Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Great Update from PHC: Anti-Corruption investigation into forgery of official documents (Forms 45) in the name of GoKP public officials serving as Presiding Officers for PK79 in Election 2024. Today in PHC, the lawyer representing 4 presiding officers attempting to attempted to ask the High Court to stop the...

Jhagra's profile picture

Taimur Saleem Khan Jhagra

363,493 subscribers

29,298 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & Politika
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

For those that don't believe in fighting the good fight, here is proof that one should never give up. This news shows why the rigging of February 8 will never go away, and why it is so important for us individually, for PTI as a party, and for the KP govt to take this issue up seriously. The evidence is so overwhelming, it will simply not go away. And there will be accountability, today, tomorrow or the day after. With respect to my complaints in July to the Anti Corruption Establishment with respect to the rigging on PK79 Muhammad Faheem reports that two brave female Presiding Officers have given written statements, despite allegedly being subjected to significant pressure to not do so. This is more than a smoking gun! I would like to commend their courage and integrity, and the KP govt must look after them. This is why every Form 45 candidate in KP must submit similar applications. At the moment, on Kamran Khan Bangash 🇵🇰 has done so. This is why, the rumours of pressure on the anti-corruption department to not proceed with this must be quashed, and why these inquiries must proceed at pace (note that the complaint is against the misconduct of officers and doesn't not impinge on the domain of the ECP). Remember, I am not doing this for my seat. I am doing it because I have, within the law, the right to fight for Imran Khan's mandate, and for democracy in Pakistan. It is a duty. I wish action had been taken on this earlier. For sixteen months, I have requested the KP govt to follow Imran Khan's instructions to conduct an official inquiry on February 8th rigging in KP. When no action was taken, and with the ECP clearly not interested in making our election tribunals functional, I decided with my lawyer to hold the officers accountable. The questions must now be asked of the RO and the DRO as to how they accepted fake Forms 45. There is no better opportunity for the KP govt to take this to a conclusion. Full vlog:
3:08

For those that don't believe in fighting the good fight, here is proof that one should never give up. This news shows why the rigging of February 8 will never go away, and why it is so important for us individually, for PTI as a party, and for the KP govt to take this issue up seriously. The evidence is so overwhelming, it will simply not go away. And there will be accountability, today, tomorrow or the day after. With respect to my complaints in July to the Anti Corruption Establishment with respect to the rigging on PK79 Muhammad Faheem reports that two brave female Presiding Officers have given written statements, despite allegedly being subjected to significant pressure to not do so. This is more than a smoking gun! I would like to commend their courage and integrity, and the KP govt must look after them. This is why every Form 45 candidate in KP must submit similar applications. At the moment, on Kamran Khan Bangash 🇵🇰 has done so. This is why, the rumours of pressure on the anti-corruption department to not proceed with this must be quashed, and why these inquiries must proceed at pace (note that the complaint is against the misconduct of officers and doesn't not impinge on the domain of the ECP). Remember, I am not doing this for my seat. I am doing it because I have, within the law, the right to fight for Imran Khan's mandate, and for democracy in Pakistan. It is a duty. I wish action had been taken on this earlier. For sixteen months, I have requested the KP govt to follow Imran Khan's instructions to conduct an official inquiry on February 8th rigging in KP. When no action was taken, and with the ECP clearly not interested in making our election tribunals functional, I decided with my lawyer to hold the officers accountable. The questions must now be asked of the RO and the DRO as to how they accepted fake Forms 45. There is no better opportunity for the KP govt to take this to a conclusion. Full vlog:

Taimur Saleem Khan Jhagra

37,346 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

I want to ask three questions first, which will make it very clear that the BJP is directing and using the Election Commission to damage India's democracy. ❓ Why is it that the CJI was removed from the selection panel of the Election Commissioner? What motivation could there be to remove the CJI? Do we not believe in the CJI? Of course, we believe in the CJI. Why is he not in that room? I sit in that room. It is a so-called democratic decision. On one side, PM Narendra Modi and HM Amit Shah. On the other side, the leader of the opposition. I have no voice in that room. What they decide is what happens. So, why are the Prime Minister and Amit Shah so keen on choosing exactly who the Election Commissioner is going to be? ❓ This is a devastating one. No Prime Minister has done this in the history of India. In December 2023, this government changed the law. They changed the law to make sure that no Election Commissioner could be punished for any action they take while they are Election Commissioners. Why would the Prime Minister and Home Minister give this gift of immunity to the Election Commissioner? Why would they need to give this tremendous gift that no prime minister has ever given before to the election commissioner? ❓ Why was the law with regard to CCTVs and the data that they contain changed? Why was a law put in place that allows the Election Commission to destroy CCTV footage 45 days after the election? What is the need? The answer given is that it is a question of data. But it is not a question of data. It is a question of stealing the election. : LoP Shri Rahul Gandhi in Lok Sabha
2:46

I want to ask three questions first, which will make it very clear that the BJP is directing and using the Election Commission to damage India's democracy. ❓ Why is it that the CJI was removed from the selection panel of the Election Commissioner? What motivation could there be to remove the CJI? Do we not believe in the CJI? Of course, we believe in the CJI. Why is he not in that room? I sit in that room. It is a so-called democratic decision. On one side, PM Narendra Modi and HM Amit Shah. On the other side, the leader of the opposition. I have no voice in that room. What they decide is what happens. So, why are the Prime Minister and Amit Shah so keen on choosing exactly who the Election Commissioner is going to be? ❓ This is a devastating one. No Prime Minister has done this in the history of India. In December 2023, this government changed the law. They changed the law to make sure that no Election Commissioner could be punished for any action they take while they are Election Commissioners. Why would the Prime Minister and Home Minister give this gift of immunity to the Election Commissioner? Why would they need to give this tremendous gift that no prime minister has ever given before to the election commissioner? ❓ Why was the law with regard to CCTVs and the data that they contain changed? Why was a law put in place that allows the Election Commission to destroy CCTV footage 45 days after the election? What is the need? The answer given is that it is a question of data. But it is not a question of data. It is a question of stealing the election. : LoP Shri Rahul Gandhi in Lok Sabha

Congress

45,738 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

#WATCH | Aurangabad, Bihar: Lok Sabha LoP and Congress MP Rahul Gandhi says, "I want to ask them, you made a law for CCTV. Then why did you change that law? Why did the government change it? Do you know that no case can be filed against the Election Commissioner? Do you know when this law was made? This law was made in 2023. Why was this law made in 2023? Because Narendra Modi and Amit Shah want that no action can be taken against the Election Commission. Because the Election Commission is helping them and is stealing votes with them."
1:03

#WATCH | Aurangabad, Bihar: Lok Sabha LoP and Congress MP Rahul Gandhi says, "I want to ask them, you made a law for CCTV. Then why did you change that law? Why did the government change it? Do you know that no case can be filed against the Election Commissioner? Do you know when this law was made? This law was made in 2023. Why was this law made in 2023? Because Narendra Modi and Amit Shah want that no action can be taken against the Election Commission. Because the Election Commission is helping them and is stealing votes with them."

ANI

105,212 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

The Hon’ble Supreme Court’s argument is that we should first go to the Election Commission, then to the High Court, and only thereafter approach the Supreme Court. However, this is a special case. The more time that is given, the longer this matter will be dragged out. That is why we wanted the Supreme Court to provide relief in the Meenakshi Natarajan case. Nevertheless, since the Court has said so, we will approach the High Court accordingly. We believe that this rejection is illegal, immoral, and anti-democratic. What the BJP Govt has done is wrong. Such major actions do not happen without the approval or direction of PM Modi. We believe that these steps are being taken deliberately as part of a larger conspiracy to weaken the Congress Party and undermine Democracy. In our view, these actions are aimed at harassing and suppressing the Opposition.
4:06

The Hon’ble Supreme Court’s argument is that we should first go to the Election Commission, then to the High Court, and only thereafter approach the Supreme Court. However, this is a special case. The more time that is given, the longer this matter will be dragged out. That is why we wanted the Supreme Court to provide relief in the Meenakshi Natarajan case. Nevertheless, since the Court has said so, we will approach the High Court accordingly. We believe that this rejection is illegal, immoral, and anti-democratic. What the BJP Govt has done is wrong. Such major actions do not happen without the approval or direction of PM Modi. We believe that these steps are being taken deliberately as part of a larger conspiracy to weaken the Congress Party and undermine Democracy. In our view, these actions are aimed at harassing and suppressing the Opposition.

Mallikarjun Kharge

117,289 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

It is very important to have a level playing field in a democracy. I want to ask the Election Commission of India and CEC Gyanesh Kumar why they did not stop the transfer of money into womens accounts. Why did they allow these transfers to happen just days before voting in both phases. And why is no journalist sitting her asking this question to the Election Commission?
2:03

It is very important to have a level playing field in a democracy. I want to ask the Election Commission of India and CEC Gyanesh Kumar why they did not stop the transfer of money into womens accounts. Why did they allow these transfers to happen just days before voting in both phases. And why is no journalist sitting her asking this question to the Election Commission?

Dr. Shama Mohamed

44,893 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

MacFarlane: Comey's arraignment is now set in that seashells by the seashore case. If the calendar holds up, the DOJ is going to have to show some of its cards in that case—they have filed so little, they've put nothing on the record in that case, wondering if it's going to implode between now and then. And all of this all of this seems to be rooted in based on the lie about the 2020 election.
0:42

MacFarlane: Comey's arraignment is now set in that seashells by the seashore case. If the calendar holds up, the DOJ is going to have to show some of its cards in that case—they have filed so little, they've put nothing on the record in that case, wondering if it's going to implode between now and then. And all of this all of this seems to be rooted in based on the lie about the 2020 election.

Acyn

162,691 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

PROROGATION CHALLENGE UPDATE Constitutional lawyer James Manson James Manson shares an update on the historic case that will be heard at the Supreme Court of Canada building in Ottawa from February 13 to 14. James also answers a question at the top of mind for many Canadians: "Why is this case taking so long?" To support this challenge, please donate to the Justice Centre:
11:17

PROROGATION CHALLENGE UPDATE Constitutional lawyer James Manson James Manson shares an update on the historic case that will be heard at the Supreme Court of Canada building in Ottawa from February 13 to 14. James also answers a question at the top of mind for many Canadians: "Why is this case taking so long?" To support this challenge, please donate to the Justice Centre:

Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms

45,856 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Here I am posting the Third video. They say that the DMK executive in that part is preventing the election officials from doing their work and that he himself is fighting to give it to his own will... He is also fighting that the voters of those who are not permanently in the constituency should not be removed... We also told the regional election office about this issue...and it does not seem that the same person is changing his mind and it is also revealed through this video that a key executive from the DMK is argument regarding this... Therefore, we request the Election Commission to take immediate action to control the improper interference of the ruling DMK government in the #SIR work... Election Commission of India TN Elections CEO
12:21

Here I am posting the Third video. They say that the DMK executive in that part is preventing the election officials from doing their work and that he himself is fighting to give it to his own will... He is also fighting that the voters of those who are not permanently in the constituency should not be removed... We also told the regional election office about this issue...and it does not seem that the same person is changing his mind and it is also revealed through this video that a key executive from the DMK is argument regarding this... Therefore, we request the Election Commission to take immediate action to control the improper interference of the ruling DMK government in the #SIR work... Election Commission of India TN Elections CEO

Sukriv Dharmesh #Say_No_To_Drug&DMK

31,840 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

The Karnataka High Court, before the single bench of Hon’ble Justice M. Nagaprasanna, heard petitions seeking transfer of the investigation into the alleged KPSC recruitment scam, including the probe against suspended KPSC Chairman Shivashankarappa Sahukar and the alleged irregularities in the recruitment of Veterinary Officers to the CBI. During the hearing, Advocate Venkatesh Dalawai appearing for the petitioners, submitted that one of the selected candidates is related to the suspended Chairman and alleged that bribes of around ₹80 lakh were paid to secure appointments. He further brought to the Court’s notice that the State Home Minister had publicly stated that the KPSC scam FIRs had been transferred to the CID for investigation. Expressing serious concern over the allegations, the Court observed that the matter appeared to be a case of “daylight robbery.” The bench questioned how candidates could have secured unusually high marks without the involvement of officials within the KPSC and remarked that the Commission had functioned efficiently until around 1998, after which several recruitment processes had become embroiled in controversy. The Court also observed that an investigation by the State’s own agency, the CID, may not inspire public confidence in a case of such magnitude. High Court directed the State Government to explain why the investigation should not be entrusted to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and ordered it to place the entire investigation material before the Court. The State has been granted one week’s time to file its response and produce the relevant records. The Court also directed that no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioners. Notices have been issued to the State Government and the CBI and the matter has been posted for further hearing on 7 August 2026.
9:05

The Karnataka High Court, before the single bench of Hon’ble Justice M. Nagaprasanna, heard petitions seeking transfer of the investigation into the alleged KPSC recruitment scam, including the probe against suspended KPSC Chairman Shivashankarappa Sahukar and the alleged irregularities in the recruitment of Veterinary Officers to the CBI. During the hearing, Advocate Venkatesh Dalawai appearing for the petitioners, submitted that one of the selected candidates is related to the suspended Chairman and alleged that bribes of around ₹80 lakh were paid to secure appointments. He further brought to the Court’s notice that the State Home Minister had publicly stated that the KPSC scam FIRs had been transferred to the CID for investigation. Expressing serious concern over the allegations, the Court observed that the matter appeared to be a case of “daylight robbery.” The bench questioned how candidates could have secured unusually high marks without the involvement of officials within the KPSC and remarked that the Commission had functioned efficiently until around 1998, after which several recruitment processes had become embroiled in controversy. The Court also observed that an investigation by the State’s own agency, the CID, may not inspire public confidence in a case of such magnitude. High Court directed the State Government to explain why the investigation should not be entrusted to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and ordered it to place the entire investigation material before the Court. The State has been granted one week’s time to file its response and produce the relevant records. The Court also directed that no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioners. Notices have been issued to the State Government and the CBI and the matter has been posted for further hearing on 7 August 2026.

ರವಿ ಕೀರ್ತಿ ಗೌಡ

16,273 görüntüleme • 22 gün önce

#WATCH | Surat, Gujarat | On the Gyanvapi case, Advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain says, "In the Gyanvapi case, the matter is subjudice in the Supreme Court. A 'Shivling' was found there on May 16, 2022, and the Allahabad HC ordered an ASI investigation. On May 19, 2023, the Supreme Court stayed that order. The case is going on at a slow pace in the trial court. The reason for this is that on 12 December 2024, the Supreme Court passed an order that no survey order will be passed in any case and no effective orders will be made in any trial, until this matter of the Place of Worship Act is decided. A huge obstacle has arisen due to this... The Muslim side does not have any proof, and the same is true in the Ram Mandir case, be it Gyanvapi or Mathura's Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi; in any case, they could not provide any proof except saying that they have been offering namaz there for the last few years... I want to clearly state that if you enter the premises of a temple and forcibly offer namaz, then the existence of the temple does not end, and the Supreme Court has also held this issue in the Ram Mandir case..."
1:22

#WATCH | Surat, Gujarat | On the Gyanvapi case, Advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain says, "In the Gyanvapi case, the matter is subjudice in the Supreme Court. A 'Shivling' was found there on May 16, 2022, and the Allahabad HC ordered an ASI investigation. On May 19, 2023, the Supreme Court stayed that order. The case is going on at a slow pace in the trial court. The reason for this is that on 12 December 2024, the Supreme Court passed an order that no survey order will be passed in any case and no effective orders will be made in any trial, until this matter of the Place of Worship Act is decided. A huge obstacle has arisen due to this... The Muslim side does not have any proof, and the same is true in the Ram Mandir case, be it Gyanvapi or Mathura's Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi; in any case, they could not provide any proof except saying that they have been offering namaz there for the last few years... I want to clearly state that if you enter the premises of a temple and forcibly offer namaz, then the existence of the temple does not end, and the Supreme Court has also held this issue in the Ram Mandir case..."

ANI

19,836 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

“If care is not taken, 2027 election may be inclusive. The date for the election, the aura surrounding that day is not good for election. So, the election will be full of Violence, crisis, that in the process of counting the votes, people will just start violence when they start to announce winner. The violence may be so bad that Governorship election may not hold! The violence may start from the north. This may mark the end of APC, ADC and other parties because the ruling party intends to rig the election”. - Ayodele
2:28

“If care is not taken, 2027 election may be inclusive. The date for the election, the aura surrounding that day is not good for election. So, the election will be full of Violence, crisis, that in the process of counting the votes, people will just start violence when they start to announce winner. The violence may be so bad that Governorship election may not hold! The violence may start from the north. This may mark the end of APC, ADC and other parties because the ruling party intends to rig the election”. - Ayodele

DGov

16,150 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

They rejected the nomination of Meenakshi Natarajan in Madhya Pradesh. Within 30 minutes, we sent a letter to the Election Commission seeking an appointment. We then rushed here directly to submit a memorandum to the Election Commission of India, but they rejected completely. We are responsible leaders of this country and elected representatives of the people. Just now, we received information that one or two leaders may be allowed to submit a memorandum to the office. However, we need a physical hearing before the Election Commission to present and argue our case. This is a clear-cut case of the murder of democracy. If even a small element of democracy remains in this country, the Election Commission must intervene in this matter without any delay. If they grant us an appointment tomorrow morning, we are prepared to wait until then. Otherwise, we will pursue all available legal options. : Congress General Secretary (Org.) Shri K C Venugopal
1:50

They rejected the nomination of Meenakshi Natarajan in Madhya Pradesh. Within 30 minutes, we sent a letter to the Election Commission seeking an appointment. We then rushed here directly to submit a memorandum to the Election Commission of India, but they rejected completely. We are responsible leaders of this country and elected representatives of the people. Just now, we received information that one or two leaders may be allowed to submit a memorandum to the office. However, we need a physical hearing before the Election Commission to present and argue our case. This is a clear-cut case of the murder of democracy. If even a small element of democracy remains in this country, the Election Commission must intervene in this matter without any delay. If they grant us an appointment tomorrow morning, we are prepared to wait until then. Otherwise, we will pursue all available legal options. : Congress General Secretary (Org.) Shri K C Venugopal

Congress

174,430 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

According to this video, we can all attest to it that the problems is not the voters but the electoral process. Why will you have less voters than the number of votes in a poling unit. Any political party that is found disrupting the election or electoral process should not be fined but disqualified. This punishment will be the best lesson for those that plan to do the same.
1:08

According to this video, we can all attest to it that the problems is not the voters but the electoral process. Why will you have less voters than the number of votes in a poling unit. Any political party that is found disrupting the election or electoral process should not be fined but disqualified. This punishment will be the best lesson for those that plan to do the same.

KAEGO ♤

19,972 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

CJI compared youth to the country with cockroaches for which he even regretted but some nautankibaaz formed ‘Cockroach Janta Party’ even after knowing that CJI is not going to contest the election, it’s the BJP who is in the power. Now, Maharashtra CM Devendra Fadnavis has compared the youth of the country with “Kutta”, CJP should immediately change their name to “Kutta Janta Party” as it’s the BJP who will fight election and we need to defeat them. It’s the real test of CJP. Also, how exposing corruption is an insult to Maharashtra?
0:36

CJI compared youth to the country with cockroaches for which he even regretted but some nautankibaaz formed ‘Cockroach Janta Party’ even after knowing that CJI is not going to contest the election, it’s the BJP who is in the power. Now, Maharashtra CM Devendra Fadnavis has compared the youth of the country with “Kutta”, CJP should immediately change their name to “Kutta Janta Party” as it’s the BJP who will fight election and we need to defeat them. It’s the real test of CJP. Also, how exposing corruption is an insult to Maharashtra?

Shantanu

55,419 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

“Fellow Nigerians, I Have Come Again To Tell You That We Need To Pray For Peter Obi, Kwankwaso And The NDC. Because It Is Obvious That The NDC Will Win The 2027 Presidential Election, And That Is The Reason Why a Lot Of Uprisings Is Being Generated From Outside The NDC, But It Is Not Getting Into The Party. There Will Never Be Division In The NDC, And We Will Go Into The Next Election With Unity And We Will Take Over Power.” ~ NDC House Of Reps Candidate Abayomi Mighty
2:41

“Fellow Nigerians, I Have Come Again To Tell You That We Need To Pray For Peter Obi, Kwankwaso And The NDC. Because It Is Obvious That The NDC Will Win The 2027 Presidential Election, And That Is The Reason Why a Lot Of Uprisings Is Being Generated From Outside The NDC, But It Is Not Getting Into The Party. There Will Never Be Division In The NDC, And We Will Go Into The Next Election With Unity And We Will Take Over Power.” ~ NDC House Of Reps Candidate Abayomi Mighty

Somto Okonkwo

52,685 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Yesterday, at the Senate plenary, I voted NO to the proviso that has the capacity of whittling down the mandatory electronic transmission of election results from the polling units in Form EC8A. As I have explained severally, this proviso adds nothing to the law but has the capacity to be misused, misunderstood, and used to undermine electoral integrity and transparency. My view is that INEC has already explained that it has the capacity to transmit election results in over 90% of polling units. Therefore, I feel it is the duty of INEC, once we make it mandatory, to come up with guidelines and regulations that will stipulate strict conditions for the few cases where presiding officers may not be able to transmit electronically as a result of communication failure; and these, from the last INEC report, cannot be more than 7%. My view, therefore, is that we should leave it for INEC to handle through its regulations and guidelines. The law should only make provision for mandatory electronic transmission, which we have done, and we should stop there. Hence, I voted yesterday, galvanised opinions, and also joined in voting NO to the inclusion of the proviso. Unfortunately, as I have said, the majority is determined to utilise its numbers, and they did so effectively. In a democracy, the majority has its way, but the minority will have its say. I believe that the majority should be used for the national good and not otherwise. It is now left for INEC to stipulate strict conditions for the admission of election results not transmitted electronically. It is also for the courts to bear in mind the general good when interpreting this section to promote electoral integrity and transparency. As I have said, the citizens must not give up. They should organise and support candidates and parties that promote and respect democratic norms, and organise and mobilise against candidates and parties that do otherwise. We wish Nigeria well. —HSD.
2:59

Yesterday, at the Senate plenary, I voted NO to the proviso that has the capacity of whittling down the mandatory electronic transmission of election results from the polling units in Form EC8A. As I have explained severally, this proviso adds nothing to the law but has the capacity to be misused, misunderstood, and used to undermine electoral integrity and transparency. My view is that INEC has already explained that it has the capacity to transmit election results in over 90% of polling units. Therefore, I feel it is the duty of INEC, once we make it mandatory, to come up with guidelines and regulations that will stipulate strict conditions for the few cases where presiding officers may not be able to transmit electronically as a result of communication failure; and these, from the last INEC report, cannot be more than 7%. My view, therefore, is that we should leave it for INEC to handle through its regulations and guidelines. The law should only make provision for mandatory electronic transmission, which we have done, and we should stop there. Hence, I voted yesterday, galvanised opinions, and also joined in voting NO to the inclusion of the proviso. Unfortunately, as I have said, the majority is determined to utilise its numbers, and they did so effectively. In a democracy, the majority has its way, but the minority will have its say. I believe that the majority should be used for the national good and not otherwise. It is now left for INEC to stipulate strict conditions for the admission of election results not transmitted electronically. It is also for the courts to bear in mind the general good when interpreting this section to promote electoral integrity and transparency. As I have said, the citizens must not give up. They should organise and support candidates and parties that promote and respect democratic norms, and organise and mobilise against candidates and parties that do otherwise. We wish Nigeria well. —HSD.

Henry Seriake Dickson

64,436 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

I talked to Ms. Meenakshi Natarajan and several other senior Congress leaders yesterday when I learned of this most remarkable and astonishing rejection of her nomination papers by the Returning Officer. This is, on the face of it, patently and blatantly illegal because no criminal case, in the eyes of the law, exists against Ms. Natarajan. This is because, in a private complaint, which anyone can file against anyone, no criminal case comes into existence unless and until the magistrate or the concerned judge takes cognizance. At the highest, in the present case of Ms. Natarajan, there is a notice by a court to her on a private complaint well before that court has taken cognizance, and indeed, the issue of cognizance is yet to be decided after hearing her by that court. So where is the question of a criminal case which she had to disclose? This is well established by Indian jurisprudence, including a High Court judgment directly on point. It is not possible that the Returning Officer took an independent, objective, fair, and impartial stance; otherwise, there is no way in law her nomination could have been rejected.. I hope and trust that the Election Commission in Delhi, the central body, will exercise its inherent, administrative, and superior powers to reverse this decision or order. Otherwise, it would be a very serious violation of the level playing field principle. It would create a highly skewed system in a democratic election, thereby affecting democracy and the basic structure itself. There is still time, since today is the last day for withdrawal. No one can, and should, in a true democracy, be denied even the right to nominate oneself for the Rajya Sabha in this manner. : Abhishek Singhvi ji Chairperson, AICC Law, RTI & HR Dept.
2:38

I talked to Ms. Meenakshi Natarajan and several other senior Congress leaders yesterday when I learned of this most remarkable and astonishing rejection of her nomination papers by the Returning Officer. This is, on the face of it, patently and blatantly illegal because no criminal case, in the eyes of the law, exists against Ms. Natarajan. This is because, in a private complaint, which anyone can file against anyone, no criminal case comes into existence unless and until the magistrate or the concerned judge takes cognizance. At the highest, in the present case of Ms. Natarajan, there is a notice by a court to her on a private complaint well before that court has taken cognizance, and indeed, the issue of cognizance is yet to be decided after hearing her by that court. So where is the question of a criminal case which she had to disclose? This is well established by Indian jurisprudence, including a High Court judgment directly on point. It is not possible that the Returning Officer took an independent, objective, fair, and impartial stance; otherwise, there is no way in law her nomination could have been rejected.. I hope and trust that the Election Commission in Delhi, the central body, will exercise its inherent, administrative, and superior powers to reverse this decision or order. Otherwise, it would be a very serious violation of the level playing field principle. It would create a highly skewed system in a democratic election, thereby affecting democracy and the basic structure itself. There is still time, since today is the last day for withdrawal. No one can, and should, in a true democracy, be denied even the right to nominate oneself for the Rajya Sabha in this manner. : Abhishek Singhvi ji Chairperson, AICC Law, RTI & HR Dept.

Congress

48,851 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

🚨 NOW: The Tyler Robinson-Charlie Kirk assassination trial is a DEATH PENALTY CASE, which is exactly why the killer was spotted PANICKING in the courtroom while bombshell tapes played "This is a death penalty case. A lot of this evidence, they're going to have to use later on to convince jurors after a conviction to put him to death, the greatest punishment that we have in this country." "So some of this evidence about the etchings and understanding how he almost viewed this as a joke is going to go a long way with those jurors and might be part of the reason why prosecutors wanted to make sure that it was admissible at this point in the proceedings." "I think after this week, his team is probably seriously thinking about going to the prosecution and asking for that [plea deal] hat in hand. But it's up to the prosecution whether or not they want to take the death penalty off the table."
1:27

🚨 NOW: The Tyler Robinson-Charlie Kirk assassination trial is a DEATH PENALTY CASE, which is exactly why the killer was spotted PANICKING in the courtroom while bombshell tapes played "This is a death penalty case. A lot of this evidence, they're going to have to use later on to convince jurors after a conviction to put him to death, the greatest punishment that we have in this country." "So some of this evidence about the etchings and understanding how he almost viewed this as a joke is going to go a long way with those jurors and might be part of the reason why prosecutors wanted to make sure that it was admissible at this point in the proceedings." "I think after this week, his team is probably seriously thinking about going to the prosecution and asking for that [plea deal] hat in hand. But it's up to the prosecution whether or not they want to take the death penalty off the table."

Eric Daugherty

140,799 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce