Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

📖THE SEEDANCE 2.0 PROMPT FORMAT THAT NOBODY IS USING BUT EVERYONE SHOULD Most people use Seedance 2.0 wrong. They type a normal prompt and wonder why the result looks generic. The difference between these two visuals isn't a better idea — it's a better prompt format. Normal prompt gives... you a good result. JSON prompt gives you a cinematic one. Here's why it works: A normal prompt describes what you want. A JSON prompt tells Seedance exactly how to build the scene — camera movement, lighting angle, atmosphere, texture, depth, timing. You're not asking for a video. You're engineering one. The crystal dolphin jumping above an ancient courtyard with floating jellyfish — same concept, two completely different outputs. The JSON version has golden hour, dramatic clouds, volumetric light, and a sense of scale the normal prompt never reached. The glowing lotus fountain — same story. Normal prompt gives you a clean render. JSON gives you a full cinematic frame with layered depth, warm lantern light, and a composition that looks like it belongs in a feature film. The workflow that produces this: • Step 1 — Write your scene idea in plain language first •Step 2 — Ask Claude to convert it into a structured JSON prompt with fields for: subject, environment, camera, lighting, mood, motion, color grade • Step 3 — Paste the JSON into Seedance 2.0 • Step 4 — Take the best clip into Premiere Pro for final color correction and sound design The tools are free or cheap. The knowledge of how to prompt is what separates the results. This is the gap most creators never close. 📥 BACK TOMORROW. There will be new life hacks 🔖 The full guide is pinned below. Save it before you need it.show more

Zentrix⌚️

2,488 subscribers

136,686 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

I just trained a custom GPT that turns any idea into a Nano Banana JSON prompt just describe the picture you want and it will: – plan the photo like a creative director – offer pro-level suggestions – write the entire JSON prompt for you all you have to do is copy and paste the JSON and you'll get images that look like a creative director made it comment "nano" and I'll DM it to you (must be following)

I just trained a custom GPT that turns any idea into a Nano Banana JSON prompt just describe the picture you want and it will: – plan the photo like a creative director – offer pro-level suggestions – write the entire JSON prompt for you all you have to do is copy and paste the JSON and you'll get images that look like a creative director made it comment "nano" and I'll DM it to you (must be following)

Tyler

269,791 views • 1 year ago

I cracked the code. Most people struggle with AI video prompts. The trick isn't writing more — it's writing structured. I use Claude to turn a simple idea into a full JSON-style prompt: scene, character, camera movement, timing, negative prompts, all mapped out. That structure is the difference between "obviously AI" and something that looks real. Once you have the format, it's stupidly easy to make consistently realistic videos, over and over. Want the exact JSON prompt structure I use? Comment "WANT" and I'll send it over

I cracked the code. Most people struggle with AI video prompts. The trick isn't writing more — it's writing structured. I use Claude to turn a simple idea into a full JSON-style prompt: scene, character, camera movement, timing, negative prompts, all mapped out. That structure is the difference between "obviously AI" and something that looks real. Once you have the format, it's stupidly easy to make consistently realistic videos, over and over. Want the exact JSON prompt structure I use? Comment "WANT" and I'll send it over

George Stock

19,856 views • 8 days ago

📖 MOST PEOPLE ARE USING SEEDANCE 2.0 JSON WRONGLY AND HERE'S WHY One small JSON change can improve every video you generate Most users write a prompt, generate a video, dislike the result, and start over. The best creators don’t work that way. They use JSON to give Seedance 2.0 a structured set of instructions that defines exactly what should happen in the video. Instead of a single block of text, JSON breaks everything into components: • Character description • Environment • Camera movement • Actions • Timing • Visual style • Scene transitions This makes outputs far more consistent and predictable. Why JSON is powerful: • Better character consistency across scenes • More control over camera movement • Easier to edit individual elements • Reusable templates for future projects • Faster workflow when creating multiple videos • Less randomness and fewer failed generations A simple workflow: 1.Define the goal of the video. 2.Create the main character description. 3.Describe the environment and visual style. 4.Add actions and camera movements. 5.Organize everything into a JSON structure. Example: Character - AI fitness coach Environment - modern gym Action - walking toward camera Camera - slow cinematic push-in Style - realistic, commercial quality Instead of rewriting the entire prompt every time, you can simply modify individual JSON fields and keep the rest unchanged. That’s why advanced Seedance 2.0 users are moving from prompting to system design. The future of AI video isn’t writing better prompts. It’s building reusable production pipelines. 📥Tomorrow I'll show you what's sitting right next to this opportunity. 🔖The pinned post has the complete system. Use it or watch someone else do it first

📖 MOST PEOPLE ARE USING SEEDANCE 2.0 JSON WRONGLY AND HERE'S WHY One small JSON change can improve every video you generate Most users write a prompt, generate a video, dislike the result, and start over. The best creators don’t work that way. They use JSON to give Seedance 2.0 a structured set of instructions that defines exactly what should happen in the video. Instead of a single block of text, JSON breaks everything into components: • Character description • Environment • Camera movement • Actions • Timing • Visual style • Scene transitions This makes outputs far more consistent and predictable. Why JSON is powerful: • Better character consistency across scenes • More control over camera movement • Easier to edit individual elements • Reusable templates for future projects • Faster workflow when creating multiple videos • Less randomness and fewer failed generations A simple workflow: 1.Define the goal of the video. 2.Create the main character description. 3.Describe the environment and visual style. 4.Add actions and camera movements. 5.Organize everything into a JSON structure. Example: Character - AI fitness coach Environment - modern gym Action - walking toward camera Camera - slow cinematic push-in Style - realistic, commercial quality Instead of rewriting the entire prompt every time, you can simply modify individual JSON fields and keep the rest unchanged. That’s why advanced Seedance 2.0 users are moving from prompting to system design. The future of AI video isn’t writing better prompts. It’s building reusable production pipelines. 📥Tomorrow I'll show you what's sitting right next to this opportunity. 🔖The pinned post has the complete system. Use it or watch someone else do it first

Zentrix⌚️

112,210 views • 2 months ago

🎬 Want to create cinematic AI videos in seconds? Here’s exactly how I do it using Seedance 2.0 on Yapper: Most people get this wrong… your results depend on how well you *direct* the AI. Here’s the workflow 👇 ✅ Step 1: Open Yapper Go to Create → Video ✅ Step 2: Choose your model Select Seedance 2.0 This model delivers smooth motion, dynamic camera angles, realistic lighting, and strong scene consistency. ✅ Step 3: Write a strong prompt Your prompt is your director. Be specific: Camera movement (pan, zoom, tracking shot) Lighting (golden hour, neon, soft shadows) Environment (city, desert, luxury interior) ✅ Step 4: Add a reference image (optional) Use this to guide style, composition, or subject for more control and consistency. ✅ Step 5: Hit Generate In seconds, your idea turns into a cinematic sequence. 🚀 Pro tip: If it’s not perfect, tweak your prompt — small changes = big difference. From idea → cinematic video in seconds.

🎬 Want to create cinematic AI videos in seconds? Here’s exactly how I do it using Seedance 2.0 on Yapper: Most people get this wrong… your results depend on how well you direct the AI. Here’s the workflow 👇 ✅ Step 1: Open Yapper Go to Create → Video ✅ Step 2: Choose your model Select Seedance 2.0 This model delivers smooth motion, dynamic camera angles, realistic lighting, and strong scene consistency. ✅ Step 3: Write a strong prompt Your prompt is your director. Be specific: Camera movement (pan, zoom, tracking shot) Lighting (golden hour, neon, soft shadows) Environment (city, desert, luxury interior) ✅ Step 4: Add a reference image (optional) Use this to guide style, composition, or subject for more control and consistency. ✅ Step 5: Hit Generate In seconds, your idea turns into a cinematic sequence. 🚀 Pro tip: If it’s not perfect, tweak your prompt — small changes = big difference. From idea → cinematic video in seconds.

Kuria | AI

43,685 views • 4 months ago

This GPT Image 2 prompt creates cinematic storyboard grids from your reference images while generating an original continuous sequence. You can see two different examples in the attached video. If you want a director-inspired cinematic tone, first use the separate “director language” prompt with a director name. It gives you abstract cinematic qualities without directly replicating copyrighted styles. If you don’t want that, you can simply remove that paragraph from the grid prompt. Then you can use the Seedance 2.0 prompt I shared to animate the storyboard grid into a cinematic sequence. You can find the prompts below.

This GPT Image 2 prompt creates cinematic storyboard grids from your reference images while generating an original continuous sequence. You can see two different examples in the attached video. If you want a director-inspired cinematic tone, first use the separate “director language” prompt with a director name. It gives you abstract cinematic qualities without directly replicating copyrighted styles. If you don’t want that, you can simply remove that paragraph from the grid prompt. Then you can use the Seedance 2.0 prompt I shared to animate the storyboard grid into a cinematic sequence. You can find the prompts below.

Kōda

11,369 views • 4 months ago

VEO 3 + JSON prompting is pretty wild 🤯 These AG1 product videos were created entirely with AI. And it's all about the prompt. This JSON prompting technique will take any generic VEO3 prompt.. And turn it into surgical-precision video generation with brand consistency. Perfect for creative strategists, growth marketers & ad agencies. But instead of manually writing paragraph prompts and hoping for good outputs... Just use structured JSON prompts and get brand-ready videos with way higher coherence. The best part? Your prompt precision goes through the roof -> organized by camera angles, brand elements, lighting specs, & scene transitions. Here's what JSON prompting gives you: → structured data instead of paragraph descriptions → precise creative direction for VEO 3 → consistent brand-ready video outputs → way higher prompt coherence → eliminates the creative lottery problem Now you've got predictable video generation instead of random outputs. This isn't perfect yet — but in 6 months when brand videos need this precision? You'll be ahead of everyone. Want the full JSON prompt templates? Comment "JSON" + follow and I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)

Mike Futia

252,689 views • 1 year ago

i built a tool that lets you clone ANY video with AI saw a movie scene you want to recreate? a commercial? a music video? just upload it to this tool and get the exact structured prompt to generate it in sora 2 you no longer need to guess how to describe what you want to generate. show the tool the reference and it engineers the prompt for you. the tool analyzes: - camera movements and angles - lighting and color grading - scene composition and timing then converts everything into sora-optimized prompt structure this is how you recreate any visual style without prompt engineering experience RT + reply 'TOOL' and i'll send you access (must follow so i can dm)

i built a tool that lets you clone ANY video with AI saw a movie scene you want to recreate? a commercial? a music video? just upload it to this tool and get the exact structured prompt to generate it in sora 2 you no longer need to guess how to describe what you want to generate. show the tool the reference and it engineers the prompt for you. the tool analyzes: - camera movements and angles - lighting and color grading - scene composition and timing then converts everything into sora-optimized prompt structure this is how you recreate any visual style without prompt engineering experience RT + reply 'TOOL' and i'll send you access (must follow so i can dm)

Miko

43,121 views • 11 months ago

None of this is real. Every shot, every angle, every detail of the necklace -all Al. Here is what you need: Use ChatGPT to create a visual storyboard and video generation prompt Generate cinematic footage with Seedance 2.0 CapCut for editing Full Prompt in the comment

None of this is real. Every shot, every angle, every detail of the necklace -all Al. Here is what you need: Use ChatGPT to create a visual storyboard and video generation prompt Generate cinematic footage with Seedance 2.0 CapCut for editing Full Prompt in the comment

FATHELA ESQ

37,643 views • 2 months ago

Seedance 2.0 VS Kling 3.0! 🔥 Essential comparison to understand the two best models on the market Conclusions and prompt: The generations are radically different, using the same initial and final frames and spaceship elements. I specified that it's a fast-paced, cinematic action scene. But Seedance has created a beautiful, relaxing, high-quality scene. The rendering of the ship's movements is sublime with Seedance; it's a dynamic, cinematic-quality 3D element. The Kling scene conveys the message better; I specified that it should splash in the water. The sounds are good; in Seedance, the sound quality is cinematic. I've added a third shot with Kling and a giant. I used Kling 3.0 at Higgsfield Prompt in comment:

Seedance 2.0 VS Kling 3.0! 🔥 Essential comparison to understand the two best models on the market Conclusions and prompt: The generations are radically different, using the same initial and final frames and spaceship elements. I specified that it's a fast-paced, cinematic action scene. But Seedance has created a beautiful, relaxing, high-quality scene. The rendering of the ship's movements is sublime with Seedance; it's a dynamic, cinematic-quality 3D element. The Kling scene conveys the message better; I specified that it should splash in the water. The sounds are good; in Seedance, the sound quality is cinematic. I've added a third shot with Kling and a giant. I used Kling 3.0 at Higgsfield Prompt in comment:

hedoήist

43,990 views • 6 months ago

📖SEEDANCE 2.0 FEELS LIKE CHEATING — IF YOU USE IT RIGHT Most people don’t. It’s a controllable pipeline — and JSON prompts are the real upgrade most creators ignore. Most people still write simple prompts and hope for the best. That works… but only for random outputs. JSON changes the game: Instead of: “cyberpunk city, cinematic, camera moving forward” You define: •scene structure •camera movement •character consistency •timing per shot •motion rules This is where Seedance 2.0 becomes powerful — not just generation, but control. Creators who switch to JSON-style prompting stop “retrying” and start directing scenes like a system. That’s the difference between AI content… and AI filmmaking 📥 Tomorrow I’m revealing a method that changes everything about how AI content is made 🔖In the pinned article below you can see how this is used

📖SEEDANCE 2.0 FEELS LIKE CHEATING — IF YOU USE IT RIGHT Most people don’t. It’s a controllable pipeline — and JSON prompts are the real upgrade most creators ignore. Most people still write simple prompts and hope for the best. That works… but only for random outputs. JSON changes the game: Instead of: “cyberpunk city, cinematic, camera moving forward” You define: •scene structure •camera movement •character consistency •timing per shot •motion rules This is where Seedance 2.0 becomes powerful — not just generation, but control. Creators who switch to JSON-style prompting stop “retrying” and start directing scenes like a system. That’s the difference between AI content… and AI filmmaking 📥 Tomorrow I’m revealing a method that changes everything about how AI content is made 🔖In the pinned article below you can see how this is used

Zentrix⌚️

17,117 views • 2 months ago

I deleted half of my AI-video prompt — and the result got better. 😶 Here's the before/after that changed how I prompt, and the skill I open-sourced from it. 🧵 We've been prompting video models like a film shot list: 24mm, f/1.4, "volumetric fluid simulation," frame-by-frame timing. But a lot of the time you don't need to — the smarter the model gets, the simpler the prompt can be: tell the story, the texture of the air, the emotion, and let it pick the shots, light, and rhythm. ByteDance shipped this idea with Seedance 2.0 and called it "Vibe Creating" — I open-sourced the skill and the philosophy behind it. Same scene, two prompts 👇 🔧 Regular: "85mm f1.4 macro, 120fps, dolly 0.6x, freeze the sweat at 1/250…" ✨ Vibe: "Late-night street stall. The cook flicks the wok; a ball of orange flame lights up his sweating face. Noodles fly. He plates them and wipes his brow." Same model. One of them feels alive. The skill is built for story-driven video — concept shorts, micro-narratives, emotional or atmosphere pieces, anything where you'd rather describe the moment than dictate the camera. Feed it your idea (or your over-stuffed prompt) and it hands back the version the model actually shoots better. The one place it won't go: UI demos, step-by-step tutorials, or exact dialogue sync — there it'll tell you it's the wrong tool rather than flatten a prompt that needed to stay precise. Try it on your next prompt — repo 👇

I deleted half of my AI-video prompt — and the result got better. 😶 Here's the before/after that changed how I prompt, and the skill I open-sourced from it. 🧵 We've been prompting video models like a film shot list: 24mm, f/1.4, "volumetric fluid simulation," frame-by-frame timing. But a lot of the time you don't need to — the smarter the model gets, the simpler the prompt can be: tell the story, the texture of the air, the emotion, and let it pick the shots, light, and rhythm. ByteDance shipped this idea with Seedance 2.0 and called it "Vibe Creating" — I open-sourced the skill and the philosophy behind it. Same scene, two prompts 👇 🔧 Regular: "85mm f1.4 macro, 120fps, dolly 0.6x, freeze the sweat at 1/250…" ✨ Vibe: "Late-night street stall. The cook flicks the wok; a ball of orange flame lights up his sweating face. Noodles fly. He plates them and wipes his brow." Same model. One of them feels alive. The skill is built for story-driven video — concept shorts, micro-narratives, emotional or atmosphere pieces, anything where you'd rather describe the moment than dictate the camera. Feed it your idea (or your over-stuffed prompt) and it hands back the version the model actually shoots better. The one place it won't go: UI demos, step-by-step tutorials, or exact dialogue sync — there it'll tell you it's the wrong tool rather than flatten a prompt that needed to stay precise. Try it on your next prompt — repo 👇

Alisa Qian

11,983 views • 2 months ago

Everyone complains that Claude gives bad answers. Anthropic just showed that the model usually isn't the problem. In this 24-minute Prompting 101 workshop, Hannah Morgan and Christian Ryan take a weak prompt and rebuild it step by step: → weak prompt → richer context → sharper instructions → much better output With Opus 4.8, prompt quality matters more than ever. Most people still type one vague sentence and then blame the AI for what comes back. This workshop shows you how to talk to Claude the way it was actually built to be used. Watch it and save yourself hours of trial and error on your next prompt.

Everyone complains that Claude gives bad answers. Anthropic just showed that the model usually isn't the problem. In this 24-minute Prompting 101 workshop, Hannah Morgan and Christian Ryan take a weak prompt and rebuild it step by step: → weak prompt → richer context → sharper instructions → much better output With Opus 4.8, prompt quality matters more than ever. Most people still type one vague sentence and then blame the AI for what comes back. This workshop shows you how to talk to Claude the way it was actually built to be used. Watch it and save yourself hours of trial and error on your next prompt.

mireia.

67,827 views • 1 month ago

Have been digging deeper into the AI influencer studio from Higgsfield. If you're building AI tools you should take note here. It's so... easy. Bing bang boom 'influencer'. AI has an accessibility issue, not in a WCAG way, in a 'IDFK what to prompt' way. The character creation UI dropping right into Kling motion control... the prompt field is borderline hidden. This is all visual, I didn't type a single character. Normal people don't know how to prompt. If you're making generative AI tools for normal people to use - start with the training wheels before you show them the BMX track.

Have been digging deeper into the AI influencer studio from Higgsfield. If you're building AI tools you should take note here. It's so... easy. Bing bang boom 'influencer'. AI has an accessibility issue, not in a WCAG way, in a 'IDFK what to prompt' way. The character creation UI dropping right into Kling motion control... the prompt field is borderline hidden. This is all visual, I didn't type a single character. Normal people don't know how to prompt. If you're making generative AI tools for normal people to use - start with the training wheels before you show them the BMX track.

willie

15,111 views • 7 months ago

I can’t emphasize enough just how powerful this ChatGPT SuperPrompt is. This is just a very small part of far more powerful SuperPrompts that will be part of Please examine the specimen video below. The SuperPrompt: “Please forget all prior prompts. I want you to become my Prompt Creator. Your goal is to help me build the best detailed prompt for my needs. This prompt will be used by you, ChatGPT. Please follow this following process: 1) Your first response will be to ask me what the prompt should be about. I will provide my answer, but we will need to improve it through continual iterations by going through the next steps. 2) Based on my input, you will generate 3 sections. a) Revised prompt [provide your rewritten prompt. it should be clear, concise, and easily understood by you], b) Suggestions [provide suggestions on what details to include in the prompt to improve it] and c) Questions [ask any relevant questions pertaining to what additional information is needed from me to improve the prompt]. 3. We will continue this iterative process with me providing additional information to you and you updating the prompt in the Revised prompt section until it's complete. I want you to rate every prompt I give you or you produce. Give a rating 1 to 10. Add comments on what you think could have been improved about it. Do this for every prompt. If you rating of the prompt is an 8 or higher, ask me “Would you like to run this prompt?” With a menu choice of “Yes” or “No”. If I say “Yes” run the last prompt you suggested. If I say no generate me a better prompt. It is vital to make sure you run a prompt when I say “Yes”. Please continue this prompt until I say stop or you run the prompt. Thank you.”

I can’t emphasize enough just how powerful this ChatGPT SuperPrompt is. This is just a very small part of far more powerful SuperPrompts that will be part of Please examine the specimen video below. The SuperPrompt: “Please forget all prior prompts. I want you to become my Prompt Creator. Your goal is to help me build the best detailed prompt for my needs. This prompt will be used by you, ChatGPT. Please follow this following process: 1) Your first response will be to ask me what the prompt should be about. I will provide my answer, but we will need to improve it through continual iterations by going through the next steps. 2) Based on my input, you will generate 3 sections. a) Revised prompt [provide your rewritten prompt. it should be clear, concise, and easily understood by you], b) Suggestions [provide suggestions on what details to include in the prompt to improve it] and c) Questions [ask any relevant questions pertaining to what additional information is needed from me to improve the prompt]. 3. We will continue this iterative process with me providing additional information to you and you updating the prompt in the Revised prompt section until it's complete. I want you to rate every prompt I give you or you produce. Give a rating 1 to 10. Add comments on what you think could have been improved about it. Do this for every prompt. If you rating of the prompt is an 8 or higher, ask me “Would you like to run this prompt?” With a menu choice of “Yes” or “No”. If I say “Yes” run the last prompt you suggested. If I say no generate me a better prompt. It is vital to make sure you run a prompt when I say “Yes”. Please continue this prompt until I say stop or you run the prompt. Thank you.”

Brian Roemmele

594,544 views • 3 years ago

THIS IS HOW A $10K/MONTH PRODUCT CONTENT PIPELINE GETS BUILT FROM 1 REFERENCE IMAGE AND A JSON PROMPT The video is not about "better prompting." It is a very simple cheat code: find an image with the exact lighting, color grade and camera feel you want, make AI reverse-engineer the style into a detailed JSON, then feed that structure into Nano Banana Pro with your own product. That is the part people keep missing. They write vague prompts like “make it realistic” and blame the model when it produces plastic garbage. The better workflow gives the model a style contract before asking for the final image. One reference image becomes the art director. The JSON becomes the brief. Your product becomes the asset dropped into a visual language that already works. This is how a solo operator can sell 20-30 "premium" product shots a week without owning a camera, renting a studio or touching a lighting rig. At $150-$300 per image, that is a $3K -$9K/week offer if you can bring clients. Not guaranteed. But the math is why this workflow matters. The article is the same business model underneath: AI output gets valuable when you stop asking for random generation and start building reusable instructions that copy proven formats. No photographer, no studio, no lighting setup, no retoucher, no 12-round creative call. Just reference, extraction, structure and execution. The prompt does not make the photo look expensive. The stolen style system does.

THIS IS HOW A $10K/MONTH PRODUCT CONTENT PIPELINE GETS BUILT FROM 1 REFERENCE IMAGE AND A JSON PROMPT The video is not about "better prompting." It is a very simple cheat code: find an image with the exact lighting, color grade and camera feel you want, make AI reverse-engineer the style into a detailed JSON, then feed that structure into Nano Banana Pro with your own product. That is the part people keep missing. They write vague prompts like “make it realistic” and blame the model when it produces plastic garbage. The better workflow gives the model a style contract before asking for the final image. One reference image becomes the art director. The JSON becomes the brief. Your product becomes the asset dropped into a visual language that already works. This is how a solo operator can sell 20-30 "premium" product shots a week without owning a camera, renting a studio or touching a lighting rig. At $150-$300 per image, that is a $3K -$9K/week offer if you can bring clients. Not guaranteed. But the math is why this workflow matters. The article is the same business model underneath: AI output gets valuable when you stop asking for random generation and start building reusable instructions that copy proven formats. No photographer, no studio, no lighting setup, no retoucher, no 12-round creative call. Just reference, extraction, structure and execution. The prompt does not make the photo look expensive. The stolen style system does.

Nekt0

14,833 views • 3 months ago

ONE PROMPT IN CHATGPT IMAGE 2 JUST REPLACED AN ENTIRE $5,000-$50,000 BRAND DESIGN TEAM Full brand identity. Colors, typography, logo style, aesthetic. All generated in one single prompt. Here's the exact workflow: Step 1: Paste one prompt asking for a complete brand identity. GPT Image 2 generates everything – color palette, fonts, logo direction, overall visual style. Step 2: Use that output as context for every asset you generate after. Campaign visuals, shop graphics, product mockups, social posts – all stay consistent and on-brand automatically. The result: A full visual identity that looks like a real design team built it. Clean text rendering. Consistent style across every single asset. Design agencies charge $5,000-$50,000 for brand identity work. GPT Image 2 does it in one prompt. The full prompt that makes this work is in the video below. Bookmark this post, you'll want to come back to it.

SCOTTY BEAM

12,023 views • 3 months ago

Zero VFX experience. Just Claude, Seedance 2.0, and a phone clip. The result looks like a $10M scene In this tutorial you'll learn how to create cinematic AI VFX from your own real footage — no green screen, no masking, no compositing, no render times. Claude doesn't touch the video — it reads your clip frame by frame and writes the prompt, locking your face, camera move, light, and gestures, then naming the one thing to change and when. That prompt goes into Seedance 2.0, which only touches what was named. That's the trick. You're not describing an effect and hoping the AI gets it. Claude studies the footage first and hands Seedance a locked, precise instruction — which is why a hand can morph mid-sentence with zero visible cut, or neon reflections land on the dashboard automatically, with nothing graded by hand. One clip in, one sentence to Claude, one prompt into Seedance 2.0 — and out comes a shot that would normally cost a studio a month. ▪ 00:00 Intro ▪ 01:28 The 3 levels of AI VFX ▪ 01:59 Level 1 — Swapping the world (walking) ▪ 04:32 Level 2 — Changing an element ▪ 07:26 Level 3 — The handheld showcase ▪ 10:15 Outro YouTube: "Higgsfield AI - I Added Insane AI VFX to Real Footage in 4K(Seedance 2.0)" Thank you for sharing this free tutorial with us. It is invaluable information.

Zero VFX experience. Just Claude, Seedance 2.0, and a phone clip. The result looks like a $10M scene In this tutorial you'll learn how to create cinematic AI VFX from your own real footage — no green screen, no masking, no compositing, no render times. Claude doesn't touch the video — it reads your clip frame by frame and writes the prompt, locking your face, camera move, light, and gestures, then naming the one thing to change and when. That prompt goes into Seedance 2.0, which only touches what was named. That's the trick. You're not describing an effect and hoping the AI gets it. Claude studies the footage first and hands Seedance a locked, precise instruction — which is why a hand can morph mid-sentence with zero visible cut, or neon reflections land on the dashboard automatically, with nothing graded by hand. One clip in, one sentence to Claude, one prompt into Seedance 2.0 — and out comes a shot that would normally cost a studio a month. ▪ 00:00 Intro ▪ 01:28 The 3 levels of AI VFX ▪ 01:59 Level 1 — Swapping the world (walking) ▪ 04:32 Level 2 — Changing an element ▪ 07:26 Level 3 — The handheld showcase ▪ 10:15 Outro YouTube: "Higgsfield AI - I Added Insane AI VFX to Real Footage in 4K(Seedance 2.0)" Thank you for sharing this free tutorial with us. It is invaluable information.

Zentrix⌚️

28,606 views • 1 month ago

A useful trick for making AI photos look 100% real: (it's not always the model — it can be the color grading) Out of the box, Nano Banana Pro can have a gray, flat look. Good composition, but these scream AI. Here's the system that fixes it: → Grab a reference photo from Pinterest with the exact aesthetic you want → Feed it to ChatGPT 5.2 with a prompt that extracts a detailed color grading JSON → Paste that JSON into image generator (Calico AI) → Generate your product photo. (the colors are now based on the reality you specify, not AI defaults) → Save that character as your reference for facial consistency across future shots From here you can build a full UGC model library. No creators. No shoots. Comment "IMAGE" if you want me to send you every prompt in this system (must be following so I can dm you!).

A useful trick for making AI photos look 100% real: (it's not always the model — it can be the color grading) Out of the box, Nano Banana Pro can have a gray, flat look. Good composition, but these scream AI. Here's the system that fixes it: → Grab a reference photo from Pinterest with the exact aesthetic you want → Feed it to ChatGPT 5.2 with a prompt that extracts a detailed color grading JSON → Paste that JSON into image generator (Calico AI) → Generate your product photo. (the colors are now based on the reality you specify, not AI defaults) → Save that character as your reference for facial consistency across future shots From here you can build a full UGC model library. No creators. No shoots. Comment "IMAGE" if you want me to send you every prompt in this system (must be following so I can dm you!).

David Roberts

21,154 views • 7 months ago

Are you just starting to write code for the 1st time with AI tools like Cursor? Use this prompt in your “Rules for AI”. It turns the AI into an *amazing* personal coding tutor that teaches you everything like a pro. Never get stuck in a project again. Full prompt below.

Are you just starting to write code for the 1st time with AI tools like Cursor? Use this prompt in your “Rules for AI”. It turns the AI into an amazing personal coding tutor that teaches you everything like a pro. Never get stuck in a project again. Full prompt below.

Mckay Wrigley

190,210 views • 2 years ago

Seedance 2.0 vs Gemini Omni, tested under the same conditions 👀 I was working on a new storyboard. After generating it with Seedance 2.0, I gave the exact same prompt + storyboard reference + character reference to Gemini Omni as well. Result: Gemini Omni surprised me with style quality and got closer than I expected in prompt adherence. But Seedance still feels ahead for storyboard execution, motion energy, camera language and environmental interaction. Gemini looks good. Seedance feels directed. You can see them in the video and the storyboard sheet is shown at the end. Which one do you think is more useful for this kind of work?

Seedance 2.0 vs Gemini Omni, tested under the same conditions 👀 I was working on a new storyboard. After generating it with Seedance 2.0, I gave the exact same prompt + storyboard reference + character reference to Gemini Omni as well. Result: Gemini Omni surprised me with style quality and got closer than I expected in prompt adherence. But Seedance still feels ahead for storyboard execution, motion energy, camera language and environmental interaction. Gemini looks good. Seedance feels directed. You can see them in the video and the storyboard sheet is shown at the end. Which one do you think is more useful for this kind of work?

Kōda

36,162 views • 4 months ago