Grokipedia's release made clear just how biased Wikipedia has been for years.

As someone who does tons of political research every day, every time I get a source that's Wikipedia, I look for an alternative. I never use Wikipedia as a source in my videos - that's how biased it is. More content breaking down biases:

Articles about conservatives on Wikipedia consistently Poison The Well. It's a logical fallacy that attempts to discredit someone with a label before actually engaging with their view. It has no place in an encyclopedia

Wikipedia was completely captured by ideology and the woke movement a very long time ago, great to finally see something come to take its place.

That’s an absolutely inspired quote “when you’ve been leaning left for so long, standing up straight, feels like falling, right” Love it. @ScottAdamsSays has a term for that kind of visual statement and how effective it is. I (embarrassingly) can’t think of it at the moment. Would love to see Scott interview you, or vice versa. Would be a must watch!

Are you from Ghana 🇬🇭?

My parents are. I was born in the Bronx.

Cool, I have been following you since the beginning of this year but only paid attention to your name “Asiedu” today. You are doing an incredible job on how you breakdown topics. I would be glad to meet you whenever you come to Ghana 🇬🇭

My college professors in economics and political science and lawn constitutional studies would not let us cite Wikipedia as a reference because they said it was so biased. Finally people are talking about this more. Very excited for Grokopedia!

This is a great take on Wikipedia vrs. grokipedia, nice job! I hope this post of yours gets some reach and educates folks to be more aware of propaganda.

even v0.1 of grokipedia is more thorough and unbiased than wikipedia wikipedia immediately frames controversial topics from the establishment / left lens grokipedia allows the reader to form their own conclusions based on facts

Thanks. I just DELETED WIKIPEDIA and added GROKEPEDIA to my shortcuts bar. I totally agree with idea that references should attempt to present complete picture of people or subjects, the pros & the cons & NOT in a subjective way (loading all negatives up front to discredit individuals of a particular political party).

I always love your explanations. You seem to always just get straight to the heart of the matter in such a wonderful to synced way. Thank you for this. I don’t use Wikipedia now or for years, but I do love the idea that there is a different option out there and how solid it is.

When I was writing technical report for all my reports in university, we were Banned from quoting/citing Wikipedia. NOW I KNOW WHY!!!

So TRUE! I would make corrections on names and events that I was involved in and send in the proof and within one to three days it was back with false, fake information. I made the corrections at least six or seven times over a few years and the facts didn’t latter, the proof didn’t matter. There was a fake agenda pointing people to a then ‘ nobody’ and posting/supporting lies and deception. That’s my experience of Wikipedia - bad!

Clear, precise, well reasoned and effectively communicated. I like the way you deliver your message.

Great analysis Thank you

I lowkey think we all have forever known that I stopped using Wikipedia when I was just trying to do some research and I just wanted to learn a little bit more and I went to the Trump page and every single thing was just negative and then I compared it to the Obama page...

Kaizen everyone needed to hear this today. Damn your good. You’re saying what I’m thinking. But you do it so well.

No I really wonder how humans openly back billionaires attacking billionaires no what exactly 👍?? X IS VERY GULLIBLE.. X IS TELLING US THAT ALREADY..because ELON TALKS ABOUT TRUMP REVIEWING AMERICA OLD ATROCIOUS HISTORY HE WILL BE ASSASSINATED in the next minutes my believes why they try to manage their friendship the true story… ELON KNEW ALL YOU EXPLAINED..

This is so insightful.

I am not sure I would trust anything Gronk would say....

Another great breakdown @thatsKAIZEN ! @scrowder did a @LWCmugclub exclusive on Wikipedia a couple years ago, it explains that bias and how it works pretty well. It’s definitely not a natural lean. I think you’d like it! 👍

Great Analysis of Grokepedia ! @elonmusk @ElonMuskNews47

Thank you @thatsKAIZEN for being one of the few clear thinkers willing to empower more clear thinking. Love the definition breakdowns.

Wikipedia is far left, so who cares if Grokipedia is far right? If being far right is introducing someone by their birth date, career path, and nationality, before trying to tear them down, then call me far right.

It amazes me that professors at accredited universities allow Wikipedia as a source for research papers. Blows my mind.

Good synopsis. Wikipedia is cooked.

remember when wikipedia wasnt a trusted source by our teachers back then? i member

I’m always so impressed with your levelheaded truth based commentary. I’m glad I followed you.

Well said. I truly didn't realize.

Batting a thousand, brother. Right AGAIN. And concise. Beautiful!

I think you are the most biased. You support anything and everything Elon does without questioning his intentions. @elonmusk's Grokipedia is nothing but a Grok of shit !!

Thank you for your steadfast and patient clarity. I’m glad to have found your contributions.