Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Gun control support just hit its lowest point in years. And the timing could not be worse for anti-gun politicians. New Rasmussen numbers show support for stricter gun control fell to 48 percent among likely voters. 43 percent now oppose it outright. Think about that. Years of media pressure.... Years of red flag laws. Years of magazine restrictions. Years of politicians demanding assault weapons bans. And support went down. Not up. But here’s where the trick comes in. The poll also asked if people would support a candidate who promised to ban semi-automatic “assault-type” weapons. 46 percent said yes. Sounds scary. Until you look at the wording. “Assault weapon” is not a real firearms category. It’s a political marketing term. People hear it and picture machine guns. But the question is really about semi-automatic firearms. One trigger pull. One round. The same way most rifles, shotguns, and handguns already work. That’s the game. Scary term. Ordinary gun. Do you think most voters actually understand what “semi-automatic” means? Drop your answer below.show more

Colion Noir

590,881 subscribers

19,176 просмотров • 4 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Юмор Новости и политика

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🚨 Minnesota DFL files 6 New Gun Control Bills—Here’s What They’re Coming For in 2026 🚨 Minnesota’s legislative session is back tomorrow — and so are the gun control bills. The DFL has pre-filed multiple new restrictions, and every bill from last year is still alive. That means "assault weapon" bans, magazine bans, carry bans, and registration schemes are all in play. Here’s what we’re facing: • HF 3401 – Ends written school carry permission • HF 3402 – 10+ round magazine ban • HF 3407 – “Ghost gun” ban + design file restrictions • HF 3357 – Capitol carry ban • HF 3433 – Expanded “assault weapon” ban + registration + inspections • HF 3434 – Semi-auto rifle and magazine ban The Senate is controlled by the DFL. The House is tied. No Republican support is expected — but we must hold the line all session long. Session runs through May. If you care about your Second Amendment rights in Minnesota, now is the time to stay engaged. 👉 Join us: 👉 Support the fight: Make sure you’re on our email list and following us for updates from the Capitol. We’re ready for the fight. Are you?

🚨 Minnesota DFL files 6 New Gun Control Bills—Here’s What They’re Coming For in 2026 🚨 Minnesota’s legislative session is back tomorrow — and so are the gun control bills. The DFL has pre-filed multiple new restrictions, and every bill from last year is still alive. That means "assault weapon" bans, magazine bans, carry bans, and registration schemes are all in play. Here’s what we’re facing: • HF 3401 – Ends written school carry permission • HF 3402 – 10+ round magazine ban • HF 3407 – “Ghost gun” ban + design file restrictions • HF 3357 – Capitol carry ban • HF 3433 – Expanded “assault weapon” ban + registration + inspections • HF 3434 – Semi-auto rifle and magazine ban The Senate is controlled by the DFL. The House is tied. No Republican support is expected — but we must hold the line all session long. Session runs through May. If you care about your Second Amendment rights in Minnesota, now is the time to stay engaged. 👉 Join us: 👉 Support the fight: Make sure you’re on our email list and following us for updates from the Capitol. We’re ready for the fight. Are you?

MN Gun Owners Caucus

10,418 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Dan Osborn is running for U.S. Senate in Nebraska, and his new “common sense” gun proposal should worry every gun owner. He wants people who own so-called “assault-style” rifles — AR-15s, M16s, AKs, and anything he decides fits that category — to take a mental health exam every five years and re-register their guns just to keep what they already legally own. But here’s the part that makes the entire proposal fall apart. The shooting he keeps using to justify it was committed with a shotgun. Not an AR-15. Not an AK. Not an M16. A shotgun. So his plan wouldn’t have stopped the very tragedy he’s using to sell it. That’s not policy. That’s emotion dressed up as “common sense.” And it gets worse. Osborn says he checked with law enforcement and one gun owner who supposedly had no issue with the idea. One guy. A sample size of one. Meanwhile, the Nebraska Firearm Owners Association — with over 26,000 members — called the proposal an attack on individual liberty. Because a right you have to renew every five years isn’t a right. It’s a subscription. And the government can cancel a subscription. Today it’s AR-15s. Tomorrow it’s shotguns. Then five years becomes three. Then the exam changes. Then the people deciding whether you’re “mentally fit” to keep your rifle are the same people who never wanted you to have it in the first place. This is how gun control works: pick the scary word, ignore the facts, call it common sense, and make law-abiding gun owners beg permission to keep what they already own. Shop the “America” hat at:

Dan Osborn is running for U.S. Senate in Nebraska, and his new “common sense” gun proposal should worry every gun owner. He wants people who own so-called “assault-style” rifles — AR-15s, M16s, AKs, and anything he decides fits that category — to take a mental health exam every five years and re-register their guns just to keep what they already legally own. But here’s the part that makes the entire proposal fall apart. The shooting he keeps using to justify it was committed with a shotgun. Not an AR-15. Not an AK. Not an M16. A shotgun. So his plan wouldn’t have stopped the very tragedy he’s using to sell it. That’s not policy. That’s emotion dressed up as “common sense.” And it gets worse. Osborn says he checked with law enforcement and one gun owner who supposedly had no issue with the idea. One guy. A sample size of one. Meanwhile, the Nebraska Firearm Owners Association — with over 26,000 members — called the proposal an attack on individual liberty. Because a right you have to renew every five years isn’t a right. It’s a subscription. And the government can cancel a subscription. Today it’s AR-15s. Tomorrow it’s shotguns. Then five years becomes three. Then the exam changes. Then the people deciding whether you’re “mentally fit” to keep your rifle are the same people who never wanted you to have it in the first place. This is how gun control works: pick the scary word, ignore the facts, call it common sense, and make law-abiding gun owners beg permission to keep what they already own. Shop the “America” hat at:

Colion Noir

39,275 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Gov. Walz Can’t Define “Assault Weapons” — But Wants to Ban Them Anyway Gov. Walz says he “supports legal gun ownership” — right before pushing an “assault weapons” ban he can’t even define. 🤡 “Not made for war”? Every common firearm traces its lineage to military tech. That’s not an argument — it’s a talking point. He admits “the devil’s in the details” — and he’s right. Because the details are where constitutional rights go to die. He also says he trusts trained, licensed permit holders. So why is the DFL trying to ban lawful carry at the Capitol? If permit holders are vetted and responsible — his words — why do their rights disappear near politicians? The government doesn’t get to ban commonly owned firearms because Gov. Walz thinks they look scary to him. You don’t “support legal gun ownership” while trying to outlaw the most popular rifles in America. Minnesotans see the contradiction. And we’re not buying it. 💥 ⚡ TAKE ACTION: 📝 SIGN A PETITION: ✊ JOIN THE FIGHT: 🛡️ BECOME A 2A DEFENDER: 💥 DONATE: #mnleg #mn2a #2A

Gov. Walz Can’t Define “Assault Weapons” — But Wants to Ban Them Anyway Gov. Walz says he “supports legal gun ownership” — right before pushing an “assault weapons” ban he can’t even define. 🤡 “Not made for war”? Every common firearm traces its lineage to military tech. That’s not an argument — it’s a talking point. He admits “the devil’s in the details” — and he’s right. Because the details are where constitutional rights go to die. He also says he trusts trained, licensed permit holders. So why is the DFL trying to ban lawful carry at the Capitol? If permit holders are vetted and responsible — his words — why do their rights disappear near politicians? The government doesn’t get to ban commonly owned firearms because Gov. Walz thinks they look scary to him. You don’t “support legal gun ownership” while trying to outlaw the most popular rifles in America. Minnesotans see the contradiction. And we’re not buying it. 💥 ⚡ TAKE ACTION: 📝 SIGN A PETITION: ✊ JOIN THE FIGHT: 🛡️ BECOME A 2A DEFENDER: 💥 DONATE: #mnleg #mn2a #2A

MN Gun Owners Caucus

28,292 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Tucker Carlson says he’s officially done supporting the Republican Party after 35 years. Listen closely to how he ends it. That’s not a man quitting. That’s a man counting. “There’s no chance I would support the Republican Party. Not going to support the Democratic Party. I don’t know what I’m going to do.” “How could I, or any American voters, support a political party that’s not loyal to the United States, that puts the interests of a foreign country above those of its own citizens?” “It’s not possible to vote for people like that. And I’m not going to.” “I’ve been a consistent defender for 35 years of the Republican Party. I mean, very consistent defender. But there’s no defending this because it’s immoral.” “And it’s exactly the opposite of what a political party in a democracy is charged with doing, which is representing its own voters, its own citizens, its own nation. And they’re not doing that.” “So, no, I’m out. And if I’m out, then I think a lot of other people are out.”

Tucker Carlson says he’s officially done supporting the Republican Party after 35 years. Listen closely to how he ends it. That’s not a man quitting. That’s a man counting. “There’s no chance I would support the Republican Party. Not going to support the Democratic Party. I don’t know what I’m going to do.” “How could I, or any American voters, support a political party that’s not loyal to the United States, that puts the interests of a foreign country above those of its own citizens?” “It’s not possible to vote for people like that. And I’m not going to.” “I’ve been a consistent defender for 35 years of the Republican Party. I mean, very consistent defender. But there’s no defending this because it’s immoral.” “And it’s exactly the opposite of what a political party in a democracy is charged with doing, which is representing its own voters, its own citizens, its own nation. And they’re not doing that.” “So, no, I’m out. And if I’m out, then I think a lot of other people are out.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,022,490 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

FBI Director Christopher Wray gives Attorney General Merrick Garland a semi auto 1927A-1 Thompson 45ACP (aka Tommy Gun) with a 50 round drum magazine as a retirement gift. I'd love to know where this happened; if it happened in Washington DC this video would be documentation/evidence of multiple crimes... 🤨 For those who may have forgotten - this is the very same Merrick Garland that wanted to put you in a cage or send armed men with guns to kill you if you had an 80% receiver or arm brace. He's also the same man who advocated for an "assault weapons ban" which would criminalize owing a Tommy Gun (and most other semi autos). If "rules for thee but not for me" were a person it'd be Merrick Garland.

FBI Director Christopher Wray gives Attorney General Merrick Garland a semi auto 1927A-1 Thompson 45ACP (aka Tommy Gun) with a 50 round drum magazine as a retirement gift. I'd love to know where this happened; if it happened in Washington DC this video would be documentation/evidence of multiple crimes... 🤨 For those who may have forgotten - this is the very same Merrick Garland that wanted to put you in a cage or send armed men with guns to kill you if you had an 80% receiver or arm brace. He's also the same man who advocated for an "assault weapons ban" which would criminalize owing a Tommy Gun (and most other semi autos). If "rules for thee but not for me" were a person it'd be Merrick Garland.

Mrgunsngear

360,839 просмотров • 1 год назад

BREAKING: Gavin Newson has just proposed the 28th Amendment to the United States Constitution. The 28th Amendment will take 4 gun safety measures and enshrine them in our Constitution. They are as follows: 1) It will raise the minimum age to purchase any gun to 21 years of age 2) It will require that there is a reasonable waiting period for gun purchases 3) It will require Universal background checks 4) It will ban the civilian purchase of assault weapons Here are my thoughts: I personally would change #4 to not ban all purchases, but make it much more difficult for the average American to purchase such a weapon. Make them jump through hoops. I would also add a stipulation that all Guns should be insured. Would you support this Amendment? Why or why not?

BREAKING: Gavin Newson has just proposed the 28th Amendment to the United States Constitution. The 28th Amendment will take 4 gun safety measures and enshrine them in our Constitution. They are as follows: 1) It will raise the minimum age to purchase any gun to 21 years of age 2) It will require that there is a reasonable waiting period for gun purchases 3) It will require Universal background checks 4) It will ban the civilian purchase of assault weapons Here are my thoughts: I personally would change #4 to not ban all purchases, but make it much more difficult for the average American to purchase such a weapon. Make them jump through hoops. I would also add a stipulation that all Guns should be insured. Would you support this Amendment? Why or why not?

Brian Krassenstein

2,920,322 просмотров • 3 лет назад

A federal court just ruled that suppressors are protected arms under the Second Amendment. Good win. But that’s not even the biggest part. The real story is what this ruling may do to magazine bans, AR bans, and every “hardware” ban anti-gun states have been protecting for years. Because the Ninth Circuit has been saying things like magazines are just accessories. Not arms. Not protected. Basically a fashion accessory for your rifle. But now the Fifth Circuit looked at suppressors and said: No. If it helps you use your firearm for lawful self-defense, it can be protected by the Second Amendment. That creates a problem. A big one. Two federal courts are now looking at the same kind of argument and reaching opposite conclusions. That’s called a circuit split. And that may be exactly what finally forces the Supreme Court to step in. So this isn’t just about suppressors. This could be the case that puts magazine bans and assault weapons bans directly on the Supreme Court’s doorstep. Now be honest: Should suppressors, magazines, and AR-15s all be protected under the Second Amendment? Or should the government get to call them “accessories” and ban them? Drop your answer below — and send this to the person who still thinks suppressors work like they do in movies.

A federal court just ruled that suppressors are protected arms under the Second Amendment. Good win. But that’s not even the biggest part. The real story is what this ruling may do to magazine bans, AR bans, and every “hardware” ban anti-gun states have been protecting for years. Because the Ninth Circuit has been saying things like magazines are just accessories. Not arms. Not protected. Basically a fashion accessory for your rifle. But now the Fifth Circuit looked at suppressors and said: No. If it helps you use your firearm for lawful self-defense, it can be protected by the Second Amendment. That creates a problem. A big one. Two federal courts are now looking at the same kind of argument and reaching opposite conclusions. That’s called a circuit split. And that may be exactly what finally forces the Supreme Court to step in. So this isn’t just about suppressors. This could be the case that puts magazine bans and assault weapons bans directly on the Supreme Court’s doorstep. Now be honest: Should suppressors, magazines, and AR-15s all be protected under the Second Amendment? Or should the government get to call them “accessories” and ban them? Drop your answer below — and send this to the person who still thinks suppressors work like they do in movies.

Colion Noir

51,537 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Sherry Benson-Podolchuk is a retired RCMP officer of 20 years "I think in our laws and our police, they have to have better tools. That means we have to change the laws when it comes to mental health and firearms." "That means if you go to a house for a mental health check and there's firearms, give them the tools to seize those weapons and let the person and the home, however old they might be, that if someone is being investigated under the mental health act, those weapons are not returned until everybody is cleared in the home." "I mean, you just, we just never know who, who is going to snap." "...I think in order to return the weapons there needs to be some sort of mandated therapy where the people in the home, the person who was being, they were doing the mental health check and everybody in the home goes for or some sort of counseling to understand why what happened here and give the person the support that they need instead of just having an application and returning the weapons." "And so that's what I mean about these rules have to be, the laws have to be changed with regards to mental health and the link between firearms and potential violence." At the end CBC knows how little they can be bothered to educate themselves about firearms in Canada Brodie Fenlon

Sherry Benson-Podolchuk is a retired RCMP officer of 20 years "I think in our laws and our police, they have to have better tools. That means we have to change the laws when it comes to mental health and firearms." "That means if you go to a house for a mental health check and there's firearms, give them the tools to seize those weapons and let the person and the home, however old they might be, that if someone is being investigated under the mental health act, those weapons are not returned until everybody is cleared in the home." "I mean, you just, we just never know who, who is going to snap." "...I think in order to return the weapons there needs to be some sort of mandated therapy where the people in the home, the person who was being, they were doing the mental health check and everybody in the home goes for or some sort of counseling to understand why what happened here and give the person the support that they need instead of just having an application and returning the weapons." "And so that's what I mean about these rules have to be, the laws have to be changed with regards to mental health and the link between firearms and potential violence." At the end CBC knows how little they can be bothered to educate themselves about firearms in Canada Brodie Fenlon

cbcwatcher

17,736 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

I’m going to say something that may make some people uncomfortable, but at this point I don’t care. I am tired of watching Black Americans refuse to ask the most important question in modern politics. For most of the last sixty years, Black voters have given Democrats somewhere between ninety and ninety-five percent of their vote. That’s not support. That’s loyalty on a scale few political parties in history have ever enjoyed. So where are the results? WHERE? When I drive through many of our neighborhoods, I don’t see the success we were promised. I see memorials on street corners. I see boys growing up without fathers. I see schools where a shocking number of children cannot read or do math at grade level. I see poverty that survives election after election while politicians return every few years demanding the same vote and offering the same explanations. Before anyone changes the subject, blames somebody else, or starts reciting talking points, answer that question. Not with feelings. Not with corny buzzwords . Not with excuses. Answer it with results. Because history is not a record of what Democrat politicians promised. History is a record of what actually happened. OUTCOMES. #AStoneGroove #SilentMajoritySpeaks

I’m going to say something that may make some people uncomfortable, but at this point I don’t care. I am tired of watching Black Americans refuse to ask the most important question in modern politics. For most of the last sixty years, Black voters have given Democrats somewhere between ninety and ninety-five percent of their vote. That’s not support. That’s loyalty on a scale few political parties in history have ever enjoyed. So where are the results? WHERE? When I drive through many of our neighborhoods, I don’t see the success we were promised. I see memorials on street corners. I see boys growing up without fathers. I see schools where a shocking number of children cannot read or do math at grade level. I see poverty that survives election after election while politicians return every few years demanding the same vote and offering the same explanations. Before anyone changes the subject, blames somebody else, or starts reciting talking points, answer that question. Not with feelings. Not with corny buzzwords . Not with excuses. Answer it with results. Because history is not a record of what Democrat politicians promised. History is a record of what actually happened. OUTCOMES. #AStoneGroove #SilentMajoritySpeaks

A Gene Robinson

40,715 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Virginia passed a new gun ban — and now some of the very prosecutors expected to enforce it are saying no. The law makes it a misdemeanor to buy, sell, transfer, import, or manufacture certain “assault firearms,” punishable by up to a year in jail and a $2,500 fine. That means a rifle that was legal on June 30th became a crime on July 1st because politicians moved a line on paper. But at least five Virginia prosecutors have already said they will not enforce the ban, arguing that it violates the Second Amendment. And here’s the poetic part: Virginia Democrats helped protect prosecutorial discretion years ago, meaning the governor and attorney general can complain all they want — but they can’t force those prosecutors to bring charges. They built the off-switch. Now it’s being used on their own gun ban. This is a win, but it’s not the end. The law is still on the books statewide, and the real fight is in court. With more than 20 million AR-15s in America and the rifle clearly in common use, this is exactly the kind of case the Supreme Court needs to stop ducking. Virginia tried to criminalize law-abiding gun owners. Their own prosecutors said no. Shop the “America” hat at:

Virginia passed a new gun ban — and now some of the very prosecutors expected to enforce it are saying no. The law makes it a misdemeanor to buy, sell, transfer, import, or manufacture certain “assault firearms,” punishable by up to a year in jail and a $2,500 fine. That means a rifle that was legal on June 30th became a crime on July 1st because politicians moved a line on paper. But at least five Virginia prosecutors have already said they will not enforce the ban, arguing that it violates the Second Amendment. And here’s the poetic part: Virginia Democrats helped protect prosecutorial discretion years ago, meaning the governor and attorney general can complain all they want — but they can’t force those prosecutors to bring charges. They built the off-switch. Now it’s being used on their own gun ban. This is a win, but it’s not the end. The law is still on the books statewide, and the real fight is in court. With more than 20 million AR-15s in America and the rifle clearly in common use, this is exactly the kind of case the Supreme Court needs to stop ducking. Virginia tried to criminalize law-abiding gun owners. Their own prosecutors said no. Shop the “America” hat at:

Colion Noir

39,910 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Stephen Colbert welcome Chris Murphy and makes the ICE shooting in Dallas about gun control, "Before we get into anything else, right off the top, I just want to point out and let everybody know that you have been a tireless advocate for gun control for years now. And as you know, and I think most of the people out here know, today there was another tragic shooting, this time at an ICE facility down in Dallas. We don't know a lot about it so far. What goes through your mind when you hear about another shooting like this?" Murphy says we shouldn't politicize violence and then politicizes violence, "it just sickens me that we have a president who instead of trying to stand up and say wherever the violence comes from, it's unacceptable, is politicizing this moment. It's about the victims and it's about a mourning of a loss of a potential moment to bring this country together. " As does Colbert, "I mean, there really hasn't been much movement to rein in the access to the long guns and many of the weapons used in these killings, but, I mean, hopefully, maybe there could be a political sea change in the United States."

Stephen Colbert welcome Chris Murphy and makes the ICE shooting in Dallas about gun control, "Before we get into anything else, right off the top, I just want to point out and let everybody know that you have been a tireless advocate for gun control for years now. And as you know, and I think most of the people out here know, today there was another tragic shooting, this time at an ICE facility down in Dallas. We don't know a lot about it so far. What goes through your mind when you hear about another shooting like this?" Murphy says we shouldn't politicize violence and then politicizes violence, "it just sickens me that we have a president who instead of trying to stand up and say wherever the violence comes from, it's unacceptable, is politicizing this moment. It's about the victims and it's about a mourning of a loss of a potential moment to bring this country together. " As does Colbert, "I mean, there really hasn't been much movement to rein in the access to the long guns and many of the weapons used in these killings, but, I mean, hopefully, maybe there could be a political sea change in the United States."

Alex Christy

405,492 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

A man from Bangladesh introduced bill SB749 and got passed, a very extensive gun ban bill in Virginia It’s headed to the governor’s desk to be signed, she’s expected to sign it “Some guy from Bangladesh just banned American citizens from owning firearms in Virginia. Saddam Azlan Salim, a state senator in Virginia, has crafted SB749 banning all types of the possession, sale, etc, of firearms. It has passed the legislation. It's going to the governor's desk, a hardcore leftist, and will most likely sign it. Saddam wasn't born in our country. He came here like five minutes ago in the year 2000, and he does not celebrate our history and our constitution — We have to stop the foreign invasion of our country with people who do not celebrate American ideals.“ The bill It prohibits the import, manufacture, sale, purchase, or transfer of defined “assault firearms” (e.g., semi-automatic rifles, pistols, or shotguns with features like folding stocks, pistol grips, threaded barrels for suppressors, or fixed magazines over 10 rounds) and “large capacity ammunition feeding devices” (magazines holding more than 15 rounds).

A man from Bangladesh introduced bill SB749 and got passed, a very extensive gun ban bill in Virginia It’s headed to the governor’s desk to be signed, she’s expected to sign it “Some guy from Bangladesh just banned American citizens from owning firearms in Virginia. Saddam Azlan Salim, a state senator in Virginia, has crafted SB749 banning all types of the possession, sale, etc, of firearms. It has passed the legislation. It's going to the governor's desk, a hardcore leftist, and will most likely sign it. Saddam wasn't born in our country. He came here like five minutes ago in the year 2000, and he does not celebrate our history and our constitution — We have to stop the foreign invasion of our country with people who do not celebrate American ideals.“ The bill It prohibits the import, manufacture, sale, purchase, or transfer of defined “assault firearms” (e.g., semi-automatic rifles, pistols, or shotguns with features like folding stocks, pistol grips, threaded barrels for suppressors, or fixed magazines over 10 rounds) and “large capacity ammunition feeding devices” (magazines holding more than 15 rounds).

Wall Street Apes

972,354 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🚨 LET’S TALK ABOUT THE DOUBLE STANDARD ON GUNS 🚨 Now, in their religion, it is considered that ilhan Omar’s son’s roommate is actually her son. Interesting After a school shooting, Democrats immediately demand tougher gun-control laws. But when firearms and ammunition are reportedly seized from the home shared by the son of Minnesota Congresswoman Ilhan Omar and his roommate—who was arrested on a weapons charge—where is that same outrage? You cannot scream “gun control” when it fits your politics and suddenly change the conversation when the situation involves someone connected to your own side. Either gun laws and public safety matter consistently—or they don’t. The American people are watching. 🇺🇸 #GunControl #SecondAmendment #Minnesota #IlhanOmar #Accountability

🚨 LET’S TALK ABOUT THE DOUBLE STANDARD ON GUNS 🚨 Now, in their religion, it is considered that ilhan Omar’s son’s roommate is actually her son. Interesting After a school shooting, Democrats immediately demand tougher gun-control laws. But when firearms and ammunition are reportedly seized from the home shared by the son of Minnesota Congresswoman Ilhan Omar and his roommate—who was arrested on a weapons charge—where is that same outrage? You cannot scream “gun control” when it fits your politics and suddenly change the conversation when the situation involves someone connected to your own side. Either gun laws and public safety matter consistently—or they don’t. The American people are watching. 🇺🇸 #GunControl #SecondAmendment #Minnesota #IlhanOmar #Accountability

Nathaniel M. Olson

62,152 просмотров • 7 дней назад

The Supreme Court just handed gun owners a **9-0 win**. But here’s the part nobody saw coming: The ACLU was on the side of the gun owner. The gun-control groups were on the side trying to keep the ban. Read that again. This case wasn’t just about weed and guns. It was about the government trying to shut off someone’s Second Amendment rights by putting them in a category. No proof he was dangerous. No proof he hurt anyone. Just a label. And once the label sticks, the right disappears. That’s the game. Today it’s “drug user.” Tomorrow it’s whatever label they decide comes next. The Supreme Court basically said: Prove the person. Not the category. So here’s the question: Should the government be able to take your gun rights based on a label alone? Or should they have to prove you’re actually dangerous? Drop your answer below — and send this to the friend who still thinks every gun law is about “safety.” Extended 15% OFF Fathers Day sale Code : 2ADAD

The Supreme Court just handed gun owners a 9-0 win. But here’s the part nobody saw coming: The ACLU was on the side of the gun owner. The gun-control groups were on the side trying to keep the ban. Read that again. This case wasn’t just about weed and guns. It was about the government trying to shut off someone’s Second Amendment rights by putting them in a category. No proof he was dangerous. No proof he hurt anyone. Just a label. And once the label sticks, the right disappears. That’s the game. Today it’s “drug user.” Tomorrow it’s whatever label they decide comes next. The Supreme Court basically said: Prove the person. Not the category. So here’s the question: Should the government be able to take your gun rights based on a label alone? Or should they have to prove you’re actually dangerous? Drop your answer below — and send this to the friend who still thinks every gun law is about “safety.” Extended 15% OFF Fathers Day sale Code : 2ADAD

Colion Noir

57,611 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

When jihadists are seen with guns, the pro-jihadi media in Bangladesh goes all out to label real firearms as toy guns. Recently, jihadists brought a man from Mecca, claiming him to be a descendant of Muhammad, and organized a gathering for him in Bangladesh. In this gathering, one of them was seen holding a gun. It’s likely that the gun was carried either for the Meccan man’s security, to show dominance, or even with the intent to harm someone. Whatever the reason may be, they currently hold government power, so they act with impunity. Government-friendly media in Bangladesh, including Janakantha, is spreading the narrative that I posted fake news, claiming the gun in question was merely a toy. According to their story, a man supposedly bought the toy gun for his 8-year-old sister at a fair, and that was the gun seen in the images I shared. However, the still image I posted gives no reason to believe the gun is a toy. Anyone can tell that the image is not from a fairground, as there’s no little girl in sight, but rather a group of older, bearded, religious men surrounding the individual. Now, I am posting a video that makes it even clearer that the gun is not a toy. By the way, during the anarchy in July-August, jihadists looted thousands of guns from over 400 police stations after killing policemen. Have they returned those weapons? Certainly not. Could this gun be one of those stolen firearms?

When jihadists are seen with guns, the pro-jihadi media in Bangladesh goes all out to label real firearms as toy guns. Recently, jihadists brought a man from Mecca, claiming him to be a descendant of Muhammad, and organized a gathering for him in Bangladesh. In this gathering, one of them was seen holding a gun. It’s likely that the gun was carried either for the Meccan man’s security, to show dominance, or even with the intent to harm someone. Whatever the reason may be, they currently hold government power, so they act with impunity. Government-friendly media in Bangladesh, including Janakantha, is spreading the narrative that I posted fake news, claiming the gun in question was merely a toy. According to their story, a man supposedly bought the toy gun for his 8-year-old sister at a fair, and that was the gun seen in the images I shared. However, the still image I posted gives no reason to believe the gun is a toy. Anyone can tell that the image is not from a fairground, as there’s no little girl in sight, but rather a group of older, bearded, religious men surrounding the individual. Now, I am posting a video that makes it even clearer that the gun is not a toy. By the way, during the anarchy in July-August, jihadists looted thousands of guns from over 400 police stations after killing policemen. Have they returned those weapons? Certainly not. Could this gun be one of those stolen firearms?

taslima nasreen

16,370 просмотров • 1 год назад

my two favorite people saying the same thing “just give it a try” 🥹 🦌: the most important thing is to just give it a try. i think the idea of taking that first step is one of the most important things in life 🦮: moments when we have to make big decisions can be scary, and i think that's completely normal. but the fact that something feels scary also means it’s a very important opportunity. that’s why i think it’s important to really think about what you want and then just give it a try. because if you don’t try, you’ll definitely regret it later on

my two favorite people saying the same thing “just give it a try” 🥹 🦌: the most important thing is to just give it a try. i think the idea of taking that first step is one of the most important things in life 🦮: moments when we have to make big decisions can be scary, and i think that's completely normal. but the fact that something feels scary also means it’s a very important opportunity. that’s why i think it’s important to really think about what you want and then just give it a try. because if you don’t try, you’ll definitely regret it later on

ev.

35,194 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

"In a fantasy or science fiction story, you can get away with one big lie. You can include one thing that's convenient for the author in order to make the plot work. In Children of Time, the question is 'what if a species of a spider developed a society, civilization, and technology. But the big lie is literally that there is a nanovirus is assisting the uplift of the spiders, and the lie is the amount of time that'll take. Because of the nanovirus, that happens in tens of thousands of years rather than hundreds of millions of years, which you would need by evolution. People need to read a book and think 'that's a thing that could happen.' It gives your book a weight and gravity that it would not have if it was magic talking spiders. So in order to support your One Big Lie, everything else needs to be true." — Adrian Tchaikovsky

"In a fantasy or science fiction story, you can get away with one big lie. You can include one thing that's convenient for the author in order to make the plot work. In Children of Time, the question is 'what if a species of a spider developed a society, civilization, and technology. But the big lie is literally that there is a nanovirus is assisting the uplift of the spiders, and the lie is the amount of time that'll take. Because of the nanovirus, that happens in tens of thousands of years rather than hundreds of millions of years, which you would need by evolution. People need to read a book and think 'that's a thing that could happen.' It gives your book a weight and gravity that it would not have if it was magic talking spiders. So in order to support your One Big Lie, everything else needs to be true." — Adrian Tchaikovsky

David Perell

66,154 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад