正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Hear me out: a GPT wrapper that generates... GPT wrappers 🤔 Introducing ⇢ GPT Wrapper Generator Create complete GPT wrappers in seconds - frontend UI, API routes, JSON schema, custom prompts, .. 100% free - more info ⇣

Fekri

12,071 subscribers

112,513 次观看 • 2 年前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

8 条评论

Fekri 的头像

Fekri2 年前

Simply copy-paste: 1. page.tsx 2. route.ts into your Next.js app & done! the coolest thing about this tool might be the URL: 😎 hope you like it! 🙏🏽

Paulius 🏴‍☠️ 的头像

Paulius 🏴‍☠️2 年前

We’ve reached peak AI wrappers

Fekri 的头像

Fekri2 年前

we can add another wrapper layer on top

Fekri 的头像

Fekri2 年前

😂

Fekri 的头像

Fekri2 年前

exactly lol lol

Rufus 的头像

Rufus2 年前

Brilliant.

Raydon Kimunguyi 的头像

Raydon Kimunguyi2 年前

Amazing product man.

Fekri 的头像

Fekri2 年前

thanks man!!

相关视频

Built a custom GPT that generates 1,000 perfect LinkedIn Sales Navigator leads in just 14 seconds! Want access? Like & Comment "GPT" below and I'll DM the link (make sure we're connected). Check out the demo video below.

Built a custom GPT that generates 1,000 perfect LinkedIn Sales Navigator leads in just 14 seconds! Want access? Like & Comment "GPT" below and I'll DM the link (make sure we're connected). Check out the demo video below.

Colin Gallagher

15,061 次观看 • 1 年前

Introducing GPT-Realtime-2 in the API: our most intelligent voice model yet, bringing GPT-5-class reasoning to voice agents. Voice agents are now real-time collaborators that can listen, reason, and solve complex problems as conversations unfold. Now available in the API alongside streaming models GPT-Realtime-Translate and GPT-Realtime-Whisper — a new set of audio capabilities for the next generation of voice interfaces.

Introducing GPT-Realtime-2 in the API: our most intelligent voice model yet, bringing GPT-5-class reasoning to voice agents. Voice agents are now real-time collaborators that can listen, reason, and solve complex problems as conversations unfold. Now available in the API alongside streaming models GPT-Realtime-Translate and GPT-Realtime-Whisper — a new set of audio capabilities for the next generation of voice interfaces.

OpenAI

3,660,209 次观看 • 3 个月前

This test shows clearly why GPT 5.6 Sol wins I asked the simplest prompt ever : > Create a gmail clone, the nearest possible to the real gmail ui You can see the result, GPT 5.6 Sol and Fable make a 100% perfect But here's the price difference: → GPT 5.6 Terra: $1.04 - 8 minutes → GPT 5.6 Luna: $0.44 - 10 minutes → GPT 5.6 Sol: $6.72 - 20 minutes → Claude Fable 5: $25.09 - 40 minutes Fable is 3.7x more expensive than Sol for "the same result"

This test shows clearly why GPT 5.6 Sol wins I asked the simplest prompt ever : > Create a gmail clone, the nearest possible to the real gmail ui You can see the result, GPT 5.6 Sol and Fable make a 100% perfect But here's the price difference: → GPT 5.6 Terra: $1.04 - 8 minutes → GPT 5.6 Luna: $0.44 - 10 minutes → GPT 5.6 Sol: $6.72 - 20 minutes → Claude Fable 5: $25.09 - 40 minutes Fable is 3.7x more expensive than Sol for "the same result"

Melvyn • Builder

22,254 次观看 • 1 个月前

introducing rd-signal-2: a frontier classification model that is 1600x cheaper than GPT 5.6 Sol. free to try in Raindrop, and available via a new API for training/hosting custom classifiers with Zero Data Retention.

introducing rd-signal-2: a frontier classification model that is 1600x cheaper than GPT 5.6 Sol. free to try in Raindrop, and available via a new API for training/hosting custom classifiers with Zero Data Retention.

ben hylak

149,352 次观看 • 8 天前

👶🤖 Introducing `gpt-engineer` ▸ One prompt generates a codebase ▸ Asks clarifying questions ▸ Generates technical spec ▸ Writes all necessary code ▸ Easy to add your own reasoning steps, modify, and experiment ▸ open source: ▸ Lets you finish a coding project in minutes. swyx scooped me on releasing first ❤️ – similarities to smol but many new innovations, check README. Next, make it bootstrap. Which means: A "gpt engineer" prompt should generate all functionality of the gpt-engineer repo itself.

👶🤖 Introducing `gpt-engineer` ▸ One prompt generates a codebase ▸ Asks clarifying questions ▸ Generates technical spec ▸ Writes all necessary code ▸ Easy to add your own reasoning steps, modify, and experiment ▸ open source: ▸ Lets you finish a coding project in minutes. swyx scooped me on releasing first ❤️ – similarities to smol but many new innovations, check README. Next, make it bootstrap. Which means: A "gpt engineer" prompt should generate all functionality of the gpt-engineer repo itself.

Anton Osika

664,759 次观看 • 3 年前

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua

Chris

250,405 次观看 • 2 个月前

Kimi K3 Standard’s first shot at my indie spaceship game! Without a shadow of a doubt, this is better than GPT-5.5’s first pass. It’s crazy that we already have an open-source model in the GPT-5.5 to GPT-5.6 class. The estimated API cost for this was just $2.50 worth of tokens. Fable 5: $22 GPT-5.5: $14 I will say that Fable 5 made the game look more visually impressive, but the gap is not that large. I think I could easily get Kimi to match its visual quality within a few iterations. What surprised me most was that Kimi’s version felt much more cohesive and coherent, with fewer bugs than GPT-5.5’s.

Kimi K3 Standard’s first shot at my indie spaceship game! Without a shadow of a doubt, this is better than GPT-5.5’s first pass. It’s crazy that we already have an open-source model in the GPT-5.5 to GPT-5.6 class. The estimated API cost for this was just $2.50 worth of tokens. Fable 5: $22 GPT-5.5: $14 I will say that Fable 5 made the game look more visually impressive, but the gap is not that large. I think I could easily get Kimi to match its visual quality within a few iterations. What surprised me most was that Kimi’s version felt much more cohesive and coherent, with fewer bugs than GPT-5.5’s.

Chris

47,926 次观看 • 1 个月前

Introducing ElevenLabs GPT, my latest custom GPT that brings any prompt to life with a realistic voice! 🗣️ You can: - generate an audiobook with one prompt! - have online articles read to you - listen to any docs you upload Watch the demo below to see it in action! 🚀

Introducing ElevenLabs GPT, my latest custom GPT that brings any prompt to life with a realistic voice! 🗣️ You can: - generate an audiobook with one prompt! - have online articles read to you - listen to any docs you upload Watch the demo below to see it in action! 🚀

Ammaar Reshi

232,009 次观看 • 2 年前

You can now generate and iterate on images with gpt-image-1.5 in Codex to create frontend designs, mockups, game assets, and more without leaving your workflow. Usage is included with your ChatGPT account, no API key needed.

You can now generate and iterate on images with gpt-image-1.5 in Codex to create frontend designs, mockups, game assets, and more without leaving your workflow. Usage is included with your ChatGPT account, no API key needed.

OpenAI

128,457 次观看 • 4 个月前

.OpenAI's GPT-5.1 is live in Cline. After testing the last several weeks, here's what we've found makes GPT-5.1 an exceptional model in Cline: GPT-5.1 is an obsessive researcher. It reads everything before writing anything. Where other models grab context and go, GPT-5.1 investigates thoroughly first, even for one-line changes. We found this overkill for simple tasks, and modified GPT-5.1's prompting resultantly, but a superpower when channeled right. Here's what you should expect from GPT-5.1 in Cline: > deep, systematic investigation before any edits > follows constraints religiously (specs, todo lists, your requirements) > maintains coherent reasoning with large contexts > delivers complete features with fewer corrections How we optimized Cline for GPT-5.1: 1. redesigned prompts for execution focus and stricter Plan/Act transitions 2. tightened tool specs, GPT-5.1 internalizes rules with just single examples 3. split /deep-planning investigation into two phases (read first, then search) Result: GPT-5.1 is a model that finishes what it starts, even across dozens of files and thousands of lines. Both GPT-5.1 (272K context) and GPT-5.1-codex (400K context) available now in Cline. $1.25/M input, $10/M output. Enable native tool calling in settings for best results. Use /deep-planning to see GPT-5.1 at its best. Full technical breakdown linked below.

.OpenAI's GPT-5.1 is live in Cline. After testing the last several weeks, here's what we've found makes GPT-5.1 an exceptional model in Cline: GPT-5.1 is an obsessive researcher. It reads everything before writing anything. Where other models grab context and go, GPT-5.1 investigates thoroughly first, even for one-line changes. We found this overkill for simple tasks, and modified GPT-5.1's prompting resultantly, but a superpower when channeled right. Here's what you should expect from GPT-5.1 in Cline: > deep, systematic investigation before any edits > follows constraints religiously (specs, todo lists, your requirements) > maintains coherent reasoning with large contexts > delivers complete features with fewer corrections How we optimized Cline for GPT-5.1: 1. redesigned prompts for execution focus and stricter Plan/Act transitions 2. tightened tool specs, GPT-5.1 internalizes rules with just single examples 3. split /deep-planning investigation into two phases (read first, then search) Result: GPT-5.1 is a model that finishes what it starts, even across dozens of files and thousands of lines. Both GPT-5.1 (272K context) and GPT-5.1-codex (400K context) available now in Cline. $1.25/M input, $10/M output. Enable native tool calling in settings for best results. Use /deep-planning to see GPT-5.1 at its best. Full technical breakdown linked below.

Cline

72,111 次观看 • 9 个月前

Introducing autoresearch with GPT 5.6 We had GPT 5.6 Sol reproduce the key findings from “Towards Mechanistically Understanding Why Memorized Knowledge Fails to Generalize in LLM Finetuning” Compared to GPT-5.5 and even Fable 5, GPT-5.6 stayed more focused on a few, critical experiments and spent less time on peripheral details. It also asked fewer “clarification” questions and independently resolved ambiguities instead of pushing them back to us OpenAI pushing the boundaries of the automated research loop with models that don’t have handcuffs

Introducing autoresearch with GPT 5.6 We had GPT 5.6 Sol reproduce the key findings from “Towards Mechanistically Understanding Why Memorized Knowledge Fails to Generalize in LLM Finetuning” Compared to GPT-5.5 and even Fable 5, GPT-5.6 stayed more focused on a few, critical experiments and spent less time on peripheral details. It also asked fewer “clarification” questions and independently resolved ambiguities instead of pushing them back to us OpenAI pushing the boundaries of the automated research loop with models that don’t have handcuffs

alphaXiv

85,291 次观看 • 1 个月前

Grid to fashion editorial video. Create a 5x5 character grid in GPT Image 2, then feed it into Seedance 2.0 Gives you clean control over shots before animation. Even if it doesn’t follow the grid 100%, it still produces really solid results. Shared prompts below 👇 Created with gpt image 2 + seedance 2.0 on mitte.ai

Grid to fashion editorial video. Create a 5x5 character grid in GPT Image 2, then feed it into Seedance 2.0 Gives you clean control over shots before animation. Even if it doesn’t follow the grid 100%, it still produces really solid results. Shared prompts below 👇 Created with gpt image 2 + seedance 2.0 on mitte.ai

Kōda

23,887 次观看 • 3 个月前

Inputting citations, especially of things that aren't in databases, can be annoying. Introducing which extracts a bibtex-formatted formatted citation from arbitrary free text using GPT-3.👇

Inputting citations, especially of things that aren't in databases, can be annoying. Introducing which extracts a bibtex-formatted formatted citation from arbitrary free text using GPT-3.👇

Theo Sanderson

66,056 次观看 • 3 年前

This custom GPT writes perfect Sora 2 prompts every time 🤯 Most people are wasting hours trying to get Sora 2 to generate decent UGC videos. The problem isn't Sora 2. It's you (and your prompts). Here's what I learned after generating 100+ UGC videos with Sora 2: Sora 2 needs hyper-specific prompts with shot composition, timing, camera movement, and scene details. Most people write: "Create a UGC video for my protein bar" What you get? Terrible results. What actually works: "9:16 vertical handheld shot, natural lighting, female creator in kitchen holding [brand] protein bar at eye level, excited testimonial energy, 0-3s hook showing bite and reaction, shallow depth of field, warm color grade" That's the difference between amateur & professional output. So I built a custom GPT that does this automatically: → Tell it your product (protein bar, skincare, SaaS tool, etc.) → It generates a detailed timeline-based Sora 2 prompt → Includes shot composition, camera angles, timing breakdowns → Optimized for 9:16 UGC TikTok/Reels format → Copy/paste directly into Sora 2 No more guessing. No more mediocre results. Just professional UGC prompts in 10 seconds. Want free access to the Sora 2 Prompt Generator GPT? > Comment "GPT" > Like this post And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)

Mike Futia

49,857 次观看 • 10 个月前

Introducing Sparkle ✨, a custom GPT that helps you craft storybooks and become a published author! It can: - Generate a book with a page by page breakdown - Provide amazing MidJourney prompts & illustrate with DALL-E - Layout pages & much more! Demo and full features below! 🧵

Introducing Sparkle ✨, a custom GPT that helps you craft storybooks and become a published author! It can: - Generate a book with a page by page breakdown - Provide amazing MidJourney prompts & illustrate with DALL-E - Layout pages & much more! Demo and full features below! 🧵

Ammaar Reshi

255,285 次观看 • 2 年前

Introducing llms.txt Generator ✨ You can now concatenate any website into a single text file that can be fed into any LLM. We crawl the whole website with and extract data with gpt-4o-mini. Create your own llms.txt at

Introducing llms.txt Generator ✨ You can now concatenate any website into a single text file that can be fed into any LLM. We crawl the whole website with and extract data with gpt-4o-mini. Create your own llms.txt at

Eric Ciarla (hiring)

230,061 次观看 • 1 年前

Introducing Odyssey-2 Pro—a frontier world model that generates long-running, interactive simulations in 720p! We're also launching the first world model API, to enable devs to build magical apps. We're now in the GPT-2 era of world models. Let the explosion of apps commence!

Introducing Odyssey-2 Pro—a frontier world model that generates long-running, interactive simulations in 720p! We're also launching the first world model API, to enable devs to build magical apps. We're now in the GPT-2 era of world models. Let the explosion of apps commence!

Odyssey

166,193 次观看 • 6 个月前