Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Has CNN ever had a "firearms expert" on that actually was a firearms expert? I genuinely can't recall ever seeing anyone talk about firearms on CNN that wasn't clueless... 🤨 "One of those firearms, we are told, was equipped with a laser sight device. This has significance, because number...

Mrgunsngear's profile picture

Mrgunsngear

376,630 subscribers

1,008,949 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политикаОбразованиеНаука и технологии
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🚨 There are puzzling questions around how one of the Bondi terrorists was able to get a firearm licence. In 2015, Sajid Akram applied for a firearms licence. Just a month later that licence was recommended for approval. As part of routine procedure Sajid Akram was asked to supply photo ID ... but for whatever reason he never got around to it and the application lapsed. In 2019, Sajid's son Naveed was living at home and because of his connection with radical jihadis he was on ASIO's radar. It has been confirmed that ASIO told NSW Police of their concerns re Naveed. The following year (2020) Sajid applied for a firearms licence from the NSW registry. In 2015 it took the registry a month to approve ... but in 2020 there was no response for three years. That's good ... he was living with his son who was on ASIO's radar ... but then why was that firearms licence approved in 2023? Another red flag was that Sajid bought six firearms and three of them were identical. That's odd ... those with multiple firearms have very little reason to buy duplicate weapons. Was this missed by the authorities? Today I got the ball rolling on a 'request for documents' that if approved will hopefully shed light on exactly why Sajid Akram's firearms licence was approved.
1:52

🚨 There are puzzling questions around how one of the Bondi terrorists was able to get a firearm licence. In 2015, Sajid Akram applied for a firearms licence. Just a month later that licence was recommended for approval. As part of routine procedure Sajid Akram was asked to supply photo ID ... but for whatever reason he never got around to it and the application lapsed. In 2019, Sajid's son Naveed was living at home and because of his connection with radical jihadis he was on ASIO's radar. It has been confirmed that ASIO told NSW Police of their concerns re Naveed. The following year (2020) Sajid applied for a firearms licence from the NSW registry. In 2015 it took the registry a month to approve ... but in 2020 there was no response for three years. That's good ... he was living with his son who was on ASIO's radar ... but then why was that firearms licence approved in 2023? Another red flag was that Sajid bought six firearms and three of them were identical. That's odd ... those with multiple firearms have very little reason to buy duplicate weapons. Was this missed by the authorities? Today I got the ball rolling on a 'request for documents' that if approved will hopefully shed light on exactly why Sajid Akram's firearms licence was approved.

John Ruddick MLC - Libertarian

17,441 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Fox Host: Who goest to a protest and brings a gun? Was he not asking for some kind of trouble? Williams: I’ve been on this channel a number of times where we talk about the second amendment and the right to carry firearms.
0:39

Fox Host: Who goest to a protest and brings a gun? Was he not asking for some kind of trouble? Williams: I’ve been on this channel a number of times where we talk about the second amendment and the right to carry firearms.

Acyn

1,657,789 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev on betting that phones would become financial tools when everyone else saw them as toys. “When we started, this was actually contrarian because most people that you talk to were playing games on their phones.” “It was a little bit of a leap to imagine a world where your phone is your primary financial device.” “‘How could you trust your finances with this device? It’s so small. What if it gets hacked?’” “So we kind of made a bet that that would actually be primary.” Vlad Tenev Robinhood
1:09

Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev on betting that phones would become financial tools when everyone else saw them as toys. “When we started, this was actually contrarian because most people that you talk to were playing games on their phones.” “It was a little bit of a leap to imagine a world where your phone is your primary financial device.” “‘How could you trust your finances with this device? It’s so small. What if it gets hacked?’” “So we kind of made a bet that that would actually be primary.” Vlad Tenev Robinhood

a16z

82,757 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Joe Rogan on why he goes to church. “When I was younger, I was very cynical about religion, and then I've gotten older…” “One of the things that I always say is, if there was a pill that could make you as nice as the people that I go to church with, everybody would be on it.” “They are the nicest f*cking people you will ever encounter. When we leave church, they're kind…” “If you get just to the teachings of Christ, I can't find any faults in it.”
1:40

Joe Rogan on why he goes to church. “When I was younger, I was very cynical about religion, and then I've gotten older…” “One of the things that I always say is, if there was a pill that could make you as nice as the people that I go to church with, everybody would be on it.” “They are the nicest f*cking people you will ever encounter. When we leave church, they're kind…” “If you get just to the teachings of Christ, I can't find any faults in it.”

Collin Rugg

2,570,496 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

".50cent wasn't there but we got into a shootout with his armed security in New York. We had a lil back and forth with firearms. Yeah I was in it man but I was telling you before, it takes you a lot of time to undo things that are second nature man." - The Game
10:18

".50cent wasn't there but we got into a shootout with his armed security in New York. We had a lil back and forth with firearms. Yeah I was in it man but I was telling you before, it takes you a lot of time to undo things that are second nature man." - The Game

Club Shay Shay

431,006 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

.Tommy Pigott: "Only 10% of [foreign aid] went to the issue. 90% was eaten up by bureaucracy and contractors and layer after layer of people making money on those efforts... It's not that we're pulling back on foreign aid -- It's actually getting it back to the point where we can make a difference; where the money that is spent actually goes to the issues that matter to the American people."
1:21

.Tommy Pigott: "Only 10% of [foreign aid] went to the issue. 90% was eaten up by bureaucracy and contractors and layer after layer of people making money on those efforts... It's not that we're pulling back on foreign aid -- It's actually getting it back to the point where we can make a difference; where the money that is spent actually goes to the issues that matter to the American people."

Rapid Response 47

243,498 просмотров • 1 год назад

CNN already had Trump-hating Bill Kristol on to dramatically read the fake birthday letter. This may be one of the most pathetic CNN clips ever and that is saying a lot because it's CNN.
0:34

CNN already had Trump-hating Bill Kristol on to dramatically read the fake birthday letter. This may be one of the most pathetic CNN clips ever and that is saying a lot because it's CNN.

MAZE

316,254 просмотров • 1 год назад

Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, on why the iPhone, the greatest consumer device ever made, is the wrong hardware for the AI era: Sam argues the iPhone's basic design wasn't made for a world where AI needs to live alongside your entire life. "I think the iPhone is currently the greatest piece of consumer hardware ever made by a lot. Like, incredible what that has done." The iPhone was designed for a pre-AI world. Sam Altman explains: "It was not meant for a world where you needed a piece of hardware that could absorb all of the context of your life. You know, you can use the phone, you can stop using the phone, you can put it in your pocket, but it's kind of like on or off." That binary, on or off, in use or in your pocket, is the core mismatch. A device that flips between active and dormant can't continuously absorb the context that a personal AGI would need to actually be useful to you. Sam uses the conversation he's having in that moment as the example: "This has been a very interesting conversation. I would love this to be referenced by my personal AGI later, but my phone is in my pocket and it's not going to understand." The vision he's pointing toward is a device that participates differently: "I would like a device that, if I wanted to, can participate and understand and know about this conversation." The shift Sam is describing is from a device you pick up and put down, to one that quietly captures the context of your life. Without that continuous context, a personal AGI can't actually be personal.
0:44

Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, on why the iPhone, the greatest consumer device ever made, is the wrong hardware for the AI era: Sam argues the iPhone's basic design wasn't made for a world where AI needs to live alongside your entire life. "I think the iPhone is currently the greatest piece of consumer hardware ever made by a lot. Like, incredible what that has done." The iPhone was designed for a pre-AI world. Sam Altman explains: "It was not meant for a world where you needed a piece of hardware that could absorb all of the context of your life. You know, you can use the phone, you can stop using the phone, you can put it in your pocket, but it's kind of like on or off." That binary, on or off, in use or in your pocket, is the core mismatch. A device that flips between active and dormant can't continuously absorb the context that a personal AGI would need to actually be useful to you. Sam uses the conversation he's having in that moment as the example: "This has been a very interesting conversation. I would love this to be referenced by my personal AGI later, but my phone is in my pocket and it's not going to understand." The vision he's pointing toward is a device that participates differently: "I would like a device that, if I wanted to, can participate and understand and know about this conversation." The shift Sam is describing is from a device you pick up and put down, to one that quietly captures the context of your life. Without that continuous context, a personal AGI can't actually be personal.

Big Brain AI

25,447 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

CNN: That's not what farmers are telling you. One farmer at a town hall told you that tariffs drove up prices of fertilizer ALFORD: It was Joe Biden that drove up the price CNN: That's not what the farmer told you ALFORD: Well, that's what I'm telling you CNN: Sir, excuse me. Are you listening to your constituents?
2:06

CNN: That's not what farmers are telling you. One farmer at a town hall told you that tariffs drove up prices of fertilizer ALFORD: It was Joe Biden that drove up the price CNN: That's not what the farmer told you ALFORD: Well, that's what I'm telling you CNN: Sir, excuse me. Are you listening to your constituents?

Aaron Rupar

861,519 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

He really thought this was a brilliant “gotcha.” No law-abiding gun owner or Second Amendment supporter has ever argued that children should be carrying firearms to school. That’s a strawman, and a ridiculous one at that. The mental gymnastics required to defend a killer are truly astonishing.
0:31

He really thought this was a brilliant “gotcha.” No law-abiding gun owner or Second Amendment supporter has ever argued that children should be carrying firearms to school. That’s a strawman, and a ridiculous one at that. The mental gymnastics required to defend a killer are truly astonishing.

I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸

19,446 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Let's check in with this firearms expert (must be with a neck tattoo like that...) and see what his advice for winning a gunfight "in an urban setting" is 🤨 Use optics and sights accordingly... #WTF #sights #knowledge #nope #education #urban #learning
0:53

Let's check in with this firearms expert (must be with a neck tattoo like that...) and see what his advice for winning a gunfight "in an urban setting" is 🤨 Use optics and sights accordingly... #WTF #sights #knowledge #nope #education #urban #learning

Mrgunsngear

84,585 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🇯🇵 A leftist whines about The Last Samurai and says people of color should never trust white people. He says that it should be "forgotten and no one should ever talk about it! It's gross!" I can tell you that as a Japanese person no one here was offended by this film.
1:07

🇯🇵 A leftist whines about The Last Samurai and says people of color should never trust white people. He says that it should be "forgotten and no one should ever talk about it! It's gross!" I can tell you that as a Japanese person no one here was offended by this film.

鈴森はるか 『haruka suzumori』 🇯🇵

58,740 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

.Scott Jennings schools Ana Navarro on CNN NewsNight after she calls the $1.8 billion DOJ fund to compensate victims of unfair lawfare “reparations.”: Navarro: “Republicans used to balk and be shocked and uh outraged by the idea of reparations to people who suffered slavery. But we're going to be giving money to uh January 6th insurrectionists. That part's okay. Yeah, it's it's disgusting.” … Jennings: Have you ever been unfairly targeted by the Department of Justice? Navarro] I have been unfairly targeted by this administration, yeah. Jennings] Have you been unfairly prosecuted by the Department of Justice? Navarro] Are those the people that are going to be in uh in this— Jennings] So the answer is no, you haven't. So so the issue is, the question is, has anyone in the history of the United States ever been unfairly targeted by the Department of Justice? Of course they have. And there ought to be just at a top line a way for people to seek recourse if they have been unfairly targeted. That having been said, this all started by the fact that Donald Trump had his tax returns unfairly and illegally leaked by the IRS. That's where all this started and he was initially seeking damages for that, which he has given up. He'll receive no money as I understand it. And now it has morphed into this idea that there have been people that have been unfairly targeted…. I want a uh do I want a world where if you've been unfairly targeted by the federal government and it was truly unfair and you truly were had something done to you that should not have been done, do I think people should be able to seek recourse for that? Absolutely I do because I think it probably happens and not on a partisan basis but it probably happens all the time. And I think people ought to be able to seek uh some sort of damages if they've been unfairly targeted by the department or by the federal government.”
1:59

.Scott Jennings schools Ana Navarro on CNN NewsNight after she calls the $1.8 billion DOJ fund to compensate victims of unfair lawfare “reparations.”: Navarro: “Republicans used to balk and be shocked and uh outraged by the idea of reparations to people who suffered slavery. But we're going to be giving money to uh January 6th insurrectionists. That part's okay. Yeah, it's it's disgusting.” … Jennings: Have you ever been unfairly targeted by the Department of Justice? Navarro] I have been unfairly targeted by this administration, yeah. Jennings] Have you been unfairly prosecuted by the Department of Justice? Navarro] Are those the people that are going to be in uh in this— Jennings] So the answer is no, you haven't. So so the issue is, the question is, has anyone in the history of the United States ever been unfairly targeted by the Department of Justice? Of course they have. And there ought to be just at a top line a way for people to seek recourse if they have been unfairly targeted. That having been said, this all started by the fact that Donald Trump had his tax returns unfairly and illegally leaked by the IRS. That's where all this started and he was initially seeking damages for that, which he has given up. He'll receive no money as I understand it. And now it has morphed into this idea that there have been people that have been unfairly targeted…. I want a uh do I want a world where if you've been unfairly targeted by the federal government and it was truly unfair and you truly were had something done to you that should not have been done, do I think people should be able to seek recourse for that? Absolutely I do because I think it probably happens and not on a partisan basis but it probably happens all the time. And I think people ought to be able to seek uh some sort of damages if they've been unfairly targeted by the department or by the federal government.”

Steve Guest

23,762 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

The resident GIFFORDS ghoul has stepped up to testify. They complain that it is “too difficult” to sue firearms companies, and argue that the PLCAA must be gutted. Really? Because we struggle to think of a major firearms manufacturer that has not been sued by these groups. For everything from rappers having guns in music videos, to depictions in video games, to crimes committed with stolen firearms in entirely different countries! All things that the manufacturer had no party to, nor any means to control.
0:57

The resident GIFFORDS ghoul has stepped up to testify. They complain that it is “too difficult” to sue firearms companies, and argue that the PLCAA must be gutted. Really? Because we struggle to think of a major firearms manufacturer that has not been sued by these groups. For everything from rappers having guns in music videos, to depictions in video games, to crimes committed with stolen firearms in entirely different countries! All things that the manufacturer had no party to, nor any means to control.

National Association for Gun Rights

63,797 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Tom Cruise trained for three months in how to handle firearms under the supervision of the LAPD. This was the first time Cruise had worked with live rounds. Cruise's tactical draw is so good in a scene that it's used by experts in lessons for handgun training. Collateral (2004).
0:31

Tom Cruise trained for three months in how to handle firearms under the supervision of the LAPD. This was the first time Cruise had worked with live rounds. Cruise's tactical draw is so good in a scene that it's used by experts in lessons for handgun training. Collateral (2004).

Love Classical Music and Movies 🎺🎻💖🎥🎬

373,132 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Must listen. Tucker just went off on the Jeffrey Epstein cover-up and his connection to Israel on Turning Point. Absolute fire. No one is allowed to say the foreign government Epstein was connected to was Israel because we have been cowed into thinking that that's naughty. There is nothing wrong with saying that... "And I think the real answer is Jeffrey Epstein was working on behalf of intel services, probably not American. And we have every right to ask on whose behalf was he working? How does a guy go from being a math teacher at the Dalton School in the late seventies with no college degree to having multiple airplanes, a private island and the largest residential…house in Manhattan? Where did all the money come from? And, no one has ever gotten to the bottom of that because no one has ever tried. And moreover, it's extremely obvious to anyone who watches that this guy had direct connections to a foreign government. Now, no one's allowed to say that that foreign government is Israel because we have been… somehow cowed… into…thinking that that's naughty. There is nothing wrong with saying that. There is nothing hateful about saying that. There's nothing antisemitic about saying that. There's nothing even antisemitic about saying that. There's nothing even antisemitic about saying that. I've spent my entire life pretty much in Washington where I knew and loved a number of people including one very close person who worked at CIA. That has never…prohibited me from saying, I think the CIA has done some horrible things. Murdered a bunch of people, participated in the murder of a sitting US president. It's got a whole trail of crimes. That doesn't make me a disloyal American. It doesn't make me anti American in any sense. I was born here, my family's been here for hundreds of years. I love this country, that's why I live here. So, criticizing the behavior of a government agency does not make you a hater, it makes you a free person. It makes you a citizen. You're allowed to do that…because you're not a slave, you're a citizen. And you have a right to expect that your government will not act against your interests and you have a right to demand that foreign governments not be allowed to act against your interests. That's not creepy. It shouldn't be forbidden. And yet, all of us have trained ourselves to believe that you can't say that somehow. That that's like too naughty and forbidden. And, the effect… of making that off limits has been to create a lot of resentment and I'll say it, hate online. Where people feel like they can't just say, like, what the hell is this? You have the former Israeli prime minister living in your house… You have had all this contact with the foreign government. Were you working on behalf of Mossad? Were you running a blackmail operation on behalf of foreign government? By the way, every single person in Washington DC thinks that. I've never met anyone who doesn't think that. I don't know any of them that hate Israel, but no one feels they can say that. Why? And I think the longer that we play along with it, the more subterranean and creepy and hateful the conversation actually becomes. So, I think it's better just to say it right out loud. Did this happen? And of course that question has been asked to the government of Israel and their answer is, we're not going to tell you. And I think our answer should be, no no As long as we're sending you money, if you were committing crimes on our soil, we have an absolute right to know, did you do this or not?"
3:34

Must listen. Tucker just went off on the Jeffrey Epstein cover-up and his connection to Israel on Turning Point. Absolute fire. No one is allowed to say the foreign government Epstein was connected to was Israel because we have been cowed into thinking that that's naughty. There is nothing wrong with saying that... "And I think the real answer is Jeffrey Epstein was working on behalf of intel services, probably not American. And we have every right to ask on whose behalf was he working? How does a guy go from being a math teacher at the Dalton School in the late seventies with no college degree to having multiple airplanes, a private island and the largest residential…house in Manhattan? Where did all the money come from? And, no one has ever gotten to the bottom of that because no one has ever tried. And moreover, it's extremely obvious to anyone who watches that this guy had direct connections to a foreign government. Now, no one's allowed to say that that foreign government is Israel because we have been… somehow cowed… into…thinking that that's naughty. There is nothing wrong with saying that. There is nothing hateful about saying that. There's nothing antisemitic about saying that. There's nothing even antisemitic about saying that. There's nothing even antisemitic about saying that. I've spent my entire life pretty much in Washington where I knew and loved a number of people including one very close person who worked at CIA. That has never…prohibited me from saying, I think the CIA has done some horrible things. Murdered a bunch of people, participated in the murder of a sitting US president. It's got a whole trail of crimes. That doesn't make me a disloyal American. It doesn't make me anti American in any sense. I was born here, my family's been here for hundreds of years. I love this country, that's why I live here. So, criticizing the behavior of a government agency does not make you a hater, it makes you a free person. It makes you a citizen. You're allowed to do that…because you're not a slave, you're a citizen. And you have a right to expect that your government will not act against your interests and you have a right to demand that foreign governments not be allowed to act against your interests. That's not creepy. It shouldn't be forbidden. And yet, all of us have trained ourselves to believe that you can't say that somehow. That that's like too naughty and forbidden. And, the effect… of making that off limits has been to create a lot of resentment and I'll say it, hate online. Where people feel like they can't just say, like, what the hell is this? You have the former Israeli prime minister living in your house… You have had all this contact with the foreign government. Were you working on behalf of Mossad? Were you running a blackmail operation on behalf of foreign government? By the way, every single person in Washington DC thinks that. I've never met anyone who doesn't think that. I don't know any of them that hate Israel, but no one feels they can say that. Why? And I think the longer that we play along with it, the more subterranean and creepy and hateful the conversation actually becomes. So, I think it's better just to say it right out loud. Did this happen? And of course that question has been asked to the government of Israel and their answer is, we're not going to tell you. And I think our answer should be, no no As long as we're sending you money, if you were committing crimes on our soil, we have an absolute right to know, did you do this or not?"

Green Lives Matter

1,251,223 просмотров • 1 год назад

Gmail Creator Paul Buchheit: We're On The Path Towards AGI "The key point that happened is that we crossed a line where AI went from a research project, where you put in a lot of money and don't get much out, to a thing where you put in money and get out more. It's like when a reaction goes critical ... that's where we are right now: people can't seem to throw money at it fast enough." Paul Buchheit on Y Combinator's Lightcone Podcast
1:40

Gmail Creator Paul Buchheit: We're On The Path Towards AGI "The key point that happened is that we crossed a line where AI went from a research project, where you put in a lot of money and don't get much out, to a thing where you put in money and get out more. It's like when a reaction goes critical ... that's where we are right now: people can't seem to throw money at it fast enough." Paul Buchheit on Y Combinator's Lightcone Podcast

Overlap: Business & Tech

73,322 просмотров • 1 год назад