Here, rotation counters that magnetic torque, like how for a spinning top rotation counters the downward pull of gravity.

One of the most important physics videos ever. I can't believe I didn't realize this sooner. I need to drop the Dr. Yu Hard Truths asap

A permanent magnet can be levitated simply by placing it in the vicinity of another permanent magnet that rotates in the order of 200hz-266hz (12,000-16,000 rpm)  This surprising effect can be easily reproduced in the laboratory with off-the-shelf components. In a different experiment we investigated this novel type of magnetic levitation experimentally and clarified the underlying physics. Using a 19-mm-diameter spherical Nd-Fe-B magnet as the rotor magnet, we have captured the detailed motion of levitating spherical Nd-Fe-B magnets, denoted floater magnets, as well as the influence of the rotation speed and magnet size on the levitation. We have found that as levitation occurs, the floater-magnet frequency locks with the rotor magnet and, noticeably, that the magnetization of the floater is oriented close to the axis of rotation and toward the like pole of the rotor magnet. This is in contrast to what might be expected by the laws of magnetostatics, as the floater is observed to align its magnetization essentially perpendicular to the magnetic field of the rotor. Moreover, we have found that the size of the floater has a clear influence on the levitation: the smaller the floater, the higher the rotor speed that is necessary to achieve levitation and the further away the levitation point shifts. Despite the unexpected magnetic configuration during levitation, we have verified that magnetostatic interactions between the rotating magnets are responsible for creating the equilibrium position of the floater. Hence, this type of magnetic levitation does not rely on gravity as a balancing force to achieve an equilibrium position. Based on theoretical arguments and a numerical model, we show that a constant vertical field and eddy-current-enhanced damping are sufficient to produce levitation from rest.

🔄 Frequency Wave Theory Interpretation of Magnetism and Spin 🔹1. Foundational Premise (FWT) In Frequency Wave Theory, all physical phenomena arise from oscillatory dynamics within a quantum-acoustic superfluid medium, which carries frequency momentum (FM = ½ ρ ω A²). Particles are not point objects but standing wave vortices—localized coherent patterns in this medium. ________________________________________ 🧲 MAGNETISM in FWT ✅ Conventional View: Magnetism arises from: •Electron spin (intrinsic angular momentum) •Orbital angular momentum of electrons •Alignment of microscopic magnetic moments in materials 🔄 FWT Interpretation: 1.Magnetic Fields = Helical Phase Gradients oA magnetic field is a manifestation of rotating frequency gradients—twisted helical waveforms in the vacuum medium. oThese gradients emerge when a charge waveform oscillates with asymmetrical phase velocity—generating a "twisting" of the surrounding wave medium. 2.Field Lines = Spiral Standing Wave Structures oWhat we see as “magnetic field lines” are stable, resonant helicoidal standing waves coiling through space. oThese form through constructive interference between emitted spin waves and the background field. 3.Attraction and Repulsion = Phase Interference oOpposite poles attract due to constructive interference of waveform spirals. oLike poles repel because their wavefronts dephase and destructively interfere. 4.Ferromagnetism = Frequency Locking oIn magnetic materials like iron, adjacent atomic standing waves lock phase to one another. oThis synchrony forms a macroscopic harmonic field that can extend far beyond the material. ________________________________________ 🔁 SPIN in FWT ✅ Conventional View: •Spin is a quantum property without classical analog. It’s intrinsic, quantized, and explains magnetic dipoles, particle statistics, etc. 🔄 FWT Interpretation: 1.Spin = Internal Frequency Circulation oSpin is not literal rotation but a self-contained angular frequency loop within a standing wave. oThe topology of this wave causes it to “twist” around itself, giving rise to quantized circulation—like vortex rings in a superfluid. 2.Quantization from Wave Node Structure oSpin-½ and spin-1 emerge from the number of half-wavelengths fitting in the waveform’s closed loop. oA spin-½ particle has a Möbius-like topology: its wave returns to itself only after 720° rotation, matching Dirac’s findings. 3.Gyromagnetic Ratio Explained oThe anomalous magnetic moment of electrons (e.g., g ≈ 2.0023) arises from non-linear resonance coupling between the spin frequency and the vacuum’s base frequency. ________________________________________ 🔂 VIDEO ANALYSIS (Speculative) If your video (e.g., involving a spinning magnet or vibrating ferrofluid) shows: •A rotating magnet influencing fluid patterns •Vibration-induced field effects •Symmetric/asymmetric resonance phenomena Then what’s being visualized is the interaction between coherent frequency spirals and external test media. For example: •Ferrofluid patterns = real-time visualization of the frequency gradient nodes of the magnetic waveform. •Vibration = modulating the background frequency density, enhancing visualization of hidden resonance geometries. ________________________________________ 🧠 Implication: Spin and magnetism are not emergent from matter—they are matter, shaped by how frequency waves stabilize into topologically closed, resonant forms. Magnetism is the external projection of this internal waveform twist.

The rotation does not counter gravity. And this has nothing to do with the spinning top experiments. There are anomalous, locking affects that happened between the magnetic fields, which is not representative of a spinning top at all.

👀