Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

15,546 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

11 Comments

Aus Integrity's profile picture
Aus Integrity1 year ago

You WASTE WE PAY.

The Washington Post's profile picture
The Washington Post1 year ago

Low-income Americans who voted for Trump say they are counting on him to keep their benefits intact even while his Cabinet picks and Republican lawmakers call on him to reduce federal spending.

Lozzy B 🇦🇺𝕏's profile picture
Lozzy B 🇦🇺𝕏1 year ago

Vote Labor Out

Andrew's profile picture
Andrew1 year ago

This is getting fun…. As an energy professional let’s debunk the 3.7% nuclear chestnut in 1 minute. Assuming we implement 14 GW of nuclear energy, it would imply we would need 14/0.037 = 380 GW to meet our future energy requirements. This is approximately the 80% global nuclear energy capacity which supplies enough energy for well over 1/4 a billion people. Another low IQ post.

Footscray's Finest's profile picture
Footscray's Finest1 year ago

FFS get your shit together campaign team

True Science PEng, DFP, ADFS, MA, MBA.'s profile picture
True Science PEng, DFP, ADFS, MA, MBA.1 year ago

The rest of the world is obviously wrong about nuclear power. Hey, our neighbour, Indonesia, is going nuclear.

Andrew's profile picture
Andrew1 year ago

The $600b chestnut is debunked below

Wutangflan's profile picture
Wutangflan1 year ago

Modern nuclear builds don’t take 20 years But while were on the subject How long have Labor been working on the renewable projects for?

Lori 🇦🇺's profile picture
Lori 🇦🇺1 year ago

The only thing being cut at the moment is our quality of life. By Labor.

Marvin's profile picture
Marvin1 year ago

Renewables gunna cost $650 billion…then ongoing costs every 10 years or so for battery replacement…it’s going to cost millions and millions more.

Top's profile picture
Top1 year ago

This you?

Related Videos