正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

He Turned Uniswap into a private print Let me explain: A dev created a ethereum:0x07f5b6823751c2e2cd4560f28af75ff887102241/$USDG pool with $30,000 in liquidity. Using a Uniswap hook, he completely blocked anyone else from adding LP. Then, he launched a bot to wash trade the pool. Whenever his own bot makes a swap...

149,138 次观看 • 2 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

33 条评论

Tradeboi Carti 的头像
Tradeboi Carti2 个月前

last theory: he's money laundering

Kepler 的头像
Kepler2 个月前

i doubt 99% of CT understood a word you just wrote. on a different note, this dude actually knows what he is doing. pure onchain madness.

CryptoY2K 的头像
CryptoY2K2 个月前

Why can’t someone else just make a different pool tho?

Antoine Rousseaux 的头像
Antoine Rousseaux2 个月前

I wanna be the only liquidity on btc

2Lambroz 🐑 (🧑‍🍳🥩🤌) 的头像
2Lambroz 🐑 (🧑‍🍳🥩🤌)2 个月前

But if this is not the main pool what is the damage of this to traders ?

Igor Igor 🪶 的头像
Igor Igor 🪶2 个月前

Probably one of the biggest scam in crypto history

Igor Igor 🪶 的头像
Igor Igor 🪶2 个月前

🚨 THIS IS WHY YOU SHOULD BE CAREFUL WITH “HIGH APR” CRYPTO POOLS. Most people see: 700% APR. Huge volume. Lots of trades. …and assume they found an opportunity. But what if the person who created the pool controls the entire game? According to the analysis shown here, the setup uses a Uniswap V4 hook that can: • Make the developer the ONLY liquidity provider • Block everyone else from adding liquidity • Use wash trading to make volume look real • Capture the trading fees • Control the liquidity and therefore influence execution Here’s the part most traders miss 👇 That “700% APR” can look incredible… BUT if ordinary users cannot actually provide liquidity, they cannot earn that APR. The developer collects the fees while traders are effectively trading against a pool controlled by one party. And artificial trading volume can make the token look much healthier than it really is. ⚠️ THIS DOESN’T NECESSARILY MEAN “CLASSIC PONZI.” A traditional Ponzi pays old investors with money from new investors. This is different. It is closer to a potentially predatory, privately controlled AMM setup where the creator can extract fees while controlling the liquidity. For the average trader, the result can still be extremely dangerous. Think about it: ❌ You cannot add LP ❌ You cannot participate in the advertised APR ❌ Volume may be artificially inflated ❌ Liquidity is controlled by one party ❌ Execution/slippage can potentially be manipulated ❌ The token can become extremely risky if liquidity is small 🚨 THE BIGGEST RED FLAG: If you see something like “Set Whitelist” inside the hook/contract logic, ASK YOURSELF: “Who is actually allowed to provide liquidity?” Because a pool that looks decentralized on the surface may not be decentralized in practice. DON’T FOMO INTO APR. DON’T TRUST VOLUME BLINDLY. DON’T ASSUME A BIG NUMBER = REAL YIELD. Always check: 🔎 Who controls the LP? 🔎 Can anyone add liquidity? 🔎 Where do the swap fees go? 🔎 Is the volume organic? 🔎 Can the creator change important parameters? 🔎 What exactly does the contract/hook allow? 💀 In crypto, the most dangerous traps can look the most profitable. DYOR. Verify the contract. Protect your capital. #Crypto #DeFi #CryptoScam #ScamAlert #CryptoSecurity #DeFiSecurity #Uniswap #UniswapV4 #Ethereum #Web3 #Memecoin #Altcoins #CryptoTrading #DEX #Liquidity #LiquidityPool #APR #YieldFarming #OnChain #SmartContracts #Blockchain #CryptoTwitter #CT #DYOR

DarkLord_gr | DeFi Dojo 的头像
DarkLord_gr | DeFi Dojo2 个月前

Can't other people create same token pair LPs to compete with him?

M-log1 的头像
M-log12 个月前

Ggs

sebayaki.eth 的头像
sebayaki.eth2 个月前

Blocking others from adding liquidity only gives you exclusive ownership of that specific pool - it doesn’t give you exclusive order flow for the pair. Other pools can still exist, and routers/aggregators will route organic trades wherever execution is best. So the private pool still has to compete for real volume and fees. You can force your own wash trades through it, sure - but then you’re mostly just paying fees from one pocket and collecting them in the other.

🍋🍋 🍋 🍋 的头像
🍋🍋 🍋 🍋2 个月前

This is a washing machine

Solz.app 的头像
Solz.app2 个月前

Wash trading this pool is not free. You still pay gas and any Uniswap protocol fee on every swap. Those costs come out of pocket even if the LP fee recycles back to you. There is no free lunch.

uhonyn 的头像
uhonyn2 个月前

tax farm season is backkkkkk

Money Bunny 的头像
Money Bunny2 个月前

Only the creator controls the liquidity here, nobody else can participate

MIRO 的头像
MIRO2 个月前

That was a very smart move on his part considering the commission rates, the profits are gut

Coinesper 的头像
Coinesper2 个月前

Big brained chad.

Jesse 的头像
Jesse2 个月前

So he made an onchain darkpool in the light of day... Scammy and brilliant at the same time.

JohnnyTime 🤓🔥 的头像
JohnnyTime 🤓🔥2 个月前

@dkni8mare That doesn’t explain why router would go through this pool

Payday Giveaways 的头像
Payday Giveaways2 个月前

Gas isn't free. He's TRYING to do what you claim, and if he can, great. He launched a vamp coin, and people traded it. But there's a good chance he'll lose money.

Muhammad Bin Tughlaq 的头像
Muhammad Bin Tughlaq2 个月前

I think different pool with different fees possible.

banana0x 的头像
banana0x2 个月前

it's a rlly smart move :0

Smitch 🥷 的头像
Smitch 🥷2 个月前

And theyre definitely not just actively rebalancing their liquidity provision with a bot to make sure their bins are where the price is?...

Nicodemus 🐁 的头像
Nicodemus 🐁2 个月前

honestly genius tier work

0xAkhMi 的头像
0xAkhMi2 个月前

But from where free comes from ??

0xPapy 的头像
0xPapy2 个月前

Ok, this guy is good.

Marcel Trichet 的头像
Marcel Trichet2 个月前

Awesome post and thank you for the reference addresses

Sisyphus | Phoenix Research 的头像
Sisyphus | Phoenix Research2 个月前

That’s smart

Ryan Soury 的头像
Ryan Soury2 个月前

.... So the lesson is to read the quoted price before executing a swap?

Jude2007.eth 的头像
Jude2007.eth2 个月前

Pretty smart though

0xfarmed 的头像
0xfarmed2 个月前

Awesome hussle

👩‍🌾0xAirdropFarmer 的头像
👩‍🌾0xAirdropFarmer2 个月前

bro he practice market maker skill

nijinn 的头像
nijinn2 个月前

thats a casino with one house seat

ziosarescum 的头像
ziosarescum2 个月前

@ProMint_X ,how much he made so far and when he started at what MC?

相关视频

Introducing the World’s First Omnipool for Tokenized Stocks Tokenized stocks now have a way to share liquidity in a single pool instead of being split across isolated trading pairs. The first EARN Omnipool is live with $NVDA, $SPCX, $PLTR, $EARN and $WETH, creating a single AMM pool where every asset can trade against the same underlying liquidity. You can now provide liquidity for 5 tokens in a single pool, keeping exposure and earning fees from all of them. An entirely new productive market structure for stocks. What is an Omnipool? An Omnipool is a multi-asset AMM built around shared liquidity. Traditional AMMs fragment capital across separate pairs such as NVDA/ETH, SPCX/ETH and PLTR/ETH. The EARN Omnipool brings those assets together inside one weighted pool, allowing users to move directly between any of them without requiring a separate pool for every possible pair. For liquidity providers, this means one deposit can provide exposure to the full basket while earning a share of the fees generated across the entire market. Unlike a normal onchain index, the Omnipool doesn’t just hold a basket of assets. It actively provides shared liquidity between them, allowing every token to trade against the same pool while holders earn fees from that activity. How does it work? The first Omnipool is an experimental fork of Balancer V3, adapted for tokenized stocks on Robinhood Chain with Uni . Each asset begins with a 20% target weight, while the AMM continuously adjusts its balances and prices as users trade. Every swap pays a fee, with the majority going to liquidity providers and an EARN protocol share supporting continued development. Liquidity providers receive OMNI, the pool’s receipt token. Each OMNI represents a proportional claim on the assets held inside the pool and can be redeemed back into the underlying basket at any time. Connecting OMNI to Uniswap V4 The Omnipool is its own AMM, separate from Uniswap, which means it does not automatically receive Uniswap routing or external arbitrage volume. To connect the two markets, the OMNI receipt token can be paired with USDG in a Uniswap V4 pool. Because OMNI represents a claim on the entire Omnipool, this effectively makes the complete five-asset market tradable through a single token. If OMNI trades below the value of the assets backing it, anyone can buy it on Uniswap and redeem it through the Omnipool. If it trades above that value, users can deposit liquidity into the Omnipool, receive OMNI and sell it on Uniswap. This creates a live arbitrage link between the Omnipool and the wider Robinhood Chain market while giving routers a simple way to access the value of the entire pool. The first pool is an experiment, but the bigger idea is to create a shared liquidity layer for the onchain stock market. We can expand this to let anyone launch their own Omnipool on EARN.

EARN

32,797 次观看 • 2 个月前

Most APR in DeFi counts the fees LPs earn. None of them count what LPs lose when the price moves against them. Metric now does. Those losses come after the trade, from LVR, impermanent loss and informed traders picking off stale quotes. Market makers measure them on every fill. Most retail LPs find out the hard way, after a “50% APR” pool slowly loses them money. APR has historically lacked transparency. It shows what a pool earned and leaves out what it gave back, so LPs can’t tell which pools actually work. We built APR Markouts to change that. After every fill, Markout asks one question. Once the market catches up, did the pool make money on this trade? Say a pool buys 1 ETH at $2,990 while the reference price is $3,000. Five minutes later ETH is at $3,004, so the pool kept $14. If ETH had dropped to $2,970, it would have lost $20. Every Metric pool now shows Markout APR, net of fees, the number LPs can trust more. You can view it 1, 5 or 30 minutes after each fill, over 24 hours, 7 days, 30 days or all time. It’s the number a market maker would use to judge a pool, and yes, it can be negative. LPs should always see what they’re getting into. A pool with a lot of volume isn’t always making its LPs money. Now you can see the difference pool by pool and bin by bin, along with your own share in your positions. Market makers have always judged pools this way. Now every LP on Metric gets the same transparency. Live now on Metric.

Metric

16,245 次观看 • 6 天前