Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Here is the clip with the transcript. What Peter says is clear: text messages including “pin it on the girl” were from “people inside the house” and from cops or related to the cops.” When The Megyn Kelly Show asks him “Oh, well, that sounds really bad. I actually...

DemetraAutumn's profile picture

Autumn 🍂❄️

2,682 subscribers

35,760 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & Politika
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

A new cop from another town didn’t know there were people the cops here bow to😳
1:13

A new cop from another town didn’t know there were people the cops here bow to😳

Jane

20,639 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

The guy, Justin Fisher, who was arrested for trespassing on Taylor Swift and Kelcie home did NOT jump a fence 🎯 he was actually speaking to security when the cops were called. Someone from that house has to be the one who called Star. Now people are saying that someone else is trying to subpoena Taylor for copy infringement. WOW #taylorswift #justinbaldoni
2:47

The guy, Justin Fisher, who was arrested for trespassing on Taylor Swift and Kelcie home did NOT jump a fence 🎯 he was actually speaking to security when the cops were called. Someone from that house has to be the one who called Star. Now people are saying that someone else is trying to subpoena Taylor for copy infringement. WOW #taylorswift #justinbaldoni

TV & Movie Addict 🍿🦋

436,129 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

DISINFORMATION CORRECTION: MEGYN KELLY & PETER TRAGOS EDITION BLATANT DEFAMATION Yesterday, on Megyn Kelly show, Peter Tragos of Lawyer You Know made a false defamatory statement against the witnesses in John O'Keefe's murder case. Tragos stated the witnesses were sending group messages amongst each other stating they "were going to pin it on the girl." This is FALSE and a BLATANT LIE. There is no such text message sent by ANY person who testified in either trial including ANY law enforcement personnel. The "pin it on the girl" is a quote attributed SOLELY to Alan Jackson in his closing argument on June 25, 2024 as to his characterization of the investigation. Tragos covered the case extensively and should be fully aware his defamatory statement is false. Both Kelly and Tragos should immediately issue retractions.
0:22

DISINFORMATION CORRECTION: MEGYN KELLY & PETER TRAGOS EDITION BLATANT DEFAMATION Yesterday, on Megyn Kelly show, Peter Tragos of Lawyer You Know made a false defamatory statement against the witnesses in John O'Keefe's murder case. Tragos stated the witnesses were sending group messages amongst each other stating they "were going to pin it on the girl." This is FALSE and a BLATANT LIE. There is no such text message sent by ANY person who testified in either trial including ANY law enforcement personnel. The "pin it on the girl" is a quote attributed SOLELY to Alan Jackson in his closing argument on June 25, 2024 as to his characterization of the investigation. Tragos covered the case extensively and should be fully aware his defamatory statement is false. Both Kelly and Tragos should immediately issue retractions.

Julie Carpenter

15,395 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

New videos show that it was *the cops* who did the attacking. Two NYPD cops harassed a group of young Latino men just cause. Then, in an attempt to falsely arrest one of the men, the cops grabbed & attacked him. The man's friends then tried to defend him from a beatdown & arrest.
2:19

New videos show that it was *the cops* who did the attacking. Two NYPD cops harassed a group of young Latino men just cause. Then, in an attempt to falsely arrest one of the men, the cops grabbed & attacked him. The man's friends then tried to defend him from a beatdown & arrest.

Ash J

1,404,412 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Dnipro. The cops stopped a truck and tried to force the driver out. Some young men saw what was happening and decided to help the driver, for which the cops pepper-sprayed them. One of the cops lost a clip from his pistol.
2:09

Dnipro. The cops stopped a truck and tried to force the driver out. Some young men saw what was happening and decided to help the driver, for which the cops pepper-sprayed them. One of the cops lost a clip from his pistol.

𝓽𝓱𝓸𝓾𝓰𝓱𝓽𝓬𝓻𝓲𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓵 👁️

23,415 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

“It was clear that people were trying to either physically harm them or intimidate them away from their decisions…” Mollie on the shocking inside story of how the liberals on Supreme Court put the lives of the conservatives in jeopardy. Watch and download:
17:20

“It was clear that people were trying to either physically harm them or intimidate them away from their decisions…” Mollie on the shocking inside story of how the liberals on Supreme Court put the lives of the conservatives in jeopardy. Watch and download:

The Megyn Kelly Show

73,899 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Outside the horror house. The police moved the protesters up to another street, some people stayed behind as they thought that there were people being protected by the cops at the property.
1:00

Outside the horror house. The police moved the protesters up to another street, some people stayed behind as they thought that there were people being protected by the cops at the property.

SnoopDeg

110,172 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Can someone, anyone, explain the major discrepancies in Lance Twiggs’s testimony that I’m hearing? 1. Lance testified that Tyler did not text him directly AT ALL on September 10th. He testified that the only message that came through that day was via an automated Discord message from Tyler to a D&D server group chat that they were both a part of at 11 pm. Why then are we shown screenshots of a personal text message thread from September 10th where there are texts from Tyler to Lance starting at 4:33 pm?? There’s also a direct text supposedly from Tyler at 11 pm as well — is that what’s being referred to as the “automated” message (although it’s not remotely from Discord)?? Tyler then supposedly sends a flurry of texts detailing his crime to Lance all before midnight. Why did Lance not account for any of these messages when he said Tyler “did not text him directly” all day?? 2. How would Lance know if the one 11 pm text message was “automated” when iMessage doesn’t differentiate between messages that are scheduled before or sent in the moment? 3. Prosecutor Ryan McBride, in his interview of Lance, while reading the messages exchanged.. said clear as day that the messages spanned from September 10th to September 12th. Lance agrees with this. Seconds later, he changes the story and says the messages were from September 10th to the evening of September 11th. Why? Agent Brian Davis, while on the stand, then testified to the messages ending September 11th, but the attorney who questioned him also sounded majorly confused based on what she was reading. She kept saying: “Does September 12th.. make more sense? Does it make sense?” Why did she initially ALSO say September 12th but then backtrack?? 4. Lance says in his testimony that he picked the note up and then never saw it again. Did he not burn it? How could he not pick it up again if he did that. Why was there no testimony to him burning it?
2:19

Can someone, anyone, explain the major discrepancies in Lance Twiggs’s testimony that I’m hearing? 1. Lance testified that Tyler did not text him directly AT ALL on September 10th. He testified that the only message that came through that day was via an automated Discord message from Tyler to a D&D server group chat that they were both a part of at 11 pm. Why then are we shown screenshots of a personal text message thread from September 10th where there are texts from Tyler to Lance starting at 4:33 pm?? There’s also a direct text supposedly from Tyler at 11 pm as well — is that what’s being referred to as the “automated” message (although it’s not remotely from Discord)?? Tyler then supposedly sends a flurry of texts detailing his crime to Lance all before midnight. Why did Lance not account for any of these messages when he said Tyler “did not text him directly” all day?? 2. How would Lance know if the one 11 pm text message was “automated” when iMessage doesn’t differentiate between messages that are scheduled before or sent in the moment? 3. Prosecutor Ryan McBride, in his interview of Lance, while reading the messages exchanged.. said clear as day that the messages spanned from September 10th to September 12th. Lance agrees with this. Seconds later, he changes the story and says the messages were from September 10th to the evening of September 11th. Why? Agent Brian Davis, while on the stand, then testified to the messages ending September 11th, but the attorney who questioned him also sounded majorly confused based on what she was reading. She kept saying: “Does September 12th.. make more sense? Does it make sense?” Why did she initially ALSO say September 12th but then backtrack?? 4. Lance says in his testimony that he picked the note up and then never saw it again. Did he not burn it? How could he not pick it up again if he did that. Why was there no testimony to him burning it?

Brave Report

21,523 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Tim Powers says the Conservative Party is a bit like a house party that’s been raided by the cops: “The house has been raided, people are leaving and others are figuring out ‘Do I back the guys who own the house and invited me to the party, or do I high‑tail it out of here.’”
0:52

Tim Powers says the Conservative Party is a bit like a house party that’s been raided by the cops: “The house has been raided, people are leaving and others are figuring out ‘Do I back the guys who own the house and invited me to the party, or do I high‑tail it out of here.’”

Scott Robertson

19,705 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

As James Tuxbury and Chris Mattei, the attorneys representing Jennifer McCabe, Brian Albert, Colin Albert, and Brian Higgins made clear in their press release, the investigation into the relentless defamation campaign against these innocent witnesses is ongoing. I am calling on both Lawyer You Know and The Megyn Kelly Show to retract and correct the false and malicious statement made in the video below by Peter Tragos on Megyn Kelly's show. During the December 2025 show Tragos told host Megyn Kelly that there was a group text between the witnesses who were at 34 Fairview in the early morning hours when John O'Keefe was killed that stated they were going to "pin it on the girl". No such text between the witnesses exists. Tragos had inappropriately lifted a line from Alan Jackson's closing and attributed it to the witnesses to give the appearance the witnesses "framed" Karen Read. Tragos' statement was a blatant and defamatory lie told to a national audience. The video currently has over 100,000 views.
0:22

As James Tuxbury and Chris Mattei, the attorneys representing Jennifer McCabe, Brian Albert, Colin Albert, and Brian Higgins made clear in their press release, the investigation into the relentless defamation campaign against these innocent witnesses is ongoing. I am calling on both Lawyer You Know and The Megyn Kelly Show to retract and correct the false and malicious statement made in the video below by Peter Tragos on Megyn Kelly's show. During the December 2025 show Tragos told host Megyn Kelly that there was a group text between the witnesses who were at 34 Fairview in the early morning hours when John O'Keefe was killed that stated they were going to "pin it on the girl". No such text between the witnesses exists. Tragos had inappropriately lifted a line from Alan Jackson's closing and attributed it to the witnesses to give the appearance the witnesses "framed" Karen Read. Tragos' statement was a blatant and defamatory lie told to a national audience. The video currently has over 100,000 views.

Julie Carpenter

14,793 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

“We were expecting you to hand over your text messages with Pfizer” “The only thing the people of Europe expect from you now it is your resignation” History will tell us that Ursula von der Leyen was the Political driving force behind the destruction of Europe.
1:16

“We were expecting you to hand over your text messages with Pfizer” “The only thing the people of Europe expect from you now it is your resignation” History will tell us that Ursula von der Leyen was the Political driving force behind the destruction of Europe.

Concerned Citizen

577,068 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

PETER TRAGOS MAKES STUNNING UNSUBSTANTIATED CLAIMS Yesterday, Peter Tragos Lawyer You Know made stunning claims about the contents of Michael Proctor's phone. He claimed that motions in the federal complaint, civil wrongful death case, and Myles King case stated that Proctor gave MSP investigative files to Colin Albert and that he texted he wanted to see Karen Read "naked" in a "jail cell." After review, no such statements exist in any filing. His inclusion of this information was particularly insidious because quotes from the Amended Complaint in the federal case were lifted word for word from the filing and interspaced between his claims. Almost as if he had used AI and it gave him an inaccurate analysis. This is not the first time Tragos has spewed misinformation. Roughly three months ago, during an interview with Megyn Kelly, Tragos claimed the witnesses sent text messages amongst each other that they were going to "pin it on the girl." No such text message has ever existed. In fact, no one other than Alan Jackson ever said that. Tragos had taken a quote from Alan Jackson's closing statement and mischaracterized it as a text among witnesses. I am calling on Peter Tragos to either issue a retraction or produce the documents which contain this information.
0:48

PETER TRAGOS MAKES STUNNING UNSUBSTANTIATED CLAIMS Yesterday, Peter Tragos Lawyer You Know made stunning claims about the contents of Michael Proctor's phone. He claimed that motions in the federal complaint, civil wrongful death case, and Myles King case stated that Proctor gave MSP investigative files to Colin Albert and that he texted he wanted to see Karen Read "naked" in a "jail cell." After review, no such statements exist in any filing. His inclusion of this information was particularly insidious because quotes from the Amended Complaint in the federal case were lifted word for word from the filing and interspaced between his claims. Almost as if he had used AI and it gave him an inaccurate analysis. This is not the first time Tragos has spewed misinformation. Roughly three months ago, during an interview with Megyn Kelly, Tragos claimed the witnesses sent text messages amongst each other that they were going to "pin it on the girl." No such text message has ever existed. In fact, no one other than Alan Jackson ever said that. Tragos had taken a quote from Alan Jackson's closing statement and mischaracterized it as a text among witnesses. I am calling on Peter Tragos to either issue a retraction or produce the documents which contain this information.

Julie Carpenter

32,462 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

"These were people who were embedded in party politics. They're chosen among their peers to really represent the future generation of the GOP." Jason Beeferman, the Politico reporter on the hundreds of racist and hateful text he uncovered messages from leaders of the Young Republicans, including one that said quote "I love Hitler" and another that called Black people monkeys. #OutFrontCNN #News
4:53

"These were people who were embedded in party politics. They're chosen among their peers to really represent the future generation of the GOP." Jason Beeferman, the Politico reporter on the hundreds of racist and hateful text he uncovered messages from leaders of the Young Republicans, including one that said quote "I love Hitler" and another that called Black people monkeys. #OutFrontCNN #News

Erin Burnett OutFront

120,512 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

Just called the cops on a drunk mexican. Dude was driving all over the road and almost hit multiple people. Followed him back to where it appears he is squatting. Will the cops actually do anything? Who knows.
0:29

Just called the cops on a drunk mexican. Dude was driving all over the road and almost hit multiple people. Followed him back to where it appears he is squatting. Will the cops actually do anything? Who knows.

PNWGUERRILLA

57,384 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

BELLAVANCE: "Cabinet ministers in Quebec are receiving text messages from separatist people saying, 'I was proud to be Canadian for one day and that was the day that the Prime Minister made that speech in Davos.'"
0:29

BELLAVANCE: "Cabinet ministers in Quebec are receiving text messages from separatist people saying, 'I was proud to be Canadian for one day and that was the day that the Prime Minister made that speech in Davos.'"

Scott Robertson

163,944 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

NOW - Charlie Kirk Sees Silver Lining in Signal Chat Leak—Trump’s Team Is All In On His Agenda “The real scandal of this would’ve been if we found these text messages or the Signal messages, and Trump’s team was working against him.” Charlie Kirk just nailed it. He argues there’s a win in the Signal chat mishap, showing the American people that Trump’s crew has his back—unlike the snakes who stabbed him in the back during his first term. Charlie Kirk laid it out, clear as day: “Instead what you found was that every single one of these people, Vice President JD Vance, Pete Hegseth, were actually defending President Trump’s agenda in private the same way they’ve been doing it in public.” “You see, over the last couple of years we’ve grown accustomed to people working against President Trump’s interests. We saw this in Trump 1.0. Imagine if we saw the Signal messages from Mark Milley, or from H.R. McMaster or from some of the people from the first administration.” “Now we see the messages—never should have happened, it was an accident—actually Pete Hegseth and J.D. Vance defending President Trump, saying the President’s instincts are correct here.” “It’s an accident, however it does show a window to the American people that in private they are doing the same thing that they are saying on television. It shows integrity, it shows symmetry, it shows consistency.” “And also the Democrats, they couldn’t care less about confidentiality. They are just trying to find anything to revive the corpse that is the Democrat Party that is barely on life support ever since President Trump’s triumphant election last November.”
1:09

NOW - Charlie Kirk Sees Silver Lining in Signal Chat Leak—Trump’s Team Is All In On His Agenda “The real scandal of this would’ve been if we found these text messages or the Signal messages, and Trump’s team was working against him.” Charlie Kirk just nailed it. He argues there’s a win in the Signal chat mishap, showing the American people that Trump’s crew has his back—unlike the snakes who stabbed him in the back during his first term. Charlie Kirk laid it out, clear as day: “Instead what you found was that every single one of these people, Vice President JD Vance, Pete Hegseth, were actually defending President Trump’s agenda in private the same way they’ve been doing it in public.” “You see, over the last couple of years we’ve grown accustomed to people working against President Trump’s interests. We saw this in Trump 1.0. Imagine if we saw the Signal messages from Mark Milley, or from H.R. McMaster or from some of the people from the first administration.” “Now we see the messages—never should have happened, it was an accident—actually Pete Hegseth and J.D. Vance defending President Trump, saying the President’s instincts are correct here.” “It’s an accident, however it does show a window to the American people that in private they are doing the same thing that they are saying on television. It shows integrity, it shows symmetry, it shows consistency.” “And also the Democrats, they couldn’t care less about confidentiality. They are just trying to find anything to revive the corpse that is the Democrat Party that is barely on life support ever since President Trump’s triumphant election last November.”

Overton

347,846 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce