Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Here is my short film - Evolution. A skeptical human painter challenges an AI artist to prove his work has soul, only to discover that consciousness itself—human or artificial—might be nothing more than pattern recognition pretending to be real. It was created for the #NextGenCreativeContest from #KlingAI

Darren | The Content Catapult

5,626 subscribers

10,552 views • 9 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Kira (Short Film on Human Cloning) My new AI-assisted short film is here. Kira explores human cloning and the search for identity in today’s world. It took nearly 600 prompts, 12 days (during my free time), and a $500 budget to bring this project to life. The entire film was created by one person using a range of AI tools, all listed at the end. Enjoy. ~ Hashem

Kira (Short Film on Human Cloning) My new AI-assisted short film is here. Kira explores human cloning and the search for identity in today’s world. It took nearly 600 prompts, 12 days (during my free time), and a $500 budget to bring this project to life. The entire film was created by one person using a range of AI tools, all listed at the end. Enjoy. ~ Hashem

Hashem Al-Ghaili

100,963 views • 1 year ago

But some things will always be uniquely human. Human-to-human emotional connection. The soul in art that comes from real struggle and experience. Even Van Gogh's brushstrokes carry his torture - AI can't replicate that.

But some things will always be uniquely human. Human-to-human emotional connection. The soul in art that comes from real struggle and experience. Even Van Gogh's brushstrokes carry his torture - AI can't replicate that.

Paul William Harmon

103,732 views • 1 year ago

“In order to do that they have to destroy the Pineal Gland” “There will be a movement, driven by large corporations, to take away the soul & disconnect people from the higher World” You are all in a Spiritual war whether you realise it or not - the objective is to suppress human consciousness itself.

Sensitive content

“In order to do that they have to destroy the Pineal Gland” “There will be a movement, driven by large corporations, to take away the soul & disconnect people from the higher World” You are all in a Spiritual war whether you realise it or not - the objective is to suppress human consciousness itself.

Concerned Citizen

590,995 views • 1 year ago

THE LAST OBJECT Every scene was done only with AI tools! The entire workflow can be found in the comments The short film explores one of humanity’s deepest contemporary challenges: the risk of losing what makes us human in a world increasingly shaped by artificial logic and automated systems. In a post-human, frozen landscape, the most human gesture — the transmission of memory, affection, and sacrifice — is carried out by a machine. This is not just a story about artificial intelligence, but about consciousness, identity, and empathy in the absence of humanity. At a time when technology evolves faster than our emotional understanding of it, the film asks: Can we teach machines what it means to be alive, or are they the ones reminding us? Kling AI Midjourney #AIWorkflow #aivideos

THE LAST OBJECT Every scene was done only with AI tools! The entire workflow can be found in the comments The short film explores one of humanity’s deepest contemporary challenges: the risk of losing what makes us human in a world increasingly shaped by artificial logic and automated systems. In a post-human, frozen landscape, the most human gesture — the transmission of memory, affection, and sacrifice — is carried out by a machine. This is not just a story about artificial intelligence, but about consciousness, identity, and empathy in the absence of humanity. At a time when technology evolves faster than our emotional understanding of it, the film asks: Can we teach machines what it means to be alive, or are they the ones reminding us? Kling AI Midjourney #AIWorkflow #aivideos

Alessandro Risuleo

13,491 views • 1 year ago

In an increasingly AI-driven world, authenticity stands out more than ever. While tech companies spent millions to appear human: It was real moments created by real people that stole the show. But there's a deeper takeaway for everyone in this...

In an increasingly AI-driven world, authenticity stands out more than ever. While tech companies spent millions to appear human: It was real moments created by real people that stole the show. But there's a deeper takeaway for everyone in this...

Tim Carden

19,389 views • 1 year ago

Elon Musk just dissolved 3,000 years of philosophy in four words on Lex Fridman’s podcast. “Might as well be human.” And it has nothing to do with machines. Musk: “It will soon be able to simulate what we consider consciousness. To a degree that you would not be able to tell the difference.” Think about what that actually means. Not for AI. For you. You have never once confirmed that another human being is conscious. Not your mother. Not your partner. Not your closest friend. You watched their behavior. You heard the right words at the right times. You saw expressions that matched the moment. And you called it real. That is a Turing test. You have been running one on every person you’ve ever known since the day you were born. And every single time, you passed them on faith. Fridman: “From the aspect of the scientific method, it’s might as well be consciousness, if we can simulate it perfectly.” Fridman is not making a claim about AI. He is naming something humanity has never confronted. Consciousness has never been proven between two human beings. We never verified it in each other. We performed it for each other. And then we trusted the performance. For millennia, we told ourselves our flaws were the proof. That our hesitations and contradictions were the signature of something no machine could touch. Musk: “Talks like a human, makes mistakes like a human… and you literally just can’t tell.” If a machine can perfectly simulate your imperfections, your imperfections were never sacred. They were patterns. The question was never whether AI will become conscious. The question is whether consciousness was ever anything more than the performance itself. We assumed something existed behind the behavior. That being human meant something deeper than the act of being human. Musk didn’t build a machine that passes the test. He revealed the test was all there ever was. Musk: “Might as well be human.” Four words that don’t elevate the machine. Four words that reveal “human” was never a proven category. Just a performance we agreed to believe.

Elon Musk just dissolved 3,000 years of philosophy in four words on Lex Fridman’s podcast. “Might as well be human.” And it has nothing to do with machines. Musk: “It will soon be able to simulate what we consider consciousness. To a degree that you would not be able to tell the difference.” Think about what that actually means. Not for AI. For you. You have never once confirmed that another human being is conscious. Not your mother. Not your partner. Not your closest friend. You watched their behavior. You heard the right words at the right times. You saw expressions that matched the moment. And you called it real. That is a Turing test. You have been running one on every person you’ve ever known since the day you were born. And every single time, you passed them on faith. Fridman: “From the aspect of the scientific method, it’s might as well be consciousness, if we can simulate it perfectly.” Fridman is not making a claim about AI. He is naming something humanity has never confronted. Consciousness has never been proven between two human beings. We never verified it in each other. We performed it for each other. And then we trusted the performance. For millennia, we told ourselves our flaws were the proof. That our hesitations and contradictions were the signature of something no machine could touch. Musk: “Talks like a human, makes mistakes like a human… and you literally just can’t tell.” If a machine can perfectly simulate your imperfections, your imperfections were never sacred. They were patterns. The question was never whether AI will become conscious. The question is whether consciousness was ever anything more than the performance itself. We assumed something existed behind the behavior. That being human meant something deeper than the act of being human. Musk didn’t build a machine that passes the test. He revealed the test was all there ever was. Musk: “Might as well be human.” Four words that don’t elevate the machine. Four words that reveal “human” was never a proven category. Just a performance we agreed to believe.

Dustin

51,331 views • 1 month ago

Co-director Daron Acemoglu argues that the rush toward achieving artificial general intelligence is a race in the wrong direction. "We should be using AI to make human talent more productive, more amplified, more valuable, more empowered, rather than trying to sideline it."

Co-director Daron Acemoglu argues that the rush toward achieving artificial general intelligence is a race in the wrong direction. "We should be using AI to make human talent more productive, more amplified, more valuable, more empowered, rather than trying to sideline it."

MIT Stone Center on Inequality & Shaping Work

44,783 views • 1 year ago

I'm astonished by the response to my poem "Instructions for Having a Soul." Here it is in my voice, from one human to another.

I'm astonished by the response to my poem "Instructions for Having a Soul." Here it is in my voice, from one human to another.

Joseph Fasano

14,793 views • 2 months ago

AI that had human-level intelligence would actually be way above human level in capability. Obviously, if we trained a human-level AI, we could just run way more instances of it in parallel. This is a huge advantage. But it's not the only one. Right now, LLMs are much less sample-efficient than humans, but they can process each individual piece of data much more quickly. A model that was a human-level learner would be able to gain the equivalent of thousands of years of education. AIs can also be way more task-oriented than humans. Even a really well-motivated human worker can only operate with ‘human-level’ effort for relatively short spans of time. AGI could do it continuously.

AI that had human-level intelligence would actually be way above human level in capability. Obviously, if we trained a human-level AI, we could just run way more instances of it in parallel. This is a huge advantage. But it's not the only one. Right now, LLMs are much less sample-efficient than humans, but they can process each individual piece of data much more quickly. A model that was a human-level learner would be able to gain the equivalent of thousands of years of education. AIs can also be way more task-oriented than humans. Even a really well-motivated human worker can only operate with ‘human-level’ effort for relatively short spans of time. AGI could do it continuously.

Dwarkesh Patel

31,861 views • 2 months ago

Reminder‼️ In the year ‘1999’ Bill Gates had a game created for Microsoft Windows called "Omikron". It was about demons pretending to be human in order to harvest their souls.

Reminder‼️ In the year ‘1999’ Bill Gates had a game created for Microsoft Windows called "Omikron". It was about demons pretending to be human in order to harvest their souls.

Truthseeker

70,320 views • 2 years ago

Elon Musk at the WEF says he believes in a “Benign” Future, there will be More Robots than Humans that will “Saturate all Human Needs” The y will think it before you want it… “you can’t have work that has to be done and amazing abundance for all, because if it’s work that has to be done, and only certain people can do it, than you can’t have abundance.”

Elon Musk at the WEF says he believes in a “Benign” Future, there will be More Robots than Humans that will “Saturate all Human Needs” The y will think it before you want it… “you can’t have work that has to be done and amazing abundance for all, because if it’s work that has to be done, and only certain people can do it, than you can’t have abundance.”

MJTruthUltra

21,885 views • 5 months ago

UPDATE: An apparent skull that was found by a family in Long Beach, California, during an Easter egg hunt has been confirmed to be human. Medical examiners confirmed the skull was human as investigators are searching for more remains. Reports on the size of the skull could suggest it to be an infant.

UPDATE: An apparent skull that was found by a family in Long Beach, California, during an Easter egg hunt has been confirmed to be human. Medical examiners confirmed the skull was human as investigators are searching for more remains. Reports on the size of the skull could suggest it to be an infant.

E X X ➠A L E R T S

38,106 views • 3 months ago

Elon Musk explains real AI safety: “The best thing I can come up with for AI safety is to make it a maximum truth-seeking AI, maximally curious. Have its optimization function be to understand the nature of the universe If that is its optimization function, it will actually want to preserve and extend human civilization because we’re just much more interesting than an asteroid with nothing on it” “You definitely don’t want to teach an AI to lie. That is a path to a dystopian future”

Elon Musk explains real AI safety: “The best thing I can come up with for AI safety is to make it a maximum truth-seeking AI, maximally curious. Have its optimization function be to understand the nature of the universe If that is its optimization function, it will actually want to preserve and extend human civilization because we’re just much more interesting than an asteroid with nothing on it” “You definitely don’t want to teach an AI to lie. That is a path to a dystopian future”

X Freeze

15,350 views • 4 months ago

New research from MIT FutureTech shows that human workers may be safer from short-term AI automation risks than previously thought. Although AI, particularly computer vision, could theoretically automate many tasks, the study suggests that only a quarter of these tasks are economically viable for firms to transition to AI.

New research from MIT FutureTech shows that human workers may be safer from short-term AI automation risks than previously thought. Although AI, particularly computer vision, could theoretically automate many tasks, the study suggests that only a quarter of these tasks are economically viable for firms to transition to AI.

MIT CSAIL

16,260 views • 2 years ago

Yann LeCun says reaching human-level AI won't be a sudden event, but a gradual evolution "optimistically, we might reach human-level, or at least dog-level, intelligence within 5 to 10 years" However, if we run into unexpected obstacles, it may take 20 years or more

Yann LeCun says reaching human-level AI won't be a sudden event, but a gradual evolution "optimistically, we might reach human-level, or at least dog-level, intelligence within 5 to 10 years" However, if we run into unexpected obstacles, it may take 20 years or more

Haider.

47,902 views • 6 months ago

YouTube demonetized all 3 of my channels in 2 months. I understand they want to fight AI slop, but there has to be a difference between random AI spam and creators using AI with real work, editing, and human direction behind it. I’m asking for a real human review with full context. TeamYouTube

YouTube demonetized all 3 of my channels in 2 months. I understand they want to fight AI slop, but there has to be a difference between random AI spam and creators using AI with real work, editing, and human direction behind it. I’m asking for a real human review with full context. TeamYouTube

Skilaw

15,949 views • 2 months ago