Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Have been digging deeper into the AI influencer studio from Higgsfield. If you're building AI tools you should take note here. It's so... easy. Bing bang boom 'influencer'. AI has an accessibility issue, not in a WCAG way, in a 'IDFK what to prompt' way. The character creation UI...

15,121 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

11 Kommentare

Profilbild von Michael Aubry
Michael Aubryvor 8 Monaten

Yup thets what we did with Gluely The idea is to abstract every technical detail away so you can describe your character like a video game and use basic prompting to get high quality results

Profilbild von willie
willievor 8 Monaten

This is the way.

Profilbild von 𝘿𝙖𝙣𝙞𝙚𝙡 𝙑𝙖𝙧𝙜𝙖
𝘿𝙖𝙣𝙞𝙚𝙡 𝙑𝙖𝙧𝙜𝙖vor 8 Monaten

money money money?! usually right?

Profilbild von willie
willievor 8 Monaten

Higgsfield is on the more expensive end yeah, but half the price of arcads for the base sub.

Profilbild von Vlad
Vladvor 8 Monaten

agree 100%. It took me longer to build a flow that would abstract all the hard parts than actually building the app.

Profilbild von Andi
Andivor 8 Monaten

isnt that what we used to call "gpt-wrapper" years ago means?

Profilbild von Time is Light
Time is Lightvor 8 Monaten

#TimeIsLight

Profilbild von Average Joe
Average Joevor 8 Monaten

I’ve only use higgsfield from my phone, does the web suite have your own library of motion captures to dub over?

Profilbild von willie
willievor 8 Monaten

Yeah, they're very tiktok but you can also add your own of course

Profilbild von Average Joe
Average Joevor 8 Monaten

I’ve been using a similar library app for TikTok videos, it’s and uses Kling 2.6, but users populate the library with any TikTok or Instagram link, it eliminates having to supply the 720p video file of you’ve ripped it from TT/Instagram

Profilbild von ᴀʟᴠᴀʀᴏ
ᴀʟᴠᴀʀᴏvor 8 Monaten

exactly, that's why we need behind the screen presets.

Ähnliche Videos

📖THE SEEDANCE 2.0 PROMPT FORMAT THAT NOBODY IS USING BUT EVERYONE SHOULD Most people use Seedance 2.0 wrong. They type a normal prompt and wonder why the result looks generic. The difference between these two visuals isn't a better idea — it's a better prompt format. Normal prompt gives you a good result. JSON prompt gives you a cinematic one. Here's why it works: A normal prompt describes what you want. A JSON prompt tells Seedance exactly how to build the scene — camera movement, lighting angle, atmosphere, texture, depth, timing. You're not asking for a video. You're engineering one. The crystal dolphin jumping above an ancient courtyard with floating jellyfish — same concept, two completely different outputs. The JSON version has golden hour, dramatic clouds, volumetric light, and a sense of scale the normal prompt never reached. The glowing lotus fountain — same story. Normal prompt gives you a clean render. JSON gives you a full cinematic frame with layered depth, warm lantern light, and a composition that looks like it belongs in a feature film. The workflow that produces this: • Step 1 — Write your scene idea in plain language first •Step 2 — Ask Claude to convert it into a structured JSON prompt with fields for: subject, environment, camera, lighting, mood, motion, color grade • Step 3 — Paste the JSON into Seedance 2.0 • Step 4 — Take the best clip into Premiere Pro for final color correction and sound design The tools are free or cheap. The knowledge of how to prompt is what separates the results. This is the gap most creators never close. 📥 BACK TOMORROW. There will be new life hacks 🔖 The full guide is pinned below. Save it before you need it.

Zentrix⌚️

137,112 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten