Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Grading Creator-Led Brands: CrunchLabs by Mark Rober (not DAVID DOBRIK 🤦‍♂️) ✅Creator-product fit: A+ He basically does scaled up versions of the exact kind of stuff that is in the kits on his YouTube channel ✅ Product quality: A I’ve never tested the product, but I know several people...

56,349 просмотров • 2 лет назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 11

Фото профиля John Coyle 🐳
John Coyle 🐳2 лет назад

Check out how @ethanshust and I graded all 5 other creator led brands: ▶️YT: 🎧Apple Pods: 🎧Spotify:

Фото профиля Clifton Sellers
Clifton Sellers2 лет назад

@crunchlabs @MarkRober @DavidDobrik It's refreshing to see a creator-led brand like Crunch Labs excel across the board

Фото профиля John Coyle 🐳
John Coyle 🐳2 лет назад

@crunchlabs @MarkRober @DavidDobrik Strong brand without the creator. Add the creator 🚀

Фото профиля Brett Erik
Brett Erik2 лет назад

@crunchlabs @MarkRober @DavidDobrik From a seamless creator-product fit to exceptional product quality, they've set a high standard

Фото профиля John Coyle 🐳
John Coyle 🐳2 лет назад

@crunchlabs @MarkRober @DavidDobrik For sure

Фото профиля Chase Dimond | Email Marketing Nerd 📧
Chase Dimond | Email Marketing Nerd 📧2 лет назад

@crunchlabs @MarkRober @DavidDobrik What's even more impressive is their brand strength

Фото профиля John Coyle 🐳
John Coyle 🐳2 лет назад

@crunchlabs @MarkRober @DavidDobrik 100% Super strong LTVs I bet.

Фото профиля LIMITLESS MIND
LIMITLESS MIND2 лет назад

@crunchlabs @MarkRober @DavidDobrik Creator-led brands are successful because they are built on authenticity and trust

Фото профиля John Coyle 🐳
John Coyle 🐳2 лет назад

@crunchlabs @MarkRober @DavidDobrik I think they're even more successful when they would have that even without the creator.

Фото профиля DAN FLESER
DAN FLESER2 лет назад

@crunchlabs @MarkRober @DavidDobrik so, you’re grading a product you’ve never tested? that’s like giving a movie 5 stars based on the trailer. but hey, if it works for you, who am i to judge? maybe i should start reviewing restaurants based on their menus. "the steak looks good, a+!"

Фото профиля John Coyle 🐳
John Coyle 🐳2 лет назад

@crunchlabs @MarkRober @DavidDobrik We’re grading it on: - standalone ability of product without the creator - product/creator fit (ie marketing) - product quality On the first two criteria, we don’t need to try the product.

Похожие видео

🚨 They Are Planning On Force Medicating You Through Your Food. This Is Not A Conspiracy Theory, This Is 100% Real “There are mechanisms to get vaccines into your system through your stomach. There are intestinal vaccines. — Gene therapy vaccines (mRNA vaccines)” “Big Pharma, conglomerate. This is one of the most corrupt things I've ever seen in my life. They are putting this stuff in our food. They're not telling us about it. And what about informed consent? What about Nuremberg? I mean, you can't give people medicine without doing that, but they're using loopholes in the federal law to get away with this. Our only way to know what's in this food is to pass a bill like this. Guys, this is cause and diet suddenly and by the way we know now i've got a paper talking about using milk ingestible we've got ingestible one of the things that everybody said well you know it'll break down in the stomach it won't matter that's not true i've got the science i've got the papers i've got the documents they have developed mechanisms to get this through the digestive system we don't know what it works on entirely we don't know how we don't have all information but what i can say absolute certainty There are mechanisms to get vaccines into your system through your stomach. There are intestinal vaccines. They can do it. We don't know all the details yet. But what we do know is that this is a big deal. So there you have it. I mean this is not conspiracy theory, y'all. We have to get up. We have to wake up, wake up, wake up, wake up. Ha ha ha. Alright, so you guys, make sure you share this video. Make sure you're contacting your congressman. If you live in another state and this is, make sure you send the bill that we have to your congressman and let them know, you guys, we have to get involved with these politics. We have to, we just have to, right? Because they're weaponizing the politics and we're just saying don't be involved in politics and don't talk about the politics. And that is really gonna put us in the trick bag. And I don't think you're gonna like where that ends up. in total, 100% tyranny, okay? And parents, please start parenting your children. Moms, please get back home with the kids. Everyone start trying to live off of one income, right? That's the only way we're gonna win, is if we take our families back, okay? Make sure if you guys are new around here, you hit that thumbs up, right? —Leave a comment down below if you even had any idea about any of this stuff, right? Comment down below” There’s even legislation for mandating labeling: “the product must be conspicuously labeled with the words "Gene Therapy Product"” More on shown Bill in the video: This bill specifies that any product that acts as, or exposed to processes that could result in the product potentially acting as, a gene therapy or that could possibly impact, alter, or introduce genetic material or a genetic change into the user of the product or certain other people must be conspicuously labeled with the words "Potential Gene Therapy Product", and reasonable steps must be taken to ensure a potential purchaser or user is made aware of the presence of this label. If a product is known to be a gene therapy product, the product must be conspicuously labeled with the words "Gene Therapy Product" — Missouri House Bill 1169, also known as "Product Disclosures", was a bill that would have regulated products that could alter a person's genome. The bill would have required products that could act as gene therapy or potentially impact genetic material to be labeled as such. — This bill specifies that any product that acts as, or exposed to processes that could result in the product potentially acting as, a gene therapy or that could possibly impact, alter, or introduce genetic material or a genetic change into the user of the product or certain other people must be conspicuously labeled The Bill DID NOT PASS, IT WAS VOTED DOWN AND FAILED

Wall Street Apes

561,116 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Ben Thompson argues Meta's ad business is good for society and is frustrated Mark Zuckerberg doesn't defend it "I think a big problem Meta has is they don't tell this story. It's weird, but Mark Zuckerberg has the same problem Sam Altman does. He doesn't love ads." "They have the best ad business in the world. They have an ad business that I think is a societal positive." "Like you and I have set up these little content businesses that make great money, but content is kind of, you get a ride on social media, right? I grew up on Twitter, people sharing my links. It was amazing." "If you're selling some product, the beauty of the internet is there is a niche out there that wants that product. The question is how do you find the niche?" "Facebook advertising. That's what it does. It helps products find the people who didn't even know they wanted that product, but when they get it, they're so happy they got it." "And that is a huge societal positive." "You have new business from a new entrepreneur making a new product. You have customers who are happy they got something that they didn't know they would get otherwise." "Those customers, by the way, got lots of free entertainment, and they didn't have to pay for it along the way." "And Meta made a bunch of money for themselves and their shareholders, which is basically everyone in the world." "This is why advertising is great. And Meta's advertising in particular is awesome. And I get frustrated that Meta doesn't talk about that." "Mark Zuckerberg has never really talked about the societal benefits of advertising except in passing."

Fireside Alpha

236,116 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Most brands treat fulfillment as the back-end of commerce. Customers experience it as the front-end of their next decision. What happens inside our network, how fast a package ships, how reliably it arrives, how cleanly a return gets processed… It determines CAC payback, repeat purchase rate, and whether LTV ever justifies the cost of acquisition. Delivery is a growth lever most brands have never had the tools to pull. We've spent a decade building the physical infrastructure, the vertically integrated software, and the AI layer that powers fulfillment for over 1,000 brands. That foundation lets us see something most fulfillment partners can't. The brands winning on lifetime value, conversion, and repeat purchase are the ones connecting their physical execution directly to their commerce experience, not treating them as separate functions managed by separate vendors. Engage, Unbox, and the broader Commerce software suite are how we operationalize that belief. One platform, from the moment a customer decides to buy to the moment the product is in their hands. Fulfillment has always been the front-end of commerce. This is the logical extension of everything we've built. The more Stord operates at the layer connecting physical execution to commerce outcomes, the less we are a fulfillment partner and the more we are the infrastructure powering the growth of every independent brand. Every order is a front-end growth signal most brands have never had access to. The most durable position in commerce is owning what happens between the order and the door, not the storefront or the checkout. Stord owns that layer, and we're extending it forward for brands of all sizes.

Sean Henry

96,924 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Marc Andreessen on the 3 things he looks for when investing in a startup The first thing Marc Andreesen looks for is a big market: “Is there a big existing market that you think you can go after and displace incumbents? Or do you believe there will be a new market that will be big?” The second thing he looks for is a 10x better product: “Is there a fundamental technology or economic change that justifies a new company? And the way I always think about that is: Is there a 10x change happening in the technology landscape? Is something 10x faster, 10x cheaper, or 10x better? If it’s not 10x, we as both VCs and entrepreneurs have to ask ourselves if it’s really worth doing because it’s really hard to start new companies . . . Existing companies are usually pretty good at what they do. So for a new company to exist, it has to bring a product to market that’s so much better than what exists that it punches through the status quo.” The third is the team: “Is the team outstanding? . . . You want to have a founding team of complementary skillsets. You want to have at least one super strong technologist — quite possibly more than one. Some of the best startups are actually more than one founding technologist. And then it often helps to have someone who is a marketing or salesperson who has a really good understanding of business.” Marc believes that you need all three of these, but if you’re going to compromise on one of those as an investor, it should be the product: “A great market is a lot easier to make up for with iterative product execution. The problem with a poor or small market is that even if you do a good job on the product, there just aren’t that many customers so it’s hard to ever get big and people get demoralized . . . And then we evaluate the team of a startup by its ability to get into a big market with a good product.”

Startup Archive

17,333 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад