正在加载视频...
视频加载失败
he cleared him so bad i’m in tears😭
2,529,688 次观看 • 6 个月前 •via X (Twitter)
50 条评论

These stupid Ritalin addicts that talk fast thinking they are smart. No kiddo, your on crack.

he talks fast because he’s smart & is actually stating FACTS , i’m crying you guys are so in denial we rdgaf😭

Since this kind of blew up. «You’re» yes correct. To clarify my beef with this little punk ritalin addict - He doesn’t argue in good faith (clearly shown here) - He talks over people (shown here) - Changes topic quickly before last point is picked a part (shown here) - Can’t concede, can’t debate, can’t listen and can’t construct good counter arguments based on previous argument - Smokes crack

@beyoncegarden You don’t even know what Ritalin is 😂

@beyoncegarden Its crack. For kids.

Talking fast usually convinces low IQ people that you’re smart

They always praise him for being smart but he got ate up by 18-25 yr olds on a daily basis 😭

you just have to laugh😭

I fear that many people in this comment section who appeal to the erratic and arrogant tone of the young man are likely immature and vaguely educated but not enough to be wise.

just because you’re using big words in the way you’re using them , doesn’t make your sentence effective i’m crying😭

Dude snorted too much Adderall before trying to debate an intelligent person

yes charlie did idk why he thought he could EVER come toe to toe with that king😭

How many milligrams up the schnoz do you think it takes to make one talk at 2x Ben Shapiro?

charlie was just saying big words to sound good, but ultimately, could never win 😭😭

that’s all he ever did , & he NEVER won😭

So, i dont think that kid knows what the fuck sentient means, and somebody let Gen Z know that being high on methamphetamines in a debate doesn't mean you cleared anything, it means you speed talked six topics in less than three minutes, and revisited all six in that same time frame and only made sense in tour own methed up mind

not reading all this😭

Your extra chromosomes are showing

A potential living being and a brain dead elderly person are not the same.

you guys just don’t get it i’m crying😭

I agree!!! Parker is so bad at this. Charlie schooled him.

Destiny really did inspire a generation of tik tok libtard wannabe debaters who actually believe memorising talking points and talking fast means you are intelligent. Parker didn't "clear" jack shit here.

Yeah, Charlie sure did, he was good at it.

No, he really didn’t. He talked fast and said a lot of dumb shit at a rapid pace, and interrupted constantly which to some people is a well argued point. -He asked do you retroactively enforce laws that did not exist, for abortion or shifting definitions of pedophilia. No. Consistent answer from Kirk. -Sentience is an awareness of the environment. In Utero babies have this. They also have brain waves. -Can a family member pull the plug on a brain dead family member? Yes, they are brain dead. They definitionally do not have brain waves. That is what brain dead means. What he’s describing IS a coma, where brain waves are present but it becomes clear they won’t recover. That is a familial choice on probability of recovery and an understanding of the individuals wishes. -A red herring is exactly what he was doing, and what Charlie described. It’s utilizing a distracting adjacent or unrelated example that does not mirror the discussion. A brain dead person is not a gestating baby. -Reducto ad absurdum is an arguing strategy where you grant the individuals claim and then extend it to its logical conclusion. The reducto ad absurdum is granting the case of a brain dead person and removing medical intervention and determining that absent medical intervention they die, as compared to a pregnant woman who absent medical intervention gives birth to a living, breathing child. Kid is not good at it, but he sure doesn’t know how to shut the fuck up.

Still quote tweeting your own post from 2 years ago

my own post from 2 years ago *with ONE BILLION views make sure you get it right🙂↕️😭

@beyoncegarden You should do the same straggot

@beyoncegarden This niggеr unironically just said “straggot”

This retard is just talking but he isn't saying anything of substance. Talking fast doesn't mean you're smart, dawg.

Wait you think the kid won 😂. No way you’re serious

What point did he make that Charlie didn’t smash? Time travel to arrest pedos? Should we do morality of abortions after alien abductions next? 😂

Liberals love there impossible scenario hypotheticals. “If you could go back in time…” Well you can’t so this is a stupid fucking question

You’re talking about Charlie, right? That younger guy that kept interrupting couldn’t hold anything together…not even sure what he was trying to argue.

Yeah charlie cooked that little brat

I can't stand this Shapiro / Destiny autistic style of "debate". Just hearing it feels like you're trapped in the mind of a skitzoprenic or something. Even if the guy had valid points, he'd still be a loser. Because who the hell wants to be around someone like that?

>Doesn't even know whar a red herring is >Tries to cite some random fallacy whose definition he also clearly doesn't know >Only debate tactics are to talk fast, talk over the other person, and say the dumbest stuff you've ever heard while not engaging Dunning-Kruger in action.

In a proper country that kid's classmates would have bullied him until he didn't act like this.

His loved ones failed him by not telling him to ease up on these toothy ahh smiles

Never answer stupid questions such as “would you go back in time and ….” What you need to do is say what you would do now.

It’s crazy that people can look at this kid and not see how incredibly brain dead he is. Everything single time he opens his mouth it’s pure emotion and no logic. He gets soo emotionally involved that he can’t hold himself back and you can tell he is about to lose it completely

Just because you talk over people as fast as you can doesn’t make you right or look smart. Lmao

Charlie did? Yeah, absolutely. Watch the whole video, if you have half a brain you can tell Charlie runs laps around them all and is only unable to “win” some debates because the kids are so arrogant, unable to converse, interrupt and go in with closed minds beforehand

The kid in his mind

Why do retards constantly assume fast talking = huge brain?

Im not sure who is supposed to have won here, absolutely nothing of value was said by either person

What a fucking moron …. smug, fast talking little bitch with no wisdom. How Charlie didn’t just knock him the fuck out I’ll never know.

Do you contribute anything on this app besides finding leftists incapable of the most basic thought and then writing “He cleared him so bad I’m in tears😭😭”

The saddest part is that there are actually some people who will believe this kid actually made any kind of logical point. All they do is make Charlie look even better than he was. These people run entirely on emotion, not logic, and always end up making themselves look foolish.

Hey the retard is back posting more clickbait. This kid wants a gotcha moment so bad yet it’s always just out of reach. ADHD brain on full display. RIP Charlie, this world wasn’t good enough for you and is worse off without you in it

Which child marriage in the Bible is he talking about? Don’t give me the Rebekah, Rachel, or Mary examples that the Muslims love to use to excuse their pedo prophet who they worship. Their ages weren’t given. And even if they were children, everyone in the Bible except one person was flawed. There are many horrendous actions by people in the Bible. It doesn’t mean God condoned the actions. They’re stories of flawed individuals who turn to God. That being said, I can’t recall one story in the Bible where someone underage was listed, and if I’m mistaken, please point it out. Then point out where God condoned it.
