Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Hearing footage shows the Maricopa Board threatening to remove elected Recorder Justin Heap, raising constitutional questions about administrative interference during an active election cycle.

11,613 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🚨THE ELECTION INTEGRITY BATTLE ON FULL DISPLAY Two sides of the battle: Maricopa County Recorder Maricopa County Recorder Justin Heap (speaker in the video) — courageous, exceedingly reasonable, and fighting to ensure the County follows AZ election law. Board of Supervisors — corrupt, obstructionist & refusing to follow the law. Recently the Maricopa County Superior Court ruled a 100% in favor of Recorder Heap in a legal dispute between him and the Board of Supervisors. On every single point in the lawsuit, the Court — a Court notorious for siding with corrupt election officials — ruled 100% in favor of the pro-election integrity, freedom, caucus alumni, now serving as the top election official in Arizona’s largest county. Why does this matter? It matters because Maricopa County has 70% of the voters in one of the top five swing states in America heading into the 2028 presidential election cycle. The Maricopa County Board of Supervisors is attempting a wholesale, illegal takeover of election administration. Even after the Court ruled 100% AGAINST the Board they are refusing to follow the law. Watch the clip for yourself — tell me that Recorder Heap is not extremely reasonable, logical, and that his highest priority isn’t simply following the law. You can’t. The Board is comprised of corrupt tyrants. Recorder Heap is fighting for the People. Bravo, Recorder Heap. Keep up the fight. You’re on the right side of history.

Jake Hoffman

13,801 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

MARICOPA ELECTION TRAINING TAPES EMERGE: Maricopa County Election Trainers Admit Poll Workers Cannot Stop Third Party Ballot Harvesting: "It's Not Our Job to Police That." OMG Citizen Journalists are on the inside recording Maricopa County Election Trainings. "We're not any type of law enforcement," said Maricopa County Election Trainer Amy Bricker when undercover O’Keefe Media Group (O’Keefe Media Group) journalists questioned how poll workers should respond to ballot harvesting during election training. When asked if poll workers can call out illegal activity, Bricker stated, "No, you cannot." During the training, one OMG citizen journalist raised concerns: "We had a couple instances during the primary where someone brought in a stack [of ballots]. My question is, are we allowed to say anything?" Bricker’s response was clear: "As long as the ballot is signed and dated, we don’t get involved." Election trainers confirmed that even if ballots are harvested illegally, "If it's signed by the owners, it's valid," raising serious questions about the integrity of the voting process. Additionally, OMG citizen journalists discovered that the Department of Justice (DOJ) federal agents will be stationed inside polling centers across Maricopa County. When questioned why, Bricker responded, "They could be following up on a lawsuit or monitoring things for this election." Maricopa County Maricopa County Elections Maricopa County Recorder's Office Stephen Richer

James O'Keefe

4,916,783 просмотров • 1 год назад

This is my take on travesty of the Maricopa BOS. It can be summed up in the first few minutes of this whole 24 minute inappropriately timed ambush of Heap at the budget meeting. Gallardo states that Helen Purcell was so well regarded that anything she wanted she was given, no questions asked. He goes on to blindside Heap with Tweets that he has no knowledge about. But here is the tell in that rant… Gallardo said, paraphrasing, how do you expect me to vote on this budget when you have senior staff disparaging 1/3 of the voters in Maricopa. It shows he is using his feelings to conduct business. I left the full 24 minute exchange so you can see how Gallardo attacked Heap, as Heap tried to respond (more calmly than I would have) Galvin interrupts & calls him a liar & Stewart, the sane voice in the room. But this problem didn’t start that day. Trouble has been brewing in the recorders office since Purcell was ousted. Since Purcell left things have not run smoothly. The budget meeting was just a spill over of behind the scenes tensions, whispers, private meetings, etc. A very unprofessional spill over. Which Brophy-McGee wasn’t going to allow Heap to respond. What does that say to Heap? This particular latest problem started before Richer even left office. Remember, Archer, the insider, told us they were rewriting the SSA because they were “protecting from possibly hostile incoming recorders”. He deleted that post, but not before I grabbed it. - see below He later told us: “At issue: Heap had allied himself with the election fraud grifters so he had to spend the entire election questioning the competency of county staff with no evidence to back up the claims. Whether that was a factor or not, last year the Board modified the elections Shared Services Agreement (SSA) shift more election related responsibilities under the Board of Supervisors.” See below. After he had told us last year that Heap’s stance on elections was the reason. The stage was set & the die was cast before Heap was sworn in. And has degraded since. The BOS stripped Heap of his constitutional duties. They have continued to dig their heals in. Fast forward to today. The board demands a report/documents within 10 days & if Heap doesn’t produce it & to their satisfaction they will vote to remove him - that is the purpose of the statute they chose. Today - they said they were not going to compel him to testify. But Heap voluntarily agreed to a verbal report. But, Brophy-McGee made him swear in. Did that instill trust? Then Stewart made a motion to declare that Heap had met his obligations. The rest of the board wouldn’t agree & Brophy-McGee made sure to say the matter is not closed, paraphrasing “we will look at this report & decide then what further actions to take” - leaving a vote to remove Heap on the table. Did that instill trust? Then Brophy-McGee has the nerve to be upset that Heap would not agree to come back to “voluntarily testify” (under oath I’m sure) because the board has done nothing to instill trust since before he even took office. The board spent over an hour laying their case for passing a predetermined event - passing a resolution (policy) on how they will deal with Heap in the future. An action that Langhofer gave them as an option to bypass any further negotiations with Heap. Frankly, I’m disappointed in Stewart going along with it. Did that instill trust? What I witnessed today was outright hostility toward Heap & the citizens there to support him. I witnessed self-exoneration. I witnessed a lawyer that is not helping matters. I witnessed a cold shoulder to their colleague. I witnessed group think, bullying & a bunch of people that are angry because Heap (& now Stewart) are not just letting the board railroad to get their way. Lesko really thinks they are giving Heap what he wants. It shows they are not listening to Heap or the taxpayers.

AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

20,664 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад