“Hairy Ginger Dad - Remixed by Frank Butcher” Part 3 Here’s when the primal connection truly begins, with HairyGingerDad’s raw penis sliding balls deep in a hairy manhole. It’s a truly hypnotic and masculine sight to behold! Come visit me at to check out the full experience today, as... show more
32,196 次观看 • 2 年前 •via X (Twitter)
0 条评论
暂无评论
原始帖子的评论将显示在这里
![You are incorrect. There's no connection between sexuality and gender identity. A man can be gay, straight, bisexual, or otherwise, and identify as masculine, feminine, or neither. If you wanted artistic depictions of "robust masculinity," as you say, you can always go back to J. C. Leyendecker, a German-American immigrant responsible for producing some of the best commercial art during the early 20th century. Leyendecker, who is widely believed to be gay, created "The Arrow Man" for Arrow Shirts and hundreds of The Saturday Evening Post's covers. If you're into menswear, as I am, you are undoubtedly familiar with his work, as he created much of the menswear art during that period. "Trad" corners of Twitter also often put his art forward today as representations of "traditional Western society." Or you can check out Osmar Schindler, whose works are markedly homoerotic. See Muskelspiel (Muscle Play, 1907) and Germanic Warrior with Roman Helmet (1902), pictured in the second and third slides below. These images celebrate "robust masculinity," but there are often layers of meaning, which makes his work interesting. What you're hinting at is a stereotype that has always been around but, in my opinion, crystallized after the trial of Oscar Wilde. In his essay "Out of the Closet," Max Mosher writes about some of this history. An excerpt: “Pansy, Nellie, swish, queen: the fairy went by many names, but one thing universally acknowledged was that he wasn’t a ‘real man.' Sexual theories of the time suggested that homosexuals were women in men’s bodies, unnaturally devoid of masculinity. But the easily recognizable identity proved useful for lonely men desperate to find each other. Gay men flocked to the stereotype like fairies to a flame. [Later], masculine gays felt alienated from an identity that didn’t represent them; early queer activists worried that the fairy stereotype gave the community a bad name.” In the 1970s, gay men rejected this "fairy" stereotype and embraced over-the-top representations of masculinity, often forms connected to the working-class male. In San Francisco, some of these men were known as "The Clones" or "The Castroids" (for how they would hang around Castro Street, a historically LGBTQ+ area of the city). Moser continues: “Clones had taken the look of the working-class male and sexualized it, emphasizing muscles through tight t-shirts, and shapely buttocks through deliberately shrunken jeans. The Clone Look was, in fact, a deconstruction of the traditional male, a kind of ‘butch drag.’ By dressing like ‘real men,’ clones had discovered that masculinity was a performance with costumes no less contrived than the fairy’s tailored suits or the radical drag queens’ gowns. The Clone Look, the first style to say it was okay to be both gay and masculine, may have encouraged thousands of men to come out.” Today, much of this aesthetic has been co-opted by the far right, as conservatives wear skin-tight Buffalo plaid shirts, stretch denim, and work boots. Regardless, I don't care for the original image not because it depicts masculinity — which I'm totally fine with and in fact have built a career in writing about as an aesthetic — but because it's cliché. To be sure, it's remarkable as photojournalism, as it captures the moment when Secret Service agents rushed Reagan out of the Augusta National Golf Club when someone crashed the gate and took people hostage in 1983. But people are not necessarily reacting to that moment; they are reacting to the semiotics of the image. I find the image cliché because it's so inert and overdetermined. There are no layers to the image; people are just into the accumulation of masculine tropes in a small frame — preppy clothes (symbolizing wealth), semi-automatic weapons (violence), and a sense of urgency (ACTION!!). I find it cliché the same way I find it cliché when a certain kind of guy loves referencing the Scarface scene where Tony Montana says "say hello to my little friend." The red-carpeted mansion (wealth), shootout with semi-automatic weapons (violence), and fast-paced scene (ACTION!!) have some obvious appeal. But... it's also pretty cliché. You are easily impressed by low quality symbols, which is perhaps why our current political moment is so exciting for you.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2086563138481381888/amplify_video_thumb/2086557586678251520/img/ynB1h_6haBQvlPbO.jpg)
