Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Heated discussion about the #Cubs deadline approach between Alex Cohen & myself, w/ Elise Menaker & Jim Callis observing the fireworks. 😂 I think a frontline SP is paramount. Cohen wants diversity. Jim asked whether I'd give up Wiggins+more for Gore/deGrom/Ryan? Yes.

Lance Brozdowski

30,176 subscribers

48,547 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

Comedy Sport #Cubs

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

“Do you know why Dr. Phil, a TV personality is getting involved in all this,” CNN Jim Acosta asked #Illinois AG about Dr. Phil showing up on ICE raids w/ the Border Czar. AG said “I think it’s done for the show…and score political points with those who want to divide.” #Breaking

“Do you know why Dr. Phil, a TV personality is getting involved in all this,” CNN Jim Acosta asked #Illinois AG about Dr. Phil showing up on ICE raids w/ the Border Czar. AG said “I think it’s done for the show…and score political points with those who want to divide.” #Breaking

Rebecca Aguilar (on Blue Sky & LinkedIn)

375,977 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Here's an example of the cheap grace that Trent Horn talked about in his exchange with Ryan in the video below. Ryan excludes even repentance from any part of the equation as to whether somebody is saved. He's very keen on asking this person on whether or not he thinks repentance means "ask for forgiveness," to which he seems to think that the mere act of speaking somehow becomes a work. But more importantly, there's no distinction between what happens interiorly and the words I give it exteriorly. Either repentance is part of the equation or not, regardless of whether it's verbally stated. So in this situation, Ryan is essentially saying that because someone believes, they could go on sinning, and in fact commit grave sins, like murdering people, and without repentance, simply because of their belief, they are still saved. That's "cheap grace"

Here's an example of the cheap grace that Trent Horn talked about in his exchange with Ryan in the video below. Ryan excludes even repentance from any part of the equation as to whether somebody is saved. He's very keen on asking this person on whether or not he thinks repentance means "ask for forgiveness," to which he seems to think that the mere act of speaking somehow becomes a work. But more importantly, there's no distinction between what happens interiorly and the words I give it exteriorly. Either repentance is part of the equation or not, regardless of whether it's verbally stated. So in this situation, Ryan is essentially saying that because someone believes, they could go on sinning, and in fact commit grave sins, like murdering people, and without repentance, simply because of their belief, they are still saved. That's "cheap grace"

meta thomist 🇻🇦

13,807 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Clueless Policing Minister Sarah Jones completely falls apart under Nick Ferrari’s questioning 🤦‍♂️ In a painful LBC interview, Sarah Jones was asked a straightforward question about the Hampshire officers who handcuffed dying 18-year-old Henry Nowak as he bled out from multiple stab wounds, after wrongly treating the stabbed student as the aggressor. Nick Ferrari: “It’s reported the officers involved won’t be referred for misconduct. Why is that?” Jones immediately stammers and hides behind the IOPC investigation. Ferrari presses: “As of now they haven’t been referred for misconduct? Are they still serving on frontline duties?” Again, nothing. Just more IOPC deflection. Ferrari: “Why can’t you tell me whether they’re still on the frontline? Don’t the people of Southampton have a right to know?” Jones keeps parroting the same line about the IOPC “looking at footage, talking to officers, talking to the family…” Ferrari, clearly fed up: “Minister, I asked whether they’re still serving frontline duties. Do you know whether they are or not?” Jones starts the IOPC script again. Ferrari cuts her off: “But do you know whether they’re still on the frontline, Minister?!” Flustered and stuttering, she mumbles something about speaking to the chief constable. Ferrari: “Have you asked the chief constable? It’s causing concern. You don’t know, do you?” Then comes the most ridiculous line of all: Jones admits she does know the answer… but she won’t tell the public because “an investigation is ongoing.” What the actual f*ck? This has nothing to do with prejudicing an investigation. It’s a basic yes or no: Are these officers still out on the streets policing the public right now? The people of Hampshire and Southampton deserve to know. This is what we get from this government, a Policing Minister who either doesn’t know what’s happening in her own brief or is too scared to say it. Pathetic.

Clueless Policing Minister Sarah Jones completely falls apart under Nick Ferrari’s questioning 🤦‍♂️ In a painful LBC interview, Sarah Jones was asked a straightforward question about the Hampshire officers who handcuffed dying 18-year-old Henry Nowak as he bled out from multiple stab wounds, after wrongly treating the stabbed student as the aggressor. Nick Ferrari: “It’s reported the officers involved won’t be referred for misconduct. Why is that?” Jones immediately stammers and hides behind the IOPC investigation. Ferrari presses: “As of now they haven’t been referred for misconduct? Are they still serving on frontline duties?” Again, nothing. Just more IOPC deflection. Ferrari: “Why can’t you tell me whether they’re still on the frontline? Don’t the people of Southampton have a right to know?” Jones keeps parroting the same line about the IOPC “looking at footage, talking to officers, talking to the family…” Ferrari, clearly fed up: “Minister, I asked whether they’re still serving frontline duties. Do you know whether they are or not?” Jones starts the IOPC script again. Ferrari cuts her off: “But do you know whether they’re still on the frontline, Minister?!” Flustered and stuttering, she mumbles something about speaking to the chief constable. Ferrari: “Have you asked the chief constable? It’s causing concern. You don’t know, do you?” Then comes the most ridiculous line of all: Jones admits she does know the answer… but she won’t tell the public because “an investigation is ongoing.” What the actual f*ck? This has nothing to do with prejudicing an investigation. It’s a basic yes or no: Are these officers still out on the streets policing the public right now? The people of Hampshire and Southampton deserve to know. This is what we get from this government, a Policing Minister who either doesn’t know what’s happening in her own brief or is too scared to say it. Pathetic.

J Stewart

345,764 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Kate Harrison "And I think that the message that we got from the prime minister yesterday looks a little bit strange compared to the situation we have now." "I think the rupture that he's talking about looks more like a ripple." "I think that he is right now, talking about new world orders, trying to carve out a new international way of doing things as opposed to doing the job that he was elected to do, which is to get back to the negotiating table and get an agreement with our largest trading partner." "So how did the remarks on Monday tee us up to get back to the table for a discussion on trade when everything was revolved around that ostensible threat to Greenland, which now looks a lot different today than it did when Mark Carney spoke?" Then after sitting through a Cochrane lecture "It was a well crafted speech delivered to an audience that was primed for that message and I give him credit for that." "But there is a difference between speechifying and actually doing things." Kate Harrison

Kate Harrison "And I think that the message that we got from the prime minister yesterday looks a little bit strange compared to the situation we have now." "I think the rupture that he's talking about looks more like a ripple." "I think that he is right now, talking about new world orders, trying to carve out a new international way of doing things as opposed to doing the job that he was elected to do, which is to get back to the negotiating table and get an agreement with our largest trading partner." "So how did the remarks on Monday tee us up to get back to the table for a discussion on trade when everything was revolved around that ostensible threat to Greenland, which now looks a lot different today than it did when Mark Carney spoke?" Then after sitting through a Cochrane lecture "It was a well crafted speech delivered to an audience that was primed for that message and I give him credit for that." "But there is a difference between speechifying and actually doing things." Kate Harrison

cbcwatcher

109,372 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

American taxpayers can’t even fathom how much money is being stolen from them nationwide “In the state of Washington, there are 539 more Somali daycare centers. Each receiving somewhere between $1.5 million to $4 million dollars taxpayer money every year.” “I just want you all to think about that for a second because like when we think about government spending, we're like $1.4 million, $1.5 million, $4 million. That's not that much money. First of all, yes it is, especially since we're talking about state taxpayer funds. But I want you to think about that number for a second. 539. And let's say all of them got the minimal funding. If they each only got the absolute minimal funding, that's $755 million. What's more likely is it's over a billion. That is $1,000,000,000 of your taxpayer money going to people who aren't actually running a daycare or as they were in Minnesota, ‘a Learing center’.“ “So either you care about fraud, waste and abuse, or you don't. That'll be determined whether or not you want to speak up about this. But if you're not going to speak up about this very obvious fraud — could you do me a favor and just shut the f*ck up about everything else”

American taxpayers can’t even fathom how much money is being stolen from them nationwide “In the state of Washington, there are 539 more Somali daycare centers. Each receiving somewhere between $1.5 million to $4 million dollars taxpayer money every year.” “I just want you all to think about that for a second because like when we think about government spending, we're like $1.4 million, $1.5 million, $4 million. That's not that much money. First of all, yes it is, especially since we're talking about state taxpayer funds. But I want you to think about that number for a second. 539. And let's say all of them got the minimal funding. If they each only got the absolute minimal funding, that's $755 million. What's more likely is it's over a billion. That is $1,000,000,000 of your taxpayer money going to people who aren't actually running a daycare or as they were in Minnesota, ‘a Learing center’.“ “So either you care about fraud, waste and abuse, or you don't. That'll be determined whether or not you want to speak up about this. But if you're not going to speak up about this very obvious fraud — could you do me a favor and just shut the f*ck up about everything else”

Wall Street Apes

141,549 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Ryan Cohen: “Why Does Everyone Want GameStop to Fail?” $GME CEO Ryan Cohen: “The media is an example. Why is it that you've got a ($EBAY) management team with no skin in the game, they're not builders, they haven't built anything themselves before, they've basically just been employees at major companies, they’ve been overpaid, I don't think they've ever broken out a sweat in their entire lives, why does everyone want them to succeed? But when you have someone that, and by the way, I'm putting $500M of my own money into this transaction, I haven't pulled a penny out of GameStop, and it seems like everyone in the media basically wants us to fail, and wants them to succeed. And you've got a board that's making hundreds of thousands of dollars a year. They don't buy stock with their own money. They end up showing up to a handful of board meetings, and they're making a fortune. You've got a management team that is grossly overpaid, taking zero risk. There's nothing more American than basically risking your own capital. So why does everyone want us to fail? david friedberg: “I do think that the media, in order to give you credibility, they're gonna have to acknowledge that all of their takes on GameStop just being a meme stock were wrong, and that there is actually a business here, and that there is value being created here, and that they missed that, and they got the story completely wrong.” -------------------------------------- Thanks to our partners! Most advertisers have never heard of the platform with an $11B annual run rate in ad spend. AppLovin Ads — 1B+ daily active users, full-screen video ads watched for a median of 35 seconds, and businesses are profitably spending hundreds of thousands of dollars a day on it. Advertiser access is in closed beta. The window is open at Nasdaq - Positioned at the nexus of technology and the capital markets, Nasdaq provides premier platforms and services for global capital markets and beyond with unmatched technology, insights and markets expertise.

Ryan Cohen: “Why Does Everyone Want GameStop to Fail?” $GME CEO Ryan Cohen: “The media is an example. Why is it that you've got a ($EBAY) management team with no skin in the game, they're not builders, they haven't built anything themselves before, they've basically just been employees at major companies, they’ve been overpaid, I don't think they've ever broken out a sweat in their entire lives, why does everyone want them to succeed? But when you have someone that, and by the way, I'm putting $500M of my own money into this transaction, I haven't pulled a penny out of GameStop, and it seems like everyone in the media basically wants us to fail, and wants them to succeed. And you've got a board that's making hundreds of thousands of dollars a year. They don't buy stock with their own money. They end up showing up to a handful of board meetings, and they're making a fortune. You've got a management team that is grossly overpaid, taking zero risk. There's nothing more American than basically risking your own capital. So why does everyone want us to fail? david friedberg: “I do think that the media, in order to give you credibility, they're gonna have to acknowledge that all of their takes on GameStop just being a meme stock were wrong, and that there is actually a business here, and that there is value being created here, and that they missed that, and they got the story completely wrong.” -------------------------------------- Thanks to our partners! Most advertisers have never heard of the platform with an $11B annual run rate in ad spend. AppLovin Ads — 1B+ daily active users, full-screen video ads watched for a median of 35 seconds, and businesses are profitably spending hundreds of thousands of dollars a day on it. Advertiser access is in closed beta. The window is open at Nasdaq - Positioned at the nexus of technology and the capital markets, Nasdaq provides premier platforms and services for global capital markets and beyond with unmatched technology, insights and markets expertise.

The All-In Podcast

169,622 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Cavan Sullivan is remaining with the Union squad for the first two matches of the best-of-three series against Chicago, instead of joining the U-17 U.S. World Cup camp. Here’s Carnell speaking about the decision — a collaborative one made between the Union, U.S. Soccer, and Cavan: "I think Cavan knew that we’re a little bit thin right now. He came up to us, and it was a good group discussion with Ernst, myself, and Cavan. He threw the idea in there, knowing that Rafa was out for a certain time and knowing that we’re a pretty thin group right now. And yeah, we decided, with good cooperation with U.S. Soccer, that he would stay for these two games. Credit to him. He wants to be around the group. He wants to give something. And even although his minutes were limited—or have been limited—I think he’s contributed in big ways, even with limited minutes. So it’s a continuation of his development, his pathway. But there’s no guarantee that he’s automatically going to start the next game now, right? That’s not the role that he’s found himself in, and he’s still building up towards something. But he did have a very good 35 minutes last week." #doop #usymnt #cf97 📹: Philadelphia Union

Cavan Sullivan is remaining with the Union squad for the first two matches of the best-of-three series against Chicago, instead of joining the U-17 U.S. World Cup camp. Here’s Carnell speaking about the decision — a collaborative one made between the Union, U.S. Soccer, and Cavan: "I think Cavan knew that we’re a little bit thin right now. He came up to us, and it was a good group discussion with Ernst, myself, and Cavan. He threw the idea in there, knowing that Rafa was out for a certain time and knowing that we’re a pretty thin group right now. And yeah, we decided, with good cooperation with U.S. Soccer, that he would stay for these two games. Credit to him. He wants to be around the group. He wants to give something. And even although his minutes were limited—or have been limited—I think he’s contributed in big ways, even with limited minutes. So it’s a continuation of his development, his pathway. But there’s no guarantee that he’s automatically going to start the next game now, right? That’s not the role that he’s found himself in, and he’s still building up towards something. But he did have a very good 35 minutes last week." #doop #usymnt #cf97 📹: Philadelphia Union

José Roberto Nuñez

20,479 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

CNBC's Squawk Box discussed Elon Musk's Tesla compensation package when it was first announced in January 2018: Ray Dalio: "I think it's fabulous. The man is Tesla. I mean, it's his dream. He built the dream... The question is, what are his incentives? ...I think it ties them together." Andrew Ross Sorkin: "This is the ultimate skin in the game... I would argue it's about as shareholder-friendly as you'd get." Jim Cramer: "I didn't like it. I loved it. Because you know what? I would double what he gets if he makes that much money for people. And I wish that everyone would take that. I know there was a discussion. I thought that was a great piece. Holy cow. Because what it really did present you was here's a man of conviction." Andrew Ross Sorkin: "I asked him what do you need this money for? Because he always says he's not incentivized by money. And his answer was, he said, 'Look, I want to help humanity pursue this multi-planetary system. Meaning he wants us all to live on Mars. And he said that requires a certain amount of capital. And for his sake, if it works, it may go towards that, which may go towards all of us." Elon Musk

CNBC's Squawk Box discussed Elon Musk's Tesla compensation package when it was first announced in January 2018: Ray Dalio: "I think it's fabulous. The man is Tesla. I mean, it's his dream. He built the dream... The question is, what are his incentives? ...I think it ties them together." Andrew Ross Sorkin: "This is the ultimate skin in the game... I would argue it's about as shareholder-friendly as you'd get." Jim Cramer: "I didn't like it. I loved it. Because you know what? I would double what he gets if he makes that much money for people. And I wish that everyone would take that. I know there was a discussion. I thought that was a great piece. Holy cow. Because what it really did present you was here's a man of conviction." Andrew Ross Sorkin: "I asked him what do you need this money for? Because he always says he's not incentivized by money. And his answer was, he said, 'Look, I want to help humanity pursue this multi-planetary system. Meaning he wants us all to live on Mars. And he said that requires a certain amount of capital. And for his sake, if it works, it may go towards that, which may go towards all of us." Elon Musk

KanekoaTheGreat

2,542,554 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Naga Munchetty, "The Urdu leaflet is an issue" "The leaflet features Keir Starmer, alongside the Indian PM Modi, and Deputy PM David Lammy along with Israeli PM Netanyahu" "Translation: Labour must be punished for Gaza. We have to defeat Reform to give Muslims a strong voice. Give your votes to the Greens" "Are those messages and is that leaflet appropriate?" Zack Polanski, "I'd say anything else is highly inappropriate" "We've had an ongoing genocide for the last couple of years" "We've got our own government not just complicit but actively enabling a genocide through the sharing or arms, intelligence" "And I think people in this country whether they're Muslim, or Jewish, as I am myself, or even people without faith, can recognise that human rights and international law are important" "We've got a Labour government where Keir Starmer who went out on national TV and said that Israel has the right to cut off water and electricity from the Palestinians" "He said that's not what he meant, but Emily Thornberry went out the same day and doubled down on it" "I think it's right that in a democracy we point out the record of this Labour government and we challenge them on it and say that's not rights and its time to end the genocide" Naga Munchetty, "This has been described as a sectarian approach to campaigning. You think that is appropriate" "I think it's totally appropriate" "People are allowed to communicate with different communities about those things communities care about" "But I also think there is an underlying racism of people saying if you're talking about Gaza you're just appealing to a Muslim community" "I'm one of just five Jewish people who have been in leadership positions in British politics" "I deeply care about Palestinians, in the same way I care about the Sudanese, Iranian, or anyone facing occupation, conflict, genocide" "I think it's important to be morally consistent on that" Charlie Stayt, "A lot of people think those leaflets are the nasty side of politics" Zack Polanski, "Genocide is quite nasty" "And I think speaking up for human rights and peace is the only appropriate position" "And it's quite wild that our British political system got to a place where the Green party is the only party doing that" "I think that's why we're winning elections, because people are saying if the party is offering to tackle the cost of living crisis and is showing moral consistency in international human rights law" "That's probably a party worth voting for"

Naga Munchetty, "The Urdu leaflet is an issue" "The leaflet features Keir Starmer, alongside the Indian PM Modi, and Deputy PM David Lammy along with Israeli PM Netanyahu" "Translation: Labour must be punished for Gaza. We have to defeat Reform to give Muslims a strong voice. Give your votes to the Greens" "Are those messages and is that leaflet appropriate?" Zack Polanski, "I'd say anything else is highly inappropriate" "We've had an ongoing genocide for the last couple of years" "We've got our own government not just complicit but actively enabling a genocide through the sharing or arms, intelligence" "And I think people in this country whether they're Muslim, or Jewish, as I am myself, or even people without faith, can recognise that human rights and international law are important" "We've got a Labour government where Keir Starmer who went out on national TV and said that Israel has the right to cut off water and electricity from the Palestinians" "He said that's not what he meant, but Emily Thornberry went out the same day and doubled down on it" "I think it's right that in a democracy we point out the record of this Labour government and we challenge them on it and say that's not rights and its time to end the genocide" Naga Munchetty, "This has been described as a sectarian approach to campaigning. You think that is appropriate" "I think it's totally appropriate" "People are allowed to communicate with different communities about those things communities care about" "But I also think there is an underlying racism of people saying if you're talking about Gaza you're just appealing to a Muslim community" "I'm one of just five Jewish people who have been in leadership positions in British politics" "I deeply care about Palestinians, in the same way I care about the Sudanese, Iranian, or anyone facing occupation, conflict, genocide" "I think it's important to be morally consistent on that" Charlie Stayt, "A lot of people think those leaflets are the nasty side of politics" Zack Polanski, "Genocide is quite nasty" "And I think speaking up for human rights and peace is the only appropriate position" "And it's quite wild that our British political system got to a place where the Green party is the only party doing that" "I think that's why we're winning elections, because people are saying if the party is offering to tackle the cost of living crisis and is showing moral consistency in international human rights law" "That's probably a party worth voting for"

Farrukh

398,285 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Jeffery Epstein vs Roaring Kitty! What would give Steven Cohen, Loop Capital, Highbridge Capital, or any of the other Dumb Stormtroopers the confidence to short GameStop way more than 100%? Epstein had the whole financial system from end-to-end compromised, from Obama and his Loop capital to Goldman Sach's Partner, Obama White House council, and FINRA Board of Governors Kathryn Ruemmler. Why does Ryan Cohen wear a bulletproof vest and what did he mean when he said "children must be protected at all costs?" How do you launder trillions of dollars around the world for the drug and human trafficking trade? and Why did Epstein make all his money as a tax consultant for primarily 2 clients, Les Wexner and Leon Black? You and me, mere peasants are held to different rules, for example only being able to write off $3500 of losses through failed investments, but what about the Harvard Endowment? Here is how illicit money moves around the world: Step 1) Donate money to Harvard and get a tax deduction Step 2) Harvard buys a stock and runs the price up one day. Step 3) The trafficker then shorts the top, and now has tax free money they can use. There are also just ways that Epstein's clients could all make tax-free money, and that is picking a public company to short in the ground, and coordinate to make it go bankrupt. This scheme became very obvious because it got so big and shameless as main stream media repeatedly kept jumping the shark. People noticed, and here we are today with Ryan Cohen as CEO and GameStop as the most healthy company in the stock market. You can see how scared the Dumb Stormtroopers are because they are threatening violence like Jim Cramer did recently on CNBC. Mainstream media lost much of its funding when USAID was cut, and they are being sued for lying. Democrat and deep state hitman like the Tren de Agua gang are being thrown in jail in El Salvador. The financial system is being updated with blockchain accountability. It looks like the plan is going according to plan!🚀

Jeffery Epstein vs Roaring Kitty! What would give Steven Cohen, Loop Capital, Highbridge Capital, or any of the other Dumb Stormtroopers the confidence to short GameStop way more than 100%? Epstein had the whole financial system from end-to-end compromised, from Obama and his Loop capital to Goldman Sach's Partner, Obama White House council, and FINRA Board of Governors Kathryn Ruemmler. Why does Ryan Cohen wear a bulletproof vest and what did he mean when he said "children must be protected at all costs?" How do you launder trillions of dollars around the world for the drug and human trafficking trade? and Why did Epstein make all his money as a tax consultant for primarily 2 clients, Les Wexner and Leon Black? You and me, mere peasants are held to different rules, for example only being able to write off $3500 of losses through failed investments, but what about the Harvard Endowment? Here is how illicit money moves around the world: Step 1) Donate money to Harvard and get a tax deduction Step 2) Harvard buys a stock and runs the price up one day. Step 3) The trafficker then shorts the top, and now has tax free money they can use. There are also just ways that Epstein's clients could all make tax-free money, and that is picking a public company to short in the ground, and coordinate to make it go bankrupt. This scheme became very obvious because it got so big and shameless as main stream media repeatedly kept jumping the shark. People noticed, and here we are today with Ryan Cohen as CEO and GameStop as the most healthy company in the stock market. You can see how scared the Dumb Stormtroopers are because they are threatening violence like Jim Cramer did recently on CNBC. Mainstream media lost much of its funding when USAID was cut, and they are being sued for lying. Democrat and deep state hitman like the Tren de Agua gang are being thrown in jail in El Salvador. The financial system is being updated with blockchain accountability. It looks like the plan is going according to plan!🚀

Michael A.M.E.

167,567 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

President Obama explains how he solves problems he's not an expert on: When asked by Destin Sandlin (creator of Smarter Every Day) how he gets up to speed on unfamiliar topics, Obama reveals an approach rooted in the scientific method. "Over the years you accumulate knowledge and you test hypothesis and propositions. So how I think about it today is different than the first day I walked into the oval office." He explains that after years in office, he built a baseline of knowledge that changed how he consumed information. Instead of going deep into every briefing book, he began scanning for what was different, looking for anomalies against patterns he'd already seen. "I've learned to be pretty good at listening carefully to people who know a lot more than I do about a topic and making sure that any dissenting voices are in the room at the same time." Obama describes a deliberate structure: After an initial presentation, he makes sure to hear from everyone present. He asks whether anyone disagrees with the baseline facts. He asks whether there's any evidence that contradicts what was just said. If there is, he wants that argument made directly in front of him. "What I'm pretty good at is then asking questions, poking, prodding, testing propositions and seeing if they hold up." He draws a direct parallel between this approach and the scientific method. Accumulate knowledge, challenge assumptions, pressure-test conclusions. A powerful reminder that the best decision-makers aren't the ones with all the answers. They're the ones who know which questions to ask and who to listen to.

President Obama explains how he solves problems he's not an expert on: When asked by Destin Sandlin (creator of Smarter Every Day) how he gets up to speed on unfamiliar topics, Obama reveals an approach rooted in the scientific method. "Over the years you accumulate knowledge and you test hypothesis and propositions. So how I think about it today is different than the first day I walked into the oval office." He explains that after years in office, he built a baseline of knowledge that changed how he consumed information. Instead of going deep into every briefing book, he began scanning for what was different, looking for anomalies against patterns he'd already seen. "I've learned to be pretty good at listening carefully to people who know a lot more than I do about a topic and making sure that any dissenting voices are in the room at the same time." Obama describes a deliberate structure: After an initial presentation, he makes sure to hear from everyone present. He asks whether anyone disagrees with the baseline facts. He asks whether there's any evidence that contradicts what was just said. If there is, he wants that argument made directly in front of him. "What I'm pretty good at is then asking questions, poking, prodding, testing propositions and seeing if they hold up." He draws a direct parallel between this approach and the scientific method. Accumulate knowledge, challenge assumptions, pressure-test conclusions. A powerful reminder that the best decision-makers aren't the ones with all the answers. They're the ones who know which questions to ask and who to listen to.

Emmett Voss

498,851 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

"You know, I don't, I have not changed. I really make the movies for myself. I really, really do." Q: "For no one else, or just sort of like what you ultimately want to see in them?" "Yeah, I think so." Q: "As a fan yourself, too? "What I want to see, yeah, like as a, like, you only have the benchmark of yourself. Like, if you ever try and make a movie for someone other than yourself... I feel like you're going to blow it. "Because you can't, you don't know how anyone else is going to feel. So like, you know, you go, 'okay, do I find that emotionally real? Do I find that interesting? Is that the Krypton I want to go to? Is that the Superman I want to see fight?' "You know, those are the questions you ask yourself constantly. And I think once you, if you're constantly answering yes to that, then you'll end up the more, the film will end up being more interesting to you. "And ultimately, the film being interesting to you allows you to make the movie better because you're interested. "If you make it for someone else over a two-year period, you're just going to not give a sh*t at some point because you're just like, 'I don't care. This is not my movie. I don't care about this movie because I made it for someone else.'" Q: "I imagine that's a very hard thing to do in Hollywood, though, is to keep your vision clear with so much collaboration, with so much going on, with so many other people in the mix." "It really depends on the project. For instance, it was hard on Guardians, you know, where I feel like what ended up happening on that movie was people, we did end up, they did end up asking me like, 'this is for kids, right?' "And I got to honestly say that I knew it was for kids, but I didn't want to make it for kids. You know what I mean? And I think that's what happened to that movie. It did get like second guessed at the end and turned more into a movie for kids. "My point of view is I can think like a child if I want. I have that enthusiasm for movies and what I think is cool. You, the collective you, don't need to try and second guess me and go, 'this is what we think a kid would like.' "And then it's like, 'oh, a song' or whatever. Then you're just like, 'okay, whatever.'"

"You know, I don't, I have not changed. I really make the movies for myself. I really, really do." Q: "For no one else, or just sort of like what you ultimately want to see in them?" "Yeah, I think so." Q: "As a fan yourself, too? "What I want to see, yeah, like as a, like, you only have the benchmark of yourself. Like, if you ever try and make a movie for someone other than yourself... I feel like you're going to blow it. "Because you can't, you don't know how anyone else is going to feel. So like, you know, you go, 'okay, do I find that emotionally real? Do I find that interesting? Is that the Krypton I want to go to? Is that the Superman I want to see fight?' "You know, those are the questions you ask yourself constantly. And I think once you, if you're constantly answering yes to that, then you'll end up the more, the film will end up being more interesting to you. "And ultimately, the film being interesting to you allows you to make the movie better because you're interested. "If you make it for someone else over a two-year period, you're just going to not give a sh*t at some point because you're just like, 'I don't care. This is not my movie. I don't care about this movie because I made it for someone else.'" Q: "I imagine that's a very hard thing to do in Hollywood, though, is to keep your vision clear with so much collaboration, with so much going on, with so many other people in the mix." "It really depends on the project. For instance, it was hard on Guardians, you know, where I feel like what ended up happening on that movie was people, we did end up, they did end up asking me like, 'this is for kids, right?' "And I got to honestly say that I knew it was for kids, but I didn't want to make it for kids. You know what I mean? And I think that's what happened to that movie. It did get like second guessed at the end and turned more into a movie for kids. "My point of view is I can think like a child if I want. I have that enthusiasm for movies and what I think is cool. You, the collective you, don't need to try and second guess me and go, 'this is what we think a kid would like.' "And then it's like, 'oh, a song' or whatever. Then you're just like, 'okay, whatever.'"

Zack Snyder Film

334,960 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Before the G7 working sessions officially began in Alberta, President Trump and Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney stepped in front of reporters. It was supposed to be a brief press stop. Instead, it turned into a revealing exchange that touched on everything from trade and war to the global balance of power—and it didn’t take long for Trump to take control of the spotlight. First up, the Canadian trade deal. Asked about the ongoing trade negotiations with Canada, Trump pointed to a basic difference in strategy between himself and Carney. The issue wasn’t hostility, he explained, but philosophy. “It’s not so much holding up. I think we have different concepts,” Trump said. “I have a tariff concept, Mark has different concept, which is something that some people like.” He made it clear he prefers the direct approach. “I’ve always been a tariff person. It’s simple, it’s easy, it’s precise and it just goes very quickly.” Carney, he noted, favors a more intricate model—“also very good,” Trump added—but the goal is to examine both frameworks and find a compromise. “We’re going to look at both and we’re going to come out with something hopefully.” When a reporter asked whether a deal could be finalized in a matter of days or weeks, Trump offered a measured yes. “It’s achievable but both parties have to agree.”

Before the G7 working sessions officially began in Alberta, President Trump and Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney stepped in front of reporters. It was supposed to be a brief press stop. Instead, it turned into a revealing exchange that touched on everything from trade and war to the global balance of power—and it didn’t take long for Trump to take control of the spotlight. First up, the Canadian trade deal. Asked about the ongoing trade negotiations with Canada, Trump pointed to a basic difference in strategy between himself and Carney. The issue wasn’t hostility, he explained, but philosophy. “It’s not so much holding up. I think we have different concepts,” Trump said. “I have a tariff concept, Mark has different concept, which is something that some people like.” He made it clear he prefers the direct approach. “I’ve always been a tariff person. It’s simple, it’s easy, it’s precise and it just goes very quickly.” Carney, he noted, favors a more intricate model—“also very good,” Trump added—but the goal is to examine both frameworks and find a compromise. “We’re going to look at both and we’re going to come out with something hopefully.” When a reporter asked whether a deal could be finalized in a matter of days or weeks, Trump offered a measured yes. “It’s achievable but both parties have to agree.”

Vigilant Fox 🦊

540,554 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🐰: If I were compared to a book, I think I’d be one that you could open and read many pages from. I already know myself. There are days when I want to look cute, there are days when I wanna look cool. It depends on the day and my mood. So I just want everyone who gets to know Namping to slowly learn more about me. Namping has many aspects to show you guys 🐰: I’m comfortable enough with you guys to be myself. And please, you don’t have to worry that I can’t be myself. In the end, that’s a philosophical question, isn’t it? What is the real “self”?, well, who knows? hahaha, so yeah it really depends on how I feel that day 🐰: I also hope that you can love me every day, no matter what my mood is that day, no matter which side of me you see. (*as he mentioned above, what he really meant was he hoped that we love him no matter what he wears, what kind of look he has, whether it’s cute or handsome) 🐰: I’m really grateful for having you guys supporting me for who I am. And about “being myself”, Namping just wanna say please don’t worry, I’ve always been myself 100% 🐰: Having met people who love me, staying with mami Chamook and P’Keng has helped me grow up and understand myself more. I can be myself and I’m really happy 🐰: I’m someone who loves myself a lot. If I was forced to do something in which I can’t be myself and have to fake things, then I would not do it. I would never. Everything you’ve seen is Namping 100%, right? 🐰: If everyone opens their heart and truly wants to know Namping, I think u will understand #nampingster

🐰: If I were compared to a book, I think I’d be one that you could open and read many pages from. I already know myself. There are days when I want to look cute, there are days when I wanna look cool. It depends on the day and my mood. So I just want everyone who gets to know Namping to slowly learn more about me. Namping has many aspects to show you guys 🐰: I’m comfortable enough with you guys to be myself. And please, you don’t have to worry that I can’t be myself. In the end, that’s a philosophical question, isn’t it? What is the real “self”?, well, who knows? hahaha, so yeah it really depends on how I feel that day 🐰: I also hope that you can love me every day, no matter what my mood is that day, no matter which side of me you see. (*as he mentioned above, what he really meant was he hoped that we love him no matter what he wears, what kind of look he has, whether it’s cute or handsome) 🐰: I’m really grateful for having you guys supporting me for who I am. And about “being myself”, Namping just wanna say please don’t worry, I’ve always been myself 100% 🐰: Having met people who love me, staying with mami Chamook and P’Keng has helped me grow up and understand myself more. I can be myself and I’m really happy 🐰: I’m someone who loves myself a lot. If I was forced to do something in which I can’t be myself and have to fake things, then I would not do it. I would never. Everything you’ve seen is Namping 100%, right? 🐰: If everyone opens their heart and truly wants to know Namping, I think u will understand #nampingster

ella⁷ ( •̯́ ₃ •̯̀) knp forever🐰🎀

34,144 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Carlos today in El Larguero was asked once again about the new regulation and he made it clear if he didn’t like them he will speak out, he also laugh about people misinterpreting what he said and set the record straight 👌🏻✨ 🎙️:“There has been a lot of critics about this regulations..” Carlos: “I think everyone is trying to see what will happen with these new regs, I think they might even be changes of regs during the year according to what we see during the first races” “If everything is a mess, if there are no overtakes because the overtake is not strong enough, if we have to lift a lot on the straights, if there is no show, i’m sure changes will be made” “if those first five races don’t go according to plan, it can be changed and that’s what i ask, for the regs to be changed in case they don’t work” 🎙️: i think you are between the least outspoken drivers.. i’ve read..” Carlos: *laughing* I think the other day my words and my statements maybe were misinterpreted, they thought i wasn’t against, what i am is not against or in favor until we see a race” “without seeing a race is difficult to be against or in favor, i mean i can tell wether i like to drive this car or not, and i can tell you that i don’t” “at the moment i like last year car better and i hope i make myself clear, i’m not here to soften anything, the cars were better last year? yes. were they faster? yes. was there more grip and aerodynamic load? yes. it was more fun? also yes.” “what happens is that i’m someone who rather wait to the first races.. give time to these engines and cars because only last week in Bahrain Leclerc was only 1 or 2s away from last year’s pole..” “cars will evolve a lot, what i said and what i stand for is (and this is at a personal level) if we need to criticize our sport and we have to change things i rather go to the chief and tell him ‘hey this is not working’ before coming to press and say ‘this is bulls..this is a mess’ because otherwise a negative cycle of news begins and i don’t like that” “because who knows maybe is not such a disaster, without knowing how the first race will go”

Carlos today in El Larguero was asked once again about the new regulation and he made it clear if he didn’t like them he will speak out, he also laugh about people misinterpreting what he said and set the record straight 👌🏻✨ 🎙️:“There has been a lot of critics about this regulations..” Carlos: “I think everyone is trying to see what will happen with these new regs, I think they might even be changes of regs during the year according to what we see during the first races” “If everything is a mess, if there are no overtakes because the overtake is not strong enough, if we have to lift a lot on the straights, if there is no show, i’m sure changes will be made” “if those first five races don’t go according to plan, it can be changed and that’s what i ask, for the regs to be changed in case they don’t work” 🎙️: i think you are between the least outspoken drivers.. i’ve read..” Carlos: laughing I think the other day my words and my statements maybe were misinterpreted, they thought i wasn’t against, what i am is not against or in favor until we see a race” “without seeing a race is difficult to be against or in favor, i mean i can tell wether i like to drive this car or not, and i can tell you that i don’t” “at the moment i like last year car better and i hope i make myself clear, i’m not here to soften anything, the cars were better last year? yes. were they faster? yes. was there more grip and aerodynamic load? yes. it was more fun? also yes.” “what happens is that i’m someone who rather wait to the first races.. give time to these engines and cars because only last week in Bahrain Leclerc was only 1 or 2s away from last year’s pole..” “cars will evolve a lot, what i said and what i stand for is (and this is at a personal level) if we need to criticize our sport and we have to change things i rather go to the chief and tell him ‘hey this is not working’ before coming to press and say ‘this is bulls..this is a mess’ because otherwise a negative cycle of news begins and i don’t like that” “because who knows maybe is not such a disaster, without knowing how the first race will go”

ari 🦄✨

15,235 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Michael Jackson, age 21, reflects on fame and family: In a 1979 interview, a young Michael Jackson was asked about his upbringing and the pressures of stardom. On his family's financial situation growing up, Michael pushes back gently on the premise: "We weren't wealthy, but we weren't poor. My father always prepared for the family and as well as my mother. Always wonderful." He credits his parents for laying the foundation: " They make sure we got the right things for ourselves. Strong parents are, I think, are very important, especially in our situation." But the conversation takes a revealing turn when the interviewer asks about discipline in the household. Michael's answer is disarmingly candid: "If she hit me, I would hit her back. Which was terrible. And they would… I would run around the house and hide and all that stuff. But I would really get it more than anybody." When asked directly whether his father was too strict, Michael's answer arrives in stages. First a reflexive "Yes," then a quick retreat ("No. He's going to kill me."), before finally settling back into honesty: "I'm glad he said it now. I'll say it. Yes." It's a small moment, but it captures something bigger: the tension between a grown performer and a son still wary of his father's reaction. Then the interviewer shifts to the other side of his life. The crowds, the screaming, the fame. Michael's answer reveals the psychological split that would define him: "I'm two different people on and off stage, but I formed a personality that's me and I can't get away from that." And finally, the weight beneath the spectacle: "It's hard to deal with. It really is. It's a hard situation and it's something I have to put up with."

Michael Jackson, age 21, reflects on fame and family: In a 1979 interview, a young Michael Jackson was asked about his upbringing and the pressures of stardom. On his family's financial situation growing up, Michael pushes back gently on the premise: "We weren't wealthy, but we weren't poor. My father always prepared for the family and as well as my mother. Always wonderful." He credits his parents for laying the foundation: " They make sure we got the right things for ourselves. Strong parents are, I think, are very important, especially in our situation." But the conversation takes a revealing turn when the interviewer asks about discipline in the household. Michael's answer is disarmingly candid: "If she hit me, I would hit her back. Which was terrible. And they would… I would run around the house and hide and all that stuff. But I would really get it more than anybody." When asked directly whether his father was too strict, Michael's answer arrives in stages. First a reflexive "Yes," then a quick retreat ("No. He's going to kill me."), before finally settling back into honesty: "I'm glad he said it now. I'll say it. Yes." It's a small moment, but it captures something bigger: the tension between a grown performer and a son still wary of his father's reaction. Then the interviewer shifts to the other side of his life. The crowds, the screaming, the fame. Michael's answer reveals the psychological split that would define him: "I'm two different people on and off stage, but I formed a personality that's me and I can't get away from that." And finally, the weight beneath the spectacle: "It's hard to deal with. It really is. It's a hard situation and it's something I have to put up with."

Emmett Voss

62,873 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

"I think you'll see maybe this week, a bunch of us in Congress doing a press conference on a bipartisan basis to try to talk about more disclosure, more information, to take the president's words, and say, okay now, let's take that into action, let's get some of these documents out of the Pentagon, out of the Defense Department, let's get some of these documents out and let's get them released to the American people" "They've kept it from us, and when we asked questions, they tried to stop us, when we've tried to put language into bills about disclosure, there are people from government coming down to talk to the HIPSC committee and go down to the Armed Services and tried to stop that stuff" Rep. Moskowitz, Oversight Committee, interview excerpts, Brian Tyler Cohen. Source : Quotes: "I do believe that the american governement is lying to the american people about these UAPs" "I think AARO, which was set up, has information that they are not sharing with the american people" "I do think the president could declassify a lot of documents" "There is plenty of video evidence, there is plenty of documentary evidence, the real question is, are they ours, are they adversaries, are they private companies, is it technology that was found here and that was reverse engineered..." "They have witnessed this stuff first hand... These are decorated military people with stellar records" "There is evidence that the Russian, the Chinese and the Americans all have crash retrieval programs" "The way it's paid for... they are overcharging for certain programs and misappropriating those funds" #ufotwitter

"I think you'll see maybe this week, a bunch of us in Congress doing a press conference on a bipartisan basis to try to talk about more disclosure, more information, to take the president's words, and say, okay now, let's take that into action, let's get some of these documents out of the Pentagon, out of the Defense Department, let's get some of these documents out and let's get them released to the American people" "They've kept it from us, and when we asked questions, they tried to stop us, when we've tried to put language into bills about disclosure, there are people from government coming down to talk to the HIPSC committee and go down to the Armed Services and tried to stop that stuff" Rep. Moskowitz, Oversight Committee, interview excerpts, Brian Tyler Cohen. Source : Quotes: "I do believe that the american governement is lying to the american people about these UAPs" "I think AARO, which was set up, has information that they are not sharing with the american people" "I do think the president could declassify a lot of documents" "There is plenty of video evidence, there is plenty of documentary evidence, the real question is, are they ours, are they adversaries, are they private companies, is it technology that was found here and that was reverse engineered..." "They have witnessed this stuff first hand... These are decorated military people with stellar records" "There is evidence that the Russian, the Chinese and the Americans all have crash retrieval programs" "The way it's paid for... they are overcharging for certain programs and misappropriating those funds" #ufotwitter

Baptiste Friscourt

73,638 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

⛔️👽 Access Denied? Were Clinton and Obama Trying to Tell Us? 👽⛔️ Obama 2026: "There's no underground facility [at Area 51], UNLESS...they hid it from the President." Clinton 1995: "If the U.S. Air Force did recover alien bodies, they didn't tell me about it, either, and I wanna know." (Clinton's comments came during a November 30th, 1995 visit he and First Lady, Hillary Clinton, made to Belfast to speak about Northern Ireland violence, the peace process, and how it was affecting Irish children. Local students were asked to share their hopes for a peaceful Northern Ireland in letters to President Clinton. President Clinton: "Eleven-year-old Keith from Carrickfergus wrote: 'Please tell everyone in America that we're not always fighting here, and that it's only a small number of people who make the trouble.' Like many of the children, Keith did not identify himself as Protestant or Catholic, and did not distinguish between the sources of the violence. "So many children told me of loved ones they have lost, of lives disrupted and opportunities forsaken and families forced to move. Yet, they showed remarkable courage and strength and a commitment to overcome the past. As 14-year-old Sharon of County Armagh wrote: 'Both sides have been hurt. Both sides must forgive.' "To all of you who asked me to do what I could to help peace take root, I pledge you America's support. We will stand with you as you take risks for peace (applause)." (And right after that, towards the very end of his prepared/scripted comments about violence and peace, there was this... ⬇️ ) Clinton: "And to all of you who have not lost your sense of humor, I say thank you. I got a letter from 13-year-old Ryan from Belfast. Now, Ryan, if you're out in the crowd tonight, here's the answer to your question: No. As far as I know, an alien spacecraft did not crash in Roswell, New Mexico in 1947 (laughter and applause). And, Ryan, if the United States Air Force did recover alien bodies, they didn't tell me about it, either, and I wanna know (laughs and more applause)." (For comments about the peace process, the Roswell letter seemed out of place. We all know the Clintons had a serious interest in UFOs, and once elected, President Clinton asked his attorney general, Webster Hubbell, to find out all he could about two things: JFK and UFOs. So I think it's a safe assumption that Clinton chose that letter from Ryan about Roswell on purpose, and was telling us that he had not been read into any alleged programs about Roswell, crash retrievals, or alien bodies. As I shared in my Obama post yesterday (and seen below), we've been told that most U.S. Presidents and members of Congress are NOT read into the alleged crash retrieval program (and similar UFO programs) because they're considered temporary employees and cannot be trusted with such secrets. Allegedly.) Full exchange between Cohen and Obama... Brian Tyler Cohen: "Are Aliens real?" Obama: "They're real, but I haven't seen 'em, and they're not being kept in... What is it?" Cohen: "Area 51." Obama: "Area 51. There's no underground facility, UNLESS there's this enormous conspiracy, and they hid it from the President of the United States."

⛔️👽 Access Denied? Were Clinton and Obama Trying to Tell Us? 👽⛔️ Obama 2026: "There's no underground facility [at Area 51], UNLESS...they hid it from the President." Clinton 1995: "If the U.S. Air Force did recover alien bodies, they didn't tell me about it, either, and I wanna know." (Clinton's comments came during a November 30th, 1995 visit he and First Lady, Hillary Clinton, made to Belfast to speak about Northern Ireland violence, the peace process, and how it was affecting Irish children. Local students were asked to share their hopes for a peaceful Northern Ireland in letters to President Clinton. President Clinton: "Eleven-year-old Keith from Carrickfergus wrote: 'Please tell everyone in America that we're not always fighting here, and that it's only a small number of people who make the trouble.' Like many of the children, Keith did not identify himself as Protestant or Catholic, and did not distinguish between the sources of the violence. "So many children told me of loved ones they have lost, of lives disrupted and opportunities forsaken and families forced to move. Yet, they showed remarkable courage and strength and a commitment to overcome the past. As 14-year-old Sharon of County Armagh wrote: 'Both sides have been hurt. Both sides must forgive.' "To all of you who asked me to do what I could to help peace take root, I pledge you America's support. We will stand with you as you take risks for peace (applause)." (And right after that, towards the very end of his prepared/scripted comments about violence and peace, there was this... ⬇️ ) Clinton: "And to all of you who have not lost your sense of humor, I say thank you. I got a letter from 13-year-old Ryan from Belfast. Now, Ryan, if you're out in the crowd tonight, here's the answer to your question: No. As far as I know, an alien spacecraft did not crash in Roswell, New Mexico in 1947 (laughter and applause). And, Ryan, if the United States Air Force did recover alien bodies, they didn't tell me about it, either, and I wanna know (laughs and more applause)." (For comments about the peace process, the Roswell letter seemed out of place. We all know the Clintons had a serious interest in UFOs, and once elected, President Clinton asked his attorney general, Webster Hubbell, to find out all he could about two things: JFK and UFOs. So I think it's a safe assumption that Clinton chose that letter from Ryan about Roswell on purpose, and was telling us that he had not been read into any alleged programs about Roswell, crash retrievals, or alien bodies. As I shared in my Obama post yesterday (and seen below), we've been told that most U.S. Presidents and members of Congress are NOT read into the alleged crash retrieval program (and similar UFO programs) because they're considered temporary employees and cannot be trusted with such secrets. Allegedly.) Full exchange between Cohen and Obama... Brian Tyler Cohen: "Are Aliens real?" Obama: "They're real, but I haven't seen 'em, and they're not being kept in... What is it?" Cohen: "Area 51." Obama: "Area 51. There's no underground facility, UNLESS there's this enormous conspiracy, and they hid it from the President of the United States."

Joe Murgia

39,030 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

JIMMYSEA HOW ARE YOU #HowAreYouFeeling #jimmysea 🩵: But in the end, I want to thank him, really. 🧑🏻: It's like you're deep down with his feelings. Phi can tell you're connected with his feelings. 🩵: I mean I’m glad that it’s him. He’s a phi chai who’s always helping. I can’t even explain how much I want to thank him. I want to thank hia for making me grow up. Become more mature and i feel like I’m much braver now. And I dare to face things. Before, if you asked me, was I scared? Yes, I was scared. I was scared of him. Scared of Hia. But later on, if you ask, am I still scared? Yes, the same. But I try to talk because I want to understand his perspective too. Like, how it really is. Because in the end, I even talked to my dad about it. Sometimes when there’s a problem, I’m like, "Pa". My Pa looks at things just like Hia Jim. He looks at the intention. In the end, my Pa said, "he means well, he wants us to succeed, right? There’s no one in this world who would talk to us this directly." But some words don’t actually mean anything bad. But I’m sensitive.

JIMMYSEA HOW ARE YOU #HowAreYouFeeling #jimmysea 🩵: But in the end, I want to thank him, really. 🧑🏻: It's like you're deep down with his feelings. Phi can tell you're connected with his feelings. 🩵: I mean I’m glad that it’s him. He’s a phi chai who’s always helping. I can’t even explain how much I want to thank him. I want to thank hia for making me grow up. Become more mature and i feel like I’m much braver now. And I dare to face things. Before, if you asked me, was I scared? Yes, I was scared. I was scared of him. Scared of Hia. But later on, if you ask, am I still scared? Yes, the same. But I try to talk because I want to understand his perspective too. Like, how it really is. Because in the end, I even talked to my dad about it. Sometimes when there’s a problem, I’m like, "Pa". My Pa looks at things just like Hia Jim. He looks at the intention. In the end, my Pa said, "he means well, he wants us to succeed, right? There’s no one in this world who would talk to us this directly." But some words don’t actually mean anything bad. But I’m sensitive.

mini (pepper’s babytee)࣪ ִֶָ⋆.

22,690 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten