Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Here is the video evidence: Junet Mohamed openly admitting MPs received "something" during Gachagua’s impeachment, and pointing to Aaron as the paymaster.🚨 They literally turned a constitutional impeachment process into a marketplace, and now they're laughing about it on camera. Gachagua never stood a chance because Parliament was bought.... show more

Sholla Ard 🇰🇪

106,418 subscribers

33,255 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Rigathi Gachagua will now have a field day after Junet Mohamed officially confirmed that William Ruto bribed them through Aaron Cheruiyot to impeach Riggy G. This reckless talk by Junet Mohamed will further cement Rigathi Gachagua popularity in Mt Kenya. Riggy G knows how to use narratives to win masses. That Statement by Junet Mohamed has sealed the fate of Mt Kenya MPS and senators who impeached Riggy G. It is over for them in Mt Kenya

Rigathi Gachagua will now have a field day after Junet Mohamed officially confirmed that William Ruto bribed them through Aaron Cheruiyot to impeach Riggy G. This reckless talk by Junet Mohamed will further cement Rigathi Gachagua popularity in Mt Kenya. Riggy G knows how to use narratives to win masses. That Statement by Junet Mohamed has sealed the fate of Mt Kenya MPS and senators who impeached Riggy G. It is over for them in Mt Kenya

JaHomaBay

57,691 views • 1 month ago

🔴An opposition CCC legislator Darlington Chigumbu says Zimbabwean MPs are not ready and fit to elect a President through parliament as proposed in the current constitutional amendments because they will be bought since they are vulnerable due to poor pay, lack of resources and organisational capacity to do their work properly. The constitutional amendments now in parliament propose that Zimbabwe must shift from direct voting for president to selection by the people’s representatives in parliament. Chigumbu, a software developer, serves as MP for the Budiriro South constituency. He was elected to the National Assembly on a CCC ticket during the 2023 general elections.

🔴An opposition CCC legislator Darlington Chigumbu says Zimbabwean MPs are not ready and fit to elect a President through parliament as proposed in the current constitutional amendments because they will be bought since they are vulnerable due to poor pay, lack of resources and organisational capacity to do their work properly. The constitutional amendments now in parliament propose that Zimbabwe must shift from direct voting for president to selection by the people’s representatives in parliament. Chigumbu, a software developer, serves as MP for the Budiriro South constituency. He was elected to the National Assembly on a CCC ticket during the 2023 general elections.

TheNewsHawks

14,898 views • 2 months ago

President William Ruto on Monday detailed his fallout with former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua, attributing their strained relationship to persistent conflicts and a lack of support for government projects. Speaking during a media engagement at Sagana State Lodge as he began his five-day tour of Mt. Kenya region, Ruto stated that Gachagua frequently picked fights with government officials and Members of Parliament, forcing him to intervene multiple times. He accused him of intimidating MPs and refusing to rally behind state programmes. He criticized Gachagua for failing to publicly defend development projects, saying that when he was Deputy President, he actively promoted government initiatives on television and in public forums. Ruto alleged that Gachagua once demanded Ksh.10 billion for political activities in Mount Kenya and threatened to make him a one-term president. He denied involvement in Gachagua’s impeachment, saying he twice stopped the process but was overruled by MPs, especially from Mt Kenya who were determined to remove him from office. Ruto said the impeachment motion was not his initiative but was pushed by leaders from the region who felt that Gachagua was undermining their political agenda and failing to support government initiatives. He maintained that while he had initially defended Gachagua against impeachment attempts, the mounting pressure from MPs made it impossible to continue shielding him. The President added that even after the fallout, he never personally endorsed the ouster but allowed due process to take its course. Ruto also pointed out that Gachagua’s removal was a result of his own political miscalculations, stating that he had failed to build consensus with leaders and instead engaged in divisive politics.

President William Ruto on Monday detailed his fallout with former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua, attributing their strained relationship to persistent conflicts and a lack of support for government projects. Speaking during a media engagement at Sagana State Lodge as he began his five-day tour of Mt. Kenya region, Ruto stated that Gachagua frequently picked fights with government officials and Members of Parliament, forcing him to intervene multiple times. He accused him of intimidating MPs and refusing to rally behind state programmes. He criticized Gachagua for failing to publicly defend development projects, saying that when he was Deputy President, he actively promoted government initiatives on television and in public forums. Ruto alleged that Gachagua once demanded Ksh.10 billion for political activities in Mount Kenya and threatened to make him a one-term president. He denied involvement in Gachagua’s impeachment, saying he twice stopped the process but was overruled by MPs, especially from Mt Kenya who were determined to remove him from office. Ruto said the impeachment motion was not his initiative but was pushed by leaders from the region who felt that Gachagua was undermining their political agenda and failing to support government initiatives. He maintained that while he had initially defended Gachagua against impeachment attempts, the mounting pressure from MPs made it impossible to continue shielding him. The President added that even after the fallout, he never personally endorsed the ouster but allowed due process to take its course. Ruto also pointed out that Gachagua’s removal was a result of his own political miscalculations, stating that he had failed to build consensus with leaders and instead engaged in divisive politics.

Cyprian, Is Nyakundi

57,525 views • 1 year ago

Jonathan Turley blasts Democrats for their persistent calls for impeachment: "It's a very destructive series of pledges that they're making. It's part of this age of rage. They're promising straight revenge, straight retaliation. This is injecting that rage straight into the body of politic and there are many who believe that can carry them back into power... ...This has become a pattern for Democrats, and I cannot express how damaging that is for our constitutional values and history. They're making impeachment into the English vote of no confidence; that's not what it is. It is something much more serious than that, but they're turning it into an unbridled circus."

Jonathan Turley blasts Democrats for their persistent calls for impeachment: "It's a very destructive series of pledges that they're making. It's part of this age of rage. They're promising straight revenge, straight retaliation. This is injecting that rage straight into the body of politic and there are many who believe that can carry them back into power... ...This has become a pattern for Democrats, and I cannot express how damaging that is for our constitutional values and history. They're making impeachment into the English vote of no confidence; that's not what it is. It is something much more serious than that, but they're turning it into an unbridled circus."

Julia 🇺🇸

78,006 views • 4 months ago

The impeachment motion moved by the DMK and Congress against Justice Swaminathan is an outright assault on the judiciary. It is a desperate attempt by the India Alliance to browbeat a judge simply because he upheld a perfectly reasonable and constitutional order permitting the Kartigai Deepam. This reckless weaponisation of impeachment to intimidate the judiciary must be condemned in the strongest terms. The Congress has a long and dark history of attacking independent judges. During the Emergency, they superseded judges, threatened courts, and shook the very foundations of India’s justice delivery system. What they are doing today is cut from the same unconstitutional cloth. This impeachment motion deserves to be thrown out immediately. And the anti Hindu, anti constitutional mindset driving the Congress-DMK combine must be exposed for what it is - an assault on faith, on freedom, and on the integrity of our institutions.

The impeachment motion moved by the DMK and Congress against Justice Swaminathan is an outright assault on the judiciary. It is a desperate attempt by the India Alliance to browbeat a judge simply because he upheld a perfectly reasonable and constitutional order permitting the Kartigai Deepam. This reckless weaponisation of impeachment to intimidate the judiciary must be condemned in the strongest terms. The Congress has a long and dark history of attacking independent judges. During the Emergency, they superseded judges, threatened courts, and shook the very foundations of India’s justice delivery system. What they are doing today is cut from the same unconstitutional cloth. This impeachment motion deserves to be thrown out immediately. And the anti Hindu, anti constitutional mindset driving the Congress-DMK combine must be exposed for what it is - an assault on faith, on freedom, and on the integrity of our institutions.

Tejasvi Surya

170,675 views • 8 months ago

#WATCH | Delhi: On Parliament panel finds all three charges proved against Justice Yashwant Varma in cash-at-residence case, Vikas Singh, Senior Advocate and President of the Supreme Court Bar Association, says, "In my view, now that his resignation has not been accepted and rightly so, because although he has a right to resign under the Constitution, the resignation takes effect only when the President accepts it. If he is still a judge continuing in office, his impeachment can happen, and this report can be placed before Parliament for discussion and voting on his impeachment on the same day. The fact that his resignation has not been accepted can be justified on good grounds because the moment his resignation is accepted, he is entitled to a pension, etc. Whereas, if he is impeached, he completely forfeits his right to a pension. A judge who has been found guilty by two very high-powered committees of this kind of misdemeanour, if he is permitted to take a pension, it will be a travesty of justice. I think it's high time that the impeachment motion is taken to its logical end and he is impeached from office..."

#WATCH | Delhi: On Parliament panel finds all three charges proved against Justice Yashwant Varma in cash-at-residence case, Vikas Singh, Senior Advocate and President of the Supreme Court Bar Association, says, "In my view, now that his resignation has not been accepted and rightly so, because although he has a right to resign under the Constitution, the resignation takes effect only when the President accepts it. If he is still a judge continuing in office, his impeachment can happen, and this report can be placed before Parliament for discussion and voting on his impeachment on the same day. The fact that his resignation has not been accepted can be justified on good grounds because the moment his resignation is accepted, he is entitled to a pension, etc. Whereas, if he is impeached, he completely forfeits his right to a pension. A judge who has been found guilty by two very high-powered committees of this kind of misdemeanour, if he is permitted to take a pension, it will be a travesty of justice. I think it's high time that the impeachment motion is taken to its logical end and he is impeached from office..."

ANI

74,335 views • 16 days ago

[WATCH] THE SECTION 89 MATTER On the Section 89 matter now before Parliament, so that the public is not misled by those who would dramatise an ordinary constitutional process. The ANC’s posture on the Section 89 Matter is one of procedural neutrality: the process is proceeding in an orderly manner under the binding Constitutional Court judgment, with the Committee’s draft Terms of Reference open for party submissions until Friday 10 July and the work of Parliament continues, it must not be rushed but deliberated carefully. The ANC will participate, if at all, only as amicus curiae, confined to parliamentary process and sequencing, because our duty is to defend the integrity of a constitutional process, not to argue any party’s merits. On the Terms of Reference, the ANC will not support the admissibility of untested hearsay: an inquiry of this gravity demands evidence under oath, properly tested, perjury on those who will think parliament is a playground to mislead or tell plain lies must also be applied. The question before parliament is whether the president committed high crimes and high misdemeanors and did so alive to it, knowingly. That is what parliament is to test but first, is the Panel Report itself a bona fide instrument, did it find correctly that high crimes and high misdemeanors occurred on the part of the president. What we know is that the Public Protector has said no, the SARB has said not so. Then, should parliament proceed now or wait till September court case? We think it is wise and economical to wait because September court gives parliament itself finality and a foundation. That is it. #ANCMediaBriefing #RegisterToVoteANC #YearOfDecisiveAction

[WATCH] THE SECTION 89 MATTER On the Section 89 matter now before Parliament, so that the public is not misled by those who would dramatise an ordinary constitutional process. The ANC’s posture on the Section 89 Matter is one of procedural neutrality: the process is proceeding in an orderly manner under the binding Constitutional Court judgment, with the Committee’s draft Terms of Reference open for party submissions until Friday 10 July and the work of Parliament continues, it must not be rushed but deliberated carefully. The ANC will participate, if at all, only as amicus curiae, confined to parliamentary process and sequencing, because our duty is to defend the integrity of a constitutional process, not to argue any party’s merits. On the Terms of Reference, the ANC will not support the admissibility of untested hearsay: an inquiry of this gravity demands evidence under oath, properly tested, perjury on those who will think parliament is a playground to mislead or tell plain lies must also be applied. The question before parliament is whether the president committed high crimes and high misdemeanors and did so alive to it, knowingly. That is what parliament is to test but first, is the Panel Report itself a bona fide instrument, did it find correctly that high crimes and high misdemeanors occurred on the part of the president. What we know is that the Public Protector has said no, the SARB has said not so. Then, should parliament proceed now or wait till September court case? We think it is wise and economical to wait because September court gives parliament itself finality and a foundation. That is it. #ANCMediaBriefing #RegisterToVoteANC #YearOfDecisiveAction

ANC SECRETARY GENERAL | Fikile Mbalula

12,372 views • 1 month ago

David Adelman was asked about his favorite childhood memories in Portland by Katy Winge and it turned into an impassioned statement as to why the Blazers should remain in PDX: "They gotta keep the team here. They gotta find a way to do that. This is a basketball city. The Northwest deserves two teams. That would be crushing for this community... Emotionally, I know what this place is and what it means to have a professional basketball team here. It's not just something to go hang out at. It's something go and be a part of."

David Adelman was asked about his favorite childhood memories in Portland by Katy Winge and it turned into an impassioned statement as to why the Blazers should remain in PDX: "They gotta keep the team here. They gotta find a way to do that. This is a basketball city. The Northwest deserves two teams. That would be crushing for this community... Emotionally, I know what this place is and what it means to have a professional basketball team here. It's not just something to go hang out at. It's something go and be a part of."

Brenna Greene

81,584 views • 6 months ago

The EFF is not winning this case I’m afraid - A member of parliament asks the speaker to appoint an independent panel to look into Phala Phala - The Speaker approves and the panel reports found out that there was prima facie evidence - But Parliament votes against the report - Justice Mathopo arguing that the EFF doesn’t have a case because parliament has the final say in this matter per rules - EFF must fight to change the rules

The EFF is not winning this case I’m afraid - A member of parliament asks the speaker to appoint an independent panel to look into Phala Phala - The Speaker approves and the panel reports found out that there was prima facie evidence - But Parliament votes against the report - Justice Mathopo arguing that the EFF doesn’t have a case because parliament has the final say in this matter per rules - EFF must fight to change the rules

Grumpy Pa

118,558 views • 1 year ago

WOW 🚨 Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard says the Democrats CHANGED THE STANDARD for impeachment right before impeaching Trump They changed it so evidence no longer had to be credible, just to get Trump Literally Treason “So in the lead up to the impeachment of President Trump, the standard was, it had to be firsthand information. And then right before he happened to go through this impeachment process, the standard changed to being able to use secondhand information, even if it were unreliable and deemed unreliable” “Inspector General did from requiring that there be either evidence or firsthand knowledge presented in order to determine whether or not a complaint is credible to merely allowing for hearsay and nothing else” “How do you find a complaint to be credible when there is zero evidence provided and there is zero firsthand knowledge provided, not only by the whistleblower, by any witness in this case and when the Inspector General himself did not even request to see the documents that these individuals are referencing in their false accusations” Democrats literally changed it so it didn’t have to be first hand knowledge, and you need no evidence to make a claim for impeachment And not a single person has been held accountable for this

WOW 🚨 Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard says the Democrats CHANGED THE STANDARD for impeachment right before impeaching Trump They changed it so evidence no longer had to be credible, just to get Trump Literally Treason “So in the lead up to the impeachment of President Trump, the standard was, it had to be firsthand information. And then right before he happened to go through this impeachment process, the standard changed to being able to use secondhand information, even if it were unreliable and deemed unreliable” “Inspector General did from requiring that there be either evidence or firsthand knowledge presented in order to determine whether or not a complaint is credible to merely allowing for hearsay and nothing else” “How do you find a complaint to be credible when there is zero evidence provided and there is zero firsthand knowledge provided, not only by the whistleblower, by any witness in this case and when the Inspector General himself did not even request to see the documents that these individuals are referencing in their false accusations” Democrats literally changed it so it didn’t have to be first hand knowledge, and you need no evidence to make a claim for impeachment And not a single person has been held accountable for this

Wall Street Apes

393,103 views • 4 months ago

Ana Navarro just said the quiet part out loud: They claimed Alex Pretti was “brandishing a gun.” He was “brandishing” a CAMERA. A phone. Video. Because to this administration, a camera is just as dangerous as a weapon, not because it can hurt them… but because it can EXPOSE them. If they were actually rounding up “murderers and rapists,” they’d be showing proof and taking victory laps. Instead, they’re hiding the evidence and lying to the public. They’re lying about Alex Pretti.

Ana Navarro just said the quiet part out loud: They claimed Alex Pretti was “brandishing a gun.” He was “brandishing” a CAMERA. A phone. Video. Because to this administration, a camera is just as dangerous as a weapon, not because it can hurt them… but because it can EXPOSE them. If they were actually rounding up “murderers and rapists,” they’d be showing proof and taking victory laps. Instead, they’re hiding the evidence and lying to the public. They’re lying about Alex Pretti.

Brian Allen

454,469 views • 7 months ago

I’m breaking down what I see as a dangerous misuse of impeachment and congressional power. In this clip from Liberty’s Voice, I explain how impeachment—once a rare and serious constitutional tool—is now being weaponized to undermine a presidency, distract an administration, and shape future elections. We’ve only had a handful of presidential impeachments in American history—from Andrew Johnson to Bill Clinton to Donald Trump—and now we’re seeing efforts to normalize it as a political strategy. Endless investigations, subpoenas, and media narratives aren’t about removal—they’re about weakening leadership and influencing what comes next. This is about more than one president. It’s about protecting the integrity of our constitutional system and ensuring that checks and balances aren’t turned into political weapons. Watch the entire episode: Rumble: YouTube:

I’m breaking down what I see as a dangerous misuse of impeachment and congressional power. In this clip from Liberty’s Voice, I explain how impeachment—once a rare and serious constitutional tool—is now being weaponized to undermine a presidency, distract an administration, and shape future elections. We’ve only had a handful of presidential impeachments in American history—from Andrew Johnson to Bill Clinton to Donald Trump—and now we’re seeing efforts to normalize it as a political strategy. Endless investigations, subpoenas, and media narratives aren’t about removal—they’re about weakening leadership and influencing what comes next. This is about more than one president. It’s about protecting the integrity of our constitutional system and ensuring that checks and balances aren’t turned into political weapons. Watch the entire episode: Rumble: YouTube:

Mark R. Levin

35,314 views • 4 months ago

As a woman, I will fight alone on behalf of all the women in #SriLanka. 52% of the country accounts for the female population, which becomes a crucial component during the #Election of governments. There are 12 female MPs in Parliament of Sri Lanka at present. This isn't the first occasion on which women have been subjected to verbal and sexual abuse in this house. This is not an issue about being in the Govt. or Opposition - MP Diana Gamage #SriLanka #WomensRights #Parliament #SLnews #Colombo

As a woman, I will fight alone on behalf of all the women in #SriLanka. 52% of the country accounts for the female population, which becomes a crucial component during the #Election of governments. There are 12 female MPs in Parliament of Sri Lanka at present. This isn't the first occasion on which women have been subjected to verbal and sexual abuse in this house. This is not an issue about being in the Govt. or Opposition - MP Diana Gamage #SriLanka #WomensRights #Parliament #SLnews #Colombo

Manthri.LK_Watch

55,072 views • 2 years ago

We are witnessing an extraordinary constitutional anomaly unfold before our eyes. The Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam passed in September 2023 has come into force with being published in the Gazette only at 9.55pm last night. It is shocking that the Government brought amendments to a Constitutional provision that was not even published in the Gazette! This shows the Government’s unprepared and lackadaisical approach to serious lawmaking. This is also yet another evidence that the treasury benches look at Parliament as no more than a rubber stamp, not bothered about the procedures and protocol necessary for a fair legislative process.

We are witnessing an extraordinary constitutional anomaly unfold before our eyes. The Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam passed in September 2023 has come into force with being published in the Gazette only at 9.55pm last night. It is shocking that the Government brought amendments to a Constitutional provision that was not even published in the Gazette! This shows the Government’s unprepared and lackadaisical approach to serious lawmaking. This is also yet another evidence that the treasury benches look at Parliament as no more than a rubber stamp, not bothered about the procedures and protocol necessary for a fair legislative process.

K C Venugopal

21,846 views • 4 months ago

As Zimbabwe approaches a critical stage in the consideration of Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3, the Convener of the Constitution Defenders Forum, TENDAI BITI, presents a detailed analysis of the Bill, its constitutional implications, and the dangers it poses to democratic governance, constitutionalism, and the sovereignty of the people. At this crucial juncture, as Parliament prepares to deliberate on this far-reaching constitutional amendment, we encourage all citizens to engage with the issues, understand what is at stake, and participate in the defence of the Constitution. Watch the full video here: #RejectAmendmentNo3 #DefendTheConstitution

As Zimbabwe approaches a critical stage in the consideration of Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3, the Convener of the Constitution Defenders Forum, TENDAI BITI, presents a detailed analysis of the Bill, its constitutional implications, and the dangers it poses to democratic governance, constitutionalism, and the sovereignty of the people. At this crucial juncture, as Parliament prepares to deliberate on this far-reaching constitutional amendment, we encourage all citizens to engage with the issues, understand what is at stake, and participate in the defence of the Constitution. Watch the full video here: #RejectAmendmentNo3 #DefendTheConstitution

Constitution Defenders Forum

15,189 views • 2 months ago

If the agenda on the table is to flaunt their anti-Hindu credentials, the MPs of the I.N.D.I. Alliance wear it like a badge of honour. All the loud talk of Constitutional rights is nothing but rhetoric for this group. And now, moving an impeachment motion against a Judge, despite an appeal already filed by the TN DMK Govt before the Honourable Supreme Court, reveals nothing but a desperate attempt to feed their politics of minority appeasement. What purpose does this political drama serve, except signalling that the rule of law is secondary to vote-bank politics? Are they also sending a message to our country that if the I.N.D.I. Alliance doesn’t like any Judge’s verdict, they will use the impeachment process as a tool to threaten the judiciary into submission? What can be a greater threat to the Constitution than this? For the people of our country, DMK and the I.N.D.I. Alliance have once again proved that for them, divisive politics comes first.

If the agenda on the table is to flaunt their anti-Hindu credentials, the MPs of the I.N.D.I. Alliance wear it like a badge of honour. All the loud talk of Constitutional rights is nothing but rhetoric for this group. And now, moving an impeachment motion against a Judge, despite an appeal already filed by the TN DMK Govt before the Honourable Supreme Court, reveals nothing but a desperate attempt to feed their politics of minority appeasement. What purpose does this political drama serve, except signalling that the rule of law is secondary to vote-bank politics? Are they also sending a message to our country that if the I.N.D.I. Alliance doesn’t like any Judge’s verdict, they will use the impeachment process as a tool to threaten the judiciary into submission? What can be a greater threat to the Constitution than this? For the people of our country, DMK and the I.N.D.I. Alliance have once again proved that for them, divisive politics comes first.

K.Annamalai

254,866 views • 8 months ago

“When the Elephants fight, the grass suffers” - African proverb In this case the grass was a cabinet minister - Dharmendra Pradhan Meta and Google are locked in a battle to spread their business in India - their largest subscription base globally. Their algorithms are setting rules for politics. The Parliament is now discussing camera angles, the PM is making midnight reels and political handles are demanding a ban on Instagram and Meta The Cabinet Minister was a roadkill. The Government is trying regulation by innuendo and force as it has outsourced governance to APPs. Have been warning about this forever:

“When the Elephants fight, the grass suffers” - African proverb In this case the grass was a cabinet minister - Dharmendra Pradhan Meta and Google are locked in a battle to spread their business in India - their largest subscription base globally. Their algorithms are setting rules for politics. The Parliament is now discussing camera angles, the PM is making midnight reels and political handles are demanding a ban on Instagram and Meta The Cabinet Minister was a roadkill. The Government is trying regulation by innuendo and force as it has outsourced governance to APPs. Have been warning about this forever:

Pankaj Pachauri

24,893 views • 1 month ago