Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

He Got Pulled Over With Multiple Guns In The Car… Watch What Happens A young guy gets pulled over with three guns in the car. A rifle in the passenger seat. A handgun on him. A second handgun down by his legs. And the traffic stop still goes exactly...

MrColionNoir's profile picture

Colion Noir

590,881 subscribers

45,348 просмотров • 8 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

ОбразованиеЗдоровье и велнесНовости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

It's amazing how a cop could be so wrong, but still try to double down. This officer pulled this guy over claiming he could not see his plate. The driver confused about why, goes out there to look. Listen to what the officer says. But then has the nerve to try and double down to turn it into a full traffic stop. Get a dash cam if you don't have one folks. You never know when it will be of use.
2:34

It's amazing how a cop could be so wrong, but still try to double down. This officer pulled this guy over claiming he could not see his plate. The driver confused about why, goes out there to look. Listen to what the officer says. But then has the nerve to try and double down to turn it into a full traffic stop. Get a dash cam if you don't have one folks. You never know when it will be of use.

Chuckling Charlie

95,405 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

This man got pulled over for a traffic stop in another state while driving home. The officer asked him for his information, the man gave it to him. The officer came back, gave him the ticket, told him where to appear if he wanted to contest and pointed out where he could mail in the fee for the ticket since he didn’t live nearby. The man said okay. The officer asked if he had any questions, the man said no, the officer said be safe and that was that. So many people said that is a normal interaction with police officers. All the other stuff is someone seeking attention. 💯 It should be this easy every time. Kudos to both those men. 👏 When you do what you are asked to do, there is never a problem, imho. Is this how your traffic stops have went? (Mine did) Why can’t they all be like this for everyone?
1:18

This man got pulled over for a traffic stop in another state while driving home. The officer asked him for his information, the man gave it to him. The officer came back, gave him the ticket, told him where to appear if he wanted to contest and pointed out where he could mail in the fee for the ticket since he didn’t live nearby. The man said okay. The officer asked if he had any questions, the man said no, the officer said be safe and that was that. So many people said that is a normal interaction with police officers. All the other stuff is someone seeking attention. 💯 It should be this easy every time. Kudos to both those men. 👏 When you do what you are asked to do, there is never a problem, imho. Is this how your traffic stops have went? (Mine did) Why can’t they all be like this for everyone?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

77,679 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

This is a perfect example of how a traffic stop should be handled. The officer approached the situation professionally and with respect, while the driver remained calm, cooperative, and understanding. No attitude, no unnecessary drama, just two people treating each other with basic courtesy. Respect goes both ways, and this is exactly what that looks like.
2:06

This is a perfect example of how a traffic stop should be handled. The officer approached the situation professionally and with respect, while the driver remained calm, cooperative, and understanding. No attitude, no unnecessary drama, just two people treating each other with basic courtesy. Respect goes both ways, and this is exactly what that looks like.

G-PA

111,969 просмотров • 12 дней назад

“Iran is not going to declare an end to the war while Israel is still attacking Lebanon. It has to be part of the deal. And of course, Bibi won’t play ball because he doesn’t want the war to end. And Trump is just waking up to that fact three months into the war, and he’s not happy about it.” “A lot of what he’s saying is that Bibi should do everything that he says. And now he’s learning that that’s not the way the world works. So constantly over the past three months, Trump is confronted by reality, which totally contradicts the made up story he has about the Iran war in his head. And guess what? In the end, reality is winning out.” “And that’s why we’re in the quagmire we’re in. Because Trump won’t accept the reality. He only wants the world to bend to what’s in his head. In this case, he’s not getting what he wants, so he’s throwing a tantrum.”
0:41

“Iran is not going to declare an end to the war while Israel is still attacking Lebanon. It has to be part of the deal. And of course, Bibi won’t play ball because he doesn’t want the war to end. And Trump is just waking up to that fact three months into the war, and he’s not happy about it.” “A lot of what he’s saying is that Bibi should do everything that he says. And now he’s learning that that’s not the way the world works. So constantly over the past three months, Trump is confronted by reality, which totally contradicts the made up story he has about the Iran war in his head. And guess what? In the end, reality is winning out.” “And that’s why we’re in the quagmire we’re in. Because Trump won’t accept the reality. He only wants the world to bend to what’s in his head. In this case, he’s not getting what he wants, so he’s throwing a tantrum.”

Josh Rogin

13,279 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Officer gets upset at man that knows his rights so he packs up his toys and goes to sit in his squad car until another officer gets him to come out and finish the traffic stop. ​The driver, identified as Mr. Brewer, is pulled over for a standard nighttime headlight violation. He complies fully with the initial lawful demands—handing over his driver's license and proof of insurance. But once the officer has the necessary paperwork to write a fix-it ticket or a standard citation, the questions start drifting into unlawful territory. ​After processing the license, the officer asks Mr. Brewer for his phone number, followed by a request for his Social Security number. ​Mr. Brewer correctly draws the line here. While law enforcement can ask for voluntary information, they cannot legally compel a driver to hand over a Social Security number or phone number during a routine traffic infraction. Mr. Brewer stands his ground, stating clearly: "I've given you everything I'm legally required to give you." ​The core battle of this stop happens when a backup officer arrives on scene. The original officer had demanded identification from Mr. Brewer’s wife, who was sitting quietly in the passenger seat. The second officer attempts to back his partner up by claiming that because Alabama is a "Stop and Identify" state, they have the right to demand her ID. ​This is a massive and common misconception among law enforcement, and Mr. Brewer shuts it down perfectly: ​The reason for the stop is a headlights violation. The scope of the officer's traffic investigation stops at the driver. ​ Under Fourth Amendment precedent, a passenger in a vehicle is not the operator and cannot be forced to identify themselves unless officers have reasonable, articulable suspicion that the passenger specifically has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime. Simply riding in a car with a headlight violation does not strip you of your right to privacy. ​Knowing that Mr. Brewer knows the law, is well-aware that refusing to sign a ticket can result in an arrest, but that signing it means the stop is legally concluded, the officers realize they have zero leverage. With the citation signed and no legal grounds to prolong the detention or force the passenger to comply, the officers back down and send them on their way. ​Knowing your rights isn't about being difficult—it's about keeping the system accountable.
4:06

Officer gets upset at man that knows his rights so he packs up his toys and goes to sit in his squad car until another officer gets him to come out and finish the traffic stop. ​The driver, identified as Mr. Brewer, is pulled over for a standard nighttime headlight violation. He complies fully with the initial lawful demands—handing over his driver's license and proof of insurance. But once the officer has the necessary paperwork to write a fix-it ticket or a standard citation, the questions start drifting into unlawful territory. ​After processing the license, the officer asks Mr. Brewer for his phone number, followed by a request for his Social Security number. ​Mr. Brewer correctly draws the line here. While law enforcement can ask for voluntary information, they cannot legally compel a driver to hand over a Social Security number or phone number during a routine traffic infraction. Mr. Brewer stands his ground, stating clearly: "I've given you everything I'm legally required to give you." ​The core battle of this stop happens when a backup officer arrives on scene. The original officer had demanded identification from Mr. Brewer’s wife, who was sitting quietly in the passenger seat. The second officer attempts to back his partner up by claiming that because Alabama is a "Stop and Identify" state, they have the right to demand her ID. ​This is a massive and common misconception among law enforcement, and Mr. Brewer shuts it down perfectly: ​The reason for the stop is a headlights violation. The scope of the officer's traffic investigation stops at the driver. ​ Under Fourth Amendment precedent, a passenger in a vehicle is not the operator and cannot be forced to identify themselves unless officers have reasonable, articulable suspicion that the passenger specifically has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime. Simply riding in a car with a headlight violation does not strip you of your right to privacy. ​Knowing that Mr. Brewer knows the law, is well-aware that refusing to sign a ticket can result in an arrest, but that signing it means the stop is legally concluded, the officers realize they have zero leverage. With the citation signed and no legal grounds to prolong the detention or force the passenger to comply, the officers back down and send them on their way. ​Knowing your rights isn't about being difficult—it's about keeping the system accountable.

Giggling Ganon

39,430 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

👮‍♂️From asking 'Are You Ok" to demanding ID 🎥Sidewalk in Johns Creek, GA. Auditor filming a business from public property. People get uncomfortable. That’s the call. Officer Siberski arrives locked in on one goal: get his ID. He refuses. No crime. No RAS. Just a camera on a sidewalk. Then senior officer Parker shows up, actually looks at the situation, gives the auditor the CAD number he asked for, and tells him he’s free to go. Siberski is not pleased. This is the difference between “I don’t like this” and “is this illegal.” ❓What happens when a cop wants your ID more than she wants the facts? ❓What happens when one officer wants your ID and the other tells you you’re free to go? Watch the whole thing.
19:28

👮‍♂️From asking 'Are You Ok" to demanding ID 🎥Sidewalk in Johns Creek, GA. Auditor filming a business from public property. People get uncomfortable. That’s the call. Officer Siberski arrives locked in on one goal: get his ID. He refuses. No crime. No RAS. Just a camera on a sidewalk. Then senior officer Parker shows up, actually looks at the situation, gives the auditor the CAD number he asked for, and tells him he’s free to go. Siberski is not pleased. This is the difference between “I don’t like this” and “is this illegal.” ❓What happens when a cop wants your ID more than she wants the facts? ❓What happens when one officer wants your ID and the other tells you you’re free to go? Watch the whole thing.

👮‍♂️🚒 Tales of Badge & Blaze™

23,784 просмотров • 3 дней назад

How bold this officer is with violating the rights of this man. Illegally searched his weapon in an open carry state. Took his personal property and refused to return it. Refused to get a supervisor out at the scene. Flat out said no. He assaulted the man by aggressively grabbing him. The list goes on and on. This officer should be relieved of duty. Also every other officer that pulled up should be investigated for not shutting down this tyrant. Know your rights folks and do not allow them to infringe on your 2A or any other right.
12:00

How bold this officer is with violating the rights of this man. Illegally searched his weapon in an open carry state. Took his personal property and refused to return it. Refused to get a supervisor out at the scene. Flat out said no. He assaulted the man by aggressively grabbing him. The list goes on and on. This officer should be relieved of duty. Also every other officer that pulled up should be investigated for not shutting down this tyrant. Know your rights folks and do not allow them to infringe on your 2A or any other right.

Giggling Ganon

32,893 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

This guy lives way out in the middle of nowhere. About an hour ago police came speeding down the road — one officer on a motorcycle pulled over, jumped into another car with the others, and they took off. But they left the entire police motorcycle sitting there completely unattended… with what he describes as a police-issue AR rifle still strapped to it, a baton, and even a Yeti cup just sitting out in the open. And the wildest part is that this is exactly where his kids get off the school bus — only 20 feet away. What do you think he should do in this situation, call the police department? I probably would have made that call already.
2:10

This guy lives way out in the middle of nowhere. About an hour ago police came speeding down the road — one officer on a motorcycle pulled over, jumped into another car with the others, and they took off. But they left the entire police motorcycle sitting there completely unattended… with what he describes as a police-issue AR rifle still strapped to it, a baton, and even a Yeti cup just sitting out in the open. And the wildest part is that this is exactly where his kids get off the school bus — only 20 feet away. What do you think he should do in this situation, call the police department? I probably would have made that call already.

End3of6Days9 (Helen) 🇺🇸

119,838 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents, working with state police, pulled over a vehicle, in Ogden, Utah… and smashed their car window because he wouldn’t roll it down all the way. Watch the shift… because this is where it goes from aggressive to completely out of control. The driver already has the window partially open. The ICE agent is yelling, giving a countdown, threatening to break the window… while another officer is trying to open the door from the other side. No explanation, or clear threat… Just escalation. Then, someone inside says, “I’m a U.S. citizen… you pointed a gun at me.” And that’s the moment everything changes. Instead of pulling back… instead of correcting… instead of even acknowledging it… The ICE agent snaps. “I don’t give a shit who you are, I don’t know you.” And then he immediately escalates further… raises the metal bar… and starts hitting the window… doubling down on force. A person says you pointed a gun at them… and your response is not to de-escalate… It’s to get MORE aggressive. That’s retaliation. They call them “non-compliant”… and within seconds, the window is smashed and the driver is dragged out. And it doesn’t stop there. The passenger… who is recording… gets told to “stay there” while the officer puts his hand on his gun. He responds, “I’m recording for my safety.” The officer shuts the door on him anyway. When he opens it again and steps out… and then the officer physically shoves him back into the car. This is what needs to be understood… The escalation didn’t come from a threat. It came the second someone spoke up… the second someone said, “you pointed a gun at me”… The second someone started documenting it. That’s when it got worse. That’s when it turned physical. That’s when the window broke. And that’s what should alarm people… because that’s not about safety anymore. That’s about being challenged… and responding with more force.
1:32

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents, working with state police, pulled over a vehicle, in Ogden, Utah… and smashed their car window because he wouldn’t roll it down all the way. Watch the shift… because this is where it goes from aggressive to completely out of control. The driver already has the window partially open. The ICE agent is yelling, giving a countdown, threatening to break the window… while another officer is trying to open the door from the other side. No explanation, or clear threat… Just escalation. Then, someone inside says, “I’m a U.S. citizen… you pointed a gun at me.” And that’s the moment everything changes. Instead of pulling back… instead of correcting… instead of even acknowledging it… The ICE agent snaps. “I don’t give a shit who you are, I don’t know you.” And then he immediately escalates further… raises the metal bar… and starts hitting the window… doubling down on force. A person says you pointed a gun at them… and your response is not to de-escalate… It’s to get MORE aggressive. That’s retaliation. They call them “non-compliant”… and within seconds, the window is smashed and the driver is dragged out. And it doesn’t stop there. The passenger… who is recording… gets told to “stay there” while the officer puts his hand on his gun. He responds, “I’m recording for my safety.” The officer shuts the door on him anyway. When he opens it again and steps out… and then the officer physically shoves him back into the car. This is what needs to be understood… The escalation didn’t come from a threat. It came the second someone spoke up… the second someone said, “you pointed a gun at me”… The second someone started documenting it. That’s when it got worse. That’s when it turned physical. That’s when the window broke. And that’s what should alarm people… because that’s not about safety anymore. That’s about being challenged… and responding with more force.

Jesus Freakin Congress

797,085 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

This dude unloads on cop in a who is in the right type situation. We are in Adam's county PA where a Law Enforcement Ranger pulls over a man because he is saying he could not see his tag. By the officers own admission he was able to see the tag as he got closer but proceeded with the stop. As per usual the officer asks for ID and the man in truck went to work on this officer telling him this is an illegal stop as no crime has been committed so he is not required to provide ID. Through out the interaction he asks the officer if he is free to go and the officer doubles down on detainment. However at the same time when asked the officer was not able to articulate a crime. The man also asked for a sergeant and the officer never compiled by getting a supervisor on scene which honestly would have been the best move. There are two ways to look at this interaction. The eyes of the officer: The officer calmly maintains that the traffic stop is entirely lawful. In the United States, law enforcement needs reasonable suspicion to initiate a traffic stop. An obscured license plate or illegally dark window tint satisfies that standard in almost every jurisdiction. Furthermore, once a lawful traffic stop is initiated, a driver is legally required to produce a valid driver's license, proof of insurance, and vehicle registration. The driver's perspective: The driver claims that his tags are legit and the officer was able to see that when he ran them. He argues that because the ranger claimed at first he could not see the tags but now he can as he approached the vehicle. Since the officer admitted he can now see the tags and there is no problem with the tags, the initial stop was "erroneous" and constitutes an illegal search and seizure. He also details a personal grievance with local law enforcement, claiming a local district attorney and police officers have been "terrorizing" him. What is your take on this stop? Was this a case of an officer error where with the cop trying to save face by digging for a reason for the stop, or was this a legal stop and this officer deserves praise for staying calm while dealing with this man's outbursts? Share your thoughts below.
6:08

This dude unloads on cop in a who is in the right type situation. We are in Adam's county PA where a Law Enforcement Ranger pulls over a man because he is saying he could not see his tag. By the officers own admission he was able to see the tag as he got closer but proceeded with the stop. As per usual the officer asks for ID and the man in truck went to work on this officer telling him this is an illegal stop as no crime has been committed so he is not required to provide ID. Through out the interaction he asks the officer if he is free to go and the officer doubles down on detainment. However at the same time when asked the officer was not able to articulate a crime. The man also asked for a sergeant and the officer never compiled by getting a supervisor on scene which honestly would have been the best move. There are two ways to look at this interaction. The eyes of the officer: The officer calmly maintains that the traffic stop is entirely lawful. In the United States, law enforcement needs reasonable suspicion to initiate a traffic stop. An obscured license plate or illegally dark window tint satisfies that standard in almost every jurisdiction. Furthermore, once a lawful traffic stop is initiated, a driver is legally required to produce a valid driver's license, proof of insurance, and vehicle registration. The driver's perspective: The driver claims that his tags are legit and the officer was able to see that when he ran them. He argues that because the ranger claimed at first he could not see the tags but now he can as he approached the vehicle. Since the officer admitted he can now see the tags and there is no problem with the tags, the initial stop was "erroneous" and constitutes an illegal search and seizure. He also details a personal grievance with local law enforcement, claiming a local district attorney and police officers have been "terrorizing" him. What is your take on this stop? Was this a case of an officer error where with the cop trying to save face by digging for a reason for the stop, or was this a legal stop and this officer deserves praise for staying calm while dealing with this man's outbursts? Share your thoughts below.

Giggling Ganon

194,059 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

This guy gets pulled over and instantly flips into full wannabe mobster mode. He starts running his mouth: “He doesn’t know how this town works… he thinks he’s a dictator… we got Scarpella over here trying to act like he’s big boss man… he’s new and doesn’t know how things work around here.” The cop calmly tells him multiple times: “Sit in the car.” Dude refuses, keeps arguing, even brags about filing complaints before. When the officer finally handcuffs him for obstruction… he’s STILL running his mouth 😂 What did he think was gonna happen?
1:33

This guy gets pulled over and instantly flips into full wannabe mobster mode. He starts running his mouth: “He doesn’t know how this town works… he thinks he’s a dictator… we got Scarpella over here trying to act like he’s big boss man… he’s new and doesn’t know how things work around here.” The cop calmly tells him multiple times: “Sit in the car.” Dude refuses, keeps arguing, even brags about filing complaints before. When the officer finally handcuffs him for obstruction… he’s STILL running his mouth 😂 What did he think was gonna happen?

End3of6Days9 (Helen) 🇺🇸

68,250 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🚨ICE agents pulled a man over, accused him of a traffic violation that his own DASH CAM disproved, then illegally used that stop to demand his immigration status, in Pittsburgh. And this is exactly what it looks like when a traffic stop becomes an illegal fishing expedition… for immigration status. In this video, ICE agents surround the man’s car, with what appears to be a police vehicle behind him. A masked ICE agent aggressively approaches the passenger window while another ICE agent goes to the driver’s window and demands his ID. ICE agents are federal immigration officers, they aren’t local police… So, why are ICE agents the ones surrounding this car, confronting the people inside, and accusing the driver of a traffic violation… while the cop appears to walk up afterward? If this was actually a traffic stop, why is the cop not initiating and enforcing the traffic violation? The driver asks why he is being stopped. The agent tells him he was “riding that guy’s ass” and claims he was following the vehicle too closely. Except there’s a problem… his dash cam video shows the exact opposite. He was traveling in his lane when another car… coming from a merge lane… pulled directly in front of him. That is the moment ICE agents appear to turn on their lights, since the driver slows down and pulls over. So, he understandably says, “Me? I wasn’t following anybody.” The agent doubles down, claiming he was too close and that he “has to be a car length away.” Then, they demand that both people get out of the vehicle. The passenger is taken by ICE, while another agent asks the driver whether he has any weapons. And then comes the real reason for the stop… “Are you allowed to be here? Are you illegal? Are you allowed to be in this country?” The driver tells them he has his resident card and hands it over. Eventually, they let him go. And THIS is where the constitutional violations become impossible to ignore. The Fourth Amendment protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures. A traffic stop is a seizure, meaning the government needs reasonable suspicion that a traffic violation, or crime, actually occurred. Even during a lawful traffic stop, officers cannot prolong the stop to investigate an unrelated matter without additional reasonable suspicion. So, when the alleged traffic violation turns into demands for identification, orders to exit the vehicle, questions about whether the people in the car are “illegal,” and an immigration-status check… the Fourth Amendment comes into question. And the fact that they eventually let this man go, after determining he was lawfully present, makes this even more disturbing. Because what exactly was the point of stopping him? He clearly wasn’t violating any tailgating law. So this wasn’t a legitimate traffic stop…it was a fabricated pretext to investigate his immigration status. And that is precisely why the Constitution exists. Because the government doesn’t get to say, “We wanted to check who you are, so we made up a reason to stop you.” And ICE does not get a free pass to stop Americans, and legal residents, and demand they prove their citizenship. The government has to follow the law, too.
1:43

🚨ICE agents pulled a man over, accused him of a traffic violation that his own DASH CAM disproved, then illegally used that stop to demand his immigration status, in Pittsburgh. And this is exactly what it looks like when a traffic stop becomes an illegal fishing expedition… for immigration status. In this video, ICE agents surround the man’s car, with what appears to be a police vehicle behind him. A masked ICE agent aggressively approaches the passenger window while another ICE agent goes to the driver’s window and demands his ID. ICE agents are federal immigration officers, they aren’t local police… So, why are ICE agents the ones surrounding this car, confronting the people inside, and accusing the driver of a traffic violation… while the cop appears to walk up afterward? If this was actually a traffic stop, why is the cop not initiating and enforcing the traffic violation? The driver asks why he is being stopped. The agent tells him he was “riding that guy’s ass” and claims he was following the vehicle too closely. Except there’s a problem… his dash cam video shows the exact opposite. He was traveling in his lane when another car… coming from a merge lane… pulled directly in front of him. That is the moment ICE agents appear to turn on their lights, since the driver slows down and pulls over. So, he understandably says, “Me? I wasn’t following anybody.” The agent doubles down, claiming he was too close and that he “has to be a car length away.” Then, they demand that both people get out of the vehicle. The passenger is taken by ICE, while another agent asks the driver whether he has any weapons. And then comes the real reason for the stop… “Are you allowed to be here? Are you illegal? Are you allowed to be in this country?” The driver tells them he has his resident card and hands it over. Eventually, they let him go. And THIS is where the constitutional violations become impossible to ignore. The Fourth Amendment protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures. A traffic stop is a seizure, meaning the government needs reasonable suspicion that a traffic violation, or crime, actually occurred. Even during a lawful traffic stop, officers cannot prolong the stop to investigate an unrelated matter without additional reasonable suspicion. So, when the alleged traffic violation turns into demands for identification, orders to exit the vehicle, questions about whether the people in the car are “illegal,” and an immigration-status check… the Fourth Amendment comes into question. And the fact that they eventually let this man go, after determining he was lawfully present, makes this even more disturbing. Because what exactly was the point of stopping him? He clearly wasn’t violating any tailgating law. So this wasn’t a legitimate traffic stop…it was a fabricated pretext to investigate his immigration status. And that is precisely why the Constitution exists. Because the government doesn’t get to say, “We wanted to check who you are, so we made up a reason to stop you.” And ICE does not get a free pass to stop Americans, and legal residents, and demand they prove their citizenship. The government has to follow the law, too.

Jesus Freakin Congress

155,877 просмотров • 29 дней назад

This lawn care owner hired this young man to weed eat while he drives the mower. As he comes to the back yard he notices him sitting down in the shade under a tree. He asks what he’s doing and he tells the owner he’s taking a break. The owner says there is no break and he needs to get back to work. The young man tells him he’s lucky because all he has to do is ride the mower. He tells him he’s taking a break and he will be back to work in a bit. If you were the owner, would you fire him on the spot? Another entitled youngster? Or, does the kid have a point, it’s fine to take a break? What would you do if that was your business and employee?
1:02

This lawn care owner hired this young man to weed eat while he drives the mower. As he comes to the back yard he notices him sitting down in the shade under a tree. He asks what he’s doing and he tells the owner he’s taking a break. The owner says there is no break and he needs to get back to work. The young man tells him he’s lucky because all he has to do is ride the mower. He tells him he’s taking a break and he will be back to work in a bit. If you were the owner, would you fire him on the spot? Another entitled youngster? Or, does the kid have a point, it’s fine to take a break? What would you do if that was your business and employee?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

1,012,418 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

This dad called 911 because his seven year old autistic son wasn’t behaving and was having a tantrum. The officer that spoke with him told the father that it was completely inappropriate to call the police over this. He said they have an entire town to protect and three officers responded and then asks the dad while chuckling - “can’t handle a seven year old?” The dad tells him that he has called 911 twice before but no one has ever got mad at him like this officer. The officer tells him that they are approaching charging him with false summoning a police officer. He also tells him that if he can’t handle a seven year then maybe they should get CYS involved because clearly the dad needs parenting classes. 😳 Many said the officer was rude and didn’t have to be. That his job is to protect and SERVE the community and that the family was just reaching out, that he needed support and someone to to talk to because they have no idea how hard it is to raise an autistic child? But others said this is not a job for a police officer, that they aren’t counselors and therapists and that there are many resources available through the city that he should using. 💯 I am team police officer. Some may find it rude but this is not in their job description. And being the third time? You have to put a stop to the 911 calls. What do you think? Do you think the officer had a right to be upset and talk the way he was talking to the dad being that this is the third time this has happened? Or, do you think he should have had more compassion for the father?
1:00

This dad called 911 because his seven year old autistic son wasn’t behaving and was having a tantrum. The officer that spoke with him told the father that it was completely inappropriate to call the police over this. He said they have an entire town to protect and three officers responded and then asks the dad while chuckling - “can’t handle a seven year old?” The dad tells him that he has called 911 twice before but no one has ever got mad at him like this officer. The officer tells him that they are approaching charging him with false summoning a police officer. He also tells him that if he can’t handle a seven year then maybe they should get CYS involved because clearly the dad needs parenting classes. 😳 Many said the officer was rude and didn’t have to be. That his job is to protect and SERVE the community and that the family was just reaching out, that he needed support and someone to to talk to because they have no idea how hard it is to raise an autistic child? But others said this is not a job for a police officer, that they aren’t counselors and therapists and that there are many resources available through the city that he should using. 💯 I am team police officer. Some may find it rude but this is not in their job description. And being the third time? You have to put a stop to the 911 calls. What do you think? Do you think the officer had a right to be upset and talk the way he was talking to the dad being that this is the third time this has happened? Or, do you think he should have had more compassion for the father?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

26,693 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Ticket to Heaven is belong to GeminiFourth Jimmy : “I think Gemfot still doesn’t know about this yet. Phi Aof is the kind of person whose mind is always full of ideas, no matter where he is or what he’s doing. Even when he’s just sitting and eating, he’s still thinking a lot. He comes up with ideas like this all the time. For this series, he got the idea when he went to Rome with JimmySea. He visited a church and thought, ‘What if I made a series about kids in a church? That would be great. That’s why he stayed a few more days in Rome to explore and really decide on it. Honestly, I’ve known about this from the very beginning. I heard about it quite a while ago, even though I still didn’t know the title of the series. But since that time in Rome, I already knew it had to be Gemfot who would act in it.” #GeminiFourth #เจมีไนน์โฟร์ท #Gemini_NT #Fourthnattawat #TicketoHeaven
0:55

Ticket to Heaven is belong to GeminiFourth Jimmy : “I think Gemfot still doesn’t know about this yet. Phi Aof is the kind of person whose mind is always full of ideas, no matter where he is or what he’s doing. Even when he’s just sitting and eating, he’s still thinking a lot. He comes up with ideas like this all the time. For this series, he got the idea when he went to Rome with JimmySea. He visited a church and thought, ‘What if I made a series about kids in a church? That would be great. That’s why he stayed a few more days in Rome to explore and really decide on it. Honestly, I’ve known about this from the very beginning. I heard about it quite a while ago, even though I still didn’t know the title of the series. But since that time in Rome, I already knew it had to be Gemfot who would act in it.” #GeminiFourth #เจมีไนน์โฟร์ท #Gemini_NT #Fourthnattawat #TicketoHeaven

🎫

45,558 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

lando on the support and mentorship he’s had from seb: “he’s probably been a guy that naturally came about and he’s been very helpful. he’s been through everything over the years. so, a super nice guy and he’s been always very helpful in the bad times, but also the good times. in terms of how to keep focused and keep your head down, how to get through those tough times but also how to use the good times to continue to help yourself improve. to come from a guy like him, he was the guy i was watching when i was a kid, so it’s certainly a cool thing. he still does a lot outside of formula 1 now, but still uses the fact he’s a 4x world champion and an incredible driver. i think just a lot of people have a huge amount of respect for him, for what he achieved but also what he does now outside of formula 1 . he’s just an incredible person, he’s a very down to earth nice person. that’s maybe not what everyone would expect from a world champion or someone who’s achieved that kind of thing, but he is. and he’s always down to have a chat, have a laugh, have a coffee, whatever it may be”
1:07

lando on the support and mentorship he’s had from seb: “he’s probably been a guy that naturally came about and he’s been very helpful. he’s been through everything over the years. so, a super nice guy and he’s been always very helpful in the bad times, but also the good times. in terms of how to keep focused and keep your head down, how to get through those tough times but also how to use the good times to continue to help yourself improve. to come from a guy like him, he was the guy i was watching when i was a kid, so it’s certainly a cool thing. he still does a lot outside of formula 1 now, but still uses the fact he’s a 4x world champion and an incredible driver. i think just a lot of people have a huge amount of respect for him, for what he achieved but also what he does now outside of formula 1 . he’s just an incredible person, he’s a very down to earth nice person. that’s maybe not what everyone would expect from a world champion or someone who’s achieved that kind of thing, but he is. and he’s always down to have a chat, have a laugh, have a coffee, whatever it may be”

ray

66,472 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

There’s no winner here. This man got pulled over in a routine traffic stop. He disclosed to the officers that he had a concealed carry permit. During what was a routine pat down he was accidentally shot by the female officer? With what looks like his own weapon. Who was in the wrong here? Or was it simply just an accident?
1:30

There’s no winner here. This man got pulled over in a routine traffic stop. He disclosed to the officers that he had a concealed carry permit. During what was a routine pat down he was accidentally shot by the female officer? With what looks like his own weapon. Who was in the wrong here? Or was it simply just an accident?

AmyLouWho

78,318 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад