Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Had so much fun chatting with Greg Kaplan (Greg Kaplan) and Michael Brennan of e61 Institute about Australia's stagnant productivity growth and how to fix it. The 2010s saw Australia's weakest productivity growth in 60 years. It was in many ways a lost decade. And it's dragging on—unlike the...

128,950 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

A crowd of Sydney listeners and I sat down with economist Peter Tulip (Peter Tulip) to talk about Australia's housing crisis. I was really happy with how this conversation turned out: we went into substantial detail and broke new ground. We chat about: - critiques of both NIMBY and YIMBY thinking - general theories of why constricted housing supply afflicts the Anglosphere in particular - what it would actually take to solve the housing crisis via the supply side - and much more Links below. Enjoy! Timestamps: (0:00:00) - Introduction. (0:03:01) - Is there a general theory as to why constricted housing supply is a problem for the Anglosphere in particular? (0:04:21) - What happened in the 1970s that meant zoning regulations started becoming a problem around then? (0:06:38) - What motivates NIMBYs? (0:11:58) - Which planning restrictions does Peter want to remove? (0:15:10) - How much would house prices fall if we removed the bad planning restrictions? (0:22:30) - How much worse can the price-to-income ratio get? What is the upper bound? (0:24:09) - Are YIMBYs overstating the productivity case for urban densification? (0:27:23) - YIMBYs underrate aesthetics and architecture. (0:37:01) - How should we think about the impact of negative gearing and the capital gains tax discount? (0:41:15) - What is Peter's policy goal? Should house prices fall, or should growth merely slow? (0:42:42) - It would take 10 to 20 years to bring prices down by 40% through increased housing supply. (0:43:37) - If we removed all bad planning restrictions, how quickly could we get a 10 to 20% increase in supply? (0:46:03) - Is "increasing housing supply" a politically realistic way to solve the housing crisis? (0:48:35) - Housing is how the middle class gets rich in Australia. What is Peter's transition plan? (0:53:20) - Why haven't we tried anything like the Hawke government's Accord, but for housing? (1:01:43) - Audience Q&A.

Joseph Noel Walker

17,173 просмотров • 1 год назад

New episode with former US Treasury Secretary and current OpenAI board member Larry Summers (Lawrence H. Summers). We discuss: - How he's been learning about AI. - The odds of the technology delivering a much faster economic growth regime (akin to the Industrial Revolution). - How AGI might change economic policymaking. Enjoy! Timestamps: (0:00:00) - Introduction. (0:00:46) - Larry's journey teaching himself about AI & deep learning since joining OpenAI’s board. (0:09:15) - How many hours per week has Larry been spending on OpenAI-related stuff? (0:10:16) - Which bottleneck to AI scaling does Larry think is the most underrated? (0:12:22) - Approximately what share of time do today's AI researchers spend on tasks that AI will be doing for them in five years? (0:15:01) - What explains the remarkable steadiness of US economic growth over the last 150 years? (0:19:42) - How likely is it that AI initiates a new growth regime with average growth that’s ~10x faster than today? (0:21:36) - What are the best economic arguments for believing AI won’t deliver a regime of ever-increasing growth rates? (0:25:33) - How much could AGI boost economic growth in developing countries merely by helping their policymakers make better decisions? (0:28:20) - How much better could monetary policy be if the Fed had AGI? (0:31:40) - How much would having AGI have helped US economic policymakers during the financial crisis & Great Recession? (0:36:07) - Is the CCP infiltrating and stealing the IP of major AI labs in the US and UK? (0:39:35) - At what point should AI be nationalised? (0:42:39) - How would Bill Clinton or Barack Obama be thinking about AI governance? (0:44:27) - If OpenAI restructures to a public benefit corporation, how does that change its incentives? (0:46:18) - What does Daron Acemoglu miss in his analysis of the economic impacts of AI?

Joseph Noel Walker

85,856 просмотров • 1 год назад

New episode! Learned a lot chatting with Martin Parkinson about the economics of migration policy. The issue that most people haven't properly understood: Australia has built an economy that requires roughly 2 million more workers than our population of citizens and permanent residents can supply. We've drifted into a guest-worker system that no government ever proposed. Is it possible to have an ethical temporary program for unskilled workers where there is no path to permanency? And what does that look like? We also discuss: - International student fees now fund close to 50% of the cost of all university research in Australia, which means a cap on student numbers trades off with research, R&D, and ultimately productivity. (Australian R&D spending already sits at 1.7% of GDP versus an OECD average of 2.7%.) - Australia has 250,000 skilled migrants -- including 50,000 engineers, 20,000 teachers, 16,000 nurses, and 1,300 electricians -- who were admitted because their qualifications were assessed as commensurate with Australian standards, but who cannot work in their fields because of state-government and professional-body licensing barriers. - The Australian skilled-occupation list is based on a 2001 taxonomy, which is why employers trying to bring in a global procurement manager were forced to map the role to "supermarket manager." - The Australian points test is "dumb": being 40 years and 1 month old gets you dramatically fewer points than being 39 years and 11 months -- Canada's system steps down gradually, ours falls off a cliff. - Indonesia's diaspora in Australia is 90,000 people -- the same size as Fiji's, and roughly 0.03% of Indonesia's population -- despite Indonesia being projected to become the world's fourth-largest economy by 2045. - And much more. Watch below - or on YouTube, Apple Podcasts or Spotify. Timestamps: (0:00:00) – Introduction. (0:02:37) – What surprised Parkinson about Australia's immigration system? (0:10:20) – How does migration affect Australians' living standards? (0:16:56) – The political equilibrium (0:19:23) – What are the objectives of the migration program? (0:24:01) – The drift into a guest-worker system (0:41:40) – How leveraged are universities to international students? (0:47:56) – Should we have an official low-skilled migration program? (0:51:32) – Using migration to slow population ageing (0:58:42) – What "skills shortage" actually means (1:08:17) – Problems with the points test (1:14:52) – Our Soviet-style occupation list (1:24:45) – We need to better utilise our skilled migrants (1:34:39) – What is the biggest problem with Australia's migration system? (1:42:01) – How can we attract true global talent? (1:45:58) – Is the migration system robust to AI disruption? (1:53:38) – What should the upper/lower bound for net migration be? (1:56:43) – The Indonesian question (2:06:53) – How much more strategic weight would a bigger population buy us?

Joseph Noel Walker

169,846 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

In WiM546, ☣️ Pleb Kruse = BTC foundationalist in exile 🟩🔆 and Robert ₿reedlove discuss what we can learn from Satoshi Nakamoto, how Bitcoin is acting as a global mitochondria, the threat of AI, the importance of destroying centralized medicine, and how to join the ongoing decentralized revolution. 0:00 - WiM Intro 1:19 - I Don't Think, I Know 15:35 - The Significance of Jesus Christ 23:27 - What We can Learn from Satoshi 36:21 - Bitcoin and Fractal Patterns 39:13 - Is Bitcoin a Global Mitochondria? 48:13 - The Farm at Okefenokee 49:39 - Heart and Soil Supplements 50:39 - Helping Lightning Startups with In Wolf's Clothing 51:31 - Every Observation is a Confession of Character 54:25 - What Happens to Us When We Die? 1:03:40 - Is AI Nefarious? 1:07:34 - Is Theft Ever Justified? 1:14:06 - On-Ramp Bitcoin Custody 1:15:29 - MindLab Pro 1:16:39 - Buy Bitcoin with Coinbits 1:18:08 - The Importance of Trust 1:21:44 - What is Dr. Jack Most Grateful for? 1:26:42 - Destroying Centralized Medicine 1:27:19 - What is the Meaning of Life? 1:32:18 - What is Dr. Jack’s Greatest Accomplishment? 1:33:51 - Dr. Jack’s Biggest Mistake 1:37:30 - Is Nature God? 1:39:34 - How Do We Stop Wasting Time? 1:42:40 - What will the World Look Like in 100 Years? 1:47:59 - Emerge Dynamics 1:49:02 - Where does Dr. Jack’s Edge Come From? 1:54:53 - Is Taking a Human Life Ever Justified? 2:07:03 - Relativism vs Absolutes 2:22:31 - Survival of the Fittest 2:26:33 - How to Better Question What You Don’t Know 2:47:10 - What is Dr. Jack’s Biggest Flaw? 2:52:14 - Rick Rubin and Andrew Huberman 2:53:48 - The Decentralized Revolution

The "What is Money?" Show

23,312 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨Our episode with Anne-Laure Le Cunff is now live! Anne-Laure Le Cunff is the founder of Ness Labs and author of Tiny Experiments: How to Live Freely in a Goal-Obsessed World. She's a neuroscience PhD and writes a newsletter that has 100,000+ subscribers. She's used those insights to develop a new model of success — one built around conducting “tiny experiments” that help her build a life on her own terms. She joins me to discuss how we get trapped in cognitive scripts, the hidden dangers of productivity culture, how we can experiment our way to a better life and MUCH more! Timestamps 0:00:00 Intro 0:00:48 Guest introduction 0:05:15 How do you know you are bored out? 0:17:18 People who love us the most might turn out to be our biggest blockers 0:22:20 Don't confuse activity with effectiveness 0:27:39 We will do virtually anything to gain what is really an illusion of control 0:32:16 The map is not the territory, the menu is not the meal. And yet, words are magic spells 0:39:16 The Winner’s Script and the Loser’s Script 0:47:34 "You gotta run at the top speed if you just want to stay in place.” 0:50:27 Let go of the linear and replace it with the loop- a more cyclical approach for growth 0:55:20 Can you sit alone in a room for 15 minutes? 0:58:24 Procrastination is just a signal from your brain that something is not quite working right now 1:20:38 We know nothing 1:24:26 AI is a rocket ship for the mind 1:28:20 In 100 years, nobody will remember you

Infinite Loops 🎙

22,154 просмотров • 1 год назад

Episode 2 of my Immigration Series: Australian immigration policy is genuinely sui generis. Not even Australians fully appreciate this. A potted history: - The only country to have run assisted passage at scale -- around 3.5 million people whose fares were subsidised, sometimes fully, in a program that began in the 1830s and ran for around 150 years, ending only in 1981. - The first country in the world to have a dedicated Department of Immigration (founded 1945). - Probably the only nation in history to have set an explicit population target after WWII -- 1% growth from migration plus 1% from natural increase. - The first country in the world to offer adult migrants English-language training (in 1948, still running) and (I'm pretty sure) a telephone interpreting service for migrants (from 1973). - In the late 1970s and early 1980s, Australia took 60,000 Indochinese refugees -- proportionally more per population than any other country in the world. - One of the earliest countries in the world to introduce mandatory detention for unlawful non-citizens (1992). - Per capita, it's been the world's largest receiver of international students for decades. - The OECD country with the highest share of overseas-born among countries with more than 10 million people -- around 32%, about 8-9x the world average, and projected to climb into the 40s, a level likely not seen in Australia since the 1880s. I discussed the history of Australia's migration exceptionalism with Mark Cully. Mark has written the first truly general history of Australian immigration (to be published later this year). He has direct experience, having served as the inaugural Chief Economist of Australia's Department of Immigration. We discuss the six most decisive decades in Australian migration history, as well as some bigger picture questions: - has migration actually increased Australians' living standards (Mark believes it probably hasn't)? - the three potential constraints on our ability to accept migrants, and which has tended to be binding in practice - what does history teach us about the rise of One Nation? - and much more. Watch below, or on YouTube, Apple Podcasts or Spotify. Timestamps: (0:00:00) – Introduction. (0:03:21) – Why didn't Australia turn to slavery? (0:10:17) – The decade that made modern Australia (1850s) (0:20:51) – What was White Australia really about? (0:30:23) – The most epic policy experiment in Australian history (the postwar migration program) (1:01:57) – The 1970s: an underrated decade (1:07:02) – The drift into a temporary-migrant economy (1:21:49) – Inside the chief economist's office (1:28:56) – Culture, social cohesion, and integration (2:01:17) – Has migration made Australia richer? (2:06:56) – The main constraint on Australian immigration over the past 200 years (2:16:11) – What makes Australian immigration exceptional?

Joseph Noel Walker

149,572 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

A special new episode to finish the year: Glyn Davis & Terry Moran are two former Secretaries of the Department of Prime Minister & Cabinet -- they're two of the tiny number of Australians who have literally sat in the Cabinet Room, week after week, watching the highest-stakes decisions get made from the inside. Terry was Secretary from 2008 to 2011, including during the GFC. Glyn was Secretary from 2022 to 2025, resigning only a few months ago. As far as I know, neither has done a long-form podcast like this before -- let alone together. My goal was to ask as many naive questions as possible about the nuts and bolts of Cabinet, and how power is used, shaped and constrained in Canberra. We go into lots of tactical detail. One general takeaway for me was how surprisingly malleable the institutions in a Westminster system are -- for better or worse, the PM really can mould the government around their persona. But the flipside of this is that once they leave power, the machinery snaps back to its default state, or reconfigures around the next PM. So PM's are very powerful, but not in a lasting way. Also, given how reflexively and unfavourably we compare government to the private sector, it was interesting to invert the lens and consider the Cabinet process as an example of operational excellence -- a system refined over more than a century and stress-tested through wars, disasters and depressions. Learning about even small details -- like what the template for Cabinet submissions looks like -- was fascinating. Links below, or watch/listen wherever you get your podcasts. Enjoy! Timestamps: 0:00:00 - Introduction. 0:02:50 - What is the biggest thing Australians get wrong about how federal government works day to day? 0:06:17 - Where does power sit in Canberra? 0:12:38 - Two powerful figures: Nugget Coombs and John Monash. 0:15:44 - Have prime ministers been getting more powerful in Australia? 0:18:24 - Is Cabinet government in the UK and Canada dead? Why not Australia? 0:20:04 - Is Albanese more powerful in Australia than Trump is in the U.S.? 0:22:42 - What is the institutional or conventional source of the PM's power? 0:29:01 - What does a typical day for the PM look like? 0:38:14 - The gritty details of the Cabinet process. 1:15:54 - What are the root causes of big mistakes by governments? 1:19:00 - How often does physical exhaustion impair outcomes? 1:21:00 - How should decision-making structures change in a crisis? 1:24:40 - One thing you'd change about the machinery of government? 1:32:23 - If the PM made solving the housing crisis their top priority, how would that be reflected in the machinery of government? 1:45:15 - How are decisions about war made? 1:49:33 - Questions about "state capacity" — that is, the ability of our governments to achieve their goals. 2:22:33 - What great book remains to be written about government in Australia? (And an explanation of the Red and Blue books.)

Joseph Noel Walker

11,039 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад