"Harm reduction arguments are not wrong because harm isn't reduced when you vote for the lesser or two evils. Harm reduction arguments are wrong because they are the ticket to making sure that a Democratic Party never becomes a resistance party, & always just follows one step behind the... most evil version of itself Republicans can invent."show more

👏👏👏

America blew it in '24. @DrJillStein had a path to the White House with a pro 99%, pro M4A, planet & peace platform. What did MSM believers do? They got in line like lemmings to vote for their teams instead of voting in the own interests. You've got to lie down to be walked on.

Exactly. Dems talk a better game, but never deliver as they work for the same donors as Repubs. Lib MSM believers get played with the VBNMW BS every time. America can never heal by duopoly team voting. We can only heal by voting on a candidate's verifiable policy and record.

Harm also isn't reduced as shown by Biden carrying out a genocide.

When you realize that both parties registered members add up to 12.5% of the available voting public for each of them you are confronted with the realization that they represent a fraction of us, these less of two evil arguments are a con.

Harm reduction is important, if you let the people who would be in your coalition die, you have no coalition. This is insufferable listening to you at this point. 14 million people are estimated to by 2030 4.5 million being children due to usaid cuts. 51 thousand a year here dyin

Always highlighting the thing you say instead of what your guest says, says everything about what your platform is about. You're not trying to have a conversation but you're trying to push an agenda.

Dems are not reformable, mitigating harm is the only option. It only becomes a barrier to progress when there is no external power outside of the party to make them irrelevant.

Thank you for being so clear and steadfast I voted for Jill Stein just on Gaza Your commitment to a real workers party and refusal to fall for the harm reduction position is So important its hard to hold w/out the specifics of the Democratic history of betrayals you articulate

Been watching you for years champion 3rd party & I get it now. I don't trust any of these progressives. I remember Ross Perot/Ron Paul, neither ran for a duopoly both came close. Bernie/justice dems/all the side quest "activist" lefties shouldve started that much needed 3rd party

Was waiting for you to give him the answer about the GP question.... feel like that would have got him and those watching to understand the utility of voting 3rd party over other options.

My Party is not the lesser of the evil. It is the greatest of the good. Declare your political liberation join the fight to defend the working class.

there's so many amazing Asian American guests you could have on your show but you picked a tool for the Dem establishment. (I appreciate your interviewing Sawant, but that came late. Very late.)

Thanks for sharing this

Helen Keller in 1911 said the two parties where fake -

Lil mouthy @WajahatAli is on his knees down there making himself useful to the establishment. Kamala 100 pushed & supported all these wars

But didn’t you already admit you have no interest in reforming the democrat party? This is a contradiction all you are is a spoiler

What is this "opposition party" that she keeps talking about? What does it entail?

Yes, the plebs need to secede. An actual event in the Roman Republic's history, the plebians moved lock and stock to another hill. The Patricians discovered they couldn't exist without them and gave them full rights.

It's wrong for both reasons

This guy isn’t a total dummy like some of your guest but obviously you are still a magnitude more intelligent than him.

This guy is on his knees making himself useful