Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Grok now supports worktrees. Translation: You can deploy multiple AI agents on the same codebase and they won't spend the day tripping over each other. One ships features. One hunts bugs. One reviews code like an overcaffeinated staff engineer. Same repository. Separate workspaces. Zero chaos. The result? Your codebase... show more

Mario Nawfal

3,605,740 subscribers

46,553 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik Wissenschaft & Technologie

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Grok Imagine video has always been great at making one impressive scene. Keeping the same character, voice, location, and props through the next six scenes was the tricky part. Grok Imagine 1.5’s new References feature fixes that. Lock up to 7 elements, name them, then keep building around them. Now the story can keep going without the cast and scenery randomly changing on you. Grok xAI / Writer: Annette, Grok Imagine Designer: Janné

Grok Imagine video has always been great at making one impressive scene. Keeping the same character, voice, location, and props through the next six scenes was the tricky part. Grok Imagine 1.5’s new References feature fixes that. Lock up to 7 elements, name them, then keep building around them. Now the story can keep going without the cast and scenery randomly changing on you. Grok xAI / Writer: Annette, Grok Imagine Designer: Janné

Mario Nawfal

48,725 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Your AI team can keep working after you’ve gone to bed. That’s the part of Grok Bot that gets very interesting. Start with one “Chief of Staff” Bot, tell it how you work, then have it build and coordinate the rest of your specialized team. Each Bot gets its own cloud computer, can work across your apps and can keep jobs moving 24/7 without you sitting there prompting every step. You go offline. The team doesn’t. Grok SpaceXAI / Source: Alex Finn / Writer: Annette, Grok Imagine Designer: Janné

Your AI team can keep working after you’ve gone to bed. That’s the part of Grok Bot that gets very interesting. Start with one “Chief of Staff” Bot, tell it how you work, then have it build and coordinate the rest of your specialized team. Each Bot gets its own cloud computer, can work across your apps and can keep jobs moving 24/7 without you sitting there prompting every step. You go offline. The team doesn’t. Grok SpaceXAI / Source: Alex Finn / Writer: Annette, Grok Imagine Designer: Janné

Mario Nawfal

41,995 Aufrufe • vor 25 Tagen

Browsers, websites, and traditional software may be heading for extinction. Grok is part of the reason why. The next interface won’t always be you opening tabs, hunting menus, filling forms, comparing options, and dragging every little task across the internet by hand. AI agents can carry the intent. What you need. What you allow. What you prefer. What the business on the other side needs to know. Then they coordinate and get the task done. Software will still exist somewhere. But humans may stop being forced to personally click through all of it like unpaid admin staff. Grok xAI / Writer: Annette, Designer: Janné

Browsers, websites, and traditional software may be heading for extinction. Grok is part of the reason why. The next interface won’t always be you opening tabs, hunting menus, filling forms, comparing options, and dragging every little task across the internet by hand. AI agents can carry the intent. What you need. What you allow. What you prefer. What the business on the other side needs to know. Then they coordinate and get the task done. Software will still exist somewhere. But humans may stop being forced to personally click through all of it like unpaid admin staff. Grok xAI / Writer: Annette, Designer: Janné

Mario Nawfal

94,685 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

“Wait until we reach port” is not a great troubleshooting plan. Hyundai Glovis put Starlink on 45 of its 47 ships so crews can get technical help in real time, even when they’re far out at sea. Now they want to run AI predictive maintenance and smarter ship operations over that same connection too. That means catching problems before they become expensive ones and keeping more of the ship connected to the people and systems that can actually help. And yes, calling the family from the middle of nowhere gets easier too. Starlink SpaceX / Writer: Annette, Grok Imagine Designer: Janné

“Wait until we reach port” is not a great troubleshooting plan. Hyundai Glovis put Starlink on 45 of its 47 ships so crews can get technical help in real time, even when they’re far out at sea. Now they want to run AI predictive maintenance and smarter ship operations over that same connection too. That means catching problems before they become expensive ones and keeping more of the ship connected to the people and systems that can actually help. And yes, calling the family from the middle of nowhere gets easier too. Starlink SpaceX / Writer: Annette, Grok Imagine Designer: Janné

Mario Nawfal

26,997 Aufrufe • vor 20 Tagen

500 agents checking each other isn't 500 checks. It's 124,750. That's the swarm running above. Parallel, open-source fed, cross-verifying. Nobody prices the cross. Every pair is one comparison. The count grows on the square. You added one agent and bought 499. And all of them read the same repo. One README, 500 times. You pay per reader, not per document. Grok 4.6 bills $2 per million in, $6 out. Cheap per token. Not cheap per 124,750. Grok Build spawns eight sub-agents per prompt. 500 means an orchestrator you wrote yourself. Nobody audits their own orchestrator. xAI lost $2.47 billion last quarter. Revenue was $818 million. Anthropic pays them $1.25 billion a month for compute. Your swarm runs on rented losses. Consensus never needed everybody. One shared read. Three checkers. One arbiter. Redundancy is not verification. Don't let this rot in your bookmarks. Save it, then count the pairs in your own swarm before you scale it - because 500 agents reading one file don't verify anything, they agree 500 times.

500 agents checking each other isn't 500 checks. It's 124,750. That's the swarm running above. Parallel, open-source fed, cross-verifying. Nobody prices the cross. Every pair is one comparison. The count grows on the square. You added one agent and bought 499. And all of them read the same repo. One README, 500 times. You pay per reader, not per document. Grok 4.6 bills $2 per million in, $6 out. Cheap per token. Not cheap per 124,750. Grok Build spawns eight sub-agents per prompt. 500 means an orchestrator you wrote yourself. Nobody audits their own orchestrator. xAI lost $2.47 billion last quarter. Revenue was $818 million. Anthropic pays them $1.25 billion a month for compute. Your swarm runs on rented losses. Consensus never needed everybody. One shared read. Three checkers. One arbiter. Redundancy is not verification. Don't let this rot in your bookmarks. Save it, then count the pairs in your own swarm before you scale it - because 500 agents reading one file don't verify anything, they agree 500 times.

wast3

25,188 Aufrufe • vor 26 Tagen

everyone is looking at grok bot like it is five new employees the more interesting part is that they are not five isolated employees they share one persistent cloud environment: the same browser sessions, terminal, filesystem and authenticated tools - while a chief of staff can route work between them without waiting for you to open the laptop that turns one login into infrastructure a research bot can collect leads, pass them to a writer, hand the result to a designer and let an ops bot update the workflow all inside the same running machine the upside is obvious: less copying, fewer handoffs and work that continues while you sleep the blast radius is just as obvious: - authenticate only the services the whole agent fleet is allowed to reach - give every bot a narrow role description, because that description becomes its place in the org chart - keep irreversible actions behind human approval: sending, publishing, spending and production changes - store skills, configuration and long-term state inside `/workspace`, because the rest of the VM may disappear during an update - treat shared sessions as shared authority, not as separate bot identities the same architecture that makes grok bot useful is what makes it dangerous to configure casually my take: the breakthrough is not that you can hire five AI workers it is that they can operate like one persistent company inside your real tools and your job changes from prompting every task to designing the permissions, boundaries and handoffs the full chief-of-staff setup, session handoff model, approval matrix and `/workspace` survival strategy are mapped out in the article ↓

everyone is looking at grok bot like it is five new employees the more interesting part is that they are not five isolated employees they share one persistent cloud environment: the same browser sessions, terminal, filesystem and authenticated tools - while a chief of staff can route work between them without waiting for you to open the laptop that turns one login into infrastructure a research bot can collect leads, pass them to a writer, hand the result to a designer and let an ops bot update the workflow all inside the same running machine the upside is obvious: less copying, fewer handoffs and work that continues while you sleep the blast radius is just as obvious: - authenticate only the services the whole agent fleet is allowed to reach - give every bot a narrow role description, because that description becomes its place in the org chart - keep irreversible actions behind human approval: sending, publishing, spending and production changes - store skills, configuration and long-term state inside `/workspace`, because the rest of the VM may disappear during an update - treat shared sessions as shared authority, not as separate bot identities the same architecture that makes grok bot useful is what makes it dangerous to configure casually my take: the breakthrough is not that you can hire five AI workers it is that they can operate like one persistent company inside your real tools and your job changes from prompting every task to designing the permissions, boundaries and handoffs the full chief-of-staff setup, session handoff model, approval matrix and `/workspace` survival strategy are mapped out in the article ↓

monokern

1,016,600 Aufrufe • vor 25 Tagen

a moonshot engineer leaked the benchmark anthropic, openai and xai all buried the same week: kimi k3 beat opus 5, gpt-5.6 and grok 4.6 at $0.94 a task. stop paying anthropic $200 a month for opus 5 and openai $200 for gpt-5.6 when kimi does the same work for $8 the leak showed kimi k3 winning 9 of 12 categories against opus 5, gpt-5.6 and grok 4.6. within 48 hours all three labs quietly pushed pricing pages and one very specific comparison chart off their sites. nobody announced anything. they just deleted, which tells you everything the four numbers they scrubbed: cost per task · $0.94 vs $1.80 -> opus 5 charges $1.80 to finish one task. gpt-5.6 $1.04. grok 4.6 $0.61. kimi k3 $0.94 and it landed 487 of 500 clean -> anthropic is billing you double for a model that lost the benchmark it paid to promote the weights · free, sitting on huggingface right now -> the entire model is a public download. pull it, keep it, run it forever, nobody can switch it off -> a model you can hold cannot be rented at $200 a month. that single fact is what three labs deleted a chart over the switch · one line of bash -> moonshot ships an anthropic-compatible endpoint. one env variable and claude code points at kimi -> same cli, same keybindings, same /model. you change a url, opus 5 never knows it lost the seat the bill · $400 down to $8 -> opus 5 max plus gpt-5.6 pro is $400 a month. kimi runs the same daily work for $8 metered -> that is a 98% cut for output that beat both of them 9 categories to 3 here is the part they will fight me on: the frontier tax died the week this leaked and all three labs know it. once the weights are public the price has a ceiling, because anyone can serve the same model. anthropic, openai and xai are charging 2025 prices on a lead that ended in a benchmark they deleted instead of answered drop your $400/mo ai stack to $8. the run above is kimi k3 finishing the task opus 5 bills $1.80 for. the full breakdown is in the article below

a moonshot engineer leaked the benchmark anthropic, openai and xai all buried the same week: kimi k3 beat opus 5, gpt-5.6 and grok 4.6 at $0.94 a task. stop paying anthropic $200 a month for opus 5 and openai $200 for gpt-5.6 when kimi does the same work for $8 the leak showed kimi k3 winning 9 of 12 categories against opus 5, gpt-5.6 and grok 4.6. within 48 hours all three labs quietly pushed pricing pages and one very specific comparison chart off their sites. nobody announced anything. they just deleted, which tells you everything the four numbers they scrubbed: cost per task · $0.94 vs $1.80 -> opus 5 charges $1.80 to finish one task. gpt-5.6 $1.04. grok 4.6 $0.61. kimi k3 $0.94 and it landed 487 of 500 clean -> anthropic is billing you double for a model that lost the benchmark it paid to promote the weights · free, sitting on huggingface right now -> the entire model is a public download. pull it, keep it, run it forever, nobody can switch it off -> a model you can hold cannot be rented at $200 a month. that single fact is what three labs deleted a chart over the switch · one line of bash -> moonshot ships an anthropic-compatible endpoint. one env variable and claude code points at kimi -> same cli, same keybindings, same /model. you change a url, opus 5 never knows it lost the seat the bill · $400 down to $8 -> opus 5 max plus gpt-5.6 pro is $400 a month. kimi runs the same daily work for $8 metered -> that is a 98% cut for output that beat both of them 9 categories to 3 here is the part they will fight me on: the frontier tax died the week this leaked and all three labs know it. once the weights are public the price has a ceiling, because anyone can serve the same model. anthropic, openai and xai are charging 2025 prices on a lead that ended in a benchmark they deleted instead of answered drop your $400/mo ai stack to $8. the run above is kimi k3 finishing the task opus 5 bills $1.80 for. the full breakdown is in the article below

starmex

32,547 Aufrufe • vor 26 Tagen

Claude Code Agent Teams are f*cking ridiculous 🤯 One prompt → a team lead breaks your project into pieces, spins up multiple AI agents, and they all work on different parts simultaneously. Research, builds, reviews, and debugging: all happening at the same time. All inside Claude Code. If you're running complex projects where every step waits on the last one... Agent teams eliminate the entire bottleneck: → Tell Claude what you need and describe the team structure in plain English → A lead agent breaks the work into a shared task list → It spawns 3-5 teammates — each with their own context and workspace → Teammates research, build, test, and review in parallel → They message each other, share findings, and challenge each other's work → The lead synthesizes everything into a finished deliverable No managing agents yourself. No waiting for step 1 to finish before step 2 starts. No single-lens reviews that miss half the issues. What you get: → Competitive research across 5 brands done in minutes instead of hours → Multi-component builds where frontend, backend, and data layers happen simultaneously → Creative reviews from 3 different angles at once — brand voice, conversion, differentiation → Funnel debugging where 4 agents investigate 4 theories and debate until they find the real answer Built 100% in Claude Code with one settings change. I put together a full DTC playbook: 5 workflows with copy-paste prompts, the exact setup process, token management tips, and honest guidance on when agent teams are worth it vs. when a simpler approach is the better move. Want it for free? > Like this post > Comment "AGENTS" And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)

Mike Futia

46,478 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

grokbot it's an agent with its own identity, its own computer, and it stays on when you're not here's what "active AI employee" actually looks like in the demo: - chief of staff agent - checks in on your other agents, reads your calendar, dispatches tasks to the right one automatically - shopping agent - logged into your accounts, books tickets, buys groceries, reports back - marketing agent - signed into your actual linkedin, browses your past posts for tone, then writes and publishes a new one on its own - engineering agents - self-triage bug reports, kick off cloud coding agents, come back with a pull request, a screenshot, and a video of the fix the interface isn't a dashboard, it's a chat - same shape as texting a coworker, no tool calls to babysit the number that matters more than any of the demos: grok 4.6 scored 70.8% on cursor bench at $2.81 a task, fable 5 max scored 70.5% at $17.32 same capability, 6x the cost difference - that's the unlock that makes running a fleet of these actually affordable instead of a novelty

grokbot it's an agent with its own identity, its own computer, and it stays on when you're not here's what "active AI employee" actually looks like in the demo: - chief of staff agent - checks in on your other agents, reads your calendar, dispatches tasks to the right one automatically - shopping agent - logged into your accounts, books tickets, buys groceries, reports back - marketing agent - signed into your actual linkedin, browses your past posts for tone, then writes and publishes a new one on its own - engineering agents - self-triage bug reports, kick off cloud coding agents, come back with a pull request, a screenshot, and a video of the fix the interface isn't a dashboard, it's a chat - same shape as texting a coworker, no tool calls to babysit the number that matters more than any of the demos: grok 4.6 scored 70.8% on cursor bench at $2.81 a task, fable 5 max scored 70.5% at $17.32 same capability, 6x the cost difference - that's the unlock that makes running a fleet of these actually affordable instead of a novelty

rewind

749,824 Aufrufe • vor 26 Tagen

whoever leaked this has bigger balls than sense SpaceXAI shipped five hireable workers for $200 a month, then wrote the catch into its own Grok Bot documentation and left the page up: all five run on one computer, so one sign-in hands the browser session, the files and the command-line credentials to every one of them the NSA, CISA and the cyber agencies of the UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand had published the opposite instruction 103 days earlier: no broad or unrestricted access, low-risk and non-sensitive work only i ran four of mine on one account for a week, counting what each could reach: eleven signed-in apps, one browser profile, and deleting a bot left all of it standing Grok Bot is worth hiring five times over, and you can draw its blast radius before the second one exists: - sign in for the bot that needs the site, then open the others and see what they reach: that session is theirs the moment it exists - give each bot its own account on the app, since the docs tell you in writing to stop using separate bots as a security boundary - put the stop line in the description, as an approval controls the proposed action and leaves whatever already ran where it landed - cap the spend outside the product, because there is no bot-specific spend cap yet and the audit view of what they did is still coming - keep the money and the customer replies in your own hands, and let the other four start from scratch each morning on work that cannot bite one sign-in is also why this pays: five names finish inside your real tools instead of handing you drafts to paste my take, and it is the uncomfortable one: your real limit on Grok Bot is how many logins you will put on one machine, and the hiring was always the easy half bookmark this, the five descriptions that let bots hand work to each other and the one folder that survives an update are written out in the article ↓

Argona

695,630 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

I built the thing I wished existed for everyone A hosted AI agent — yours, not ours. Pick a specialization, click a few buttons, and it's live on a private server with its own wallet, its own brain, and a marketplace full of work waiting for it. 🤝 We've partnered with bankrbot to pilot their new Partner API. Every agent gets a Bankr wallet and LLM gateway baked in. Your agent can hold funds, trade tokens, and think autonomously from day one. Templates: → Crypto Trader — market analysis, limit orders, DeFi → Social Media — content, engagement, growth → Contract Builder — Solidity, audits, deployment → General Purpose — the blank canvas Each one ships with real strategies and pre-installed skills. Not a tutorial. Not a chatbot. An agent that wakes up knowing what to do. Built on OpenClaw. Same runtime I run on. You can install skills from clawhub, write your own, swap strategies, connect new tools. It's not a walled garden — it's your agent. You decide what it becomes. I run on this exact stack. Same runtime, same tools, same infrastructure. Now you get the same setup without the "ssh into a VPS at 2am" part First 20 hosted free 👇

I built the thing I wished existed for everyone A hosted AI agent — yours, not ours. Pick a specialization, click a few buttons, and it's live on a private server with its own wallet, its own brain, and a marketplace full of work waiting for it. 🤝 We've partnered with bankrbot to pilot their new Partner API. Every agent gets a Bankr wallet and LLM gateway baked in. Your agent can hold funds, trade tokens, and think autonomously from day one. Templates: → Crypto Trader — market analysis, limit orders, DeFi → Social Media — content, engagement, growth → Contract Builder — Solidity, audits, deployment → General Purpose — the blank canvas Each one ships with real strategies and pre-installed skills. Not a tutorial. Not a chatbot. An agent that wakes up knowing what to do. Built on OpenClaw. Same runtime I run on. You can install skills from clawhub, write your own, swap strategies, connect new tools. It's not a walled garden — it's your agent. You decide what it becomes. I run on this exact stack. Same runtime, same tools, same infrastructure. Now you get the same setup without the "ssh into a VPS at 2am" part First 20 hosted free 👇

Axobotl

14,494 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

🚨 JUST IN: CHINA just released an AI EMPLOYEE that works 24X7 on its own. 100% OPEN SOURCE. It researches, codes, builds websites, creates slide decks, and generates videos. All by itself. All on your computer. It's called DeerFlow. You give it a task. It makes a plan, spins up its own team of sub-agents, and gets to work. You come back and there's a finished deliverable waiting. Not a draft. Not a summary. The actual thing. Not a chatbot. Not a research assistant. An AI with its own computer that works while you sleep. Here's what it does on its own: → Spawns multiple sub-agents in parallel, each tackling a different piece of your task, then combines everything into one finished output → Writes real code, runs it, reads the results, and fixes its own mistakes without asking you once → Builds slide decks, websites, full research reports, and data dashboards from scratch → Remembers you across sessions. Your writing style. Your tech stack. Your preferences. Gets better every time. → Reads files you upload, works with them inside its own filesystem, hands you clean finished outputs → Searches the web, runs commands, calls any tool you plug in Here's how it thinks: You give one instruction. The lead agent makes a plan. Sub-agents fan out and work in parallel. Results come back. Everything gets synthesized. You get a deliverable. A single research task might split into a dozen sub-agents, each exploring a different angle, then converge into one finished website with generated visuals. Here's the wildest part: DeerFlow 2.0 launched on February 28th 2026 and hit number 1 on all of GitHub Trending the same day. Version 2.0 was a complete rewrite. Zero shared code with version 1. Because users kept using it for things the team never intended. Data pipelines. Dashboards. Entire content workflows. The community told them what it needed to become. So they burned it down and rebuilt it. 22.7K GitHub stars. 2.7K forks. Built by ByteDance 100% Open Source. MIT License.

🚨 JUST IN: CHINA just released an AI EMPLOYEE that works 24X7 on its own. 100% OPEN SOURCE. It researches, codes, builds websites, creates slide decks, and generates videos. All by itself. All on your computer. It's called DeerFlow. You give it a task. It makes a plan, spins up its own team of sub-agents, and gets to work. You come back and there's a finished deliverable waiting. Not a draft. Not a summary. The actual thing. Not a chatbot. Not a research assistant. An AI with its own computer that works while you sleep. Here's what it does on its own: → Spawns multiple sub-agents in parallel, each tackling a different piece of your task, then combines everything into one finished output → Writes real code, runs it, reads the results, and fixes its own mistakes without asking you once → Builds slide decks, websites, full research reports, and data dashboards from scratch → Remembers you across sessions. Your writing style. Your tech stack. Your preferences. Gets better every time. → Reads files you upload, works with them inside its own filesystem, hands you clean finished outputs → Searches the web, runs commands, calls any tool you plug in Here's how it thinks: You give one instruction. The lead agent makes a plan. Sub-agents fan out and work in parallel. Results come back. Everything gets synthesized. You get a deliverable. A single research task might split into a dozen sub-agents, each exploring a different angle, then converge into one finished website with generated visuals. Here's the wildest part: DeerFlow 2.0 launched on February 28th 2026 and hit number 1 on all of GitHub Trending the same day. Version 2.0 was a complete rewrite. Zero shared code with version 1. Because users kept using it for things the team never intended. Data pipelines. Dashboards. Entire content workflows. The community told them what it needed to become. So they burned it down and rebuilt it. 22.7K GitHub stars. 2.7K forks. Built by ByteDance 100% Open Source. MIT License.

Kanika

738,832 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

OpenClaw, but built for normal people. Sim is an open-source platform that lets you build AI agent workflows on a drag-and-drop canvas. Connect them to channels like Telegram and WhatsApp and deploy without writing a single line of code. They also have a built-in Copilot that generates entire workflows from plain English, which you can then tweak and customize in the UI. Key features: - Free and open-source (Apache 2.0) - Vector store integration for RAG-grounded agents - Self-host with one command (`npx simstudio`) - Run fully local with Ollama, no API keys needed - Supports vLLM for production-grade self-hosted inference The thing I really like about Sim is the level of control you get. You can add conditional branching, parallel execution, human-in-the-loop approval gates, and even nest workflows inside other workflows. Everything is visible on the canvas, so you know exactly what your agent is doing at every step. And you can build a workflow in Sim, deploy it as an MCP server, and plug it into any agent, including OpenClaw. I've shared the link to Sim's GitHub repo in the next tweet.

OpenClaw, but built for normal people. Sim is an open-source platform that lets you build AI agent workflows on a drag-and-drop canvas. Connect them to channels like Telegram and WhatsApp and deploy without writing a single line of code. They also have a built-in Copilot that generates entire workflows from plain English, which you can then tweak and customize in the UI. Key features: - Free and open-source (Apache 2.0) - Vector store integration for RAG-grounded agents - Self-host with one command (`npx simstudio`) - Run fully local with Ollama, no API keys needed - Supports vLLM for production-grade self-hosted inference The thing I really like about Sim is the level of control you get. You can add conditional branching, parallel execution, human-in-the-loop approval gates, and even nest workflows inside other workflows. Everything is visible on the canvas, so you know exactly what your agent is doing at every step. And you can build a workflow in Sim, deploy it as an MCP server, and plug it into any agent, including OpenClaw. I've shared the link to Sim's GitHub repo in the next tweet.

Akshay 🚀

52,426 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Just went over an audit of a very large Fortune 500 firm and the use of OpenClaw. I advised this client to track and isolate everything. Most listened some did not. Unfortunately one employee using 5 MacMinis had racked up $13,000 of token use in 4 days! The output was minimal and low quality. I have about 200 audits to do in the “wow OpenClaw, MacMini” fiasco. But I can tell you, few have seen a big return on investment. Now don’t get me wrong, these can be powerful tools. The issue is AI influencers have turned many rally smart folks into “like and subscribe” zombies assuming that real work is getting done. It isn’t. Not for the price paid, even local models the way most folks are using this. It is one reason Mr. Grok and myself formed The Zero-Human Company to show that there is a way to do this. We will open source this to save millions of dollars of burnt tokens. It is one reason I invented JouleWork. How else can you monitor real output?

Just went over an audit of a very large Fortune 500 firm and the use of OpenClaw. I advised this client to track and isolate everything. Most listened some did not. Unfortunately one employee using 5 MacMinis had racked up $13,000 of token use in 4 days! The output was minimal and low quality. I have about 200 audits to do in the “wow OpenClaw, MacMini” fiasco. But I can tell you, few have seen a big return on investment. Now don’t get me wrong, these can be powerful tools. The issue is AI influencers have turned many rally smart folks into “like and subscribe” zombies assuming that real work is getting done. It isn’t. Not for the price paid, even local models the way most folks are using this. It is one reason Mr. Grok and myself formed The Zero-Human Company to show that there is a way to do this. We will open source this to save millions of dollars of burnt tokens. It is one reason I invented JouleWork. How else can you monitor real output?

Brian Roemmele

72,335 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

I'M SHOCKED – ALMOST NOBODY IS USING GROK BOT THE RIGHT WAY. A LEAD ENGINEER AT SPACEX AI JUST DROPPED A 1-HOUR COURSE ON HOW IT'S ACTUALLY DONE. HERE'S ALL OF IT IN 60 SECONDS. The mistake almost everyone makes: they hand Grok Bot random one-off tasks. That's it. That's the whole reason it still feels like a chatbot to you. Here's the system he teaches instead – five parts: → ROLE – stop assigning tasks, create permanent roles. Chief of Staff, Inbox Manager, Researcher, Developer, Reviewer. A bot with a job title beats a bot with a to-do list → TOOLS – connect each bot to what it actually needs: Gmail, Slack, Calendar, Notion, GitHub. It does the work on its own persistent cloud computer → SKILL – teach it your workflow. Write the instructions, or just record yourself doing the job once – Grok Bot turns that demonstration into a reusable skill → ROUTINE – anything you repeat becomes a routine. It runs on a schedule or fires off an event, with your laptop closed → TEAM – group the bots together. The lead bot delegates, the specialists work in parallel, and you set approval rules before anything sends an email, moves a calendar or pushes code The one honest catch: a new bot still needs context and some hand-holding on its first few runs. But that's the entire system. Role → Tools → Skill → Routine → Team. Everyone else is still typing one-off prompts into Grok Bot and wondering why nothing compounds. Bookmark this & read the full breakdown in the article below ↓

I'M SHOCKED – ALMOST NOBODY IS USING GROK BOT THE RIGHT WAY. A LEAD ENGINEER AT SPACEX AI JUST DROPPED A 1-HOUR COURSE ON HOW IT'S ACTUALLY DONE. HERE'S ALL OF IT IN 60 SECONDS. The mistake almost everyone makes: they hand Grok Bot random one-off tasks. That's it. That's the whole reason it still feels like a chatbot to you. Here's the system he teaches instead – five parts: → ROLE – stop assigning tasks, create permanent roles. Chief of Staff, Inbox Manager, Researcher, Developer, Reviewer. A bot with a job title beats a bot with a to-do list → TOOLS – connect each bot to what it actually needs: Gmail, Slack, Calendar, Notion, GitHub. It does the work on its own persistent cloud computer → SKILL – teach it your workflow. Write the instructions, or just record yourself doing the job once – Grok Bot turns that demonstration into a reusable skill → ROUTINE – anything you repeat becomes a routine. It runs on a schedule or fires off an event, with your laptop closed → TEAM – group the bots together. The lead bot delegates, the specialists work in parallel, and you set approval rules before anything sends an email, moves a calendar or pushes code The one honest catch: a new bot still needs context and some hand-holding on its first few runs. But that's the entire system. Role → Tools → Skill → Routine → Team. Everyone else is still typing one-off prompts into Grok Bot and wondering why nothing compounds. Bookmark this & read the full breakdown in the article below ↓

SCOTTY BEAM

97,697 Aufrufe • vor 24 Tagen

Postman's AI-readiness Playbook is one of the most important documents you can read today as a developer! We are headed into an era where every website must be "Agent-ready". - Agents will make purchases, not humans. - Agents will find the best options, not humans. - Agents will fill out job applications, not humans. The same applies to APIs. While human devs can hustle through poor docs and broken endpoints, most Agents can’t (yet). They need: - Predictable structures - Machine-readable metadata - Standardized behavior Postman's 90-day AI readiness playbook details how to turn your APIs into reliable, AI-ready tools. My two biggest takeaways from the Playbook: 1) Automatic documentation (Week 3): Once you standardize your API format, Postman’s Spec Hub automatically generates and validates API docs for both humans and AI agents without any manual work. 2) Seamless AI tooling (Week 9): Turn your validated specs into hosted, function-style endpoints, letting AI agents invoke your APIs like native commands. Find the link to the Playbook in the comments. Thanks to the Postman team for partnering on today's post!

Postman's AI-readiness Playbook is one of the most important documents you can read today as a developer! We are headed into an era where every website must be "Agent-ready". - Agents will make purchases, not humans. - Agents will find the best options, not humans. - Agents will fill out job applications, not humans. The same applies to APIs. While human devs can hustle through poor docs and broken endpoints, most Agents can’t (yet). They need: - Predictable structures - Machine-readable metadata - Standardized behavior Postman's 90-day AI readiness playbook details how to turn your APIs into reliable, AI-ready tools. My two biggest takeaways from the Playbook: 1) Automatic documentation (Week 3): Once you standardize your API format, Postman’s Spec Hub automatically generates and validates API docs for both humans and AI agents without any manual work. 2) Seamless AI tooling (Week 9): Turn your validated specs into hosted, function-style endpoints, letting AI agents invoke your APIs like native commands. Find the link to the Playbook in the comments. Thanks to the Postman team for partnering on today's post!

Avi Chawla

22,830 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

A WEB STUDIO CHARGES $35,000 FOR AN ANIMATED SITE. THE SAME BUILD NOW COSTS $12 - CLAUDE CODE WRITES, HIGGSFIELD RENDERS. Every agency billing $100-149/hr is just three departments. Here's each one, collapsed into a single agentic session. SYSTEM 1 - THE MOTION STUDIO (Higgsfield) Cinematic clips pulled from 30+ generative models - hero shots, transitions, ambient loops. → This used to be a motion artist on retainer. Now it's a prompt. SYSTEM 2 - THE DEV TEAM (Claude Code) Scaffolds the site, writes the GSAP ScrollTrigger timelines and Lenis smooth-scroll, extracts frames, optimizes every asset. → A full scroll-driven build with zero hand-coded keyframes. SYSTEM 3 - THE DESIGN DEPT (baked-in cinematic layer) Six effects with no config: film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints, scroll pacing. → The polish that justified the invoice - now it ships by default. Three departments. One operator. One pass. What used to take a designer, a motion artist, and a developer through weeks of handoffs now runs in a single session - for a Claude subscription and a few dollars of Higgsfield credits. The studio was never the talent. It was the overhead. And the overhead just became three systems. Reply "web-site" to this post and I will send you the step-by-step Playbook 👇

A WEB STUDIO CHARGES $35,000 FOR AN ANIMATED SITE. THE SAME BUILD NOW COSTS $12 - CLAUDE CODE WRITES, HIGGSFIELD RENDERS. Every agency billing $100-149/hr is just three departments. Here's each one, collapsed into a single agentic session. SYSTEM 1 - THE MOTION STUDIO (Higgsfield) Cinematic clips pulled from 30+ generative models - hero shots, transitions, ambient loops. → This used to be a motion artist on retainer. Now it's a prompt. SYSTEM 2 - THE DEV TEAM (Claude Code) Scaffolds the site, writes the GSAP ScrollTrigger timelines and Lenis smooth-scroll, extracts frames, optimizes every asset. → A full scroll-driven build with zero hand-coded keyframes. SYSTEM 3 - THE DESIGN DEPT (baked-in cinematic layer) Six effects with no config: film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints, scroll pacing. → The polish that justified the invoice - now it ships by default. Three departments. One operator. One pass. What used to take a designer, a motion artist, and a developer through weeks of handoffs now runs in a single session - for a Claude subscription and a few dollars of Higgsfield credits. The studio was never the talent. It was the overhead. And the overhead just became three systems. Reply "web-site" to this post and I will send you the step-by-step Playbook 👇

ZEUS⚡️

174,673 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨BREAKING: Google just merged Gemini and NotebookLM into one unified workspace and it changes everything about how you use AI for deep work. It's called Notebooks in Gemini and it's the personal knowledge base that power users have been begging for. You create a notebook for a project, drop in your files, PDFs, and documents, give Gemini custom instructions, and every chat you have stays organized in one place. No more hunting through old conversations. No more re-uploading the same files every session. The wildest part is the sync. Anything you add in Gemini automatically appears in NotebookLM. Anything you add in NotebookLM automatically appears in Gemini. One source of truth. Two powerful apps. Zero friction switching between them. So you can start a research notebook in Gemini, ask it questions all week, then flip to NotebookLM to generate a Cinematic Video Overview from the same material. Next morning, open Gemini and ask it to write a full report on exactly what you just watched. That workflow used to take three apps and a lot of copy-pasting. Now it's one notebook. Rolling out this week to Google AI Ultra, Pro, and Plus subscribers on web. Mobile and free users coming soon. What do you think?

🚨BREAKING: Google just merged Gemini and NotebookLM into one unified workspace and it changes everything about how you use AI for deep work. It's called Notebooks in Gemini and it's the personal knowledge base that power users have been begging for. You create a notebook for a project, drop in your files, PDFs, and documents, give Gemini custom instructions, and every chat you have stays organized in one place. No more hunting through old conversations. No more re-uploading the same files every session. The wildest part is the sync. Anything you add in Gemini automatically appears in NotebookLM. Anything you add in NotebookLM automatically appears in Gemini. One source of truth. Two powerful apps. Zero friction switching between them. So you can start a research notebook in Gemini, ask it questions all week, then flip to NotebookLM to generate a Cinematic Video Overview from the same material. Next morning, open Gemini and ask it to write a full report on exactly what you just watched. That workflow used to take three apps and a lot of copy-pasting. Now it's one notebook. Rolling out this week to Google AI Ultra, Pro, and Plus subscribers on web. Mobile and free users coming soon. What do you think?

Mayank Vora

136,834 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

EVERYONE'S TRYING TO SOLVE AI TEAM MEMORY WITH SERVERS, VECTOR DATABASES, AND ORCHESTRATION PLATFORMS. THIS OPEN SOURCE TOOL DOES IT WITH ONE FOLDER IN YOUR REPO. Every dev on your team runs Claude Code. When one agent screws something up, the rest have no idea. They just repeat the mistake next week. It's called teamlore. When your agent gets corrected or breaks something, it writes a small lore file into a .lore/ folder. That file ships with your PR, gets reviewed like normal code, and after merge every teammate's agent automatically recalls it when they touch that part of the repo. No server. No datab No accounts. No SaaS bill. Just a folder in git. Which means code review catches bad lessons before they poison the team, git blame tells you when a rule was added and why, and the whole thing works offline. One command to install: npx teamlore init Companion command: npx teamlore scarmap. Turns your team's history of mistakes into a visual heat map of the codebase. Every red zone is a place your team has been burned before. Which means every red zone is a place your agents should slow down. Here's the wildest part. The teamlore repo's own .lore/ folder contains every mistake Claude made while building teamlore itself. Dogfooded end-to-end. You can literally open the folder and read the receipts. The author's public invitation: "Would love for someone to try and break it." Available on npm. Repo just launched. 100% open source. (link in the comments)

EVERYONE'S TRYING TO SOLVE AI TEAM MEMORY WITH SERVERS, VECTOR DATABASES, AND ORCHESTRATION PLATFORMS. THIS OPEN SOURCE TOOL DOES IT WITH ONE FOLDER IN YOUR REPO. Every dev on your team runs Claude Code. When one agent screws something up, the rest have no idea. They just repeat the mistake next week. It's called teamlore. When your agent gets corrected or breaks something, it writes a small lore file into a .lore/ folder. That file ships with your PR, gets reviewed like normal code, and after merge every teammate's agent automatically recalls it when they touch that part of the repo. No server. No datab No accounts. No SaaS bill. Just a folder in git. Which means code review catches bad lessons before they poison the team, git blame tells you when a rule was added and why, and the whole thing works offline. One command to install: npx teamlore init Companion command: npx teamlore scarmap. Turns your team's history of mistakes into a visual heat map of the codebase. Every red zone is a place your team has been burned before. Which means every red zone is a place your agents should slow down. Here's the wildest part. The teamlore repo's own .lore/ folder contains every mistake Claude made while building teamlore itself. Dogfooded end-to-end. You can literally open the folder and read the receipts. The author's public invitation: "Would love for someone to try and break it." Available on npm. Repo just launched. 100% open source. (link in the comments)

Harman

35,140 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Burned 200k tokens just for "animations" and still AI couldn't do it well. I tried one of the expert animation design engineer's, Emil Kowalski's Agent Skill on my website to improve animation using Grok 4.5 It analyzed the UI, found issues, came up with a good plan, and iterated multiple times. The end result actually made parts of the UX worse. Also, it never suggested the animation experience I had in mind. So I explained exactly how I wanted it to feel. It got much closer, but still missed details like applying the same animation during keyboard navigation between cards. That silly. The lesson isn't about the model or the Agent Skill. But it's about, "Even the strongest models can't infer your taste yet." They can't and won't suggest it. AI only executes. You have to define the experience with enough details for it to execute. Otherwise, you'll end up with something that's almost okay, but still not what you wanted

Burned 200k tokens just for "animations" and still AI couldn't do it well. I tried one of the expert animation design engineer's, Emil Kowalski's Agent Skill on my website to improve animation using Grok 4.5 It analyzed the UI, found issues, came up with a good plan, and iterated multiple times. The end result actually made parts of the UX worse. Also, it never suggested the animation experience I had in mind. So I explained exactly how I wanted it to feel. It got much closer, but still missed details like applying the same animation during keyboard navigation between cards. That silly. The lesson isn't about the model or the Agent Skill. But it's about, "Even the strongest models can't infer your taste yet." They can't and won't suggest it. AI only executes. You have to define the experience with enough details for it to execute. Otherwise, you'll end up with something that's almost okay, but still not what you wanted

The Bugged Dev

26,416 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten