Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

💀HARD DATA: WHY IRON DOME LOST IT 🔸Only covers 144 sq km 🔸Works well against individual rockets, but fails catastrophically against mass attacks 🔸Hypersonic gap: Fattah missile reaches Israel in 7 mins – Dome reportedly needs 11 mins to reload batteries 6/7

Sputnik

498,974 subscribers

171,416 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

Bilim & Teknoloji Haberler & Politika Eğitim

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

9 Yorum

Sputnik profil fotoğrafı

Sputnik1 yıl önce

🚨🇮🇱💥ISRAEL'S IRON DOME: NOT AS INVINCIBLE AS YOU THINK 🇮🇷Iran just cracked Israel's air defenses, making it attack its own systems. Here’s how: 🧵

Sputnik profil fotoğrafı

Sputnik1 yıl önce

🔥IRAN CRACKED ISRAELI AIR DEFENSES Videos online suggest IRGC managed to breach the data transmission and correction signal system at the early stage of flight, Yuri Knutov, military expert and historian of air defense forces, tells Sputnik. 2/7

Sputnik profil fotoğrafı

Sputnik1 yıl önce

💥SYSTEM OVERLOAD TACTICS Iran overwhelmed Israeli systems with: 1️⃣ 100+ Shahed drones 2️⃣ Old ballistic missiles as DECOYS 3️⃣ Advanced Fattah hypersonic missiles (unstoppable by Arrow/PAC-3) Iron Dome's interception rate dropped to 10-15%, as a result. 3/7

Sputnik profil fotoğrafı

Sputnik1 yıl önce

💥HYPERSONIC ADVANTAGE Iran’s Fattah hypersonic missiles & guided ballistic Haj Qassems HIT Israeli Defense Ministry HQ & a major airbase housing F-35 & F-16. Arrow & Patriot systems FAILED to stop them - despite Israel's advertising. 4/7

Sputnik profil fotoğrafı

Sputnik1 yıl önce

🤥ART OF DECEPTION Iran deployed decoys so effectively that Israeli strikes repeatedly hit FAKE TARGETS, mistaking them for the real ones. 5/7

Sputnik profil fotoğrafı

Sputnik1 yıl önce

😎LESSONS LEARNED Iran drew lessons from Israel's strike 6 months ago, when aeroballistic missiles seriously damaged its air defenses. They improved tactics, set up backup command centers & control systems, and maneuvered more effectively. 7/7

osmanlı tokad profil fotoğrafı

osmanlı tokad1 yıl önce

Close the Strait of Hormuz only to countries that help Israel

Ed herbert profil fotoğrafı

Ed herbert1 yıl önce

Loveit

Tajj profil fotoğrafı

Tajj1 yıl önce

It is Arrow or thaad or David sling,, iron dome is used for smaller rockets

Benzer Videolar

🇮🇷🇮🇱🇱🇧🇺🇸 I can't speak to the veracity or timing of this video, but scenes like this—the mass launch of apparent Tamir/Iron Dome interceptors against rockets reportedly launched from Lebanon—are what Iran and Hizballah likely want to see and induce. Tamir stocks are not infinite, and Iran benefits from having Iron Dome batteries "pinned" in northern Israel, with the ELM-2084 radars facing north—not ~northeast. When tied up intercepting inexpensive and plentiful unguided artillery rockets launched from Lebanon—and Hizballah's strike drones—Iron Dome batteries cannot be positioned to undertake low-probability, short-range, and rather desperate/last-ditch interception attempts against long-range Iranian ballistic missiles in other parts of Israel.

🇮🇷🇮🇱🇱🇧🇺🇸 I can't speak to the veracity or timing of this video, but scenes like this—the mass launch of apparent Tamir/Iron Dome interceptors against rockets reportedly launched from Lebanon—are what Iran and Hizballah likely want to see and induce. Tamir stocks are not infinite, and Iran benefits from having Iron Dome batteries "pinned" in northern Israel, with the ELM-2084 radars facing north—not ~northeast. When tied up intercepting inexpensive and plentiful unguided artillery rockets launched from Lebanon—and Hizballah's strike drones—Iron Dome batteries cannot be positioned to undertake low-probability, short-range, and rather desperate/last-ditch interception attempts against long-range Iranian ballistic missiles in other parts of Israel.

Shahryar Pasandideh

21,340 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

🚨Russian New Ballistic Missile Now Ready to Hit EU Capitals in Minutes🇷🇺🇧🇾 Lukashenko just dropped a bombshell. Russia's "Oreshnik" missile is now live in Belarus, and the flight times to major cities are absolutely terrifying. Positioned in Belarus, it places key European, but specially Ukrainian cities under a two-minute threat window. Check these flight times from Belarus: 🔸Kiev: 1 min 51 sec 🔸Warsaw: 2 min 23 sec 🔸Prague: 3 min 🔸Bratislava: 2 min 50 sec 🔸Vienna: 3 min 15 sec 🔸Copenhagen: 3 min 30 sec 🔸Berlin: 4 min 🔸Brussels (NATO HQ): 4 min 30 sec 🔸Paris: 6 min 30 sec 🔸Rome: 7 min 🔸London: 7 min 45 sec Capabilities: 🔸Speed: >12,300 km/h 🔸Payload: 6 submunitions warheads 🔸First combat use confirmed on Nov 21, 2024, against Ukrainian target. This is a strategic power projection, compressing decision-making time for NATO and Ukraine to mere minutes. Real flight times may vary due to trajectory and missile defense, but the message is clear: you can't win a war against a nuclear superpower.

🚨Russian New Ballistic Missile Now Ready to Hit EU Capitals in Minutes🇷🇺🇧🇾 Lukashenko just dropped a bombshell. Russia's "Oreshnik" missile is now live in Belarus, and the flight times to major cities are absolutely terrifying. Positioned in Belarus, it places key European, but specially Ukrainian cities under a two-minute threat window. Check these flight times from Belarus: 🔸Kiev: 1 min 51 sec 🔸Warsaw: 2 min 23 sec 🔸Prague: 3 min 🔸Bratislava: 2 min 50 sec 🔸Vienna: 3 min 15 sec 🔸Copenhagen: 3 min 30 sec 🔸Berlin: 4 min 🔸Brussels (NATO HQ): 4 min 30 sec 🔸Paris: 6 min 30 sec 🔸Rome: 7 min 🔸London: 7 min 45 sec Capabilities: 🔸Speed: >12,300 km/h 🔸Payload: 6 submunitions warheads 🔸First combat use confirmed on Nov 21, 2024, against Ukrainian target. This is a strategic power projection, compressing decision-making time for NATO and Ukraine to mere minutes. Real flight times may vary due to trajectory and missile defense, but the message is clear: you can't win a war against a nuclear superpower.

NewRulesGeopolitics

53,215 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

🚨🇱🇧 IDF IN PANIC: Hezbollah smashes top Israeli drone with low-cost SAM Hezbollah units have downed an Israeli Hermes 450 over Lebanon, drawing attention to the Mizag-1 — a low-cost Iranian MANPADS increasingly used to counter UAVs in the region. 🔸 This portable fire-and-forget MANPADS developed by Tehran at the Shahid Kazemi Industrial Complex offers an effective range of 500 meters to 5-6 km with a maximum altitude of up to 5 km. 🔸 The 16.9 kg shoulder-fired system features a 1.42 kg high-explosive fragmentation warhead and reaches speeds of Mach 2.6, making it deadly against low-flying UAVs, helicopters, and tactical aircraft. 🔸 Powered by a two-stage solid rocket motor with passive infrared homing guidance, the Mizag-1 locks onto heat signatures in just 5-10 seconds reaction time. 🔸 At roughly 17 kg total weight and only 1.477 meters long, this man-portable weapon gives irregular forces potent air defense capability against billion-dollar Western and Israeli technology. 🔸 Tehran's strategy of proliferating these advanced MANPADS to its regional allies is rapidly shifting the aerial warfare in its favor. 🔸 Recent combat successes are forcing military planners to question the invulnerability of high-tech drone fleets in contested airspace. 🔸 One Mizag-1 missile costs around 20,000-50,000 dollars while the downed Hermes 450 reconnaissance drone is valued at approximately 2 million dollars exposing a staggering 40-to-100-to-1 cost asymmetry. Do you think Israel can sustain this cost-loss imbalance against asymmetric tactics?

🚨🇱🇧 IDF IN PANIC: Hezbollah smashes top Israeli drone with low-cost SAM Hezbollah units have downed an Israeli Hermes 450 over Lebanon, drawing attention to the Mizag-1 — a low-cost Iranian MANPADS increasingly used to counter UAVs in the region. 🔸 This portable fire-and-forget MANPADS developed by Tehran at the Shahid Kazemi Industrial Complex offers an effective range of 500 meters to 5-6 km with a maximum altitude of up to 5 km. 🔸 The 16.9 kg shoulder-fired system features a 1.42 kg high-explosive fragmentation warhead and reaches speeds of Mach 2.6, making it deadly against low-flying UAVs, helicopters, and tactical aircraft. 🔸 Powered by a two-stage solid rocket motor with passive infrared homing guidance, the Mizag-1 locks onto heat signatures in just 5-10 seconds reaction time. 🔸 At roughly 17 kg total weight and only 1.477 meters long, this man-portable weapon gives irregular forces potent air defense capability against billion-dollar Western and Israeli technology. 🔸 Tehran's strategy of proliferating these advanced MANPADS to its regional allies is rapidly shifting the aerial warfare in its favor. 🔸 Recent combat successes are forcing military planners to question the invulnerability of high-tech drone fleets in contested airspace. 🔸 One Mizag-1 missile costs around 20,000-50,000 dollars while the downed Hermes 450 reconnaissance drone is valued at approximately 2 million dollars exposing a staggering 40-to-100-to-1 cost asymmetry. Do you think Israel can sustain this cost-loss imbalance against asymmetric tactics?

NewRulesGeopolitics

54,024 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

🚨🇷🇺 NATO IN PANIC: RUSSIA’S FIRST ZIRCON-ARMED NUCLEAR SUBMARINE IS ENTERING SERVICE Russia’s Project 885M nuclear submarine Perm is expected to complete trials and join the Navy before the end of 2026. It will be Russia’s first multipurpose nuclear submarine built from the outset to carry Zircon hypersonic cruise missiles as standard armament. 🔸 The Yasen-M combines the concealment and endurance of a nuclear-powered attack submarine with Russia’s most advanced naval strike weapons. Its arsenal includes Zircon, Kalibr and Oniks missiles for attacks against warships and targets deep inland. 🔸 The submarine has a submerged displacement of around 13,800 tonnes, reaches 31 knots underwater, can dive to 520 metres and remain at sea for up to 100 days. 🔸 Zircon reaches speeds of around Mach 9 and can strike sea and land targets at ranges exceeding 1,000 km. Its speed leaves defending forces only minutes to detect the launch, identify the target and attempt an interception. 🔸 The missile has already been successfully launched from beneath the surface, but Perm turns that tested capability into the standard armament of an operational submarine rather than a launch from an adapted trial platform. 🔸 Surface ships carrying hypersonic missiles can be tracked by satellites, aircraft and patrol vessels. A Yasen-M can remain hidden beneath the ocean, change its firing position and attack from an unexpected direction. 🔸 The same submarine can hunt carrier groups and other major warships while holding naval bases, ports, command centres and infrastructure on land at risk. Finding Perm will be NATO’s first problem. Stopping its missiles after launch will be the second — and at Mach 9, the alliance may have only minutes to solve it. Does NATO have an answer to a Mach 9 missile launched from beneath the ocean?

🚨🇷🇺 NATO IN PANIC: RUSSIA’S FIRST ZIRCON-ARMED NUCLEAR SUBMARINE IS ENTERING SERVICE Russia’s Project 885M nuclear submarine Perm is expected to complete trials and join the Navy before the end of 2026. It will be Russia’s first multipurpose nuclear submarine built from the outset to carry Zircon hypersonic cruise missiles as standard armament. 🔸 The Yasen-M combines the concealment and endurance of a nuclear-powered attack submarine with Russia’s most advanced naval strike weapons. Its arsenal includes Zircon, Kalibr and Oniks missiles for attacks against warships and targets deep inland. 🔸 The submarine has a submerged displacement of around 13,800 tonnes, reaches 31 knots underwater, can dive to 520 metres and remain at sea for up to 100 days. 🔸 Zircon reaches speeds of around Mach 9 and can strike sea and land targets at ranges exceeding 1,000 km. Its speed leaves defending forces only minutes to detect the launch, identify the target and attempt an interception. 🔸 The missile has already been successfully launched from beneath the surface, but Perm turns that tested capability into the standard armament of an operational submarine rather than a launch from an adapted trial platform. 🔸 Surface ships carrying hypersonic missiles can be tracked by satellites, aircraft and patrol vessels. A Yasen-M can remain hidden beneath the ocean, change its firing position and attack from an unexpected direction. 🔸 The same submarine can hunt carrier groups and other major warships while holding naval bases, ports, command centres and infrastructure on land at risk. Finding Perm will be NATO’s first problem. Stopping its missiles after launch will be the second — and at Mach 9, the alliance may have only minutes to solve it. Does NATO have an answer to a Mach 9 missile launched from beneath the ocean?

NewRulesGeopolitics

29,823 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🚨🇷🇺 NATO IN PANIC: RUSSIA’S TUNGUSKA-M1 AIR DEFENSE JUST GOT UNKILLABLE Russia's battle-proven Tunguska-M1 gun-missile system has received major combat upgrades from the Special Military Operation, adding spaced armor, EW antennas, and a cutting-edge ELINS digital thermal imaging station — while keeping its original 30 mm cannons and 9M311 missiles intact. 🔸 The vehicle now features spaced armor plates on the hull and turret sides, creating standoff protection against drones and ATGMs, plus rear dome housings likely equipped with radio reconnaissance and jamming systems to detect and blind incoming UAVs. 🔸 A new ELINS digital OES sits on the turret roof, featuring a stabilized single optical unit with switchable wide/narrow fields of view that simultaneously handles automatic target tracking and in-flight missile guidance, even in optical interference and poor visibility. 🔸 Electronic warfare proves far more economical against drone swarms than expending expensive 9M311-1M missiles (effective to 10 km) or thousands of 30 mm rounds per minute on low-value FPV targets. 🔸 The upgraded sensors work in perfect complement: passive optics reduce electromagnetic signature while the radar covers weather-limited conditions, dramatically boosting overall survivability without redesigning the proven tracked chassis. 🔸 With 240–250 Tunguska-family vehicles in Russian service, widespread retrofits during routine overhauls are technically simple and cost-effective — yet only a single upgraded example has surfaced in public footage so far. Do you think NATO drones can counter Tunguska-M1 on the battlefield? Follow to keep up with the latest military and technological trends.

🚨🇷🇺 NATO IN PANIC: RUSSIA’S TUNGUSKA-M1 AIR DEFENSE JUST GOT UNKILLABLE Russia's battle-proven Tunguska-M1 gun-missile system has received major combat upgrades from the Special Military Operation, adding spaced armor, EW antennas, and a cutting-edge ELINS digital thermal imaging station — while keeping its original 30 mm cannons and 9M311 missiles intact. 🔸 The vehicle now features spaced armor plates on the hull and turret sides, creating standoff protection against drones and ATGMs, plus rear dome housings likely equipped with radio reconnaissance and jamming systems to detect and blind incoming UAVs. 🔸 A new ELINS digital OES sits on the turret roof, featuring a stabilized single optical unit with switchable wide/narrow fields of view that simultaneously handles automatic target tracking and in-flight missile guidance, even in optical interference and poor visibility. 🔸 Electronic warfare proves far more economical against drone swarms than expending expensive 9M311-1M missiles (effective to 10 km) or thousands of 30 mm rounds per minute on low-value FPV targets. 🔸 The upgraded sensors work in perfect complement: passive optics reduce electromagnetic signature while the radar covers weather-limited conditions, dramatically boosting overall survivability without redesigning the proven tracked chassis. 🔸 With 240–250 Tunguska-family vehicles in Russian service, widespread retrofits during routine overhauls are technically simple and cost-effective — yet only a single upgraded example has surfaced in public footage so far. Do you think NATO drones can counter Tunguska-M1 on the battlefield? Follow to keep up with the latest military and technological trends.

NewRulesGeopolitics

19,221 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

🚨🇷🇺 NATO IN PANIC: RUSSIA’S NEW PANTSIR AIR DEFENSES MIX HYPERSONIC-SPEED INTERCEPTORS WITH ANTI-DRONE MINI-MISSILES Russia has reinforced its air defenses with a new batch of mobile Pantsir-S and fixed-site Pantsir-SMD systems, Rostec announced. The systems passed the required tests and military acceptance before delivery. The batch size was not disclosed. 🔸 Three missile classes: The delivered Pantsirs can fire standard surface-to-air missiles, hypersonic interceptors and compact close-range missiles. Crews can combine all three in one launcher loadout to match the expected threat. Rostec did not identify the hypersonic missile model. 🔸 Mobile protection: Pantsir-S combines missiles and automatic cannons on a self-propelled chassis, allowing it to protect critical sites and reinforce air-defense units against aircraft, missiles and drones. 🔸 Fixed-site defense: Pantsir-SMD is built to defend permanent facilities. Rostec says it has confirmed its stated performance under real operational conditions, including during mass drone attacks. 🔸 Smarter use of ammunition: With a full anti-drone loadout, Pantsir-SMD can carry up to 48 miniature interceptors instead of 12 standard missiles. Mixing full-size and miniature missiles reduces the total below 48, but prepares the same system for both fast, high-value threats and mass raids by low-cost drones. 🔸 Combat record: Rostec says the Pantsir family has already destroyed drones, ballistic missiles, cruise missiles and other airborne weapons. The flexible loadout is the central advantage. A single Pantsir position can prepare for raids in which cheap drones arrive alongside faster missiles instead of relying on one interceptor type for every target. Can a combined NATO missile-and-drone raid overwhelm Russia’s new Pantsirs?

🚨🇷🇺 NATO IN PANIC: RUSSIA’S NEW PANTSIR AIR DEFENSES MIX HYPERSONIC-SPEED INTERCEPTORS WITH ANTI-DRONE MINI-MISSILES Russia has reinforced its air defenses with a new batch of mobile Pantsir-S and fixed-site Pantsir-SMD systems, Rostec announced. The systems passed the required tests and military acceptance before delivery. The batch size was not disclosed. 🔸 Three missile classes: The delivered Pantsirs can fire standard surface-to-air missiles, hypersonic interceptors and compact close-range missiles. Crews can combine all three in one launcher loadout to match the expected threat. Rostec did not identify the hypersonic missile model. 🔸 Mobile protection: Pantsir-S combines missiles and automatic cannons on a self-propelled chassis, allowing it to protect critical sites and reinforce air-defense units against aircraft, missiles and drones. 🔸 Fixed-site defense: Pantsir-SMD is built to defend permanent facilities. Rostec says it has confirmed its stated performance under real operational conditions, including during mass drone attacks. 🔸 Smarter use of ammunition: With a full anti-drone loadout, Pantsir-SMD can carry up to 48 miniature interceptors instead of 12 standard missiles. Mixing full-size and miniature missiles reduces the total below 48, but prepares the same system for both fast, high-value threats and mass raids by low-cost drones. 🔸 Combat record: Rostec says the Pantsir family has already destroyed drones, ballistic missiles, cruise missiles and other airborne weapons. The flexible loadout is the central advantage. A single Pantsir position can prepare for raids in which cheap drones arrive alongside faster missiles instead of relying on one interceptor type for every target. Can a combined NATO missile-and-drone raid overwhelm Russia’s new Pantsirs?

NewRulesGeopolitics

17,769 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🚨🇮🇷 IRAN'S DRONES ARE THE WEST'S WORST NIGHTMARE: Hadid 110 vs Shahed 136 Iran's drone technology has evolved significantly, with its first combat use of the new Hadid 110 last month—a high-speed, stealth drone that enhances Iran's offensive capabilities. While the Shahed 136 was revolutionary for its low-cost, mass-saturation approach, the Hadid 110 marks a shift towards more advanced, precise, and faster loitering munitions. 🔸 Hadid 110’s turbojet engine hits speeds of 510 km/h, far outpacing the Shahed 136’s 185 km/h. This speed gives it a clear advantage against traditional missile defense systems. 🔸 Shahed 136 pioneered cost-efficient swarm tactics, flooding defenses with overwhelming numbers — but the Hadid 110 now breaks through with stealth features and precision strikes, proving speed and survival matter more than sheer volume. 🔸 Iran’s Hadid 110 has cutting-edge radar evasion, designed to penetrate advanced defense systems, making it a lethal high-speed missile that even Israel and the US struggle to intercept. 🔸 While Shaheds still play a crucial role in mass attacks, the Hadid 110 takes on high-value, heavily-defended targets, like radar stations and military infrastructure, with its 30 kg payload and 350 km range — a far cry from its predecessor’s capabilities. US and Israel’s reliance on outdated interception methods is increasingly obsolete as Iran adapts its drones to counter these systems. How can the West win if Iran’s drones evolve faster than their defenses?

🚨🇮🇷 IRAN'S DRONES ARE THE WEST'S WORST NIGHTMARE: Hadid 110 vs Shahed 136 Iran's drone technology has evolved significantly, with its first combat use of the new Hadid 110 last month—a high-speed, stealth drone that enhances Iran's offensive capabilities. While the Shahed 136 was revolutionary for its low-cost, mass-saturation approach, the Hadid 110 marks a shift towards more advanced, precise, and faster loitering munitions. 🔸 Hadid 110’s turbojet engine hits speeds of 510 km/h, far outpacing the Shahed 136’s 185 km/h. This speed gives it a clear advantage against traditional missile defense systems. 🔸 Shahed 136 pioneered cost-efficient swarm tactics, flooding defenses with overwhelming numbers — but the Hadid 110 now breaks through with stealth features and precision strikes, proving speed and survival matter more than sheer volume. 🔸 Iran’s Hadid 110 has cutting-edge radar evasion, designed to penetrate advanced defense systems, making it a lethal high-speed missile that even Israel and the US struggle to intercept. 🔸 While Shaheds still play a crucial role in mass attacks, the Hadid 110 takes on high-value, heavily-defended targets, like radar stations and military infrastructure, with its 30 kg payload and 350 km range — a far cry from its predecessor’s capabilities. US and Israel’s reliance on outdated interception methods is increasingly obsolete as Iran adapts its drones to counter these systems. How can the West win if Iran’s drones evolve faster than their defenses?

NewRulesGeopolitics

17,494 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Come and hear about the war crimes committed by Hamas. This is an important post, read it all. I mean, beyond the "usual" things they do, like killing Israeli civilians, LGBTQ+ individuals, and opposition figures in Gaza. This war crime is the relentless rocket fire on Israeli civilians. In 2001, Hamas, the Gaza basee terrorist organization, began independently producing and launching rockets into civilian population centers. Since then, especially after Israel fully withdrew from Gaza in 2005, Hamas' rocket fire intensified, and their launch capabilities expanded significantly. Instead of investing in Gaza's infrastructure, Hamas diverted aid funds, equipment provided by the UN and world governments to build rockets with the sole purpose of indiscriminately killing Israeli civilians. They placed launchers and bomb-making facilities within civilian populations and schools. The attached video shows Hamas using sewage pipes and hoses to construct long-range rockets, and an image displays missile depots and launchers inside a mosque and a Gaza youth movement building. Rocket attacks in the early years killed dozens of civilians, with thousands injured despite citizens seeking shelter during rocket alerts. At this point, Israel decided to invest billions in the Iron Dome defense system to protect its citizens. Israel's commitment to protecting all citizens, both Jewish and Arab, contrasts sharply with Hamas. After years of effort, Israel successfully deployed the Iron Dome, boasting a 96% success rate in intercepting rockets aimed at civilian centers. The system identifies and intercepts only those rockets posing a threat to population centers, sparing open areas. Launching such rockets into civilian areas is a war crime, turning launch sites and missile depots into legitimate military targets, even within civilian populations. Imagine the Israeli casualties if Israel hadn't neutralized missile depots or activated the Iron Dome. Now, consider the following data: The cost of producing a Hamas rocket ranges from $100 to several thousand dollars for a more sophisticated one. They use simple materials like cement supplied by the UN, irrigation system pipes, and other basic tools. Israel, on the other hand, invests a significant amount in Iron Dome missiles, with each interceptor costing between $50,000 and $200,000. Israel's annual investment in defense, protecting both its Jewish and Arab citizens, amounts to billions, while Hamas invests billions in developing rockets aimed at killing civilians and in the development of terrorist infrastructure. Since the current conflict began, Hamas has fired over 9,000 rockets at Israel, with over 10% landing within Gaza itself. The Iron Dome intercepted over two thousand rockets, costing nearly $200 million for the entire interceptor supply. Imagine the potential damage if all these rockets hit Israel – thousands of rockets could cause an estimated over a thousand casualties, thousands of injuries, and extensive damage. Hamas' continued rocket fire on Israeli civilians is a war crime. It always has been and always will be. We can no longer turn a blind eye to this. After Hamas carried out a brutal massacre in addition to rocket attacks, we had no other choice. Israel stands on the side of morality and justice. While Hamas fires missiles at civilian populations and commits atrocities against innocent civilians, Israel targets only legitimate military objectives according to international law. Israel uses precision missiles, costing hundreds of millions of dollars, while Hamas fires indiscriminate rockets. Hamas poses a threat to Israeli citizens, committing war crimes without restraint, and it can not continue. In the pictures: the summary of the data written in the post about the Hamas rocket fire and a video of a rocket falling on the road. Imagine how many people could be killed by her. Please share this post. #ChooseYourSide #FreeGazaFromHama #StandWithIsrael #HamasisISIS

Come and hear about the war crimes committed by Hamas. This is an important post, read it all. I mean, beyond the "usual" things they do, like killing Israeli civilians, LGBTQ+ individuals, and opposition figures in Gaza. This war crime is the relentless rocket fire on Israeli civilians. In 2001, Hamas, the Gaza basee terrorist organization, began independently producing and launching rockets into civilian population centers. Since then, especially after Israel fully withdrew from Gaza in 2005, Hamas' rocket fire intensified, and their launch capabilities expanded significantly. Instead of investing in Gaza's infrastructure, Hamas diverted aid funds, equipment provided by the UN and world governments to build rockets with the sole purpose of indiscriminately killing Israeli civilians. They placed launchers and bomb-making facilities within civilian populations and schools. The attached video shows Hamas using sewage pipes and hoses to construct long-range rockets, and an image displays missile depots and launchers inside a mosque and a Gaza youth movement building. Rocket attacks in the early years killed dozens of civilians, with thousands injured despite citizens seeking shelter during rocket alerts. At this point, Israel decided to invest billions in the Iron Dome defense system to protect its citizens. Israel's commitment to protecting all citizens, both Jewish and Arab, contrasts sharply with Hamas. After years of effort, Israel successfully deployed the Iron Dome, boasting a 96% success rate in intercepting rockets aimed at civilian centers. The system identifies and intercepts only those rockets posing a threat to population centers, sparing open areas. Launching such rockets into civilian areas is a war crime, turning launch sites and missile depots into legitimate military targets, even within civilian populations. Imagine the Israeli casualties if Israel hadn't neutralized missile depots or activated the Iron Dome. Now, consider the following data: The cost of producing a Hamas rocket ranges from $100 to several thousand dollars for a more sophisticated one. They use simple materials like cement supplied by the UN, irrigation system pipes, and other basic tools. Israel, on the other hand, invests a significant amount in Iron Dome missiles, with each interceptor costing between $50,000 and $200,000. Israel's annual investment in defense, protecting both its Jewish and Arab citizens, amounts to billions, while Hamas invests billions in developing rockets aimed at killing civilians and in the development of terrorist infrastructure. Since the current conflict began, Hamas has fired over 9,000 rockets at Israel, with over 10% landing within Gaza itself. The Iron Dome intercepted over two thousand rockets, costing nearly $200 million for the entire interceptor supply. Imagine the potential damage if all these rockets hit Israel – thousands of rockets could cause an estimated over a thousand casualties, thousands of injuries, and extensive damage. Hamas' continued rocket fire on Israeli civilians is a war crime. It always has been and always will be. We can no longer turn a blind eye to this. After Hamas carried out a brutal massacre in addition to rocket attacks, we had no other choice. Israel stands on the side of morality and justice. While Hamas fires missiles at civilian populations and commits atrocities against innocent civilians, Israel targets only legitimate military objectives according to international law. Israel uses precision missiles, costing hundreds of millions of dollars, while Hamas fires indiscriminate rockets. Hamas poses a threat to Israeli citizens, committing war crimes without restraint, and it can not continue. In the pictures: the summary of the data written in the post about the Hamas rocket fire and a video of a rocket falling on the road. Imagine how many people could be killed by her. Please share this post. #ChooseYourSide #FreeGazaFromHama #StandWithIsrael #HamasisISIS

Ori Miller | אורי מילר

404,990 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

This is probably the clearest & greatest example of why America needs more people manufacturing missiles. Iron Dome & David's Sling partially failed here in this video, but the much larger reason for the successful strikes are that the Iranians have a very advanced missile program. Some of the missiles have never been used in a real world combat situation before & that's what makes the Ukraine & Iran wars very unique. Intercepting missiles reliably is the hardest feat to accomplish in the defense realm. The difficult part though is you aren't normally dealing with just one warhead. You have to deal with sustained missile barrages which can be further complicated if they use cluster munitions in the warhead. 10 missile warheads can quickly turn into 10 large projectiles with 40 smaller projectiles. This impact these cluster munitions have on our radar systems is incredibly frustrating due to all the noise they produce. Top tier missile defense is a mix of the best math, physics and logistics. The best missile defense system in the world is worthless if it can't deploy enough interceptors to protect a civilian population. The warfare part here is also unique. The Iranians are using their land based missile program to inflict incredible damage against American, Israeli & Gulf nation targets. This tactic has been so successful it has forced America to use up a substantial portion of our interceptors & other munitions in the stockpile. This is why America must manufacture more weapons, missiles, rockets & munitions than we ever have before! 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

This is probably the clearest & greatest example of why America needs more people manufacturing missiles. Iron Dome & David's Sling partially failed here in this video, but the much larger reason for the successful strikes are that the Iranians have a very advanced missile program. Some of the missiles have never been used in a real world combat situation before & that's what makes the Ukraine & Iran wars very unique. Intercepting missiles reliably is the hardest feat to accomplish in the defense realm. The difficult part though is you aren't normally dealing with just one warhead. You have to deal with sustained missile barrages which can be further complicated if they use cluster munitions in the warhead. 10 missile warheads can quickly turn into 10 large projectiles with 40 smaller projectiles. This impact these cluster munitions have on our radar systems is incredibly frustrating due to all the noise they produce. Top tier missile defense is a mix of the best math, physics and logistics. The best missile defense system in the world is worthless if it can't deploy enough interceptors to protect a civilian population. The warfare part here is also unique. The Iranians are using their land based missile program to inflict incredible damage against American, Israeli & Gulf nation targets. This tactic has been so successful it has forced America to use up a substantial portion of our interceptors & other munitions in the stockpile. This is why America must manufacture more weapons, missiles, rockets & munitions than we ever have before! 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

EV_Trapper

86,378 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

🚨🚨🚨 TRUMP'S OWN ENVOY JUST ADMITTED ISRAEL CAN BE DESTROYED WITH A SINGLE BOMB 🚨🚨🚨 Steve Witkoff → the man Trump sent to negotiate with Iran → just said it on camera: "Israel is a one-bomb country. One bomb takes them out." Read that again. This isn't some Iranian general. This isn't propaganda. This is the U.S. Special Envoy to the Middle East → TRUMP'S GUY → saying it out loud on live television. THE MATH: → Iran has 430kg of enriched uranium — enough for 11 nuclear warheads → Witkoff himself confirmed: "We don't know where all of it is" → Israel is 22,145 km² — the size of New Jersey → One detonation over Tel Aviv = 4 MILLION people in the blast radius → Iron Dome intercept rate against ballistic missiles = 0% → The entire justification for this war was to PREVENT this scenario 💀 430kg of uranium = UNACCOUNTED FOR 💀 11 possible warheads = LOCATIONS UNKNOWN 💀 Witkoff says "I don't know how this war ends" = NO EXIT STRATEGY 💀 New Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei = HARDLINER WITH A GRUDGE ⚠️ The U.S. spent $300 BILLION on this war in 11 days ⚠️ 8 U.S. soldiers dead — Iran claims 3,000+ military casualties ⚠️ Oil crashed from $119 to $88 on Trump's "war is complete" comment ⚠️ Iran just drone-struck the UAE's LARGEST refinery — war is NOT over They're showing you victory speeches and "mission accomplished" energy. They're NOT showing you that the man who started this war just admitted on camera that the country he's protecting can be erased with a single weapon — and Iran might already have it. You don't send your negotiator on TV to say "one bomb takes them out" for reassurance → you say that when you're TERRIFIED it might actually happen → and that only happens when you've already LOST control of the situation. This is the most dangerous admission by a U.S. official since the Cuban Missile Crisis. Prepare accordingly. 🚨🚨🚨

🚨🚨🚨 TRUMP'S OWN ENVOY JUST ADMITTED ISRAEL CAN BE DESTROYED WITH A SINGLE BOMB 🚨🚨🚨 Steve Witkoff → the man Trump sent to negotiate with Iran → just said it on camera: "Israel is a one-bomb country. One bomb takes them out." Read that again. This isn't some Iranian general. This isn't propaganda. This is the U.S. Special Envoy to the Middle East → TRUMP'S GUY → saying it out loud on live television. THE MATH: → Iran has 430kg of enriched uranium — enough for 11 nuclear warheads → Witkoff himself confirmed: "We don't know where all of it is" → Israel is 22,145 km² — the size of New Jersey → One detonation over Tel Aviv = 4 MILLION people in the blast radius → Iron Dome intercept rate against ballistic missiles = 0% → The entire justification for this war was to PREVENT this scenario 💀 430kg of uranium = UNACCOUNTED FOR 💀 11 possible warheads = LOCATIONS UNKNOWN 💀 Witkoff says "I don't know how this war ends" = NO EXIT STRATEGY 💀 New Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei = HARDLINER WITH A GRUDGE ⚠️ The U.S. spent $300 BILLION on this war in 11 days ⚠️ 8 U.S. soldiers dead — Iran claims 3,000+ military casualties ⚠️ Oil crashed from $119 to $88 on Trump's "war is complete" comment ⚠️ Iran just drone-struck the UAE's LARGEST refinery — war is NOT over They're showing you victory speeches and "mission accomplished" energy. They're NOT showing you that the man who started this war just admitted on camera that the country he's protecting can be erased with a single weapon — and Iran might already have it. You don't send your negotiator on TV to say "one bomb takes them out" for reassurance → you say that when you're TERRIFIED it might actually happen → and that only happens when you've already LOST control of the situation. This is the most dangerous admission by a U.S. official since the Cuban Missile Crisis. Prepare accordingly. 🚨🚨🚨

JinWoo Kim, IQ 289

21,372 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Gojek completes more food deliveries than GrubHub, Uber Eats, and DoorDash combined, and more rides per day than Lyft. Vikrama Dhiman (Vikrama Dhiman) heads all things product at Gojek Tech, including product management, design, and research, across teams in Indonesia, Singapore and India. He is among the most well-known and respected product leaders in all of Asia, and one of my most requested guests. In our conversation, we discuss: 🔸 The most common traits of successful PMs 🔸 The 3 W’s framework for PM career growth 🔸 The right way to push back as a PM 🔸 The Four A’s of leveling up in product management 🔸 Common pitfalls that stall PM careers 🔸 Advice for transitioning into PM 🔸 Why intent alone is not enough 🔸 Much more Listen now 👇 - YouTube: - Spotify: - Apple: Some key takeaways: 1. As a PM—especially early in your career—make sure you’re nailing execution before you spend too much time on strategy. Effective strategic thinking requires context on the company, product, and stakeholders that you might not have yet. But you always have opportunities to execute and make your team members’ lives easier. As you execute more, you’ll begin to understand the strategic needs more deeply, and you’ll have more opportunities to contribute at that level. 2. Three traits that make you a great PM to work with: a. Raise difficult issues without being difficult to work with b. Bring up important topics without drawing importance to yourself c. Remember that you are in charge of getting decisions made, not making the decisions yourself 3. Good PMs produce good artifacts: PRDs, product notes, design briefs, etc. These demonstrate your proficiency across core PM skills, and they are your opportunity to “have impact on the impact”—to add value to a team that is adding value to the company. If you’re not sure what to focus on next in your PM career, go scrutinize your recent artifacts and ask how they could be improved. 4. To push back on ideas without being difficult to work with, ask clarifying questions and bring the conversation to a logical space rather than an emotional one. Here are some of Vikrama’s favorites: a. Why has this become suddenly important? b. So that I am clear, can you help clarify xyz? c. What would success look like? d. What time frame do you need this in? 5. Vikrama’s 3 W’s framework for PM career growth comprises (1) what you produce, (2) what you bring to the table, and (3) what your operating model is. Strong product managers excel at two of the three W’s. Product managers who rise in their career excel at all three. 6. Three mindset shifts that can enable faster growth: a. Focus on things you can control: Concentrate your efforts on aspects of your role that you can influence or control, especially as you advance in your career. b. Always embrace change: As an IC PM, you experience rapid change. It’s important that as you get to mid/senior level, you never stop looking for ways to improve. c. How you see yourself: Cultivate a positive and growth-oriented mindset about yourself and your capabilities. 7. Three core competencies to focus on when transitioning into PM roles are (1) data, (2) design/research, and (3) technology. Someone from a design background should focus on strengthening data or tech skills to complement their existing expertise. Similarly, someone from a tech background should pick a design skill to focus on. This approach allows for maximum leverage.

Gojek completes more food deliveries than GrubHub, Uber Eats, and DoorDash combined, and more rides per day than Lyft. Vikrama Dhiman (Vikrama Dhiman) heads all things product at Gojek Tech, including product management, design, and research, across teams in Indonesia, Singapore and India. He is among the most well-known and respected product leaders in all of Asia, and one of my most requested guests. In our conversation, we discuss: 🔸 The most common traits of successful PMs 🔸 The 3 W’s framework for PM career growth 🔸 The right way to push back as a PM 🔸 The Four A’s of leveling up in product management 🔸 Common pitfalls that stall PM careers 🔸 Advice for transitioning into PM 🔸 Why intent alone is not enough 🔸 Much more Listen now 👇 - YouTube: - Spotify: - Apple: Some key takeaways: 1. As a PM—especially early in your career—make sure you’re nailing execution before you spend too much time on strategy. Effective strategic thinking requires context on the company, product, and stakeholders that you might not have yet. But you always have opportunities to execute and make your team members’ lives easier. As you execute more, you’ll begin to understand the strategic needs more deeply, and you’ll have more opportunities to contribute at that level. 2. Three traits that make you a great PM to work with: a. Raise difficult issues without being difficult to work with b. Bring up important topics without drawing importance to yourself c. Remember that you are in charge of getting decisions made, not making the decisions yourself 3. Good PMs produce good artifacts: PRDs, product notes, design briefs, etc. These demonstrate your proficiency across core PM skills, and they are your opportunity to “have impact on the impact”—to add value to a team that is adding value to the company. If you’re not sure what to focus on next in your PM career, go scrutinize your recent artifacts and ask how they could be improved. 4. To push back on ideas without being difficult to work with, ask clarifying questions and bring the conversation to a logical space rather than an emotional one. Here are some of Vikrama’s favorites: a. Why has this become suddenly important? b. So that I am clear, can you help clarify xyz? c. What would success look like? d. What time frame do you need this in? 5. Vikrama’s 3 W’s framework for PM career growth comprises (1) what you produce, (2) what you bring to the table, and (3) what your operating model is. Strong product managers excel at two of the three W’s. Product managers who rise in their career excel at all three. 6. Three mindset shifts that can enable faster growth: a. Focus on things you can control: Concentrate your efforts on aspects of your role that you can influence or control, especially as you advance in your career. b. Always embrace change: As an IC PM, you experience rapid change. It’s important that as you get to mid/senior level, you never stop looking for ways to improve. c. How you see yourself: Cultivate a positive and growth-oriented mindset about yourself and your capabilities. 7. Three core competencies to focus on when transitioning into PM roles are (1) data, (2) design/research, and (3) technology. Someone from a design background should focus on strengthening data or tech skills to complement their existing expertise. Similarly, someone from a tech background should pick a design skill to focus on. This approach allows for maximum leverage.

Lenny Rachitsky

115,463 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Hundreds of Hollywood celebrities signed a petition calling on the U.S. to stop providing Israel with weapons. A lot of us felt uneasy about that petition. Intuitively, we all understand that military advice or analysis should probably not come from Hollywood actors. Just because someone played a five-star general in a movie doesn’t make them an expert on war. So yes, this petition is not only misguided—it’s dangerous. Let me explain why. I’m not a military expert either, but I listen to those who are. Recently, a group of high-level military experts visited Israel to assess its military operations. They concluded that Israel is fighting a just war against Hamas in full compliance with international law. They observed that Israel is taking extraordinary precautions to minimize civilian harm—even building roads to deliver aid during the conflict. No other military in history has made such an effort. Furthermore, when Australia investigated the tragic incident in which World Central Kitchen workers were accidentally killed, they found that Israel conducts thorough and transparent investigations when such mistakes occur. In recent days, White House National Security Communications Advisor and retired Navy admiral John Kirby said, “The biggest obstacle to peace right now is Hamas,” the same group that executed six hostages just this past weekend. The U.S. provides weapons to Israel because Israel is fighting a multi-front war against Iran’s jihadi proxy armies—Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis, and more. Among these weapons is the Iron Dome, a purely defensive technology that intercepts rockets in mid-air, saving countless lives. Yet, this is what these celebrities are trying to stop. War is horrific. But what these Hollywood celebrities are really promoting, whether they realize it or not, is Hamas’s dream of a defenseless Israel. If these celebrities truly want to see an end to the devastation in Gaza, they need to put the pressure where it belongs—on Hamas, the group responsible for starting this war and destabilizing the entire region.

Hundreds of Hollywood celebrities signed a petition calling on the U.S. to stop providing Israel with weapons. A lot of us felt uneasy about that petition. Intuitively, we all understand that military advice or analysis should probably not come from Hollywood actors. Just because someone played a five-star general in a movie doesn’t make them an expert on war. So yes, this petition is not only misguided—it’s dangerous. Let me explain why. I’m not a military expert either, but I listen to those who are. Recently, a group of high-level military experts visited Israel to assess its military operations. They concluded that Israel is fighting a just war against Hamas in full compliance with international law. They observed that Israel is taking extraordinary precautions to minimize civilian harm—even building roads to deliver aid during the conflict. No other military in history has made such an effort. Furthermore, when Australia investigated the tragic incident in which World Central Kitchen workers were accidentally killed, they found that Israel conducts thorough and transparent investigations when such mistakes occur. In recent days, White House National Security Communications Advisor and retired Navy admiral John Kirby said, “The biggest obstacle to peace right now is Hamas,” the same group that executed six hostages just this past weekend. The U.S. provides weapons to Israel because Israel is fighting a multi-front war against Iran’s jihadi proxy armies—Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis, and more. Among these weapons is the Iron Dome, a purely defensive technology that intercepts rockets in mid-air, saving countless lives. Yet, this is what these celebrities are trying to stop. War is horrific. But what these Hollywood celebrities are really promoting, whether they realize it or not, is Hamas’s dream of a defenseless Israel. If these celebrities truly want to see an end to the devastation in Gaza, they need to put the pressure where it belongs—on Hamas, the group responsible for starting this war and destabilizing the entire region.

Noa Tishby

294,984 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

.Nubank is larger than Coinbase, Robinhood, Affirm, and SoFi combined, has more customers than Bank of America (while only operating in three countries in Latin America), and 80% to 90% of its growth comes through word of mouth because of the way they make customers fanatical about their product. Jag Duggal is chief product officer at Nubank, and in our conversation, we dig into: 🔸 How Nubank creates fanatical users 🔸 Measuring PMF through the Sean Ellis score 🔸 Tactics for driving word-of-mouth growth 🔸 The role of category design in creating successful products 🔸 Why companies should strive to be “fundamentally different,” not “incrementally better” 🔸 Much more Listen now 👇 - YouTube: - Spotify: - Apple: Some key takeaways: 1. The “Sean Ellis score” is a key element of how Nubank measures product-market fit and makes decisions about investing in new products. The score is based on asking customers, “How disappointed would you be if this product went away?” The answer options are: a. Very disappointed b. Somewhat disappointed c. Not disappointed d. I no longer use this product 2. A few of your strongest customers can teach you more than many of your weaker ones. Your strongest customers are generally your most engaged users, deriving the most value from your product. If you use the Sean Ellis question, your strongest customers will be those with the highest scores. Try to learn: what characteristics make them a better fit for your product? What can they teach you about the value of your product? 3. The best user research technique is often to just pick up the phone and call 10 customers. You don’t need a research plan, a research lead, someone to summarize results, etc. Those things just add distance between you and the customer and overhead that slows research down. If you have a direct line to the customer instead, you’ll often find that it only takes five conversations before you gain strong, reliable insights. 4. Your strategy doesn’t have to be “right,” but it does have to be clear. A clear strategy allows you to identify when things are off course, because it defines “what was supposed to be happening.” Aspirations or vague statements like “to re-invent banking” are not clear strategies. Clear strategies are detailed plans centered on specific problems, solutions, customers, and strengths. 5. Jag lives and breathes the motto “We’re in the business of being fundamentally different, not incrementally better.” In competitive markets, merely improving incrementally on existing solutions isn’t enough. Strive to be fundamentally different by reinventing or creating new categories. This approach not only sets you apart from competitors but can also redefine the industry standards. 6. To develop products that truly resonate with users, start by identifying deeply held pain points. This can be achieved through meticulous customer research, or asking indirect questions to uncover genuine needs and frustrations. The goal is to develop a solution that addresses these issues so effectively that customers become enthusiastic advocates. 7. Before diving into research, articulate a clear hypothesis. This gives direction to your research efforts and helps you interpret the data you gather effectively. Don’t become overly attached to your hypothesis. Be willing to assess whether it’s right or wrong based on the evidence you gather, rather than trying to defend it at all costs.

.Nubank is larger than Coinbase, Robinhood, Affirm, and SoFi combined, has more customers than Bank of America (while only operating in three countries in Latin America), and 80% to 90% of its growth comes through word of mouth because of the way they make customers fanatical about their product. Jag Duggal is chief product officer at Nubank, and in our conversation, we dig into: 🔸 How Nubank creates fanatical users 🔸 Measuring PMF through the Sean Ellis score 🔸 Tactics for driving word-of-mouth growth 🔸 The role of category design in creating successful products 🔸 Why companies should strive to be “fundamentally different,” not “incrementally better” 🔸 Much more Listen now 👇 - YouTube: - Spotify: - Apple: Some key takeaways: 1. The “Sean Ellis score” is a key element of how Nubank measures product-market fit and makes decisions about investing in new products. The score is based on asking customers, “How disappointed would you be if this product went away?” The answer options are: a. Very disappointed b. Somewhat disappointed c. Not disappointed d. I no longer use this product 2. A few of your strongest customers can teach you more than many of your weaker ones. Your strongest customers are generally your most engaged users, deriving the most value from your product. If you use the Sean Ellis question, your strongest customers will be those with the highest scores. Try to learn: what characteristics make them a better fit for your product? What can they teach you about the value of your product? 3. The best user research technique is often to just pick up the phone and call 10 customers. You don’t need a research plan, a research lead, someone to summarize results, etc. Those things just add distance between you and the customer and overhead that slows research down. If you have a direct line to the customer instead, you’ll often find that it only takes five conversations before you gain strong, reliable insights. 4. Your strategy doesn’t have to be “right,” but it does have to be clear. A clear strategy allows you to identify when things are off course, because it defines “what was supposed to be happening.” Aspirations or vague statements like “to re-invent banking” are not clear strategies. Clear strategies are detailed plans centered on specific problems, solutions, customers, and strengths. 5. Jag lives and breathes the motto “We’re in the business of being fundamentally different, not incrementally better.” In competitive markets, merely improving incrementally on existing solutions isn’t enough. Strive to be fundamentally different by reinventing or creating new categories. This approach not only sets you apart from competitors but can also redefine the industry standards. 6. To develop products that truly resonate with users, start by identifying deeply held pain points. This can be achieved through meticulous customer research, or asking indirect questions to uncover genuine needs and frustrations. The goal is to develop a solution that addresses these issues so effectively that customers become enthusiastic advocates. 7. Before diving into research, articulate a clear hypothesis. This gives direction to your research efforts and helps you interpret the data you gather effectively. Don’t become overly attached to your hypothesis. Be willing to assess whether it’s right or wrong based on the evidence you gather, rather than trying to defend it at all costs.

Lenny Rachitsky

111,459 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

🚀 To Strike Israel from Iran: What a Missile Must Survive (and What It Costs) After decades of planning, $30+ billion spent, 13 integrated missile defense systems-including U.S. CENTCOM assets, NATO-linked radar, and space-based infrared-Israel was still caught off guard by a few missiles hitting old apartments buildings? Iranian missile aiming for Israel has to bypass these systems; 🛰️ TIER 1 — Detection & Tracking (3 systems) ➟ SBIRS (U.S. satellites) Global heat-signature detection within seconds. Real-time cue to all allied defenses. 💰 $19+ billion U.S. program cost since inception ➟ DSP (Defense Support Program) Cold War legacy satellites still supporting IR tracking. 💰 Originally over $15 billion (inflation-adjusted) ➟ Israeli OTH + Green Pine Radar Feeds targeting data to Arrow batteries with 900 km+ range. 💰 Each radar unit: $50–60 million 🛡️ TIER 2 — Strategic Interceptors (4 systems) ➟ Arrow 3 – Hits warheads in space (exo-atmospheric) 💰 $3 million+ per interceptor, $2.2 billion+ development cost ➟ Arrow 2 – Hits during reentry (endo-atmospheric) 💰 Interceptor: $2–2.5 million each 💰 Co-developed with U.S.: ~$1 billion+ in U.S. aid ➟ Aegis BMD (U.S. Navy) – Sea-based SM-3 interceptors 💰 Ship cost: $1.7 billion+ per vessel 💰 Each SM-3 missile: $12–18 million ➟ THAAD – U.S. high-altitude regional defense 💰 Battery: $800 million 💰 Interceptor: $11–13 million each 🎯 These are built to stop Shahab, Sejjil, Ghadr, and Emad-type MRBMs. 🧨 TIER 3 — Close-In Defenses (6 systems) ➟ David’s Sling – Intercepts mid-range & cruise 💰 Each missile: $1 million+ 💰 System dev cost: $1.7 billion+ ➟ Patriot PAC-3 – Ballistic & air threats 💰 Each interceptor: $4–5 million 💰 Battery: $1.1 billion+ ➟ Iron Dome – For short-range rockets & drones 💰 Missile: $40,000–100,000 💰 Full system: $50–70 million per battery 💰 Over $3 billion in U.S. funding to date ➟ Barak-8 – Naval-based interceptor 💰 Missile: $1.5–2 million+ ➟ Sky Dew – Airborne blimp radar 💰 Development: ~$300–400 million range 💰 Experimental, high-maintenance ➟ C-RAM (U.S. Army) – Close-range base defense 💰 ~$15–20 million per setup 💰 Fires 20–30 rounds per second with high cost-per-use Soooooo ➟ Iran must beat $20–30+ billion in integrated defensive infrastructure ➟ That includes: ➟ 3 global detection systems ➟ 4 intercept layers (exo, reentry, mid, terminal) ➟ 6 tactical kill nets surrounding every target zone ➟ Every shot they take faces a defense architecture that costs more than some countries’ entire GDP Also—why isn’t Israel’s automated Red Alert system going off?

🚀 To Strike Israel from Iran: What a Missile Must Survive (and What It Costs) After decades of planning, $30+ billion spent, 13 integrated missile defense systems-including U.S. CENTCOM assets, NATO-linked radar, and space-based infrared-Israel was still caught off guard by a few missiles hitting old apartments buildings? Iranian missile aiming for Israel has to bypass these systems; 🛰️ TIER 1 — Detection & Tracking (3 systems) ➟ SBIRS (U.S. satellites) Global heat-signature detection within seconds. Real-time cue to all allied defenses. 💰 $19+ billion U.S. program cost since inception ➟ DSP (Defense Support Program) Cold War legacy satellites still supporting IR tracking. 💰 Originally over $15 billion (inflation-adjusted) ➟ Israeli OTH + Green Pine Radar Feeds targeting data to Arrow batteries with 900 km+ range. 💰 Each radar unit: $50–60 million 🛡️ TIER 2 — Strategic Interceptors (4 systems) ➟ Arrow 3 – Hits warheads in space (exo-atmospheric) 💰 $3 million+ per interceptor, $2.2 billion+ development cost ➟ Arrow 2 – Hits during reentry (endo-atmospheric) 💰 Interceptor: $2–2.5 million each 💰 Co-developed with U.S.: ~$1 billion+ in U.S. aid ➟ Aegis BMD (U.S. Navy) – Sea-based SM-3 interceptors 💰 Ship cost: $1.7 billion+ per vessel 💰 Each SM-3 missile: $12–18 million ➟ THAAD – U.S. high-altitude regional defense 💰 Battery: $800 million 💰 Interceptor: $11–13 million each 🎯 These are built to stop Shahab, Sejjil, Ghadr, and Emad-type MRBMs. 🧨 TIER 3 — Close-In Defenses (6 systems) ➟ David’s Sling – Intercepts mid-range & cruise 💰 Each missile: $1 million+ 💰 System dev cost: $1.7 billion+ ➟ Patriot PAC-3 – Ballistic & air threats 💰 Each interceptor: $4–5 million 💰 Battery: $1.1 billion+ ➟ Iron Dome – For short-range rockets & drones 💰 Missile: $40,000–100,000 💰 Full system: $50–70 million per battery 💰 Over $3 billion in U.S. funding to date ➟ Barak-8 – Naval-based interceptor 💰 Missile: $1.5–2 million+ ➟ Sky Dew – Airborne blimp radar 💰 Development: ~$300–400 million range 💰 Experimental, high-maintenance ➟ C-RAM (U.S. Army) – Close-range base defense 💰 ~$15–20 million per setup 💰 Fires 20–30 rounds per second with high cost-per-use Soooooo ➟ Iran must beat $20–30+ billion in integrated defensive infrastructure ➟ That includes: ➟ 3 global detection systems ➟ 4 intercept layers (exo, reentry, mid, terminal) ➟ 6 tactical kill nets surrounding every target zone ➟ Every shot they take faces a defense architecture that costs more than some countries’ entire GDP Also—why isn’t Israel’s automated Red Alert system going off?

Morgan

14,342 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

🚨12 HOUR NEWS RECAP 1. Trump ordered U.S fighter jets and armed drones to launch a major assault on Houthi targets in Yemen. He issued a statement telling the Houthis: "Your time is up, and your attacks must stop." 2. A missile fired from Yemen struck Egypt's Sinai Peninsula near the resort city of Sharm el-Sheikh. The IDF is investigating whether Israel was the intended target but has not yet confirmed this. 3. SpaceX's Dragon capsule docked with the ISS, delivering 4 astronauts in a NASA crew swap. It will also bring back 2 stranded astronauts who have been on the ISS for 9 months since their Boeing Starliner was deemed too unsafe to return them. 4. Macron declared that Russia has no say in whether NATO troops enter Ukraine, stating that the decision lies solely with Kyiv. Britain and France are considering deploying thousands of peacekeepers as part of a ceasefire plan, while Russia outright rejects any NATO forces in Ukraine. 5. Todd Lyons, Acting ICE Director, said that Biden had cooked the books on ICE arrest data: "They were purposely misleading the American people by categorizing individuals processed and released into the interior of the United States as ICE arrests." 6. Over 300,000 Serbians took part in anti-government protests, calling for the resignation of President Aleksandar Vučić. It was Serbia's largest protest ever. 7. A fire at Club Pulse in Kocani, North Macedonia, killed at least 50 people and injured over 100. The blaze started during a concert by the band DNA when pyrotechnics were used, rapidly spreading through the crowded venue. 8. Kim Kardashian is reportedly taking legal action to remove Ye's new track from X after it featured their 11-year-old daughter, North. The song, 'Lonely Roads Still Go To Sunshine,' includes what appears to be Diddy's voice, despite his ongoing legal troubles, as well as a verse from North. 9. Trump signed an order to downsize the U.S Agency for Global Media, cutting wasteful spending at taxpayer-funded media outlets. It led to most Voice of America journalists being placed on administrative leave. 10. Israel's Defense Minister confirmed that the Iron Beam, a high-power laser air defense system, will be operational by the end of 2025. The Rafael-developed system is designed to intercept rockets, mortars, UAVs, and cruise missiles - at just $2-$3.50 per shot, compared to $40,000-$50,000 per Iron Dome interceptor.

🚨12 HOUR NEWS RECAP 1. Trump ordered U.S fighter jets and armed drones to launch a major assault on Houthi targets in Yemen. He issued a statement telling the Houthis: "Your time is up, and your attacks must stop." 2. A missile fired from Yemen struck Egypt's Sinai Peninsula near the resort city of Sharm el-Sheikh. The IDF is investigating whether Israel was the intended target but has not yet confirmed this. 3. SpaceX's Dragon capsule docked with the ISS, delivering 4 astronauts in a NASA crew swap. It will also bring back 2 stranded astronauts who have been on the ISS for 9 months since their Boeing Starliner was deemed too unsafe to return them. 4. Macron declared that Russia has no say in whether NATO troops enter Ukraine, stating that the decision lies solely with Kyiv. Britain and France are considering deploying thousands of peacekeepers as part of a ceasefire plan, while Russia outright rejects any NATO forces in Ukraine. 5. Todd Lyons, Acting ICE Director, said that Biden had cooked the books on ICE arrest data: "They were purposely misleading the American people by categorizing individuals processed and released into the interior of the United States as ICE arrests." 6. Over 300,000 Serbians took part in anti-government protests, calling for the resignation of President Aleksandar Vučić. It was Serbia's largest protest ever. 7. A fire at Club Pulse in Kocani, North Macedonia, killed at least 50 people and injured over 100. The blaze started during a concert by the band DNA when pyrotechnics were used, rapidly spreading through the crowded venue. 8. Kim Kardashian is reportedly taking legal action to remove Ye's new track from X after it featured their 11-year-old daughter, North. The song, 'Lonely Roads Still Go To Sunshine,' includes what appears to be Diddy's voice, despite his ongoing legal troubles, as well as a verse from North. 9. Trump signed an order to downsize the U.S Agency for Global Media, cutting wasteful spending at taxpayer-funded media outlets. It led to most Voice of America journalists being placed on administrative leave. 10. Israel's Defense Minister confirmed that the Iron Beam, a high-power laser air defense system, will be operational by the end of 2025. The Rafael-developed system is designed to intercept rockets, mortars, UAVs, and cruise missiles - at just $2-$3.50 per shot, compared to $40,000-$50,000 per Iron Dome interceptor.

Mario Nawfal

206,057 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

$Shabbos Kestenbaum: I’m deeply troubled by foreign influence in the U.S. government. Just last week, the Department of Education, under Section 117 of the Higher Education Act, found that Qatar alone had spent $6 billion on American colleges and universities. Why is Qatar paying American institutions of higher learning? It also deeply concerns me that there are so many Chinese communists at Harvard University that the Chinese Communist Party reportedly refers to the Harvard Kennedy School as “their party school.” I’m equally disturbed by well-documented Russian influence campaigns, including the use of consulates, like the one near where I live in Riverdale, New York, to spy on and conduct espionage against Americans. But let’s be honest: no one in this room, and no one in our political culture or media, seems to care about any of that. As my opponent just demonstrated, the only country they are singularly obsessed with is Israel. You didn’t mention any other country in a topic that didn’t even include the word Israel. But fine, let’s talk about Israel. Israel is a country that, just three years after gas chambers and crematoria, managed to defeat seven Arab Islamist armies. It is a nation of about nine million people, yet it has more Nobel Prize winners than China and India combined. Israel grants full and equal rights to Jews and Arabs alike, so much so that an Arab Supreme Court justice, Salim Joubran, sentenced a Jewish prime minister, Ehud Olmert, to prison. There is no other country in the Middle East where Jews and Muslims have full, guaranteed equal rights. Before discussing Israel’s virtues further, let’s talk about American foreign policy. The Federalist Papers are filled with references to treaties and the importance of what the Founders called common defense. They understood that the government’s most sacred duty is to protect its people, often through foreign alliances. America’s first war as a nation was the Barbary War, fought to stop Islamist piracy in the Mediterranean, because President Thomas Jefferson recognized that threats abroad become threats at home. The idea that nations don’t need mutually beneficial alliances is historically absurd. Which brings us back to Israel. What does the United States gain from its relationship with Israel? A great deal. U.S. Abrams tanks use the Trophy active protection system, designed and developed in Israel. The U.S. Marine Corps uses the most advanced shoulder-launched bunker-busting weapon in the world, based on an Israeli design. American fighter pilots use helmet-mounted targeting systems developed by Israel’s Elbit Systems. Much of the U.S. UAV fleet is based on Israeli designs used as far back as the Gulf War. Just last week, Israel announced completion of Iron Beam, a system that can shoot down rockets, mortars, and drones at a fraction of the cost. Israel is also the only country that buys American F-35s and then improves them, modifications later resold by the U.S. to other allies. Israel was among the first to fly the F-15, F-16, and F-35 in real combat, providing invaluable battlefield data that saves the Pentagon years of research and development and helps the U.S. compete with Russia and China. This is a partnership, not a charity. Israeli tunnel-detection technology used against Hezbollah is now used by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security against cartel tunnels on the southern border. Israel’s Mossad raided Iran’s nuclear archives in Tehran. When the United States needs human intelligence in the Middle East, there is only one country it turns to, and we all know which one that is. Shabbos Kestenbaum$

Shabbos Kestenbaum: I’m deeply troubled by foreign influence in the U.S. government. Just last week, the Department of Education, under Section 117 of the Higher Education Act, found that Qatar alone had spent $6 billion on American colleges and universities. Why is Qatar paying American institutions of higher learning? It also deeply concerns me that there are so many Chinese communists at Harvard University that the Chinese Communist Party reportedly refers to the Harvard Kennedy School as “their party school.” I’m equally disturbed by well-documented Russian influence campaigns, including the use of consulates, like the one near where I live in Riverdale, New York, to spy on and conduct espionage against Americans. But let’s be honest: no one in this room, and no one in our political culture or media, seems to care about any of that. As my opponent just demonstrated, the only country they are singularly obsessed with is Israel. You didn’t mention any other country in a topic that didn’t even include the word Israel. But fine, let’s talk about Israel. Israel is a country that, just three years after gas chambers and crematoria, managed to defeat seven Arab Islamist armies. It is a nation of about nine million people, yet it has more Nobel Prize winners than China and India combined. Israel grants full and equal rights to Jews and Arabs alike, so much so that an Arab Supreme Court justice, Salim Joubran, sentenced a Jewish prime minister, Ehud Olmert, to prison. There is no other country in the Middle East where Jews and Muslims have full, guaranteed equal rights. Before discussing Israel’s virtues further, let’s talk about American foreign policy. The Federalist Papers are filled with references to treaties and the importance of what the Founders called common defense. They understood that the government’s most sacred duty is to protect its people, often through foreign alliances. America’s first war as a nation was the Barbary War, fought to stop Islamist piracy in the Mediterranean, because President Thomas Jefferson recognized that threats abroad become threats at home. The idea that nations don’t need mutually beneficial alliances is historically absurd. Which brings us back to Israel. What does the United States gain from its relationship with Israel? A great deal. U.S. Abrams tanks use the Trophy active protection system, designed and developed in Israel. The U.S. Marine Corps uses the most advanced shoulder-launched bunker-busting weapon in the world, based on an Israeli design. American fighter pilots use helmet-mounted targeting systems developed by Israel’s Elbit Systems. Much of the U.S. UAV fleet is based on Israeli designs used as far back as the Gulf War. Just last week, Israel announced completion of Iron Beam, a system that can shoot down rockets, mortars, and drones at a fraction of the cost. Israel is also the only country that buys American F-35s and then improves them, modifications later resold by the U.S. to other allies. Israel was among the first to fly the F-15, F-16, and F-35 in real combat, providing invaluable battlefield data that saves the Pentagon years of research and development and helps the U.S. compete with Russia and China. This is a partnership, not a charity. Israeli tunnel-detection technology used against Hezbollah is now used by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security against cartel tunnels on the southern border. Israel’s Mossad raided Iran’s nuclear archives in Tehran. When the United States needs human intelligence in the Middle East, there is only one country it turns to, and we all know which one that is. Shabbos Kestenbaum

Open Source Intel

64,335 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce