Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Hamas senior official Mousa Abu Marzouk: At no point did we talk about surrendering our weapons; whether disarmament is necessary and who will control Gaza will be discussed in negotiations

Open Source Intel

931,899 subscribers

37,789 views • 6 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Hamas Official Mousa Abu Marzouk: The Tunnels in Gaza Were Built to Protect Hamas Fighters, Not Civilians; Protecting Gaza Civilians Is the Responsibility of the U.N. and Israel #Hamas #Gaza

Hamas Official Mousa Abu Marzouk: The Tunnels in Gaza Were Built to Protect Hamas Fighters, Not Civilians; Protecting Gaza Civilians Is the Responsibility of the U.N. and Israel #Hamas #Gaza

MEMRI

7,034,396 views • 2 years ago

Senior Hamas official Mousa Abu Marzouk explains: “Nobody could have anticipated the consequences of our October 7th attack. We didn’t expect a barbaric world war to be launched against us” Well…

Senior Hamas official Mousa Abu Marzouk explains: “Nobody could have anticipated the consequences of our October 7th attack. We didn’t expect a barbaric world war to be launched against us” Well…

Visegrád 24

1,988,729 views • 2 years ago

🟢 “If Netanyahu’s talking about weapons in Gaza that he wants to confiscate, why is he arming Palestinian groups operating outside the law and outside national norms in southern, central, and northern Gaza? What will happen to their weapons if weapons are taken from the other (Hamas’) side? There are many questions here.” — Senior Hamas Leader Dr. Mousa Abu Marzouk on Trump and Netanyahu’s demands to disarm the Palestinian resistance Clip via الجزيرة مباشر

🟢 “If Netanyahu’s talking about weapons in Gaza that he wants to confiscate, why is he arming Palestinian groups operating outside the law and outside national norms in southern, central, and northern Gaza? What will happen to their weapons if weapons are taken from the other (Hamas’) side? There are many questions here.” — Senior Hamas Leader Dr. Mousa Abu Marzouk on Trump and Netanyahu’s demands to disarm the Palestinian resistance Clip via الجزيرة مباشر

Drop Site

43,181 views • 6 months ago

🚨 Gaza Technocratic Committee Official Barred From Entering Gaza Over Past Conviction, Hamas Leader Tells AJ Mubasher Speaking to Al Jazeera Mubasher, Senior Hamas leader Mousa Abu Marzouk said Hamas raised objections to two individuals proposed for the new technocratic committee (NCAG): one who had made what he described as inappropriate public statements and was subsequently removed from contention for the committee, and another who he said has documented charges, a prior court ruling, and is accused of involvement in assassinations of Islamic Jihad members. Abu Marzouk did not name either individual, but with the second case was referring to the senior Palestinian Authority security figure designated to oversee Gaza’s internal security - Sami Nasman. He said the objections were conveyed through Egyptian mediation and that Egypt complied: the first name was removed from contention for the committee, while the other was barred from entering Gaza and according to Abu Marzouk is being replaced. Egypt has not publicly confirmed the account. Abu Marzouk said that aside from these cases, the committee is welcome to enter Gaza and begin its work. He said the handover process would take place with Gaza’s existing administrative apparatus, which he said is ready, and that Hamas would provide security and protection to any committee entering to serve the population. Senior Hamas leader Mousa Abu Marzouk said no political or administrative body can enter or operate in Gaza without coordination with Hamas. (More on Sami Nasman in linked post below)

🚨 Gaza Technocratic Committee Official Barred From Entering Gaza Over Past Conviction, Hamas Leader Tells AJ Mubasher Speaking to Al Jazeera Mubasher, Senior Hamas leader Mousa Abu Marzouk said Hamas raised objections to two individuals proposed for the new technocratic committee (NCAG): one who had made what he described as inappropriate public statements and was subsequently removed from contention for the committee, and another who he said has documented charges, a prior court ruling, and is accused of involvement in assassinations of Islamic Jihad members. Abu Marzouk did not name either individual, but with the second case was referring to the senior Palestinian Authority security figure designated to oversee Gaza’s internal security - Sami Nasman. He said the objections were conveyed through Egyptian mediation and that Egypt complied: the first name was removed from contention for the committee, while the other was barred from entering Gaza and according to Abu Marzouk is being replaced. Egypt has not publicly confirmed the account. Abu Marzouk said that aside from these cases, the committee is welcome to enter Gaza and begin its work. He said the handover process would take place with Gaza’s existing administrative apparatus, which he said is ready, and that Hamas would provide security and protection to any committee entering to serve the population. Senior Hamas leader Mousa Abu Marzouk said no political or administrative body can enter or operate in Gaza without coordination with Hamas. (More on Sami Nasman in linked post below)

Drop Site

15,005 views • 6 months ago

Iranian FM Abbas Araghchi: “No negotiations with the Americans exist.” “Our senior officials have received their messages, and it will be decided whether any response is necessary.” “The very fact that the Americans are talking about negotiations is an admission of defeat.”

Iranian FM Abbas Araghchi: “No negotiations with the Americans exist.” “Our senior officials have received their messages, and it will be decided whether any response is necessary.” “The very fact that the Americans are talking about negotiations is an admission of defeat.”

Open Source Intel

110,321 views • 5 months ago

Jeremy Scahill asked senior Hamas leader Mousa Abu Marzouk earlier this week about Trump’s proposed prisoner exchange deal: freeing 48 Israelis (living and dead) in return for 250 Palestinians serving life and 1,700 from Gaza, including women and children. Abu Marzouk told Drop Site that leaders like Marwan Barghouti, Ahmed Sa’adat, and Abdullah Barghouti are a top priority — “a necessity for Palestinian unity and solidarity.” Scahill also questioned him about reports that the Palestinian Authority sought to block Barghouti’s release in earlier negotiations.

Jeremy Scahill asked senior Hamas leader Mousa Abu Marzouk earlier this week about Trump’s proposed prisoner exchange deal: freeing 48 Israelis (living and dead) in return for 250 Palestinians serving life and 1,700 from Gaza, including women and children. Abu Marzouk told Drop Site that leaders like Marwan Barghouti, Ahmed Sa’adat, and Abdullah Barghouti are a top priority — “a necessity for Palestinian unity and solidarity.” Scahill also questioned him about reports that the Palestinian Authority sought to block Barghouti’s release in earlier negotiations.

Drop Site

16,593 views • 10 months ago

‼️“WE WILL NOT PLAY GAMES WITH HAMAS” DANNY DANON Israel’s UN Ambassador Danny Danon says Hamas is now trying to redefine what “disarmament” means. According to Danon, Hamas’s proposal is to place its weapons in a warehouse inside Gaza—while keeping the keys. “That’s not disarmament.” Danon says real disarmament means Hamas’s weapons are removed from Gaza entirely. “Once it happens, we will pull out of Gaza and we can build a new future for Gaza. But we will not play games with Hamas. We learned the lesson from October 7th.” His bottom line: Hamas will not be allowed to retain the capability to threaten Israel again. Danny Danon 🇮🇱 דני דנון

‼️“WE WILL NOT PLAY GAMES WITH HAMAS” DANNY DANON Israel’s UN Ambassador Danny Danon says Hamas is now trying to redefine what “disarmament” means. According to Danon, Hamas’s proposal is to place its weapons in a warehouse inside Gaza—while keeping the keys. “That’s not disarmament.” Danon says real disarmament means Hamas’s weapons are removed from Gaza entirely. “Once it happens, we will pull out of Gaza and we can build a new future for Gaza. But we will not play games with Hamas. We learned the lesson from October 7th.” His bottom line: Hamas will not be allowed to retain the capability to threaten Israel again. Danny Danon 🇮🇱 דני דנון

Mossad Commentary

41,586 views • 18 days ago

🚨 BREAKING: Senior Hamas leader Mousa Abu Marzouk indicates that Hamas is open to relinquishing weapons capable of striking beyond Gaza’s borders as part of phase 2 ceasefire negotiations. Hamas and Islamic Jihad have thus far rejected any talk of unilateral disarmament. And Abu Marzouk drew a clear line between light arms needed for self-defense and long-range weapons that could threaten Israel — suggesting that discussions on disarming the latter would be on the table once talks move to the second phase. He emphasized that phase 1 remains incomplete, with Israel “violating the agreement, obstructing aid deliveries, and continuing strikes that have killed more than 250 Palestinians in 21 days.” “All such issues,” he said, “would be discussed through dialogue — within a framework that respects the goals of all parties: the mediators, the international actors, the Palestinian people, and yes, even Israel’s concerns about future calm. But that dialogue must balance everyone’s interests — not just impose the will of one side.” Responding to the U.S.-backed proposal for a UN-mandated international force to disarm Hamas, Abu Marzouk explained: “Now, what weapons are we talking about? If you mean weapons whose range goes beyond the buffer zone, I say this is understandable — because such weapons could threaten the other side. But when you talk about disarming all weapons in general, that makes no sense. It has no meaning. When I carry light arms whose range doesn’t even reach 400 or 500 meters — and in some areas they talk about 1,000 meters — what exactly is the point of removing those? The only outcome is chaos in the very areas they claim to want stability. But if the weapons in question genuinely threaten the surroundings, then yes — that’s something that can be discussed and talked about. That’s why I’ve said we haven’t yet entered that phase of dialogue, the phase meant to achieve everyone’s goals. Our goal is stability. Our goal is to prevent war. Our goal is to avoid new threats and to make sure there’s no repetition of October 7. Their goals are their own — but we also have ours. We care about protecting our people, about social peace, about reconstruction, and about bringing life back to our people. That’s what matters to us — our people’s safety, dignity, and happiness. Not turning Gaza into an American sphere of influence or a place for business deals, or what they call a ‘Riviera.’ That is not in our minds, nor in the minds of the Palestinian people.” Source: الجزيرة مباشر

🚨 BREAKING: Senior Hamas leader Mousa Abu Marzouk indicates that Hamas is open to relinquishing weapons capable of striking beyond Gaza’s borders as part of phase 2 ceasefire negotiations. Hamas and Islamic Jihad have thus far rejected any talk of unilateral disarmament. And Abu Marzouk drew a clear line between light arms needed for self-defense and long-range weapons that could threaten Israel — suggesting that discussions on disarming the latter would be on the table once talks move to the second phase. He emphasized that phase 1 remains incomplete, with Israel “violating the agreement, obstructing aid deliveries, and continuing strikes that have killed more than 250 Palestinians in 21 days.” “All such issues,” he said, “would be discussed through dialogue — within a framework that respects the goals of all parties: the mediators, the international actors, the Palestinian people, and yes, even Israel’s concerns about future calm. But that dialogue must balance everyone’s interests — not just impose the will of one side.” Responding to the U.S.-backed proposal for a UN-mandated international force to disarm Hamas, Abu Marzouk explained: “Now, what weapons are we talking about? If you mean weapons whose range goes beyond the buffer zone, I say this is understandable — because such weapons could threaten the other side. But when you talk about disarming all weapons in general, that makes no sense. It has no meaning. When I carry light arms whose range doesn’t even reach 400 or 500 meters — and in some areas they talk about 1,000 meters — what exactly is the point of removing those? The only outcome is chaos in the very areas they claim to want stability. But if the weapons in question genuinely threaten the surroundings, then yes — that’s something that can be discussed and talked about. That’s why I’ve said we haven’t yet entered that phase of dialogue, the phase meant to achieve everyone’s goals. Our goal is stability. Our goal is to prevent war. Our goal is to avoid new threats and to make sure there’s no repetition of October 7. Their goals are their own — but we also have ours. We care about protecting our people, about social peace, about reconstruction, and about bringing life back to our people. That’s what matters to us — our people’s safety, dignity, and happiness. Not turning Gaza into an American sphere of influence or a place for business deals, or what they call a ‘Riviera.’ That is not in our minds, nor in the minds of the Palestinian people.” Source: الجزيرة مباشر

Drop Site

164,489 views • 9 months ago

⚡Hamas: We will not allow anyone in Gaza to become part of Hezbollah or Shi'ism. We even suppressed those who did. We deal with America, so why should we not deal with Iran? Salem Abu Musameh, Hamas official and co-founder

⚡Hamas: We will not allow anyone in Gaza to become part of Hezbollah or Shi'ism. We even suppressed those who did. We deal with America, so why should we not deal with Iran? Salem Abu Musameh, Hamas official and co-founder

Xumas

155,895 views • 10 months ago

Senior Hamas Official Ghazi Hamad: October 7 Led to International Recognition of a Palestinian State and Proved Defeating Israel Is Not That Difficult; We Will Never Surrender Our Weapons – Israel Can Dream We Will

Senior Hamas Official Ghazi Hamad: October 7 Led to International Recognition of a Palestinian State and Proved Defeating Israel Is Not That Difficult; We Will Never Surrender Our Weapons – Israel Can Dream We Will

MEMRI

311,447 views • 1 year ago

🇵🇸 Gazans ‘not optimistic’ about Hamas disarmament deal In central Gaza's Deir el-Balah, displaced Palestinians question whether a deal announced by US President Donald Trump for Hamas to hand over its weapons and Israeli forces to withdraw will be implemented

🇵🇸 Gazans ‘not optimistic’ about Hamas disarmament deal In central Gaza's Deir el-Balah, displaced Palestinians question whether a deal announced by US President Donald Trump for Hamas to hand over its weapons and Israeli forces to withdraw will be implemented

AFP News Agency

31,492 views • 21 days ago

This is an inflection point in our future. We need someone who will fight for our values — and someone who will fix our problems. Join us at

This is an inflection point in our future. We need someone who will fight for our values — and someone who will fix our problems. Join us at

Mayor Matt Mahan

53,031 views • 6 months ago

⚡️NEW: Senior Hamas political leader Mousa Abu Marzouk spoke to Al Jazeera about the “necessary conditions” Hamas needs to negotiate with mediators to carry out a successful exchange of captives. He highlights the need for: 1. Binding end to Israeli attacks - so Israel cannot restart attacks after getting back its captives 2. An Israeli withdrawal 3. Humanitarian aid should be delivered throughout Gaza Hamas write in their formal response: “The Movement declares its approval for the release of all Israeli captives—living and dead—according to the exchange formula outlined in President Trump’s proposal, **with the necessary field conditions in place to carry out the exchange.** In this context, the Movement affirms its readiness to immediately enter, through mediators, negotiations to discuss the details.

⚡️NEW: Senior Hamas political leader Mousa Abu Marzouk spoke to Al Jazeera about the “necessary conditions” Hamas needs to negotiate with mediators to carry out a successful exchange of captives. He highlights the need for: 1. Binding end to Israeli attacks - so Israel cannot restart attacks after getting back its captives 2. An Israeli withdrawal 3. Humanitarian aid should be delivered throughout Gaza Hamas write in their formal response: “The Movement declares its approval for the release of all Israeli captives—living and dead—according to the exchange formula outlined in President Trump’s proposal, with the necessary field conditions in place to carry out the exchange. In this context, the Movement affirms its readiness to immediately enter, through mediators, negotiations to discuss the details.

Drop Site

75,329 views • 10 months ago

🟢 “I want to tell you a story that was shared with me by the chief Egyptian negotiator,” Senior Hamas leader Abu Marzouk told Drop Site’s Jeremy Scahill. Maj. Gen. Ahmed Abdel Khaleq asked his Israeli intelligence counterpart whether he understood the maps attached to Trump’s Gaza proposal. Marzouk said the Israeli replied, “‘No.’ Why? Because this map has no meaning. It is hand-drawn, with no spaces, distances, locations, or anything,” Marzouk said. “While in previous discussions, the text was clear… these maps were drawn by people who are used to camel races. They don’t know the basics of map-making.” Marzouk said “the first point now must be to define the maps… neither the Israelis nor the Egyptians understood the maps at all.”

🟢 “I want to tell you a story that was shared with me by the chief Egyptian negotiator,” Senior Hamas leader Abu Marzouk told Drop Site’s Jeremy Scahill. Maj. Gen. Ahmed Abdel Khaleq asked his Israeli intelligence counterpart whether he understood the maps attached to Trump’s Gaza proposal. Marzouk said the Israeli replied, “‘No.’ Why? Because this map has no meaning. It is hand-drawn, with no spaces, distances, locations, or anything,” Marzouk said. “While in previous discussions, the text was clear… these maps were drawn by people who are used to camel races. They don’t know the basics of map-making.” Marzouk said “the first point now must be to define the maps… neither the Israelis nor the Egyptians understood the maps at all.”

Drop Site

111,182 views • 10 months ago

No outside force will be able to take control of Gaza if there are still 20,000 Hamas terrorists running around the territory. No investor will rebuild Gaza if Hamas remains and things could flare up again. This is our opportunity to put Gaza on a different track and ensure security for decades to come.

No outside force will be able to take control of Gaza if there are still 20,000 Hamas terrorists running around the territory. No investor will rebuild Gaza if Hamas remains and things could flare up again. This is our opportunity to put Gaza on a different track and ensure security for decades to come.

Ron Dermer - רון דרמר

76,141 views • 1 year ago

Take 5 minutes and watch the full statements from the interview of senior Hamas official Mohammed Nazal to Reuters - Hamas is now trying to minimize the damage it caused: 🔴Nazal clarifies that Hamas will not hand over its weapons and will continue to control the Gaza Strip security-wise. 🔴He also adds that Hamas intends only a temporary "hudna" with Israel to "give the Strip some breathing room."

Take 5 minutes and watch the full statements from the interview of senior Hamas official Mohammed Nazal to Reuters - Hamas is now trying to minimize the damage it caused: 🔴Nazal clarifies that Hamas will not hand over its weapons and will continue to control the Gaza Strip security-wise. 🔴He also adds that Hamas intends only a temporary "hudna" with Israel to "give the Strip some breathing room."

Raylan Givens

174,987 views • 10 months ago