正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Greg Brockman talked about this on The Knowledge Project. "Our data centers use incredibly little water." "That's actually misinformation." "It's less than a household. It's because it's a closed loop." "Think of it as like a swimming pool of water, and you just circle it around. And so it's...

272,526 次观看 • 26 天前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.: "Fluoride was put in the water in the 1940s. And it was put in the water to stop tooth decay. Yes. But now it's recognized that most of our mouth washes and toothpaste have fluoride in them and you don't need fluoride in the water and it's a very inefficient way of preventing tooth decay because you're getting it in people's blood and that's how it's exposing the teeth." "And as it turns out, fluoride is very, very dangerous. It causes IQ loss. We know, you know, they haven't done a lot of studies that they should have done, but there are extensive studies that show if you put fluoride in water at double the rate that EPA now allows, that is in all of our water systems, they use it in this country, that it causes dramatic IQ loss in children and particularly in unborn fetuses. It also causes bone cancer, and we had an explosion of bone cancer beginning in the 1940s." "It causes arthritis, and it causes the deterioration of bones, of bone fractures, and it causes thyroid injuries. It also calcifies the pineal gland of the human brain, which is the part of our brain that actually creates our spiritual feelings. And so it's just something, yeah. It's something that you wouldn't want in a water supply. And it's a very easy, it's gonna have to be taken out anyway because of this court case, but the EPA will drag its feet and take 10 years or 15 years to do it." "This is so shocking to me because, you know, being against fluoride in the water was the single most reliable marker of mental illness, according to the US media for like, 60 years. Well, you know, it was, it was the, it was the subject of a conspiracy theory. Right. Put in our water by communists. Exactly. In order to sap the figure from the American people. And as it turns out, you know, it actually, the health injuries that... were predicted for it, were not exactly, but there are profound health injuries and it's just insane to have it in our water." "It's absolutely insane. So why would EPA fight the removal of it? CDC says it's one of the 10 greatest health introductions of any, or inventions of any in the 20th century. And so they've stuck their neck, it's like everything else that they do. They stick their neck out on something, they promote it to the American public and then they don't wanna dial it back." "They do not wanna admit that they made a mistake. And they do this with a lot of products. Once they approve them, they're gonna fight to keep them there. But it's one of the easiest thing you can do to start restoring American health is just get the floor out of the water. You're gonna have a higher IQ children. You're gonna have less bone cancer, less..."

Camus

130,603 次观看 • 1 年前

Data Centers are coaching their workers on how to lie to the public and their family about how Data Center water usage is actually a good thing “I work at an architecture firm that mainly does data centers, and just to give you all an idea of how out of touch the people making these things are. Today we had a meeting where we were essentially asked to defend the water usage of data centers to our friends and family in conversation at the dinner table or online. They provided them with a graph to break down water usage (included) but I’ll go over it The chart compares “domestic water usage” (toilets, sinks, etc.) for a typical-sized closed-loop data center of 600,000 gallons per year against other things of “equivalent square footage”: Cornfield: 5.85 million gallons Vineyard: 5.60 million Golf course: 5.45 million Peanut farm: 2.88 million Movie theater: 935,000 5 households: 730,000 They make the point that “Data centers aren’t the big water users you think” But that’s not really true “It's still using an incredible amount of water — and the key piece of evidence here was when someone gets pissed at a data center's water usage, ask them if they like golf. And when they say yes, let them know that a golf course uses 9 times as much water much water as a data center. That'll shut them up, because no one disapproves of golf courses using an exorbitant amount of water…” Not to mention, this is incredibly misleading The 600,000 gallons is mostly just building operations of things like sinks and bathrooms. It downplays or completely excludes the main water use, which is cooling the servers More fake propaganda

Wall Street Apes

53,761 次观看 • 17 天前

Former BlackRock fund manager Ed Dowd on students booing AI: "[The] sales pitch seems to be white collar jobs are going to disappear in 18 months. We need your electricity and your water. Good luck" "That's not a good pitch" "Executives actually say this" "I think the constraining factor [for AI buildout] is electrons, water, and social acceptability of this. And there's going to be a lot of fights. So it's all coming to a head" This clip of Dowd (Edward Dowd), a former BlackRock fund manager and co-founder of Phinance Technologies, is taken from a discussion with Adam Taggart (Adam Taggart) posted to YouTube on May 21, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "I've already seen the AI bulls come out and defend the students booing. They say the same sentiment occurred around the Internet, which I was there. It did not. No one was booing anybody talking about the Internet... So that did not happen. "They got a marketing sales pitch problem and I pointed this out on X. Their sales pitch seems to be white collar jobs are going to disappear in 18 months. We need your electricity and your water. Good luck. That's not a good pitch. "These executives actually say this. Now part of the reason I don't think the AI bubble is going to continue is because there actually is a shortage of, you know, capacity to run these data centers and there's not enough water to do it. So they're running into, running into opposition. "So I'm of the opinion Capex is going to be scaled back as they realize they can't plug into anything. And there's somebody on X, who's an analyst who's running around the country looking at all the data centers. And he said you'd be surprised at how many of them are not completed yet. "So there seems to be this, all this future Capex announcements, but then the actual going in the ground, getting it up and running is not as fast as people think. And that's the bottleneck and that's how you end up with like a ton of, inventory of Nvidia chips and everything that you can't deploy it. So it's sitting in a warehouse. "And you don't even need, and you don't need to order any more Nvidia chips. I think the constraining factor is electrons, water and social acceptability of this. And there's going to be a lot of fights. So it's all coming to a head."

Sense Receptor

68,272 次观看 • 22 天前

The Truth About Electric Cars. Each Individual Charging Station Is Using The Equivalent Power Of 280 Homes Every Hour 🚨 If All Chargers At One Station Are Being Used, The Power Being Used Is Equivalent Is 1,080 Homes Every Hour “I think I'm just doing a quick little video here just to give people an idea of how much energy it takes to charge an electric vehicle. I'm at Electrify America. This is a 350 kilowatt station. I'm consuming roughly 137 kilowatts. It'll fluctuate. Sometimes I can go up to the full 350. But to put this into perspective, an average home consumes 1.25 kilowatts per hour. 135 kilowatts per hour. It's like the equivalent of 106 homes on the grid, just this one station. Now, if I was gonna get the full 350 kilowatts like these can supply, that would be the equivalent of 280 homes. Now think about all six chargers running at full capacity. That's like 1,080 homes on the grid. Just a little food for thought. It's things people don't realize the amount of energy it takes to fast charge these batteries. It's a huge amount of electricity. And now you understand why the electric companies can't even supply that much power to one spot. It's like think of 1600 homes and how much copper and wire that would take to supply that many houses. So yeah, it's pretty cool. Somebody else just pulled in and yeah, there goes another 280 homes on the grid as soon as he plucks in. So just a little food for thought. I do love my electric vehicle. They're awesome. They're quiet, but it's just something that people don't really think about. Show you my dash. They're great cars. I really like them. So you forget about range and all that. I'm just talking about what it takes to fast charge one. It's it's a ridiculous amount of money. Okay. Now I'm at like a hundred. So that's like a hundred homes right there. Hundred and twenty kilowatts because one point two one kilowatts per hour is what a is what a house uses. So yeah. They got to figure something out because to have every car in America on the grid, it's going to be... I don't even know what those numbers would be. Well, just food for thought. And I thought I'd talk about it while I'm sitting here charging, waiting. It's another thing. Got to wait here for 30 minutes. And then sometimes Electrify America. Half of these chargers are broken. Or I think they're throttling them down because of the grid can't even handle it. So I think that's what's happening. I don't know. But like, for instance, this one here wasn't working. So oh yeah, look unavailable. You know, there you go. That's usually the case. So either you're waiting in line for somebody or half of these chargers don't even work. And I don't I'm not complaining. Maybe I sound like it. But it's it's an issue and hopefully they figure this out. And where's the electricity coming from at night? It's not solar. And I don't know. You guys can comment and blow steam, whatever you want. I just wanted to show you what it's like and give you a little concept of the amount of energy used. All right, talk to you later.”

Wall Street Apes

1,241,000 次观看 • 2 年前