正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Hegseth: "We mean to increase acquisition risk in order to decrease operational risk. Let me say that again. We need to increase acquisition risk in order to decrease operational risk ... An 85% solution in the hands of our armed forces today is infinitely better than an unachievable 100%...

309,313 次观看 • 11 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

32 条评论

Rudy 的头像
Rudy11 个月前

"we're going to funnel $$$$$ to our friends for shit that might not even work"

ProfessingProfessor 🇺🇸🇮🇱🇺🇦 的头像
ProfessingProfessor 🇺🇸🇮🇱🇺🇦11 个月前

What Hegseth and Trump really want is to use no-bid contracting so they can hand lucrative defense contracts to corporations that donate to Trump and the Republicans. Just more Republican corruption.

Lincs 的头像
Lincs11 个月前

Imagine if a DEI person said we need to lower military standards so that if it works 85% of the time, that's better than us wasting time trying to get it to work 100% of the time.

ResisterSue recently widowed 💔😭💔😭🇺🇸🌻🇺🇦 的头像
ResisterSue recently widowed 💔😭💔😭🇺🇸🌻🇺🇦11 个月前

#DUIHIRE #SignalGate unqualified ass #PeteHegsethResign

Frieda Pickle 的头像
Frieda Pickle11 个月前

An 85% solution? Increased acquisition risk ALSO INCREASES operational risk. Ex: if a gun meets only 85% of specs required for specific battlefield conditions.. it means soldiers die due to malfunctioning equipment.

Theophilus M 的头像
Theophilus M11 个月前

Deploying half-baked tech to the battlefield is a shortcut to headlines and tragedies.

Theophilus M 的头像
Theophilus M11 个月前

Military procurement needs oversight and testing, not catchphrases and rushed rollouts.

Colorado Mom 🟧 📎 🇺🇦🇺🇦 VOTE BLUE 的头像
Colorado Mom 🟧 📎 🇺🇦🇺🇦 VOTE BLUE11 个月前

It should be mandatory that all appointees take a course in a federal Appropriations Law. I was a Comptroller for the DoD and its apparent they don't understand

Theophilus M 的头像
Theophilus M11 个月前

This is the opposite of prudence, accelerating unproven systems increases danger, not safety.

Jahoo 的头像
Jahoo11 个月前

Translation: Put untested gear in the hands of our soldiers and hope for the best. Bonus points for getting around oversight that keep his buddies from getting even richer.

Bob The Old Antifa Hippie 🇺🇸🇺🇦 的头像
Bob The Old Antifa Hippie 🇺🇸🇺🇦11 个月前

A fucking idiot says what? We're entering a very dangerous moment, folks. This drunk's tactic—sacrificing lives for strategic gains—sounds a lot like the 🇷🇺 M.O. in 🇺🇦. Soldiers, sailors & airmen will be unnecessarily dying if this is implemented. #MAGAisNaziFascism

Ariana Wyle 的头像
Ariana Wyle11 个月前

Anyone know wth this means in English?

Lori A Wells 的头像
Lori A Wells11 个月前

So basically we are going to buy weapon systems that don’t work with no oversight

Anna Baxter 🇺🇸✌🏻 的头像
Anna Baxter 🇺🇸✌🏻11 个月前

We got it the first time, Kegsbreath. He ruined far too many brain cells.

HarveyGoguen 的头像
HarveyGoguen11 个月前

WTF is he talking about?

Cody J 的头像
Cody J11 个月前

He's not an intelligent man.

Jane Brown 的头像
Jane Brown11 个月前

I think he's saying he'll buy lots of junk because his besties are selling untested solutions.

Larry 的头像
Larry11 个月前

Is he drinking again? What the hell is that word salad?

Nell, wizard of the rainforest😷🇺🇦 的头像
Nell, wizard of the rainforest😷🇺🇦11 个月前

This is about money, not national security. Beware the military industrial complex - Eisenhower

Vote Pro Choice 1 Blue vote at a time. 🇺🇸🦅 的头像
Vote Pro Choice 1 Blue vote at a time. 🇺🇸🦅11 个月前

So instead of ENSURING a device works, as long as the analysis says it will work they will consider it qualified. I mean, who needs actual testing and confirmation? Am I right?

Down with the Oligarchy 的头像
Down with the Oligarchy11 个月前

Who are “the enemy”? These crooks make corrupt deals with Russia, China, and middle eastern potentates like it’s going out of style. Their deployments and rhetoric indicate their “enemy” is us—the American people.

𝙎𝙋𝙊𝙊𝙆𝙔 𝙁𝙊𝙍𝘾𝙀 𝙂𝘼𝙕𝙀𝙏𝙏𝙀 ™ 🇺🇸🇺🇦 的头像
𝙎𝙋𝙊𝙊𝙆𝙔 𝙁𝙊𝙍𝘾𝙀 𝙂𝘼𝙕𝙀𝙏𝙏𝙀 ™ 🇺🇸🇺🇦11 个月前

“An 85 proof, I mean percent”

Piccolo Pete (Lizzie) 🇺🇸🏳️‍🌈💙 的头像
Piccolo Pete (Lizzie) 🇺🇸🏳️‍🌈💙11 个月前

I can tell he has gone to a lot of self-help seminars. It’s all bullshit talk.

🇨🇦 Annie Dufour 的头像
🇨🇦 Annie Dufour11 个月前

The headless chicken strategy! Who cares if you lose a a few lives... Hey, it ain't worth that much compared to equipment! Never, ever seen such reckless, morally bankrupt, and-god, stupid- boy in charge of something so serious and lethal. A boy. Brainless. My God, he's stupid. It's painful. #Hegseth @votevets

Land of Tope & Dory 🐀 的头像
Land of Tope & Dory 🐀11 个月前

Hello, I'm English and I don't know what the fuck this means in English...,..

Kevin Baron 的头像
Kevin Baron11 个月前

I’m glad I flew in 100% V-22s and Black Hawks, tho just about 85% of the ol’ E-4B. A couple armored vehicles downrange I recall were barely a 40%. Some of the coffee was like 10%.

Shubert Somer 的头像
Shubert Somer11 个月前

Tell it to the 82nd Airborne, Pete. "These parachutes will be fine - they worked at least 85% of the time in testing" 🤣🤣🤣🤡

Dj Omega Mvp 的头像
Dj Omega Mvp11 个月前

Putting equipment etc into the hands of military personnel so not only do they have to wait on food lines they also have the opportunity to be injured by the equipment the government provides because it’s not passing the tests required

A. Frech 的头像
A. Frech11 个月前

👇

Dj Omega Mvp 的头像
Dj Omega Mvp11 个月前

I dare him to try to explain that in simple English

Jon Herrick 💙 noooDM’s! 的头像
Jon Herrick 💙 noooDM’s!11 个月前

Omfg, let’s rush through untested arms and have our service members use them! The losses are worth that 15% that testing would give us! 🤬💩🤬💩

Dj Omega Mvp 的头像
Dj Omega Mvp11 个月前

Please someone give me a translation because what he said makes no sense.

相关视频