正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Great explanation by Bret Weinstein: "The mRNA platform solves a problem. It is a gene therapy technology, and it allows you to deliver an mRNA message. mRNA means messenger RNA. Usually messenger RNA is produced in the nucleus of your cells. It moves to the cytoplasm, and then something... called a ribosome translates it into protein." "Protein does the work of the cell. It creates most of the structures of the cell. So what they innovated was a mechanism for getting RNA messages that they controlled, that they dictated into cells so that your cells would produce a vaccine-like substance. So instead of a vaccine factory, they had a factory that produces a injectable that turns your cell into a factory." "I mean, it's a brilliant idea at one level Not ready to be injected into a human being and frankly There is a fundamental flaw in it that cannot be solved with present technology. This is where the rubber meets the road. When you get sick with a virus, that virus hijacks your cells. Your cells are covered in protein that you yourself produce." "By a complex process in utero, your immune system learns to ignore every protein that you yourself make. So the way immunity works is you learn to ignore your own proteins and then anytime you see something that you don't recognize. You fight it as a pathogen. When a virus invades your cells it hijacks them and they produce more virus. They do that they produce proteins that your immune system does not recognize." "So your immune system has a capacity to surveil all your cells and when it encounters a cell that is putting out proteins that you yourself make but also proteins. It doesn't recognize it regards those cells as virally infected and it destroys them because no matter how important the cell in question is right? There's no way to get the virus out of it. So killing it is a better plan than leaving it in place." "So now these folks who made the mRNA vaccines inject them into people and they tell us that the vaccine will stay in the deltoid. Well, no, it's not going to stay in the deltoid. You're injecting a fluid into a space that doesn't have room for it's going to leak out and in many cases, the needle itself will just by accident have landed in a vein and that injection will actually go in a concentrated way into the bloodstream." "There is no targeting mechanism at all on the lipid nanoparticles the fats that are used to transport these mRNA messages into the body. You may remember from chemistry that like dissolves like. Fats are what these mRNAs are coated in every cell in your body has a fat layer on the outside. Those fats join the mRNA message goes into the cell the cell starts producing this foreign protein your immune system Sees that foreign protein." "This is actually part of the design. Your immune system is supposed to see it That's where the immunity is supposed to come from But your immune system in recognizing these foreign proteins on your own cells will assume they are virally infected and it will destroy them." "If that happens in your deltoid, not a huge deal. If it happens in your liver, probably not a huge deal if it happens in your heart It's a huge deal, especially if you've got a big concentrated glob of it. So a bunch of cells in your heart were producing these foreign proteins and got attacked by your immune system because your heart, a is very well protected." "So it doesn't usually suffer from insults. B it has very low capacity for repair. In fact, mostly it doesn't repair it's scars. Hmm. So if you've got a concentrated dose of this in your heart a bunch of your heart cells got transfected. Your immune system will kill those cells that leaves you with a wound." "It's a wound you don't even know you have because your heart is not innervated for you to be able to feel that damage. There's no benefit to it because such damage would be very unusual so you've got a damaged heart. It's never gonna be the same." "At best months will pass and it will scar over but at worst maybe you're on the soccer field and you're going to score the big goal and your blood pressure goes up to a level that hasn't been in months and that wound does arbitrary things. Maybe you collapse. So the key the punchline to this story is none of those things have anything to do with the content of the message that was encoded into these things." "That just has to do with the platform. The platform has this defect built into it, and anything, any disease you attempted to remedy with this mechanism would cause the same problem. So that's a dire failure. I would also point out, there are many other flaws with this technology. The way the mRNA molecules were stabilized was irresponsible." "It made for a process that cannot be terminated and is not naturally terminated by biological biological pathways. It also caused the ribosomes to incorrectly translate into protein so that you get arbitrary products that have arbitrary consequences. The manufacturing of these injectables was piss poor the quality control was garbage." "There are all kinds of impurities contaminants including DNA from SV40 which has potentially cancer inducing properties so these shots were an absolute horror show design failure after design failure manufacturing flaw after manufacturing flaw and the idea that anybody injected healthy people with them is needs to be explained."show more

Camus

287,055 subscribers

607,223 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

健康养生科学技术新闻政治

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 条评论

Camus 的头像

Camus1 年前

Credit: @BretWeinstein;

Gen Belisarius 的头像

Gen Belisarius1 年前

Auto Immune disease by design with cancer viruses. IMO, this image (not sure where it came from) has been and will continue to explain what is happening to the people that took these injections. This ends very badly.

Neil Chesen MD 的头像

Neil Chesen MD1 年前

There needs to be more awareness that many of the current RSV and flu vaccines are based on this mRNA platform and these are given to children. Beware.

Sandra Douglas 的头像

Sandra Douglas1 年前

As a chemical engineer, I recommend the following thread which breaks down where the manufacturing mistakes were made 👇

Dr.O 的头像

Dr.O1 年前

Great so 4 years later Weinstein finally understands the basic immunology of WHY I said the idea of giving yourself a shot to force your body to make a foreign protein was always retarded bad MAD SCIENCE

cudchewerchad 的头像

cudchewerchad1 年前

Glad the direct mechanism for damaging the heart is mentioned. There's also no mechanism to turn off the body's production of the spike protein, no way of knowing the safety of the LNPs (which can carry the mRNA across the blood-brain barrier), the PEG 2000 used to stabilize the LNPs is labeled "Not for human or animal use"... There are far too many concerns about these shots to have given them wholesale (and continue giving them) to an uninformed population. There is no informed consent involved with the Covid shots.

Dr. Lynn Fynn-derella🐭 的头像

Dr. Lynn Fynn-derella🐭1 年前

Decent explanation in a simplistic form @BretWeinstein

DogFacePonia 的头像

DogFacePonia1 年前

I want more information and testing on all different mRNA vaccines. This seems to indicate that all mRNA vaccines have a fatal flaw that needs to be resolved.

Chipmonk 的头像

Chipmonk1 年前

Mandating any kind of gene therapy should be illegal.

REGENETARIANISM תִּקּוּן עוֹלָם 的头像

REGENETARIANISM תִּקּוּן עוֹלָם1 年前

That's only part of the problem with this platform. Here's a explanation of many of the other problems: Not ready for prime time As for the cytotoxin t-cell response @BretWeinstein thinks he discovered, you actually need prior infection for this to occur. Why? Because you need to first development the adaptive immune response for your immune system to recognize for CD8 t-cells to respond to. Now if the mRNA injections provoke this CD8 response in addition to a b-cell response, then it's the 2nd or later doses that are problematic for any cell types transfected w. the mRNA. ----------------

相关视频

We've been told the COVID vaccines are a marvel of modern science. But what if the platform itself—the mRNA technology—is inherently dangerous, and the pandemic was used to normalize it before its flaws were solved? As Bret Weinstein explains, while the spike protein is problematic, the greater danger is the mRNA platform. "Anything you loaded onto that platform would produce many of these pathologies, because the platform itself is deeply flawed." The pandemic provided the perfect excuse to deploy this technology on billions with minimal testing, making its flaws "disappear" in the name of urgency. This normalized a platform that can be quickly reformulated for any new pathogen, creating a lifetime of repatentable products. But what is the core flaw? It's the lipid nanoparticle (LNP) delivery system. The mRNA message is wrapped in tiny fat bubbles. The critical failure: they don't stay in the deltoid muscle. They circulate throughout your entire body. Here’s why that’s catastrophic: Your cells are covered in a fatty layer. These lipid nanoparticles, being fat-based, are absorbed by any cells they encounter—your heart, liver, brain, ovaries, testes. Once inside, the cell is hijacked. It reads the mRNA instructions and begins mass-producing a foreign protein (like the spike protein). This triggers a devastating immune response. Your immune system is designed to recognize and DESTROY any of your own cells that start producing a protein they shouldn't. It treats them like cancer or a viral infection. So, the shot turns your body's cells into targets. As Weinstein states: "Their mRNA shots are a pseudovirus. They infect cells, cause those cells to make this protein, and then the immune system... destroys them." If this cellular destruction happens in an organ you can spare, like the liver, you might be okay. But if it happens in your heart? It creates a microscopic wound. Under stress, this can lead to a catastrophic event like a burst blood vessel. The platform has no targeting mechanism. It cannot control which of your vital organs becomes a battleground. The result is an unpredictable, Russian roulette of auto-immune destruction. The takeaway is stark: The problem isn't just what's in the shot, but how the shot works. Until this fundamental delivery flaw is solved—if it ever can be—any future mRNA product deployed must be met with extreme skepticism and a resounding NO. This is not anti-vax. This is pro-science. It is a demand for safe, effective, and honestly tested medical technology.

We've been told the COVID vaccines are a marvel of modern science. But what if the platform itself—the mRNA technology—is inherently dangerous, and the pandemic was used to normalize it before its flaws were solved? As Bret Weinstein explains, while the spike protein is problematic, the greater danger is the mRNA platform. "Anything you loaded onto that platform would produce many of these pathologies, because the platform itself is deeply flawed." The pandemic provided the perfect excuse to deploy this technology on billions with minimal testing, making its flaws "disappear" in the name of urgency. This normalized a platform that can be quickly reformulated for any new pathogen, creating a lifetime of repatentable products. But what is the core flaw? It's the lipid nanoparticle (LNP) delivery system. The mRNA message is wrapped in tiny fat bubbles. The critical failure: they don't stay in the deltoid muscle. They circulate throughout your entire body. Here’s why that’s catastrophic: Your cells are covered in a fatty layer. These lipid nanoparticles, being fat-based, are absorbed by any cells they encounter—your heart, liver, brain, ovaries, testes. Once inside, the cell is hijacked. It reads the mRNA instructions and begins mass-producing a foreign protein (like the spike protein). This triggers a devastating immune response. Your immune system is designed to recognize and DESTROY any of your own cells that start producing a protein they shouldn't. It treats them like cancer or a viral infection. So, the shot turns your body's cells into targets. As Weinstein states: "Their mRNA shots are a pseudovirus. They infect cells, cause those cells to make this protein, and then the immune system... destroys them." If this cellular destruction happens in an organ you can spare, like the liver, you might be okay. But if it happens in your heart? It creates a microscopic wound. Under stress, this can lead to a catastrophic event like a burst blood vessel. The platform has no targeting mechanism. It cannot control which of your vital organs becomes a battleground. The result is an unpredictable, Russian roulette of auto-immune destruction. The takeaway is stark: The problem isn't just what's in the shot, but how the shot works. Until this fundamental delivery flaw is solved—if it ever can be—any future mRNA product deployed must be met with extreme skepticism and a resounding NO. This is not anti-vax. This is pro-science. It is a demand for safe, effective, and honestly tested medical technology.

Camus

104,291 次观看 • 9 个月前

Brett Weinstein, Professor of Evolutionary Biology. Host of the DarkHorse podcast. "The mRNA platform is brilliant. But it has a giant gaping flaw in it, which is ; Any cell of yours that produces a foreign protein, will be targetted by your immune system and destroyed. You will create an autoimmune disorder. When it works. How do you keep it out of your heart. Not by coding it in a lipid nanoparticle. So, they had no way to deliver it safely to market. So then they had a pandemic, the emergency allowed them to do it. This technology, in my opinion, was at least 3 decades out from being usefully and safely deployed at all, if at all. They did not want to wait, this crisis gave them the opportunity not to wait. And now, they will blame the spike protein, we picked the wrong protein. When in actual fact there are 2 problems, the spike protein and the platform itself."

Brett Weinstein, Professor of Evolutionary Biology. Host of the DarkHorse podcast. "The mRNA platform is brilliant. But it has a giant gaping flaw in it, which is ; Any cell of yours that produces a foreign protein, will be targetted by your immune system and destroyed. You will create an autoimmune disorder. When it works. How do you keep it out of your heart. Not by coding it in a lipid nanoparticle. So, they had no way to deliver it safely to market. So then they had a pandemic, the emergency allowed them to do it. This technology, in my opinion, was at least 3 decades out from being usefully and safely deployed at all, if at all. They did not want to wait, this crisis gave them the opportunity not to wait. And now, they will blame the spike protein, we picked the wrong protein. When in actual fact there are 2 problems, the spike protein and the platform itself."

RefugeOfSinners (ROS)

1,204,546 次观看 • 2 年前

"The makers of this immunotoxic vaccine knew [it would kill people]...You can't make something this damaging to humanity without doing it on purpose...It would not be so able to hijack your immune system to kill you slowly or quickly if it was not done purposefully." This is a clip of testimony given by Dr. Chris Shoemaker (Chris Shoemaker, MD), a comprehensive physician in Canada, during a recent session of the National Citizens Inquiry (National Citizens Inquiry (NCI | CeNC)). The National Citizens Inquiry (NCI) is a citizen-led and citizen-funded public inquiry into the Covid-19 health-protection measures taken by all levels of government in Canada. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "We all understand transplants. We understand if someone's kidney is put into you or someone's heart is put into you, your own natural immune system would attack the heck out of that transplanted kidney or attack the heck out of that transplanted heart if the surgeons and the internists didn't give a great degree of immune suppression, very heavy drugs that that would make your immune system basically go to sleep so that that new heart or that new kidney could settle into your body. "Here's the problem with spike protein. When spike protein goes into your body, you got 30,000 sorry, 30,000 billion cells in your body. You've got 40,000 billion mRNAs; enough to go into every cell of your body. So they're all going in and they're all creating a flag. They are all creating the fact that your body recognizes your heart is no longer your heart. It's a transplanted heart. Your kidney is no longer your kidney. It's a transplanted kidney...and that's why the body goes after it. And that's why the attacks are so varied. That's why one person could be suffering massively from a hepatitic or a kidney ailment, and another person will have a dissection in their aorta because their aorta is being inflamed by the attack or the heart. "The typical one is myocarditis in children, young adolescents, male and female, getting pain and troponin elevations and all the features of myocarditis. And it's because your immune system—it's not the spike itself—that's harming you. It's your immune system going after the spike that has changed the genetic image of your heart. And your body thinks it's not your heart, and that's why it attacks the heck out of it. "This is basic immunologic science. The makers of this immunotoxic vaccine knew this. They knew this for a purpose. You can't make something this damaging to humanity without doing it on purpose. And that is actually my major message of my talk today is I accuse someone—and I can't name them right now—but I accuse some entity of highly purposefully making things in the fashion that they did because it would not be as toxic as it is. It would not be so able to hijack your immune system to kill you slowly or quickly if it was not done purposefully. It has been done purposefully."

"The makers of this immunotoxic vaccine knew [it would kill people]...You can't make something this damaging to humanity without doing it on purpose...It would not be so able to hijack your immune system to kill you slowly or quickly if it was not done purposefully." This is a clip of testimony given by Dr. Chris Shoemaker (Chris Shoemaker, MD), a comprehensive physician in Canada, during a recent session of the National Citizens Inquiry (National Citizens Inquiry (NCI | CeNC)). The National Citizens Inquiry (NCI) is a citizen-led and citizen-funded public inquiry into the Covid-19 health-protection measures taken by all levels of government in Canada. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "We all understand transplants. We understand if someone's kidney is put into you or someone's heart is put into you, your own natural immune system would attack the heck out of that transplanted kidney or attack the heck out of that transplanted heart if the surgeons and the internists didn't give a great degree of immune suppression, very heavy drugs that that would make your immune system basically go to sleep so that that new heart or that new kidney could settle into your body. "Here's the problem with spike protein. When spike protein goes into your body, you got 30,000 sorry, 30,000 billion cells in your body. You've got 40,000 billion mRNAs; enough to go into every cell of your body. So they're all going in and they're all creating a flag. They are all creating the fact that your body recognizes your heart is no longer your heart. It's a transplanted heart. Your kidney is no longer your kidney. It's a transplanted kidney...and that's why the body goes after it. And that's why the attacks are so varied. That's why one person could be suffering massively from a hepatitic or a kidney ailment, and another person will have a dissection in their aorta because their aorta is being inflamed by the attack or the heart. "The typical one is myocarditis in children, young adolescents, male and female, getting pain and troponin elevations and all the features of myocarditis. And it's because your immune system—it's not the spike itself—that's harming you. It's your immune system going after the spike that has changed the genetic image of your heart. And your body thinks it's not your heart, and that's why it attacks the heck out of it. "This is basic immunologic science. The makers of this immunotoxic vaccine knew this. They knew this for a purpose. You can't make something this damaging to humanity without doing it on purpose. And that is actually my major message of my talk today is I accuse someone—and I can't name them right now—but I accuse some entity of highly purposefully making things in the fashion that they did because it would not be as toxic as it is. It would not be so able to hijack your immune system to kill you slowly or quickly if it was not done purposefully. It has been done purposefully."

Sense Receptor

25,280 次观看 • 1 年前

Bret Weinstein Reveals the Hidden Danger of mRNA Vaccines: "It’s Worse Than You Think" The mRNA platform was designed to make your cells produce a foreign protein—the spike—displaying it on their surface. But here’s the terrifying part: there’s no precision in where this happens. Your heart. Your brain. Your vital organs. Any cell can be hijacked to become a spike protein factory. And when your immune system sees these cells, it does what it’s programmed to do—attack them as if they’re infected by a virus. Myocarditis isn’t just a "side effect." It’s a symptom of your body literally destroying its own heart cells because they’ve been turned into targets. The inflammation? That’s collateral damage from an immune system forced to wage war on itself. This isn’t immunity. This is autoimmunity by design. And the worst part? No one knows the long-term consequences. —Bret Weinstein

Bret Weinstein Reveals the Hidden Danger of mRNA Vaccines: "It’s Worse Than You Think" The mRNA platform was designed to make your cells produce a foreign protein—the spike—displaying it on their surface. But here’s the terrifying part: there’s no precision in where this happens. Your heart. Your brain. Your vital organs. Any cell can be hijacked to become a spike protein factory. And when your immune system sees these cells, it does what it’s programmed to do—attack them as if they’re infected by a virus. Myocarditis isn’t just a "side effect." It’s a symptom of your body literally destroying its own heart cells because they’ve been turned into targets. The inflammation? That’s collateral damage from an immune system forced to wage war on itself. This isn’t immunity. This is autoimmunity by design. And the worst part? No one knows the long-term consequences. —Bret Weinstein

Camus

147,765 次观看 • 9 个月前

The REAL reason why "the mRNA platform is so dangerous" - Bret Weinstein explains. "So, why do you get myocarditis from an mRNA shot? It doesn't have anything to do with spike. Spike, maybe making the problem worse, but the fact that your heart cells are producing a foreign protein means that your your immune system will spot them as virally infected and it will destroy them and myocarditis is not the problem... myocarditis is a symptom." Watch the full "What Jessica Rose Knows" Inside Rail episode on DarkHorse available on all popular podcast platforms, Youtube, Locals, and Rumble.

The REAL reason why "the mRNA platform is so dangerous" - Bret Weinstein explains. "So, why do you get myocarditis from an mRNA shot? It doesn't have anything to do with spike. Spike, maybe making the problem worse, but the fact that your heart cells are producing a foreign protein means that your your immune system will spot them as virally infected and it will destroy them and myocarditis is not the problem... myocarditis is a symptom." Watch the full "What Jessica Rose Knows" Inside Rail episode on DarkHorse available on all popular podcast platforms, Youtube, Locals, and Rumble.

The DarkHorse Podcast

389,371 次观看 • 1 年前

"There's absolutely no question that this was not an accident...the fact that we have one-third DNA product and two-thirds RNA product [in the C19 jabs] is, for whatever reason, the ratio that the makers wanted it to be. They have lied to us in the extreme." Canadian Comprehensive Physician Dr. Chris Shoemaker (@CShoemakerMD) describes for the RAIR Foundation (RAIR Foundation USA) how the DNA contamination of the COVID injections "was not an accident." Shoemaker notes that "They have lied to us in the extreme" and "We are in danger in the extreme, not just in the short term." "There's absolutely no question that this was not an accident. There's absolutely no question that it was carefully and scientifically accomplished," Shoemaker says. "And the fact that we have one-third DNA product and two-thirds RNA product is, for whatever reason, the ratio that the makers wanted it to be." "What's the difference [if there is] DNA is in [the jabs] instead of just mRNA? The difference is that...the DNA, functionally, once in the nucleus, can influence the nucleus, [and] can produce mRNA near the nucleus and have that mRNA migrate out into the cytoplasm of the cell," Shoemaker says. "And once that's done, what should be, at worst, an 8-month process inside your body is, in fact, an 8- to 10-year process inside your body because of the nefarious decision to allow DNA in these shots." Partial transcription of clip: "There's absolutely no question that this was not an accident. There's absolutely no question that it was carefully and scientifically accomplished. And the fact that we have one-third DNA product and two-thirds RNA product is, for whatever reason, the ratio that the makers wanted it to be. They have lied to us in the extreme. "We are in danger in the extreme, not just in the short term. We know the 2 percent, 3 percent of people who passed away suddenly and surprisingly and that's way more than should happen. But the long term effect on the ability to fight cancer or for a cancer to perhaps be a turbo cancer, all these are being influenced by both DNA and RNA that is within us. "The key thing is that it makes the whole process last longer. If it was only mRNA, it would probably be 8 to 12 months only that mRNA would seed out into your body and be repeatedly creating spike, repeatedly creating spike. Remember, the end-product is the most dangerous part of this human engineered genome. The spike protein is the thing that congeals blood cells against each other. The spike protein is the thing that, if it's in your liver, is waving a flag saying, Hey, I'm not your liver. I'm not a human liver. I've got this strange created spike protein. You can identify that I'm not your liver, and you can attack it, and you can make hepatitis for this person because it's not even their liver. "This is what mRNA does is create a flag so that you're attacking through your healthy immune system. Your healthy immune system is going after it in organ after organ after organ. For some people, it's just a specific organ that was already a bit weak to begin with. And for other people, it's a different organ. But either way, mRNA produces a spike flag, which your immune system attacks. "To return to your question about DNA, what's the difference that DNA is in there instead of just mRNA? The difference is that the DNA can, for years, not just 8 to 12 months. The DNA, functionally, once in the nucleus, can influence the nucleus, can produce mRNA near the nucleus and have that mRNA migrate out into the cytoplasm of the cell. And once that's done, what should be, at worst, an 8-month process inside your body is, in fact, an 8 to 10 year process inside your body because of the nefarious decision to allow DNA in these shots."

"There's absolutely no question that this was not an accident...the fact that we have one-third DNA product and two-thirds RNA product [in the C19 jabs] is, for whatever reason, the ratio that the makers wanted it to be. They have lied to us in the extreme." Canadian Comprehensive Physician Dr. Chris Shoemaker (@CShoemakerMD) describes for the RAIR Foundation (RAIR Foundation USA) how the DNA contamination of the COVID injections "was not an accident." Shoemaker notes that "They have lied to us in the extreme" and "We are in danger in the extreme, not just in the short term." "There's absolutely no question that this was not an accident. There's absolutely no question that it was carefully and scientifically accomplished," Shoemaker says. "And the fact that we have one-third DNA product and two-thirds RNA product is, for whatever reason, the ratio that the makers wanted it to be." "What's the difference [if there is] DNA is in [the jabs] instead of just mRNA? The difference is that...the DNA, functionally, once in the nucleus, can influence the nucleus, [and] can produce mRNA near the nucleus and have that mRNA migrate out into the cytoplasm of the cell," Shoemaker says. "And once that's done, what should be, at worst, an 8-month process inside your body is, in fact, an 8- to 10-year process inside your body because of the nefarious decision to allow DNA in these shots." Partial transcription of clip: "There's absolutely no question that this was not an accident. There's absolutely no question that it was carefully and scientifically accomplished. And the fact that we have one-third DNA product and two-thirds RNA product is, for whatever reason, the ratio that the makers wanted it to be. They have lied to us in the extreme. "We are in danger in the extreme, not just in the short term. We know the 2 percent, 3 percent of people who passed away suddenly and surprisingly and that's way more than should happen. But the long term effect on the ability to fight cancer or for a cancer to perhaps be a turbo cancer, all these are being influenced by both DNA and RNA that is within us. "The key thing is that it makes the whole process last longer. If it was only mRNA, it would probably be 8 to 12 months only that mRNA would seed out into your body and be repeatedly creating spike, repeatedly creating spike. Remember, the end-product is the most dangerous part of this human engineered genome. The spike protein is the thing that congeals blood cells against each other. The spike protein is the thing that, if it's in your liver, is waving a flag saying, Hey, I'm not your liver. I'm not a human liver. I've got this strange created spike protein. You can identify that I'm not your liver, and you can attack it, and you can make hepatitis for this person because it's not even their liver. "This is what mRNA does is create a flag so that you're attacking through your healthy immune system. Your healthy immune system is going after it in organ after organ after organ. For some people, it's just a specific organ that was already a bit weak to begin with. And for other people, it's a different organ. But either way, mRNA produces a spike flag, which your immune system attacks. "To return to your question about DNA, what's the difference that DNA is in there instead of just mRNA? The difference is that the DNA can, for years, not just 8 to 12 months. The DNA, functionally, once in the nucleus, can influence the nucleus, can produce mRNA near the nucleus and have that mRNA migrate out into the cytoplasm of the cell. And once that's done, what should be, at worst, an 8-month process inside your body is, in fact, an 8 to 10 year process inside your body because of the nefarious decision to allow DNA in these shots."

Sense Receptor

95,273 次观看 • 1 年前

Most people don’t truly understand how mRNA vaccines work. Unlike traditional vaccines, where a factory produces the antigen and injects it into the body, mRNA vaccines turn YOUR OWN CELLS into the factory. Here’s how it works: Inside every one of your cells, there are ribosomes—tiny protein-making machines. Normally, these ribosomes get instructions from your cell’s nucleus (the brain of the cell) to produce proteins that build muscle, fight infections, and keep your body functioning. mRNA vaccines hijack this natural process by delivering a blueprint that instructs your ribosomes to produce a specific protein—like the spike protein of a virus. Your immune system then recognizes this protein as foreign, triggering a defense response and preparing your body to fight off future infections. Why does this matter? 1️⃣ Faster production – No need for external manufacturing of viral proteins, cutting vaccine development time. 2️⃣ Adaptability – The technology can be rapidly adjusted for new viruses and mutations. 3️⃣ No live virus – Unlike traditional vaccines, mRNA vaccines don’t use weakened or dead viruses, reducing risk. But here’s the big question: Are we playing with fire, or is this the future of medicine? We’re bypassing nature’s traditional immune response by directly programming our cells to make viral proteins. Dr. Mink Chawla and I break it all down in this episode. WATCH HERE:

Most people don’t truly understand how mRNA vaccines work. Unlike traditional vaccines, where a factory produces the antigen and injects it into the body, mRNA vaccines turn YOUR OWN CELLS into the factory. Here’s how it works: Inside every one of your cells, there are ribosomes—tiny protein-making machines. Normally, these ribosomes get instructions from your cell’s nucleus (the brain of the cell) to produce proteins that build muscle, fight infections, and keep your body functioning. mRNA vaccines hijack this natural process by delivering a blueprint that instructs your ribosomes to produce a specific protein—like the spike protein of a virus. Your immune system then recognizes this protein as foreign, triggering a defense response and preparing your body to fight off future infections. Why does this matter? 1️⃣ Faster production – No need for external manufacturing of viral proteins, cutting vaccine development time. 2️⃣ Adaptability – The technology can be rapidly adjusted for new viruses and mutations. 3️⃣ No live virus – Unlike traditional vaccines, mRNA vaccines don’t use weakened or dead viruses, reducing risk. But here’s the big question: Are we playing with fire, or is this the future of medicine? We’re bypassing nature’s traditional immune response by directly programming our cells to make viral proteins. Dr. Mink Chawla and I break it all down in this episode. WATCH HERE:

Gary Brecka

51,737 次观看 • 1 年前

What did Yale School of Medicine find in those who were injured after receiving the COVID injection??? It turns out that after you inject someone with a gene therapy whose job it is to turn the body into a manufacturing plant for a toxic, foreign viral protein...the body makes that protein...for a long time...up to 709 days. And when your body continuously makes a foreign protein that activates the immune system, the body enters a state of chronic immune activation that screws up the immune system such that it no longer correctly recognizes pathogens (or cancer cells), but instead produces antibodies that attack its own tissues. All of this is what one would predict. Those at the top who promoted and allowed this to happen are criminally responsible for this entirely predictable outcome. To learn how to get this crap out of your body, JOIN

What did Yale School of Medicine find in those who were injured after receiving the COVID injection??? It turns out that after you inject someone with a gene therapy whose job it is to turn the body into a manufacturing plant for a toxic, foreign viral protein...the body makes that protein...for a long time...up to 709 days. And when your body continuously makes a foreign protein that activates the immune system, the body enters a state of chronic immune activation that screws up the immune system such that it no longer correctly recognizes pathogens (or cancer cells), but instead produces antibodies that attack its own tissues. All of this is what one would predict. Those at the top who promoted and allowed this to happen are criminally responsible for this entirely predictable outcome. To learn how to get this crap out of your body, JOIN

Christina Parks

64,254 次观看 • 1 年前

This is Not a Vaccine: Senator Ron Johnson Exposes the Deceptive Narrative of mRNA 'Vaccines' "They literally changed the definition to encompass this. Starting with the claim that it's going to stay in your arm. No. Evidence from Japanese regulators and a Pfizer study with rats reveals that the lipid nanoparticles bio-distribute throughout the body, concentrating in the ovaries, adrenal glands, and other places. Okay? They knew this was going to spread everywhere." "Why'd they lie to us? Why? It's not messenger RNA; it's modified RNA. Messenger RNA needs to be encapsulated in lipid particles to protect it because it degrades very quickly in the body. This modified RNA is engineered not to degrade, so it's encapsulated not just for protection but to sustain its presence, with studies showing it still circulating in the body two months after injection." "Although, they haven't studied beyond that point, we know normal mRNA degrades within hours or days. So, it's not real mRNA. Encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles, it distributes throughout the body. It enters the cell, unlike a standard vaccine which uses an attenuated or killed virus that the body can recognize and react to for future protection." "This doesn't work that way; it enters the cell, hijacks it to become a manufacturing site for the spike protein, just one small part of the virus. Yep. Okay? And then your body expresses this protein, which travels through the body." "Again, anything that isn't part of the self is recognized as an enemy by the body. So, the body's immune response is to attack it. And when the body attacks itself, that's called inflammation. So, that's a real problem."

This is Not a Vaccine: Senator Ron Johnson Exposes the Deceptive Narrative of mRNA 'Vaccines' "They literally changed the definition to encompass this. Starting with the claim that it's going to stay in your arm. No. Evidence from Japanese regulators and a Pfizer study with rats reveals that the lipid nanoparticles bio-distribute throughout the body, concentrating in the ovaries, adrenal glands, and other places. Okay? They knew this was going to spread everywhere." "Why'd they lie to us? Why? It's not messenger RNA; it's modified RNA. Messenger RNA needs to be encapsulated in lipid particles to protect it because it degrades very quickly in the body. This modified RNA is engineered not to degrade, so it's encapsulated not just for protection but to sustain its presence, with studies showing it still circulating in the body two months after injection." "Although, they haven't studied beyond that point, we know normal mRNA degrades within hours or days. So, it's not real mRNA. Encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles, it distributes throughout the body. It enters the cell, unlike a standard vaccine which uses an attenuated or killed virus that the body can recognize and react to for future protection." "This doesn't work that way; it enters the cell, hijacks it to become a manufacturing site for the spike protein, just one small part of the virus. Yep. Okay? And then your body expresses this protein, which travels through the body." "Again, anything that isn't part of the self is recognized as an enemy by the body. So, the body's immune response is to attack it. And when the body attacks itself, that's called inflammation. So, that's a real problem."

Camus

170,891 次观看 • 1 年前

Scientists just figured out how to reverse aging using AI. And this is a massive breakthrough. We can now reprogram any human cell back to age 20. Heart cells, brain cells, skin cells, all reset to their biological prime. And here’s the wildest part…the technology to do this, has already existed since 2012 (it won the Nobel Prize). But the real breakthrough wasn’t possible until this year, when they supercharged it with AI. It’s a wild story. So in 2006, scientists discovered Yamanaka factors. They’re proteins that can basically convert any normal cell into a universal stem cell. Now this was a huge deal, because these stem cells are basically like magic healers. If you have torn muscle tissue, you could inject these stem cells into the area and they will turn into the youthful muscle cells you need. So Yamanaka factors were this insane breakthrough, because they allowed any human to turn any cell you already have into these magic healers. But, there was one big problem… It turns out, the original Yamanaka factors weren’t very good at this stem cell conversion. They could do it, but they just weren’t very reliable. Enter OpenAI...and this is where things get crazy. OpenAI designed a special AI model built specifically to create new proteins. Think of it like ChatGPT but for protein engineering. So they took all the Yamanaka research and asked this new AI to go ham on improving it. And get this… Their version was 50x more effective than the original. They tested it on 50 year old cells and it successfully started repairing 30% of their cells in just 7 days. This is just science fiction…it actually happened. And it sounds crazy, but in a few years, humans will be able to take a shot that will literally reverse the age of their cells.

Scientists just figured out how to reverse aging using AI. And this is a massive breakthrough. We can now reprogram any human cell back to age 20. Heart cells, brain cells, skin cells, all reset to their biological prime. And here’s the wildest part…the technology to do this, has already existed since 2012 (it won the Nobel Prize). But the real breakthrough wasn’t possible until this year, when they supercharged it with AI. It’s a wild story. So in 2006, scientists discovered Yamanaka factors. They’re proteins that can basically convert any normal cell into a universal stem cell. Now this was a huge deal, because these stem cells are basically like magic healers. If you have torn muscle tissue, you could inject these stem cells into the area and they will turn into the youthful muscle cells you need. So Yamanaka factors were this insane breakthrough, because they allowed any human to turn any cell you already have into these magic healers. But, there was one big problem… It turns out, the original Yamanaka factors weren’t very good at this stem cell conversion. They could do it, but they just weren’t very reliable. Enter OpenAI...and this is where things get crazy. OpenAI designed a special AI model built specifically to create new proteins. Think of it like ChatGPT but for protein engineering. So they took all the Yamanaka research and asked this new AI to go ham on improving it. And get this… Their version was 50x more effective than the original. They tested it on 50 year old cells and it successfully started repairing 30% of their cells in just 7 days. This is just science fiction…it actually happened. And it sounds crazy, but in a few years, humans will be able to take a shot that will literally reverse the age of their cells.

Whiplash347

68,643 次观看 • 7 个月前

😱😱🚨🚨🚨 Popular Youtube Doctor / Influencer, Dr Boz makes a dramatic U-Turn on the experimental gene therapy. Highlights All right, so this was the other part that bothered me. It bothered me from the beginning, but it really makes me nervous once you see what this I had heard whisperings about this, but I didn't believe it. I did not believe it. so this bothered me from the beginning, though, that they kept using the word vaccine when it was not like a normal vaccine. This is a messenger RNA. this is a strand of single DNA, or rna that you make DNA from, so that you're teaching the body about how to respond to this by impacting your dna. So it shouldn't have been called vaccines. It should have been called gene therapy product, because it was really changing the gene. The problem with what they were playing with is there is no off switch for this. In a vaccination, your immunity rises and then it falls and your body's done with what they were playing with. There's no mechanism built into our bodies that has the ability to turn it off. Like, if you take that messenger, that DNA, you have a messenger RNA. Now you're making a protein. Well, how do you stop making a protein once this turns it on? ..... Some batches were contaminated with double stranded rna. The double stranded DNA has a high potential to trigger immune inflammatory reactions such as myocarditis. So here it gets a little bit. This is where it really bothers me. So you say, well, I don't know much about these vaccinations. Is that like a normal thing to find in your vaccination with an mrna is you're going to have some double stranded things, they say, each batch variability further complicated in recent findings of DNA contamination. Again, DNA contamination. First of all, what the hell is DNA doing in a vaccination that is supposed to be for the protein production to fight off this virus? but in the analysis of multiple vials high levels of DNA contamination in both a monovalent and bivalent vaccines in orders of magnitude higher than the limitations. What they found was an enormous amount of DNA particles in the rna that I injected into me, into my kids, into my patients. so how does such dangerous large scale contamination escape the scrutiny of the public health officials? And were the manufacturers aware of all of this excess dna that was found inside these vaccinations? Oh yeah, this is the part that I wanted to say. so when you have foreign dna in your human genome, it disrupts the existing natural genetic sequence. It also carries a further risk of disease, including cancer. I mean, DNA in your body, very dangerous, just like CRISPR, except it's random chance of what the heck's in there? Because it's a contaminant. It's not intended to be in there. What's it doing in there? .... There is an 803 increase in autoimmune disorders when people had these vaccinations. And it goes on to say, we not only know that, we know that as you look at some of the images from people who have autopsies from death due to myocarditis, I wonder if this is. Here we go. ... This spike proteins are found in the cells of human heart. Cells with spike proteins inside the muscles of these patients. Again, spike proteins are not supposed to be inside us at all. The people who had Covid didn't have spike proteins found in their cardiac tissues. The people who had the vaccinations, the ones who had this messenger rna that made a protein, and then they made the protein and didn't have the off button, well, they're now found at autopsy in the cells of cardiac tissues. And here are the. I mean, that sounds ridiculous. That sounds like something I wouldn't even believe until you start looking at the autopsies and wondering. .... they were using some of the people who started in the placebo line, but ended up with the vaccination in the data for the placebo. So they got the vaccination, they had a significant adverse effect. But they're being counted in the people who didn't get the vaccination because that's where they started. They didn't fix that. So you don't have to be a statistician to understand what I'm trying to say, which is they played games to have this bias towards the favorability of the vaccination. ..... 52,000 vaccinations would be needed in order to prevent one Covid-19 death. Now they go through talking about all this, how this number needed to vaccinate. They are taking a conservative approach to this. So as you do the math, they're rounding in a way to be conservative, giving the benefit of the doubt. and it's saying this exact injection, it is estimated that about two lives could be saved for every 100,000 injections. and then they go to say, but now we see that we have 27 deaths per 100,000 in the same batch of injections that were happening because of adverse events. So you're going to save two lives, but you are going to have 27 deaths as a result of the significant adverse effects. And yet this was not reported. There were nearly 14 times more deaths caused by the modified mrna injections. .... They recommended it in pregnancy when they knew that absolutely not one single subject in the trial was pregnant. I think that's just egregious. .... And then what was my part in it? How could have I been a little more? Again, I had all of my kids vaccinated. I had all of the people I loved vaccinated. And when you look back and say, dang, look at what it did to especially the kids. anyway, I say that to you, to say, this information is out there. I don't know how long this report will be there. I want to do my part in at least spreading the information that's in this report, because, holy mackerel, did a lot of work go into that report.

😱😱🚨🚨🚨 Popular Youtube Doctor / Influencer, Dr Boz makes a dramatic U-Turn on the experimental gene therapy. Highlights All right, so this was the other part that bothered me. It bothered me from the beginning, but it really makes me nervous once you see what this I had heard whisperings about this, but I didn't believe it. I did not believe it. so this bothered me from the beginning, though, that they kept using the word vaccine when it was not like a normal vaccine. This is a messenger RNA. this is a strand of single DNA, or rna that you make DNA from, so that you're teaching the body about how to respond to this by impacting your dna. So it shouldn't have been called vaccines. It should have been called gene therapy product, because it was really changing the gene. The problem with what they were playing with is there is no off switch for this. In a vaccination, your immunity rises and then it falls and your body's done with what they were playing with. There's no mechanism built into our bodies that has the ability to turn it off. Like, if you take that messenger, that DNA, you have a messenger RNA. Now you're making a protein. Well, how do you stop making a protein once this turns it on? ..... Some batches were contaminated with double stranded rna. The double stranded DNA has a high potential to trigger immune inflammatory reactions such as myocarditis. So here it gets a little bit. This is where it really bothers me. So you say, well, I don't know much about these vaccinations. Is that like a normal thing to find in your vaccination with an mrna is you're going to have some double stranded things, they say, each batch variability further complicated in recent findings of DNA contamination. Again, DNA contamination. First of all, what the hell is DNA doing in a vaccination that is supposed to be for the protein production to fight off this virus? but in the analysis of multiple vials high levels of DNA contamination in both a monovalent and bivalent vaccines in orders of magnitude higher than the limitations. What they found was an enormous amount of DNA particles in the rna that I injected into me, into my kids, into my patients. so how does such dangerous large scale contamination escape the scrutiny of the public health officials? And were the manufacturers aware of all of this excess dna that was found inside these vaccinations? Oh yeah, this is the part that I wanted to say. so when you have foreign dna in your human genome, it disrupts the existing natural genetic sequence. It also carries a further risk of disease, including cancer. I mean, DNA in your body, very dangerous, just like CRISPR, except it's random chance of what the heck's in there? Because it's a contaminant. It's not intended to be in there. What's it doing in there? .... There is an 803 increase in autoimmune disorders when people had these vaccinations. And it goes on to say, we not only know that, we know that as you look at some of the images from people who have autopsies from death due to myocarditis, I wonder if this is. Here we go. ... This spike proteins are found in the cells of human heart. Cells with spike proteins inside the muscles of these patients. Again, spike proteins are not supposed to be inside us at all. The people who had Covid didn't have spike proteins found in their cardiac tissues. The people who had the vaccinations, the ones who had this messenger rna that made a protein, and then they made the protein and didn't have the off button, well, they're now found at autopsy in the cells of cardiac tissues. And here are the. I mean, that sounds ridiculous. That sounds like something I wouldn't even believe until you start looking at the autopsies and wondering. .... they were using some of the people who started in the placebo line, but ended up with the vaccination in the data for the placebo. So they got the vaccination, they had a significant adverse effect. But they're being counted in the people who didn't get the vaccination because that's where they started. They didn't fix that. So you don't have to be a statistician to understand what I'm trying to say, which is they played games to have this bias towards the favorability of the vaccination. ..... 52,000 vaccinations would be needed in order to prevent one Covid-19 death. Now they go through talking about all this, how this number needed to vaccinate. They are taking a conservative approach to this. So as you do the math, they're rounding in a way to be conservative, giving the benefit of the doubt. and it's saying this exact injection, it is estimated that about two lives could be saved for every 100,000 injections. and then they go to say, but now we see that we have 27 deaths per 100,000 in the same batch of injections that were happening because of adverse events. So you're going to save two lives, but you are going to have 27 deaths as a result of the significant adverse effects. And yet this was not reported. There were nearly 14 times more deaths caused by the modified mrna injections. .... They recommended it in pregnancy when they knew that absolutely not one single subject in the trial was pregnant. I think that's just egregious. .... And then what was my part in it? How could have I been a little more? Again, I had all of my kids vaccinated. I had all of the people I loved vaccinated. And when you look back and say, dang, look at what it did to especially the kids. anyway, I say that to you, to say, this information is out there. I don't know how long this report will be there. I want to do my part in at least spreading the information that's in this report, because, holy mackerel, did a lot of work go into that report.

aussie17

440,071 次观看 • 2 年前

Bret Weinstein: "I now regard anything that is delivered into the tissue with a hypodermic needle as a radical intervention. You will often hear people who are defending shots that have mercury in them by saying, well, yes, there's mercury in it, but it's less than there is in a tuna fish sandwich. Well, that is a game of smoke and mirrors. One, there shouldn't be any mercury in a tuna fish sandwich. That is the result of humans polluting the environment. Two, the amount of mercury in a tuna fish sandwich is not trivial, which is why pregnant women are advised to avoid them. Three, there is a huge difference between ingesting something into your gut, where your gut is wired not to transport things into your interior, your actual interior. So most of that mercury will pass through you if you eat it, whereas injecting it into you, this is not something you would normally be encountering. Your body doesn't have the mechanisms to deal with it, so its consequences are arbitrary. So in any case, when we inoculate, it seems like a minimal intervention. It is a radical intervention. And I still believe that vaccination in the sense meant the original sense is potentially an extremely valuable intervention, but I absolutely do not trust the mechanisms that generate these products or that test them either for how effective they are or how safe they are."

Bret Weinstein: "I now regard anything that is delivered into the tissue with a hypodermic needle as a radical intervention. You will often hear people who are defending shots that have mercury in them by saying, well, yes, there's mercury in it, but it's less than there is in a tuna fish sandwich. Well, that is a game of smoke and mirrors. One, there shouldn't be any mercury in a tuna fish sandwich. That is the result of humans polluting the environment. Two, the amount of mercury in a tuna fish sandwich is not trivial, which is why pregnant women are advised to avoid them. Three, there is a huge difference between ingesting something into your gut, where your gut is wired not to transport things into your interior, your actual interior. So most of that mercury will pass through you if you eat it, whereas injecting it into you, this is not something you would normally be encountering. Your body doesn't have the mechanisms to deal with it, so its consequences are arbitrary. So in any case, when we inoculate, it seems like a minimal intervention. It is a radical intervention. And I still believe that vaccination in the sense meant the original sense is potentially an extremely valuable intervention, but I absolutely do not trust the mechanisms that generate these products or that test them either for how effective they are or how safe they are."

Camus

98,099 次观看 • 1 年前

Only been saying this for over three years!! Biologist Heather Heying Drops Some Inconvenient Truths on the Science Behind mRNA Vaccines "Your immune system starts going after your own cells, which is not a disaster if it's a cell in your nose or in your deltoid. But what if it's a cell in your heart? Then you start to have problems because those cells are not going to regenerate."

Only been saying this for over three years!! Biologist Heather Heying Drops Some Inconvenient Truths on the Science Behind mRNA Vaccines "Your immune system starts going after your own cells, which is not a disaster if it's a cell in your nose or in your deltoid. But what if it's a cell in your heart? Then you start to have problems because those cells are not going to regenerate."

Dr Dave Cartland BMedSc MBChB Ex-MRCGP

40,534 次观看 • 1 年前

“What did you think of Lando being booed at race because people and I've seen it online as well say he doesn't deserve the title because McLaren favored him over his teammate. Do you think that's total nonsense?” Jacques Villeneuve: “That's a little bit ridiculous. When there was some booing in some races, that was embarrassing. You should never boo a driver that's clean, doesn't do anything dirty, on track is respectful, and on top of it is super fast. What's wrong with people? That was embarrassing. And, had it been that Piastri was a second a lap faster than him and somehow Lando was winning because a lot of things were happening, his car breaking down every time, then you could start thinking, okay, that's really not cool. That's not fair. But that wasn't the case. And in the second half, Norris has been faster right at the beginning as well, last year as well. So there's this whole middle of the season where Piastri was driving a lot better than Norris and was getting the points. Norris had an engine blowing up, not Piastri. And so those fans, they don't look at that either. You have to look at the whole picture, at the whole season. And suddenly if your favorite is starting to go backwards, you just got to bite the bullet and accept it. Your favorite is just going backwards. That doesn't mean that the other one is treated better or the other one is undeserving just because the one you're a fan of is not winning right now. That’s really wrong. If you're a fan of the sport, then you have to be a fan of the sport and understand when your driver is maybe not cutting it at this point in time, even though he was before and he will in the future again. It's all a question of timing. But that's the price we have to pay now with social media and how big F1 has become. It's very passionate. The people are passionate and once, you know, fans come from fanatism, you stop thinking, when you get in that mindset and it happens to all of us. You want something so much that you get attached and you cannot - it's hard to start seeing reality. So you will try to mold the reality to your thought process and if your champion is not winning then it cannot be his fault. It has to be something from the outside. It has to be the team destroying his chance or not favoring and so on and so on and so on. But there's nothing concrete behind those comments. It's pure fandom and it'll always be like this. And ultimately it's not a bad thing. You know drivers at that - sportsman at that level have to grow a thick skin. If not, you don't deserve to be there. You just have to have a thick skin because they're all very happy to get the compliments. They love it when it's just positive, but it gets balanced out with negatives and you need to be able to take and accept the negatives as well. It goes both ways. You cannot have the good. You just have to be a thick skin and know that it's part and parcels of what's going on. And in one month, it will be forgotten and maybe everything will change and it be the other driver that suddenly will be criticized and so on. So, it's just that's just the way it is.”

“What did you think of Lando being booed at race because people and I've seen it online as well say he doesn't deserve the title because McLaren favored him over his teammate. Do you think that's total nonsense?” Jacques Villeneuve: “That's a little bit ridiculous. When there was some booing in some races, that was embarrassing. You should never boo a driver that's clean, doesn't do anything dirty, on track is respectful, and on top of it is super fast. What's wrong with people? That was embarrassing. And, had it been that Piastri was a second a lap faster than him and somehow Lando was winning because a lot of things were happening, his car breaking down every time, then you could start thinking, okay, that's really not cool. That's not fair. But that wasn't the case. And in the second half, Norris has been faster right at the beginning as well, last year as well. So there's this whole middle of the season where Piastri was driving a lot better than Norris and was getting the points. Norris had an engine blowing up, not Piastri. And so those fans, they don't look at that either. You have to look at the whole picture, at the whole season. And suddenly if your favorite is starting to go backwards, you just got to bite the bullet and accept it. Your favorite is just going backwards. That doesn't mean that the other one is treated better or the other one is undeserving just because the one you're a fan of is not winning right now. That’s really wrong. If you're a fan of the sport, then you have to be a fan of the sport and understand when your driver is maybe not cutting it at this point in time, even though he was before and he will in the future again. It's all a question of timing. But that's the price we have to pay now with social media and how big F1 has become. It's very passionate. The people are passionate and once, you know, fans come from fanatism, you stop thinking, when you get in that mindset and it happens to all of us. You want something so much that you get attached and you cannot - it's hard to start seeing reality. So you will try to mold the reality to your thought process and if your champion is not winning then it cannot be his fault. It has to be something from the outside. It has to be the team destroying his chance or not favoring and so on and so on and so on. But there's nothing concrete behind those comments. It's pure fandom and it'll always be like this. And ultimately it's not a bad thing. You know drivers at that - sportsman at that level have to grow a thick skin. If not, you don't deserve to be there. You just have to have a thick skin because they're all very happy to get the compliments. They love it when it's just positive, but it gets balanced out with negatives and you need to be able to take and accept the negatives as well. It goes both ways. You cannot have the good. You just have to be a thick skin and know that it's part and parcels of what's going on. And in one month, it will be forgotten and maybe everything will change and it be the other driver that suddenly will be criticized and so on. So, it's just that's just the way it is.”

naenia ¹ ⁶³

29,833 次观看 • 5 个月前

Sen. Ron Johnson on the Covid "vaccines": "This is not a vaccine. They literally changed the definition to encompass this." "There are a number of lies told, starting with it's going to stay in your arm.... They knew this was going to go all over the body. Why did they lie to us?" "It's not messenger RNA—it's modified RNA. Messenger RNA... degrades very quickly in the body." "This doesn't do that. This enters the cell, takes over the cell, turns it into a manufacturing site to express that spike protein... It's toxic to the body." "It's not self. Anything that's not yourself is an enemy of the body. So they know the body's going to attack it." "So that's a real problem."

Sen. Ron Johnson on the Covid "vaccines": "This is not a vaccine. They literally changed the definition to encompass this." "There are a number of lies told, starting with it's going to stay in your arm.... They knew this was going to go all over the body. Why did they lie to us?" "It's not messenger RNA—it's modified RNA. Messenger RNA... degrades very quickly in the body." "This doesn't do that. This enters the cell, takes over the cell, turns it into a manufacturing site to express that spike protein... It's toxic to the body." "It's not self. Anything that's not yourself is an enemy of the body. So they know the body's going to attack it." "So that's a real problem."

Camus

97,388 次观看 • 11 个月前

Sen. Ron Johnson on the Covid "vaccines": "This is not a vaccine. They literally changed the definition to encompass this." "There are a number of lies told, starting with it's going to stay in your arm.... They knew this was going to go all over the body. Why did they lie to us?" "It's not messenger RNA—it's modified RNA. Messenger RNA... degrades very quickly in the body." "This doesn't do that. This enters the cell, takes over the cell, turns it into a manufacturing site to express that spike protein... It's toxic to the body." "It's not self. Anything that's not yourself is an enemy of the body. So they know the body's going to attack it." "So that's a real problem."

Sen. Ron Johnson on the Covid "vaccines": "This is not a vaccine. They literally changed the definition to encompass this." "There are a number of lies told, starting with it's going to stay in your arm.... They knew this was going to go all over the body. Why did they lie to us?" "It's not messenger RNA—it's modified RNA. Messenger RNA... degrades very quickly in the body." "This doesn't do that. This enters the cell, takes over the cell, turns it into a manufacturing site to express that spike protein... It's toxic to the body." "It's not self. Anything that's not yourself is an enemy of the body. So they know the body's going to attack it." "So that's a real problem."

Wide Awake Media

91,056 次观看 • 1 年前