Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

🚨HARD LEFT AGITATORS INVADE REFORM PUB EVENT These leftists are abusing and clearly intimidating the Reform student group at St Andrews University. The volume of her voice is horrendous, no less the meaningless tripe coming out of her mouth. She has NO CLUE what she’s talking about. Her arguments...

31,497 views • 6 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Candace Owens is now accusing TPUSA of using DARVO tactics against her. Which is funny because the exact opposite is true. How does DARVO work? Deny: The offender says the bad behavior never happened or wasn’t harmful. Candace pretends as if her behavior is normal. She often denies things that she blatantly said on camera. And she claims her actions aren’t harmful because she frames it as her just asking questions. Attack: The offender attacks the person/people who speak up against them. The offender accuses them of being liars and etc. Candace attacks everyone who speaks out against her. And she acts as if they’re speaking out against her for no reason even though she’s the one initiating the conflicts. She accuses them of being liars who are paid to not agree with her. Reverse Victim and Offender: The offender claims they are the real victim and tries to make the actual victim look like a bad guy. This is what Candace has been doing for months. She accuses people of all kinds of things. Launches personal attacks against them. Criticizes them all day everyday. Drags their name through the mud. Sends her cult to harass them. And then when they speak out about it she immediately plays victim. She even goes so far as to pretend people are trying to kill her when they crack a joke about her that she doesn’t like. So as always with Candace every accusation is an admission. I’ve never in my life seen someone that projects as much as she does. Candace knows all about DARVO because she’s using that method in her podcasts.

Cinema Shogun

10,053 views • 1 month ago

People are trying to make sense of why Reform have put forward Laila Cunningham as their candidate for Mayor of London. Is she a real Muslim? Is Reform containment? The simplest answer is that Cunningham is only interested in politics as a path for self-promotion. She's a grifter. She saw Reform are likely to form the next government, rote-learned the slick "British values" talking points to get ahead in a party desperate to not be called racist, and was pushed as the progressive-proof face of the party. Everything she does is to increase her personal advantage. She made headlines with her "supermum" citizens arrest stunt. She was in favour of hate crime legislation when it benefitted her. She wrote Woke poetry about how London's diversity was its strength — words which could have come straight from the mouth of Sadiq Khan. Then she jumped aboard the Conservatives when they were in power. She took selfies with everyone she could, because it was more important to be seen at functions than to be actually doing anything. She went to Pride and hosted the first Iftar event as a Councillor for Westminster North. The contradictions don't matter. She doesn't believe anything consistent. These are just the rituals of being a part of liberal political circles. The passwords you have to speak to be part of the club. It gatekeeps in favour of shameless grifters. She only pulled out of being the Conservative Parliamentary candidate for Rotherham right before the 2024 election. What connection does she have to Rotherham? None, since she loves London so much that she's always lived there and wants to be Mayor. She just took the seat as a nonwhite Muslim woman, until she realised she couldn't win and it would damage her future prospects. We shouldn’t trust Cunningham. Not just because she's a Muslim, and both the British right and public at large don't like Islam. We shouldn’t trust her because her entire political career appears to be about making her famous. She wants to be in power and on camera for the sake of it. She isn't really all that interested in philosophy or policy. Otherwise, she wouldn't be reciting insults like "far right" or pushing the incoherent platitudes of "British values", because neither stand up to scrutiny. It's a grift. And if we want an effective right-wing in this country, we shouldn’t reward it.

Connor Tomlinson

114,095 views • 8 months ago