正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Helen Andrews makes a sharp, uncomfortable point in this 2:18 clip: the rapid feminization of elite professions—especially law—may have helped fuel the spread of “wokeness,” and she worries that’s particularly dangerous in the legal system. She argues that law, more than almost any other field, needs people who are...

232,098 次观看 • 5 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

🚨The University of Washington Law Professor Who Wants to Defund the Police, Divert Armed Robbery, Radicalize Law Schools and Let Mob Rule Decide Meet Angélica Cházaro, the Charles I. Stone Professor of Law at the University of Washington. She teaches Critical Race Theory, Poverty Law, Professional Responsibility, and Immigration Law. In footage I uncovered, Cházaro describes CRT as an “intellectual movement in legal scholarship." She explains that CRT rejects the idea of neutrality in law, insists on “race consciousness” over colorblindness, and sees the law as a tool that preserves the status quo rather than resolving oppression. Within that framework, she points to “defund the police, abolish the police, [and] fund all the social goods” as the kind of systemic changes CRT calls for. She urges direct action that “makes people uncomfortable,” supports diversion over prosecution even for armed robbery, and warns that legal reforms often serve only to “silence mass uprisings.” Her framing of political power boils down to mob rule, where “whoever makes people uncomfortable” ends up holding sway. Cházaro says law schools are not neutral training grounds but institutions that “produce the kinds of lawyers and thinking that continue to instantiate racial subordination generation after generation.” She insists they must be radically transformed. By day, she teaches your child “Problems in Professional Responsibility.” By night, she is a core organizer with Decriminalize Seattle. Without further ado — Angélica Cházaro.

Stu

17,606 次观看 • 11 个月前

Honourable Members, The Constitution empowers the President to appoint the National Director of Public Prosecutions without stipulating any criteria to that effect. Although there are no requirements in law to do so, I decided to constitute a panel to assist in the process of appointment of the next NDPP, in terms of calling for nominations, shortlisting candidates and interviewing the shortlisted candidates. This is similar to process followed when I appointed the current NDPP, Adv Shamila Batohi. This process is transparent and helps to build public confidence in a critical office. I selected a panel that would combine a variety of skills and experiences. These include public service administration, financial management, legal and jurisprudence, administration of justice, and promotion of equality and human rights. The panel I constituted that includes representatives from the National Executive, Chapter 9 institutions and legal bodies. I chose the heads of certain Chapter 9 institutions for the panel because these are independent bodies established to support and protect South Africa's constitutional democracy, the rule of law and human rights. They are required to always act impartially and subject only to the Constitution and the law, ensuring their decisions are made without fear, favour or prejudice. They are therefore well positioned to understand the qualities and capabilities expected of an NDPP. I have included legal practitioners in the advisory panel so that candidates are evaluated by people with experience in the legal and criminal justice system. In addition to their legal acumen, candidates must be able to demonstrate qualities and capabilities relating to leadership, strategic management, financial management, ethical leadership, and a broad understanding of the justice system. Based on their assessment, the panel will submit a shortlist of recommended candidates to me for consideration and appointment as empowered by the Constitution and the NPA Act. #RamaphosaQandA

Cyril Ramaphosa 🇿🇦

14,439 次观看 • 8 个月前