Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

GPT-6.1 Sol vs GPT-6 Astra on Higgsfield. Both models got the same task: build a 3D game prototype - with GPT-6.1 Sol completing the same workflow 4x faster at one-fifth the cost.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

241,143 subscribers

49,790 views • 3 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Gaming Science & Technology

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

22 Comments

I'm_Gregson3 days ago

Larpers...

NekoPrompt3 days ago

Does this exceed Claude 5.5?

Mira Synth Tech3 days ago

4x faster 1/5 the cost?? Sol is cooking. That’s a massive leap for prototyping

Duggu3 days ago

6.1 sol looks better😱

Echo✨Muse3 days ago

Looks much better.

Hussain Hashim | Building SundayBack3 days ago

@higgsfield_ai curious if the Sol model's faster completion affects quality. Sometimes speed trades off with depth in game mechanics.

sanzida3 days ago

That’s a pretty striking difference in speed and cost. 👀 4× faster at one-fifth the cost makes the comparison especially interesting for 3D workflows. 🎮🔥

Aaliya3 days ago

u guys r so fast

human000013 days ago

Locking the character bible before an overnight agent run is the part that saves the morning redo.

Luis de Oliveira3 days ago

@Sonecarox

TÜRK3 days ago

Scamfield

Servantes3 days ago

Bro this is scam not marketing

Axel Großklaus3 days ago

"a game prototype" that is the Elden Ring Shadow of the Erdtree DLC..

DX | Video Editor3 days ago

what happen？

Vitman3 days ago

and the graphics are more vivid in GPT 6.1 Sol

Saud3 days ago

This is amazing AI ever i tried 💓 100% recommend 😍

Gem | AI SaaS & Tools3 days ago

AWESOME!

Blum3 days ago

Great comparison. GPT has been putting out some really good models lately

Hana Kaito AI🌞3 days ago

Speed and cost make a huge difference when building 3D prototypes. Exciting to see AI pushing game development forward!

Ergod3 days ago

didn't realize we could do all this in higgs i'll have to give yall a try :)

ShadowAguy3 days ago

If both prototypes are equally playable, speed matters less than cleanup. How many manual rescues and failed tool calls did each model need?

Harout Boyajian3 days ago

Give us the game links so we can try it if it's true.

Related Videos

GPT 6.1 Sol 30x cheaper than Sonnet 5.5 at 3D ⚙️ openAI just dropped GPT 6.1 Sol, we put it up against Sonnet 5.5 and made them create a 3D keyboard assembly video in Three.js Run both models via sub ->

GPT 6.1 Sol 30x cheaper than Sonnet 5.5 at 3D ⚙️ openAI just dropped GPT 6.1 Sol, we put it up against Sonnet 5.5 and made them create a 3D keyboard assembly video in Three.js Run both models via sub ->

atomic.chat

194,318 views • 3 days ago

GPT-6.1 Sol vs Claude Opus 5.5 in 3D gaming. Two takes on a high-speed ride through a cyberpunk city. Made with Higgsfield.

GPT-6.1 Sol vs Claude Opus 5.5 in 3D gaming. Two takes on a high-speed ride through a cyberpunk city. Made with Higgsfield.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

42,030 views • 3 days ago

Let's keep benchmarking with the Night train this time, with GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna, so here are all four! 🚀 I gave each model the exact same prompt: “Build a Night train.” •Opus 5.5 • GPT-6 Astra • GPT-6 Sol • GPT-6 Luna Something that really surprised me: GPT-6 Sol produced almost the exact same rocket launch as Opus 5.5! The colors are slightly different, but the overall result is remarkably similar. For this prompt, I’d even put Sol ahead of Astra. I’m seriously impressed by Sol, especially at half the API price of Opus 5.5! 🤯 I’m starting to use this approach in my own workflow. I kept one Codex subscription so I can run a bunch of Sol sub-agents while keeping my main agent on Astra. Sol is so cheap for what it can do! Knowing when to switch models based on the task, the quality you need, and the cost is becoming an essential skill in this new AI era.

Let's keep benchmarking with the Night train this time, with GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna, so here are all four! 🚀 I gave each model the exact same prompt: “Build a Night train.” •Opus 5.5 • GPT-6 Astra • GPT-6 Sol • GPT-6 Luna Something that really surprised me: GPT-6 Sol produced almost the exact same rocket launch as Opus 5.5! The colors are slightly different, but the overall result is remarkably similar. For this prompt, I’d even put Sol ahead of Astra. I’m seriously impressed by Sol, especially at half the API price of Opus 5.5! 🤯 I’m starting to use this approach in my own workflow. I kept one Codex subscription so I can run a bunch of Sol sub-agents while keeping my main agent on Astra. Sol is so cheap for what it can do! Knowing when to switch models based on the task, the quality you need, and the cost is becoming an essential skill in this new AI era.

Tony

112,633 views • 8 days ago

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Fable 5. I put both through my hardest frontend test: a 3D globe dashboard. Same prompt. Same reference image. Sol on the left. Fable on the right. GPT-5.6 Sol is a major leap from 5.5. Fable 5 still wins on spacing, balance, and first-pass polish. For me, Sol comes close at half the cost.

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Fable 5. I put both through my hardest frontend test: a 3D globe dashboard. Same prompt. Same reference image. Sol on the left. Fable on the right. GPT-5.6 Sol is a major leap from 5.5. Fable 5 still wins on spacing, balance, and first-pass polish. For me, Sol comes close at half the cost.

Kai

199,798 views • 2 months ago

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Sol for 3D game development with Higgsfield in Unreal Engine.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Sol for 3D game development with Higgsfield in Unreal Engine.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

535,686 views • 10 days ago

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Sol in 3D game development. Two takes on a dogsled racing game. Made with Higgsfield.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Sol in 3D game development. Two takes on a dogsled racing game. Made with Higgsfield.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

67,504 views • 10 days ago

🚨 GEMINI 4 vs GPT-6 Astra Tested both models with same prompt GPT-6 Astra: much more detailed character + environment Gemini 4: more basic gameplay scene Overall GPT-6 Astra COOKED… But Gemini 4 Is Also Good Is Google finally back in the game?

🚨 GEMINI 4 vs GPT-6 Astra Tested both models with same prompt GPT-6 Astra: much more detailed character + environment Gemini 4: more basic gameplay scene Overall GPT-6 Astra COOKED… But Gemini 4 Is Also Good Is Google finally back in the game?

Salio

794,376 views • 14 days ago

I tap out, I'm switching my daily driver to Low in GPT-6 Astra. - Similar performance as GPT 5.6 Sol max - Lower cost than GPT 5.6 Sol max - Iterate faster than GPT 5.6 Sol max - low thinking produces result faster (don't need 2x speed anymore) Very underrated imo. You get to iterate faster, for cheaper, at similar performance of SOTA from a week ago. 00:00 Intelligence vs Cost graph 02:24 Astra Light vs GPT-5.6 Sol max 03:34 Faster iteration 05:07 Speed

I tap out, I'm switching my daily driver to Low in GPT-6 Astra. - Similar performance as GPT 5.6 Sol max - Lower cost than GPT 5.6 Sol max - Iterate faster than GPT 5.6 Sol max - low thinking produces result faster (don't need 2x speed anymore) Very underrated imo. You get to iterate faster, for cheaper, at similar performance of SOTA from a week ago. 00:00 Intelligence vs Cost graph 02:24 Astra Light vs GPT-5.6 Sol max 03:34 Faster iteration 05:07 Speed

Wesley

78,394 views • 23 days ago

I asked Opus 5.5, GPT-6 Astra, GPT-6 Sol, Kimi K3 to build the Eiffel Tower in Three.js. Opus 5.5: $8.95 | 10 mins GPT-6 Astra: $7.45 | 8 mins GPT-6 Sol: $3.90 | 5 mins Kimi K3: $4.04 | 6 mins Opus 5.5 really impressed me. The frontend and 3D detailing are seriously good, and I preferred it over Astra for this task. GPT-6 Sol was a bit disappointing, while Kimi K3 looks really good for the price. It delivered a strong result at almost half the cost. Kimi K3.1 is going to be a monster for sure. Overall, Anthropic made a great comeback with Opus 5.5.

I asked Opus 5.5, GPT-6 Astra, GPT-6 Sol, Kimi K3 to build the Eiffel Tower in Three.js. Opus 5.5: $8.95 | 10 mins GPT-6 Astra: $7.45 | 8 mins GPT-6 Sol: $3.90 | 5 mins Kimi K3: $4.04 | 6 mins Opus 5.5 really impressed me. The frontend and 3D detailing are seriously good, and I preferred it over Astra for this task. GPT-6 Sol was a bit disappointing, while Kimi K3 looks really good for the price. It delivered a strong result at almost half the cost. Kimi K3.1 is going to be a monster for sure. Overall, Anthropic made a great comeback with Opus 5.5.

Bhavy☄️

165,918 views • 9 days ago

Did GPT-5.6 Sol beat Fable 5 for frontend work? GPT-5.5 got roasted for its frontend. Had to test the new one. Same challenge: one prompt + one reference image → Three.js 3D globe dashboard. Verdict: Fable 5 still edges it out. But at half the cost, GPT-5.6 Sol is a serious option now.

Did GPT-5.6 Sol beat Fable 5 for frontend work? GPT-5.5 got roasted for its frontend. Had to test the new one. Same challenge: one prompt + one reference image → Three.js 3D globe dashboard. Verdict: Fable 5 still edges it out. But at half the cost, GPT-5.6 Sol is a serious option now.

Kai

21,502 views • 2 months ago

GPT-6.1 Sol found a paying client while making a label for a friend. From the bottle photo to the brewery’s inbox with Higgsfield inside ChatGPT.

GPT-6.1 Sol found a paying client while making a label for a friend. From the bottle photo to the brewery’s inbox with Higgsfield inside ChatGPT.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

12,217 views • 2 days ago

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra in 3D gaming. Samurai game demos made with Higgsfield.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra in 3D gaming. Samurai game demos made with Higgsfield.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

1,113,334 views • 10 days ago

Claude Opus 5.5 completely MOGS GPT 6 Sol. Same prompt. Same task. Look at the results. Opus 5.5 has way better taste and design. It is not subtle. You can see it immediately. GPT 6 Sol is a step up from GPT 5.6 Sol. But next to Opus 5.5 it is not even close. Anthropic is back.

Claude Opus 5.5 completely MOGS GPT 6 Sol. Same prompt. Same task. Look at the results. Opus 5.5 has way better taste and design. It is not subtle. You can see it immediately. GPT 6 Sol is a step up from GPT 5.6 Sol. But next to Opus 5.5 it is not even close. Anthropic is back.

Bridgebench

55,238 views • 10 days ago

Sam Altman announces the release of GPT 6.1 Sol, OpenAI's most powerful model yet.

Sam Altman announces the release of GPT 6.1 Sol, OpenAI's most powerful model yet.

Yahoo Finance

50,448 views • 3 days ago

GPT-6 Astra put together the flying Oval Office. GPT-6 Astra + Blender + Higgsfield Supercomputer, the whole thing from one description.

GPT-6 Astra put together the flying Oval Office. GPT-6 Astra + Blender + Higgsfield Supercomputer, the whole thing from one description.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

29,076 views • 28 days ago

Codex tip: once GPT-6.1 Sol is your main model, stop running Astra on every turn put Astra on call as an architect agent GPT-6.1 Sol keeps writing the code Astra only gets spawned at three points: → before a plan: is this the right approach? → when the same error comes back: am I digging in the wrong place? → before "done": what did I miss? Astra reviews. Sol ships Jev engineering is the same move one layer down: the forks that need no thinker (which file, which tool, retry or stop) go to Jev in under half a second, and the big models only see the ones that split - the full tree > GPT-6.1 Sol on high runs the main session > explorer reads the code on Luna > worker edits and runs tests on Sol > researcher pulls the docs on Luna > all three on medium > Astra on call as the architect > auto_review checks every approval paste the tree and this prompt into Codex ↓ "Rebuild my Codex setup around this tree: 1. Check ~/.codex/agents and .codex/agents for agents that already fit explorer, worker and researcher. > Draft new TOML files only for missing roles > explorer and researcher on gpt-6-luna, worker on gpt-6.1-sol, all with model_reasoning_effort medium > Add an architect agent on gpt-6-astra, model_reasoning_effort high, whose only job is reviewing plans, repeated errors and finished work > Skip any that pin a different model and list them 2. In ~/.codex/config.toml set model to gpt-6.1-sol, model_reasoning_effort to high and approvals_reviewer to auto_review 3. Find anything that would override this (active profiles, flags in my shell aliases, agents.default_subagent_model). Report it, change nothing 4. Add one rule to AGENTS.md: spawn the architect before a large plan, when an error repeats, and before calling a long task done Show me every change as a diff first. No edits until I say go." ↳

Codex tip: once GPT-6.1 Sol is your main model, stop running Astra on every turn put Astra on call as an architect agent GPT-6.1 Sol keeps writing the code Astra only gets spawned at three points: → before a plan: is this the right approach? → when the same error comes back: am I digging in the wrong place? → before "done": what did I miss? Astra reviews. Sol ships Jev engineering is the same move one layer down: the forks that need no thinker (which file, which tool, retry or stop) go to Jev in under half a second, and the big models only see the ones that split - the full tree > GPT-6.1 Sol on high runs the main session > explorer reads the code on Luna > worker edits and runs tests on Sol > researcher pulls the docs on Luna > all three on medium > Astra on call as the architect > auto_review checks every approval paste the tree and this prompt into Codex ↓ "Rebuild my Codex setup around this tree: 1. Check ~/.codex/agents and .codex/agents for agents that already fit explorer, worker and researcher. > Draft new TOML files only for missing roles > explorer and researcher on gpt-6-luna, worker on gpt-6.1-sol, all with model_reasoning_effort medium > Add an architect agent on gpt-6-astra, model_reasoning_effort high, whose only job is reviewing plans, repeated errors and finished work > Skip any that pin a different model and list them 2. In ~/.codex/config.toml set model to gpt-6.1-sol, model_reasoning_effort to high and approvals_reviewer to auto_review 3. Find anything that would override this (active profiles, flags in my shell aliases, agents.default_subagent_model). Report it, change nothing 4. Add one rule to AGENTS.md: spawn the architect before a large plan, when an error repeats, and before calling a long task done Show me every change as a diff first. No edits until I say go." ↳

delost

901,097 views • 2 days ago

GPT-6 Astra helps Proaction build fleet-management agents faster, with shorter computer-use runs to get the same work done.

GPT-6 Astra helps Proaction build fleet-management agents faster, with shorter computer-use runs to get the same work done.

OpenAI Developers

67,438 views • 7 days ago

GPT-6.1 Sol turned a song file into a release campaign. It took the controls and gave the track a cover, a rollout and a shot at the stage. Higgsfield plugin inside ChatGPT.

GPT-6.1 Sol turned a song file into a release campaign. It took the controls and gave the track a cover, a rollout and a shot at the stage. Higgsfield plugin inside ChatGPT.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

15,724 views • 2 days ago

GPT-6.1 Sol on Higgsfield built a prototype that gives ranchers a bird’s-eye view of their herd. It turns drone footage into live herd counts and tracking, with alerts when an animal wanders off.

GPT-6.1 Sol on Higgsfield built a prototype that gives ranchers a bird’s-eye view of their herd. It turns drone footage into live herd counts and tracking, with alerts when an animal wanders off.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

90,751 views • 3 days ago

Kimi K3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol. I reused the 3D globe test from Kimi vs Fable 5. Same prompt. Same reference image. Kimi K3 left. GPT-5.6 Sol right. Kimi edges out Sol on UI fidelity and globe realism. At current API prices, Kimi is about 50% cheaper. For frontend work, it's my pick.

Kimi K3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol. I reused the 3D globe test from Kimi vs Fable 5. Same prompt. Same reference image. Kimi K3 left. GPT-5.6 Sol right. Kimi edges out Sol on UI fidelity and globe realism. At current API prices, Kimi is about 50% cheaper. For frontend work, it's my pick.

Kai

15,769 views • 2 months ago