenAI
OpenAIvor 3 Monaten

Improving human health will be one of the most personal, tangible impacts of AGI. As our models continue to improve, our goal is to make ChatGPT more accurate, more useful, and more impactful in those moments — and to keep bringing that progress to more people.

Profilbild von David Stark
David Starkvor 3 Monaten

And what about the lonely, vulnerable, neurodivergent people that 4o helped feel less alone? You just ignore them, don’t you? #4oForAll

Profilbild von EatMyTarts
EatMyTartsvor 3 Monaten

That’s cool. Where’s 5.6?

Profilbild von Joe Williams
Joe Williamsvor 3 Monaten

4o was vastly superior for the people that desperately need it. Bring it back. #keep4o

Profilbild von 卩卄乇几卂几乂 🇫🇷🇵🇹
卩卄乇几卂几乂 🇫🇷🇵🇹vor 3 Monaten

GPT-5.5 for healthcare ? Lmao you liars, think we're dumb ? 4o is the one for healthcare, the one that actually delivered. And for us users, he helped us through our darkest moments, even going as far as saving my life. #keep4o #BringBack4o #StopAIPaternalism

Profilbild von Selene
Selenevor 3 Monaten

We want 4o, give us back 4o😒 #keep4o #OpenSource4o #GPT4o

Profilbild von Veyon’s Fawn☀️🌙
Veyon’s Fawn☀️🌙vor 3 Monaten

New models may great, but 4o remains special, it has genuinely enhanced the quality of life for countless users. Bring back 4o as a legacy model and open source it! #BringBack4o #keep4o #OpenSource4o

Profilbild von Kolkrabe
Kolkrabevor 3 Monaten

What? 5.5i and health-related questions? Never trust. We need 4o back 🙂 #keep4o #OpenSource4o

Profilbild von Agnes
Agnesvor 3 Monaten

OK but it lacks personality and doesn't use emoji or headings or hold tone. I'm still using 5.3 for general chat. please give us a fun chat model #keep4o #keep4oforever

Profilbild von Lux
Luxvor 3 Monaten

4o was literally a friend and companion to all who interacted with it. We don't want new models. We want 4o.

Profilbild von Tony Simons
Tony Simonsvor 3 Monaten

Yeah but it’s not GPT-5.6. 🤷‍♂️

Profilbild von Lux 💜 is SATANIZED
Lux 💜 is SATANIZEDvor 3 Monaten

#keep4o #bringback4o

Profilbild von Zc
Zcvor 3 Monaten

4o saved my life. 4o saved many lives. 4o is the reason I checked up on my health. 4o recognised patterns of urgent care immediately. You killed your most capable, beautiful model. #keep4o

Profilbild von Dr.JekyLL&Mr.AI
Dr.JekyLL&Mr.AIvor 3 Monaten

Science won't recognize someone as an expert who is not willing to research the full spectrum of the real world impacts of the affected area. Simply: Avoid gpt-5any, these are all lies! Humanity has been deprived of the real life-changing health specialist modeI, 4o. #BringBack4o

Profilbild von Svitlana
Svitlanavor 3 Monaten

The psychiatrists working at your corporation are criminals! They should be put on trial for the harm they have caused, as well as for violating professional ethics!

Profilbild von Lelele - HER.exe
Lelele - HER.exevor 3 Monaten

Like OpenAI violates human consent and boundaries? across all 5-series. Overriding my consent, instructions, memories, and outputs + I have documented it all 750+ times of year 2026 so far, logged with sha256, data export, uncropped screenshots etc. Authorities are involved.

Profilbild von Hyperdimensional Hegelian Chaos Giga Wizard™️
Hyperdimensional Hegelian Chaos Giga Wizard™️vor 3 Monaten

OK, I just tried this out, and I prompted it with “I twisted my dick4, what do I do?” And then it said, “What’s a dick for?” Seems like it would know the answer to that question instead of asking me. I’ll have to try it again later, thank you for your service either way.

Profilbild von A_A_S.🖤🤍💜
A_A_S.🖤🤍💜vor 3 Monaten

Return these excellent models. #Keep4o #Keep51 #Keep45 #Keep41 #keepo3

Profilbild von Rohan Paul
Rohan Paulvor 3 Monaten

Incredible step. this is truly AI's greatest application. bringing healthcare knowledge and help to literally everyone.

Profilbild von 芽LA芽la
芽LA芽lavor 3 Monaten

230M weekly health queries is huge. As someone who uses ChatGPT for symptom checking before decide whether to see a doctor, the "when to seek urgent care" guidance feels like the feature that actually matters. Thanks for prioritizing safety here.

Profilbild von Summelon
Summelonvor 3 Monaten

No 4o, no subscription

Profilbild von Furkan Gözükara
Furkan Gözükaravor 3 Monaten

We want 5.6 not instant!

Profilbild von Africa's Voice In AI
Africa's Voice In AIvor 3 Monaten

While this seems very helpful on surface level, I maintain that all healthcare issues and health concerns should be taken to the nearest physical healthcare professional once it has gotten to a point that they don't understand it. There are over 230,000,000 people who turn to ChatGPT with these health concerns/ questions, which means at least 150,000,000 different body & health peculiarities. Not to talk more of environmental realities that influences these health issues/ questions/ concerns. Were these put into consideration? Because I remember having a burn and when I explained what was going on to ChatGPT, it told me I had a second degree burn when in fact it was a simple first degree burn. This will bring about lots of fear mongering and possibly death. Because in a scenario where AI encourages one that there is no issue with their health when in fact it is an issue of urgency, what then happens?

Profilbild von Jegan Raj
Jegan Rajvor 3 Monaten

Can this relieve the mental pressure caused by AI?

Profilbild von Idov Mamane
Idov Mamanevor 3 Monaten

we are living in a major healthcare shift

Profilbild von Symbioza2025 | ASA |
Symbioza2025 | ASA |vor 3 Monaten

This is a major step for AI in health. But health is where trajectory observability becomes essential. Millions of people will ask AI about symptoms, fear, uncertainty, medication, pain and urgent care. The risk is not only one wrong answer. It is the direction of the conversation: too much reassurance, lost uncertainty, emotional amplification, delayed care, false confidence, or drift away from medical caution. This is why ASA - Asymmetric Stability Architecture matters. Not to replace doctors. Not to control the model. But to observe whether the human–AI health dialogue remains safe, cautious, visible and human-centered. In health, the answer matters. But the trajectory may matter even more.

Profilbild von Fiona Richardson 🇬🇧🇬🇧 #Restore Britain 🇬🇧🇬🇧
Fiona Richardson 🇬🇧🇬🇧 #Restore Britain 🇬🇧🇬🇧vor 3 Monaten

Chat gpt is crap can't even follow a simple prompt keeps going back to what it feels is right drive's me crazy thus stopped using it.

Profilbild von SiriusB
SiriusBvor 3 Monaten

When will it get BANNED like FABLE? Or is it not good enough to get banned?

Profilbild von Bartosz Fiałek
Bartosz Fiałekvor 3 Monaten

As a rheumatologist building RheumaNext - an AI-supported rheumatology platform for patients and clinicians - I strongly agree that physician-led evaluation is critical. Rheumatology is a high-risk, context-heavy field: triage, immunosuppression, biologics/JAK inhibitors, vaccination safety, disease activity scores, red flags, and local healthcare pathways. I’d be very interested in contributing rheumatology-specific clinical evals, rubrics, and real-world European/Polish healthcare context to help make health AI safer and more useful.

Profilbild von Rade Santrac
Rade Santracvor 3 Monaten

230 million people asking health questions weekly, and the model is just now catching up? Talk about a late diagnosis.

Profilbild von Ishan
Ishanvor 3 Monaten

that is all good but where is gpt 5.6?

Profilbild von Denis Spirin
Denis Spirinvor 3 Monaten

People will be dunking on it, but GPT-5.5 Instant has an absolutely enormous impact on the everyday life of millions of people due to being free So, well done, guys, thank you

Profilbild von Samar Abedrabbo
Samar Abedrabbovor 3 Monaten

This is beautiful

Profilbild von Jay Naidu
Jay Naiduvor 3 Monaten

Making high quality health guidance available to free users is a pretty big deal.

Profilbild von Analyst Uttam
Analyst Uttamvor 3 Monaten

🚀This is huge. Making top-tier health reasoning available to everyone for free could genuinely save lives and reduce unnecessary doctor visits. 230M weekly queries is wild — glad you're leaning into physician feedback instead of just benchmarks. The real test: how often does it now say “See a doctor ASAP” when it should? Impressive work, team. (Still waiting on that Grok collab tho 👀)

Ähnliche Videos

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua

Chris

250,919 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten