Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Has Zelensky turned Putin’s worst nightmare into reality? While Putin is afraid to leave Russia and has even reduced meetings with his own officials, Ukraine’s president is working on other diplomatic fronts. After a tour of Middle Eastern countries, he recently visited Turkey and then Syria. In a country...

131,756 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

The syrian pivot: how putin’s investment became Ukraine’s strategic hub. I would pay anything to be a fly on the wall in the Kremlin when putin sees this footage. Man, if you told me two years ago that Bashar al-Assad would be hiding in a Moscow basement while the newguy in Damascus, Ahmed al-Sharaa, was out here cutting deals with President Zelenskyy, I would’ve said you’re dreaming. putin spent a decade—and a terrifying amount of Russian blood and treasure—bombing Syria into submission just to keep a "loyal" puppet in power and secure those Mediterranean military bases. And now? The new government is basically using those very same ports—the ones putin thought were his permanent "Southern Flank"—to help Ukraine move grain. It’s peak irony. The "Grand Strategist" in Moscow basically cleared the path for a government that’s now cozying up to his biggest adversary. It’s a masterclass in how quickly putin’s "influence" evaporates. Putin thought he bought Syria forever. Instead he just subsidised the infrastructure for the next administration to move on without him. Seeing al-Sharaa talk about "stability" while facilitating Ukrainian trade must feel like a slow-motion slap in the face to every "Z-patriot" back in Russia. Ahmed al-Sharaa: “This is a great success achieved for the stability of Syria. There is a historical partnership between Syria and Ukraine in the fields of food and energy. Ukraine has great experience in agricultural production and the pharmaceutical industry. Syria is also an agricultural country and needs these skills. Our main goal is to create a hub where food and basic materials from Ukraine can be re-exported through Syrian ports. Turkey contributes greatly to global and regional stability through initiatives like this forum. Turkey's role has now reached a global dimension. The Syria-Turkey partnership is the foundation for the future security of the region and the world. Syria has ceased to be a crisis and has turned into a historical opportunity for reconstruction and stability.”

Yasmina

68,292 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

The visit of President Zelenskyy to Syria on April 5, 2026, is, without exaggeration, historic. It is the first visit by a President of Ukraine to Damascus - the capital of a country that until recently was a key Russian ally in the Middle East. In June 2022, after Syria recognized the "independence" of the Russian-occupied territories of the so-called "DPR" and "LPR" and supported Russia’s military aggression against Ukraine, Ukraine severed diplomatic relations with Syria and imposed an embargo. Following the fall of Bashar al-Assad’s regime in September 2025, Ukraine and Syria signed a joint communiqué on restoring diplomatic relations. President Zelenskyy’s visit to Syria on April 5, 2026, demonstrates the final loss of Russian influence in the region after the collapse of Assad’s regime. This is not just a bilateral visit, but the final stage of a regional tour that began in late March. President Zelenskyy visited Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Qatar, and Jordan - reaching concrete agreements in both defense and economic spheres. Visits to Turkey, and then Syria, logically complete this arc. The sequence Ankara-Damascus is highly symbolic. President Erdoğan is the key external patron of Syria’s new authorities. President Zelenskyy effectively arrived in Damascus with Turkish backing, significantly increasing the status and credibility of the visit. A Ukraine-Turkey-Syria axis is now taking shape. Turkey acts as the central mediator in this trilateral format, strengthening stability in both the Black Sea and Mediterranean regions. ◾️ Security dimension Syria seeks stability. Ukraine is a unique partner: it has real experience countering Russian and Iranian expansion, while not being a NATO member. ◾️ Energy dimension In particular, discussions include a Qatar-Turkey-Europe gas pipeline project aimed at diversifying Europe’s gas supplies and reducing dependence on Russia. ◾️ Diplomatic dimension vis-à-vis Russia While trilateral talks between Ukraine, the United States, and Russia are on hold due to hostilities in the Middle East, Ukraine is building an alternative architecture of influence - regional partners capable of exerting economic and diplomatic pressure on Moscow. ◾️ Food security and reconstruction Ukraine has reaffirmed its role as a reliable grain supplier to Syria under the Grain from Ukraine and Food from Ukraine initiatives. Discussions also include the reconstruction of Syrian infrastructure, particularly in the energy and industrial sectors. 📹: Apro-Ukraine rally in Idlib, Syria, opposing Syrian normalization with Russia, October 2025/ Thomas van Linge

Anton Gerashchenko

82,888 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

For those of you listening to these clips without any context and thinking that Zelensky did anything wrong, here’s the context you’re missing: 0:00 - 0:25 – Zelensky starts off by explaining to Vance that, no, he can’t just sign a ceasefire agreement with Putin like Ukraine has done in the past—because Putin has repeatedly broken those agreements. Putin previously promised not to invade Ukraine and to release prisoners, yet he never released the prisoners and, of course, went on to invade Ukraine. For Vance to be so naïve as to think that another signature from Putin would mean anything is purely ignorant. 0:25 - 0:38 – Vance claims Zelensky is being “disrespectful” for simply explaining why he can’t trust Putin’s word. He says it’s "disrespectful" for Zelensky to "come to the Oval Office to litigate" the matter publicly. What else is he supposed to do? Just nod along and accept a deal that would set Ukraine up for failure? 0:41 - 0:46 – Vance tells Zelensky he should be thanking the President. Let’s be clear—Zelensky has already thanked Trump multiple times over the past 40 days, even after Trump blatantly lied and claimed that Ukraine started the war. So let’s talk about actual disrespect—who exactly is the one being disrespectful here? 1:03 - 1:10 – Vance accuses Zelensky of coming to the Oval Office to attack the Trump administration. But there was no attack. Zelensky was simply explaining why Trump’s idea of signing a flimsy, unenforceable deal with Russia makes no sense, given that Putin has broken almost every agreement he has ever signed. That’s not an attack on Trump—it’s a reality check. 1:15 - 1:34 – Zelensky explains that during a war, "everybody has problems, even you." Trump loses it, snapping back, "You don’t know that. Don’t tell us what we are going to feel." But let’s be real—America has absolutely felt the effects of this war. Higher gas prices Increased inflation Over $100 billion in U.S. aid sent to Ukraine Political infighting over the war More U.S. troops stationed in Europe Depleting U.S. weapons stockpiles Zelensky is 100% right—but for some reason, Trump completely lost it and is now trying to paint Zelensky as the disrespectful one? This was pure theater. It was a staged act by Trump to vilify Zelensky. The only real disrespect in that room was directed at Zelensky himself.

Ed Krassenstein

322,463 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🇹🇷🇸🇾‼️🚨 Assad’s fault the conflict escalated? In July Erdogan tried to come close to Assad and invited him for possible talks to restore relations any time: “I have already called on Mr. Assad for a visit to Turkey or a meeting in a third country and I have instructed my foreign minister on this matter. We want to start a new process by overcoming this resentment.” ‼️ Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham (splinter branch of Al Qaeda) rebels, who started an offensive now, were angry! HTS in Idlib were burning Turkish flags in dissatisfaction with Erdogan plan to restart diplomatic relations with Assad. -> But Assad decided not to go down this path and refused to start talks with Erdogan, unless Erdogan abides by his conditions of fully sovereignty and retreats from Syria fully. Which essentially is impossible before talks, but could have been part of the agreement. Erdogan said: "The door is open to Assad but their approach is important. Assad wants Türkiye out of Northern Syria. This is out of the question. We are fighting terrorism there.” The important part is, that Assad decided not to open a diplomatic path with Erdogan. -> Now Erdogan decided to actually escalate and enforce either talks, or remove Assad. Assad was able to establish good relations with other Arab states and join the Arab league again, the last bit he missed is the normalized of relations with Turkey. It’s a shame Assad did not do that, Russia and Iran were pressuring Assad to make peace. It is rumored that Bashar is emotional and upset with Erdogan, so he was waiting for him to go and wanted to make peace with the next president. Assad and Erdogan were close, they even went on family vacations together and Bashar never forgave Erdogan that he turned on him that much. ‼️ Now … whenever you want to blame Assad or not, likely he could have averted the current escalation by meeting Erdogan and working on a peace plan, with a slow withdrawal of Turkey from Syria.

Lord Bebo

325,962 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

US Vice President J.D. Vance made a sharp statement warning Russia that it will be "very bad" for them if they do not actively engage in "good-faith" negotiations on Ukraine. According to Vance, Trump believes the conflict harms everyone – Russia, Ukraine, and America – and is dissatisfied that Russia allegedly is not sufficiently committed to a peaceful resolution. "And here is what I will say about the president: he is keenly responsive to the reality on the ground. And the reality is this: first, we have conducted incredibly good-faith negotiations with both the Russians and the Ukrainians. And I believe the president is becoming increasingly impatient with the Russians because he feels they are not offering enough to end the war. That is first. Second, the president is increasingly convinced that this war is bad for Russia. You constantly hear this from me. You constantly hear this from the president. The war is bad for Russia. It is bad for Ukraine. It is bad for America. We want the killings to stop. That remains the president's position. But the president can also look at the reality on the ground. He sees economic indicators coming from Eastern Europe. He sees the number of casualties, both Russian and Ukrainian, in this war. And the president tells Vladimir Putin that it is time to stop the killings. He would say this to Zelensky as well, and essentially has said this to Zelensky. He wants this war to end, and he is doing everything possible to stop it. But listen, if the Russians refuse to negotiate in good faith, I think it will be very, very bad for their country. That is what the president has made clear. This is not a change of position. This is an acknowledgment of the reality on the ground. We will continue to fight for peace every day in the Trump administration." They are losing and are desperate to pressure Russia to agree to Minsk 3. What they don’t say is - Russia gave their terms in summer of 2024 and their position has never changed, as such accept and fulfill Russia’s conditions and the war will end .

Dagny Taggart

55,272 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten