Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Here’s a 5min #jakol video before matulog. Watch how I cum in slow motion. Blīthè 🇵🇭 Blithe @supotph #uncut #supot #jakolph #jakolpinoy #alterph #alterbulacan #alterphillipines #jakolerongpinoy #jakolvids #jakolcum

𝙴𝚍𝚍

32,132 subscribers

12,630 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

NSFW #jakol #uncut #supot #jakolph #jakolpinoy #alterph #alterbulacan #alterphillipines #jakolerongpinoy #jakolvids #jakolcum

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Here’s a slow motion video of Optimus practicing Kung Fu. Watch how smooth and precise the moves are, almost like a human. What makes it even more incredible is that every move is controlled by AI in real-time.

Here’s a slow motion video of Optimus practicing Kung Fu. Watch how smooth and precise the moves are, almost like a human. What makes it even more incredible is that every move is controlled by AI in real-time.

DogeDesigner

152,811 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

If you wanna see how I got into this mess, here’s a video of freave tying & gagging me in the chair! You can see the size of the Silencilicone mouth plug before the duct tape goes on. Not to mention his awesome and inescapable rope technique. Big Woof. Watch till the end!

Sensitive content

If you wanna see how I got into this mess, here’s a video of freave tying & gagging me in the chair! You can see the size of the Silencilicone mouth plug before the duct tape goes on. Not to mention his awesome and inescapable rope technique. Big Woof. Watch till the end!

Tommygun 16K

174,119 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce

First frame + Last frame = Fashion ads in minutes. Here’s how I generated this U.S. Polo sequence using Kling 3.0 + Calico AI: → The Input: A start frame and an end frame to lock in the subject and composition. → The Prompt: Don't just ask for a "cool video." Specifically prompted for "slow cinematic push-in," "shallow depth of field," and "micro-parallax" to get that premium brand-film look. → The Output: Motion that looks like a high-budget fashion shoot. Studio shoots are expensive, but AI is leveling the playing field. Comment 'PROMPT' if you want me to send you all of the prompts and the system I used to build this. (must be following so I can dm you!)

David Roberts

26,045 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

🚨UFO Capture: DENVER CO 9/23 OP States: "Took this video just the other day. I have and most of my life had dropped es that follow me on the regular or watch over me I guess you could say. But this one threw me for a loop....goes from glowing orb to what I call a door with a red spot in the middle. Maybe it's a portal....I dunno weird AF tbough...enjoy. CO 9/23 10:00 AM If you put in slow motion you can see it change shape turn into a long worm like thing and just crazy stuff!! Anyone else have ideas or seen this before?" What do we think about this one? #ufotwtitter #uapX Source:

🚨UFO Capture: DENVER CO 9/23 OP States: "Took this video just the other day. I have and most of my life had dropped es that follow me on the regular or watch over me I guess you could say. But this one threw me for a loop....goes from glowing orb to what I call a door with a red spot in the middle. Maybe it's a portal....I dunno weird AF tbough...enjoy. CO 9/23 10:00 AM If you put in slow motion you can see it change shape turn into a long worm like thing and just crazy stuff!! Anyone else have ideas or seen this before?" What do we think about this one? #ufotwtitter #uapX Source:

Skywatch Signal

28,960 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

I've been obsessing over Runway Gen-4.5 this past week. I tested it quite extensively, and I noticed a few things that should be fundamental to any video model: 1. Amazing spatial awareness. It just knows what comes next in the scene and renders it perfectly, with the correct distance, geometry, and style. 2. It understands the space and time. For example, how a character interacts with the environment, even if you don't prompt for it: High altitude > Windy. 3. This spatial sense of motion and place makes it look natural and cinematic. Regarding this last point, I've said it many times here on X that Runway needs to get out of the slow-motion era, and in the end, they delivered massively on it. It's just beautiful to watch scenes come to life naturally. Now, we just need sound and 1080p. Cristóbal Valenzuela take your time, we're here.

I've been obsessing over Runway Gen-4.5 this past week. I tested it quite extensively, and I noticed a few things that should be fundamental to any video model: 1. Amazing spatial awareness. It just knows what comes next in the scene and renders it perfectly, with the correct distance, geometry, and style. 2. It understands the space and time. For example, how a character interacts with the environment, even if you don't prompt for it: High altitude > Windy. 3. This spatial sense of motion and place makes it look natural and cinematic. Regarding this last point, I've said it many times here on X that Runway needs to get out of the slow-motion era, and in the end, they delivered massively on it. It's just beautiful to watch scenes come to life naturally. Now, we just need sound and 1080p. Cristóbal Valenzuela take your time, we're here.

Alex Patrascu

16,141 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

I’ve been using Topaz Labs for my video upscaling needs, but choosing the right model depends on what your footage needs. Starlight Precise 2.5 is the detail machine. It’s ideal for sharpening real or older footage, or refining AI video that already has strong structure but needs more clarity and fine detail. Astra 2 is the fixer. I use it for AI-generated footage that needs correction, especially clips with warped details, motion artifacts, flicker, blur or that slightly plastic AI look. Here’s a before-and-after comparison showing both models taking 720p footage to 4K. Two different tools, two different jobs. Be sure to watch in full screen to fully appreciate the difference. Try both at

I’ve been using Topaz Labs for my video upscaling needs, but choosing the right model depends on what your footage needs. Starlight Precise 2.5 is the detail machine. It’s ideal for sharpening real or older footage, or refining AI video that already has strong structure but needs more clarity and fine detail. Astra 2 is the fixer. I use it for AI-generated footage that needs correction, especially clips with warped details, motion artifacts, flicker, blur or that slightly plastic AI look. Here’s a before-and-after comparison showing both models taking 720p footage to 4K. Two different tools, two different jobs. Be sure to watch in full screen to fully appreciate the difference. Try both at

Captain HaHaa

14,870 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🚨 DID YOU KNOW the “security footage” released around the Trump assassination attempt may show signs of AI generation… and almost nobody is asking why? Not a conspiracy. Not a meme. Frame-by-frame anomalies. Visual artifacts. Timing problems. Continuity breaks. Publicly available footage. Open-source analysis. Good thing your boy lives in deep research. SO HERE’S THE PART THEY HOPE YOU NEVER SLOW DOWN ENOUGH TO NOTICE. In this full breakdown, I show: Possible AI-style motion artifacts hidden in plain sight Irregular shadow and lighting behavior Timing inconsistencies in the sequence Details in the footage that appear… off And why the official narrative may have major holes Because if this footage is authentic… it should withstand scrutiny. If it isn’t? That raises much bigger questions. Some platforms don’t seem eager for this analysis to circulate. Convenient. Watch the FULL video while it’s up. Then ask yourself: Was this real security footage… Or something manufactured to shape perception? The evidence is in the video. Decide for yourself. 👀 If you want, I can make it even more “Jesse On FIRE nuclear” with LEAKED / WHAT THEY DON’T WANT YOU TO SEE energy too.

🚨 DID YOU KNOW the “security footage” released around the Trump assassination attempt may show signs of AI generation… and almost nobody is asking why? Not a conspiracy. Not a meme. Frame-by-frame anomalies. Visual artifacts. Timing problems. Continuity breaks. Publicly available footage. Open-source analysis. Good thing your boy lives in deep research. SO HERE’S THE PART THEY HOPE YOU NEVER SLOW DOWN ENOUGH TO NOTICE. In this full breakdown, I show: Possible AI-style motion artifacts hidden in plain sight Irregular shadow and lighting behavior Timing inconsistencies in the sequence Details in the footage that appear… off And why the official narrative may have major holes Because if this footage is authentic… it should withstand scrutiny. If it isn’t? That raises much bigger questions. Some platforms don’t seem eager for this analysis to circulate. Convenient. Watch the FULL video while it’s up. Then ask yourself: Was this real security footage… Or something manufactured to shape perception? The evidence is in the video. Decide for yourself. 👀 If you want, I can make it even more “Jesse On FIRE nuclear” with LEAKED / WHAT THEY DON’T WANT YOU TO SEE energy too.

🔥Jesse ON FIRE🔥

19,224 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Want to create your own AI Scott Adams video? Today we’re releasing an early beta that lets anyone generate a ~15 second AI Scott clip on any topic. Copy/paste a headline. Watch AI Scott respond.Use it for your own curiosity or drop it into an X conversation and let AI Scott do the talking . Again this is sneak peak beta of something much bigger we are working on. Short clips only for now. And not the full AI model used in daily AICWSA yet. Yes rendering is slow. We’ll improve as capacity allows. If demand explodes, we'll throttle off before we cause a GPU brownout. Elon’s space data centers can’t get here fast enough. The goal of this AI project is to realize the wishes of Scott Adams that he discussed here: And here’s the video on how to access the beta now:

Want to create your own AI Scott Adams video? Today we’re releasing an early beta that lets anyone generate a ~15 second AI Scott clip on any topic. Copy/paste a headline. Watch AI Scott respond.Use it for your own curiosity or drop it into an X conversation and let AI Scott do the talking . Again this is sneak peak beta of something much bigger we are working on. Short clips only for now. And not the full AI model used in daily AICWSA yet. Yes rendering is slow. We’ll improve as capacity allows. If demand explodes, we'll throttle off before we cause a GPU brownout. Elon’s space data centers can’t get here fast enough. The goal of this AI project is to realize the wishes of Scott Adams that he discussed here: And here’s the video on how to access the beta now:

AI Coffee with Scott Adams

52,179 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

🎶 Iran’s Latest AI Lego Song Video The latest entry in Iran’s viral series of AI-generated Lego-style propaganda music videos takes a different tone than its predecessors, with less mockery of Trump and Hegseth, and a direct appeal to ordinary Americans. The track opens: “I love the land of the free, but not the man in the hall. Between your flag and my home, there’s a bridge made of gold. But your leaders keep burning every story we’ve told.” The lyrics invoke the 1953 CIA-backed coup against Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh: “Remember ‘53, Mosaddegh and the coup / Your leaders broke our democracy before it was new.” And the human cost of sanctions: “Your cynics’ maximum pressure is just slow motion demise / Medicine scarce and the currency’s floor bound / How can I cheer for the eagle when it’s pinning me down?” It also draws a parallel between Iranian and American working people: “I got cousins in Cali and friends in Detroit / Where the hearts in the Pentagon look for gaps to exploit / They want us to hate, they want a wall made of glass / But we’re both just the victims of a ruling class.” It closes with expressions of solidarity: “We’re fighting the same fight, just different skies. Peace to the Bronx. Peace to Shiraz. One world, two cages. Time to break the bars.“

🎶 Iran’s Latest AI Lego Song Video The latest entry in Iran’s viral series of AI-generated Lego-style propaganda music videos takes a different tone than its predecessors, with less mockery of Trump and Hegseth, and a direct appeal to ordinary Americans. The track opens: “I love the land of the free, but not the man in the hall. Between your flag and my home, there’s a bridge made of gold. But your leaders keep burning every story we’ve told.” The lyrics invoke the 1953 CIA-backed coup against Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh: “Remember ‘53, Mosaddegh and the coup / Your leaders broke our democracy before it was new.” And the human cost of sanctions: “Your cynics’ maximum pressure is just slow motion demise / Medicine scarce and the currency’s floor bound / How can I cheer for the eagle when it’s pinning me down?” It also draws a parallel between Iranian and American working people: “I got cousins in Cali and friends in Detroit / Where the hearts in the Pentagon look for gaps to exploit / They want us to hate, they want a wall made of glass / But we’re both just the victims of a ruling class.” It closes with expressions of solidarity: “We’re fighting the same fight, just different skies. Peace to the Bronx. Peace to Shiraz. One world, two cages. Time to break the bars.“

Drop Site

150,843 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

🚨 I’VE IDENTIFIED WHERE $BTC WILL BOTTOM We’ve finally seen BTC pullback from the 200 MA! Of course, we’ll still need to watch how the market reacts at key support levels BUT im expecting roughly 85K - and here’s why: In every bear market, Bitcoin has reached the weekly Fibonacci 0.382 level before putting in the real bottom. For more details, check out MY VIDEO 2018: → Reached 0.382 Fib → Dumped to –0.18 2022: → Reached 0.382 Fib → Dumped to –0.618 2026: → Reach: 0.382 Fib → Then dump into: –0.18/–0.27 range? ($48K/$41K) This pattern has already worked in 2 cycles and could repeat in this one as well. In any case, DYOR. Im also still expecting Bitcoin to make new lows, just like I wrote earlier! Drop a comment and let me know what you think: has $BTC already put in the BOTTOM, or is the real bottom still ahead? EVERYTHING IS GOING ACCORDING TO MY PLAN, DON’T WORRY TURN ON NOTIFICATIONS, FOLLOW ME, AND BOOKMARK THIS

🚨 I’VE IDENTIFIED WHERE $BTC WILL BOTTOM We’ve finally seen BTC pullback from the 200 MA! Of course, we’ll still need to watch how the market reacts at key support levels BUT im expecting roughly 85K - and here’s why: In every bear market, Bitcoin has reached the weekly Fibonacci 0.382 level before putting in the real bottom. For more details, check out MY VIDEO 2018: → Reached 0.382 Fib → Dumped to –0.18 2022: → Reached 0.382 Fib → Dumped to –0.618 2026: → Reach: 0.382 Fib → Then dump into: –0.18/–0.27 range? ($48K/$41K) This pattern has already worked in 2 cycles and could repeat in this one as well. In any case, DYOR. Im also still expecting Bitcoin to make new lows, just like I wrote earlier! Drop a comment and let me know what you think: has $BTC already put in the BOTTOM, or is the real bottom still ahead? EVERYTHING IS GOING ACCORDING TO MY PLAN, DON’T WORRY TURN ON NOTIFICATIONS, FOLLOW ME, AND BOOKMARK THIS

Tony Research

150,168 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Lenz Law "Eddy Current" Experiments 2 of 3 - Ring Magnets and a Spinning Copper Rod (YouTube deleted this experiment as well, labeling it as "medical misinformation.") Around 2010, I wrote a Facebook note titled "Frictionless Flywheel". (Facebook deleted my page of 15 years). In that write-up, I speculated and predicted that... ... if a magnet falls in slow motion down a copper tube... then what would happen if you did the inverse? Drop a magnet ring around a copper rod? It's the same relative motion between the magnet and the copper. So the magnet would tilt at an angle while slightly rotating as it falls in slow motion around the copper. But then I said... "Let's take it one step further... I predict that if you have magnet rings around a copper rod... and then you spin the rod... that the magnet rings would stabilize around the rod from eddy currents." I said, there will be a magnetic bearing effect where the magnet ring will levitate and spin. Because it's following in the wake of the eddy currents produced by the rotating copper. So the magnet should catch up to speed of the copper and match it like the moon to the Earth. Essentially remaining fixed relative to the copper rod... but since the copper is spinning at a high RPM, then the magnet should spin at a high RPM; albeit, with a slight lag. So, abiding by the scientific method, I make an observation of the magnet falling in slow motion. I thought critically about. I get a new idea. Once the new idea passes muster, I allow my self to make a prediction for a scenario that hasn't been tried yet. Worked it out in my mind to see if it was viable. But then I needed to test it. I didn't have the ability to spin a copper rod at a high enough RPM that I theorized would be needed. So I communicated with my friend Josh Toms We had been talking about different experiments for quite a while. Josh is a real experimenter and a good man. He tests things before he speaks on them and when he speaks, it's with an informed opinion. He sent me a copper sphere about 2 inches in diameter and taught me some cool stuff about eddy currents I hadn't seen when sending each other clips of experiments we were working on. I explained the concept of the "frictionless flywheel" and my prediction that the magnets would levitate and stabilize around the copper rod if it was fast enough. So Josh built a platform using an angle grinder as a motor to spin a copper rod. He put very strong NdFeB magnets around the 1 inch diameter copper rod. IT WORKED! Josh brought this platform to the Tesla Technology Conference in Albuquerque, NM in 2010 where we met up. I filmed the demonstration of the platform you see in this video. There was a young boy who was fascinated by some of the magnet demonstrations I and others were giving at the conference. So I was explaining the process of what was happening to the inquisitive kid. Again.. what you notice here is that the eddy currents act as a force field to prevent friction between the magnets and copper. There is a stable gap and "magnetic cushion" that forms after a certain RPM. (Dependent upon the mass/gauss of the magnet in relation to the diamagnetic quality/mass of the copper or material in motion.) And what is super interesting to me is that once again... you can violently shake the entire platform and it WILL NOT disturb the magnets. The will not touch that copper after a certain RPM. You could make violent 90˚ turns and from the perspective of the magnets... it's just moving in slow motion relative to the copper. Just like how the magnet falls in slow motion relative to the copper down the tube. But this is just at a higher velocity relative to a stationary observer viewing the rotating system. But it doesn't matter if it's a centripetally rotating system at a constant velocity or linear acceleration in a particular direction... those eddy currents act as a force field to protect whatever is relative to the magnets and/or copper in those moments. So the claim and prediction that a frictionless flywheel effect and magnetic bearing would take place between a ring magnet and spinning copper rod DEMONSTRATED to be true. Now "PROVING" this scenario means to derive mathematical equations to justify an explanation of how the end results arise. Spinning magnets on a copper rod doesn't prove anything. In science... proof is math. Experiments can never prove anything. Experiments never provide equations or numbers or variables. Experiments provide evidence. You collect the evidence FIRST... AFTER doing real-world, hands-on experimentation. Anything else is just armchair research and talk. You write the proofs on paper to describe how you think things happen. And your proofs must abide by the constraints of the model you use. Sure... you can use a mathematical artifice like Lorentz invariance (relativity) to prove the end results arise because of: dark matter accumulating between the magnet and copper. Or that it must be space-time curvature bending... Or that it must be because of the aether rippling and vortexing... Or because of the dynamic casimir effect or zero point energy. Or anti-gravity. NOPE! None of those things are needed in the explanations I offer for any experiments and real-world data collected. I use the framework of what I call GALILEAN VARIANCE. Good ol' classical physics in 3D Euclidean space. No 4th dimension. No space-time. No aether. No nonsense. Only Newtonian Mechanics and elementary math.... but with a twist! ... and under.. "a new light". I have a completely different interpretation as to what gravity is and the mechanism of how it arises. Issac Newton never claimed to have a theory for the CAUSE of gravity. Newton's brilliant work and optics describes the behavior of matter and energy within a gravitational field. But he never claimed to know what causes gravity. "I have not as yet been able to discover the reason for these properties of gravity from phenomena, and I do not form any hypotheses." - Newton However... I do claim to have an explanation for the cause and mechanism of gravity. And it means a total abandonment of relativity and half of QED. Gravity IS a force! (and an emission) Eddy currents are not gravity. Magnetism is not gravity. And the kicker... gravity is not electric either. It's an illusion. Gravity is not an illusion. But the illusion is that people think gravity is electric. It's not. I have a completely different take. And boy has it gotten me in a lot of trouble and banned from speaking time and time again. But... if the information is valid... then trying to suppress it is like trying to hold an inflated basketball under water. Your arms are gonna get tired eventually and things are gonna come up to the surface with spring-loaded force. Equal to the amount people tried holding it back. The Rebirth of Classical Physics: Time, Light & Gravity

Lenz Law "Eddy Current" Experiments 2 of 3 - Ring Magnets and a Spinning Copper Rod (YouTube deleted this experiment as well, labeling it as "medical misinformation.") Around 2010, I wrote a Facebook note titled "Frictionless Flywheel". (Facebook deleted my page of 15 years). In that write-up, I speculated and predicted that... ... if a magnet falls in slow motion down a copper tube... then what would happen if you did the inverse? Drop a magnet ring around a copper rod? It's the same relative motion between the magnet and the copper. So the magnet would tilt at an angle while slightly rotating as it falls in slow motion around the copper. But then I said... "Let's take it one step further... I predict that if you have magnet rings around a copper rod... and then you spin the rod... that the magnet rings would stabilize around the rod from eddy currents." I said, there will be a magnetic bearing effect where the magnet ring will levitate and spin. Because it's following in the wake of the eddy currents produced by the rotating copper. So the magnet should catch up to speed of the copper and match it like the moon to the Earth. Essentially remaining fixed relative to the copper rod... but since the copper is spinning at a high RPM, then the magnet should spin at a high RPM; albeit, with a slight lag. So, abiding by the scientific method, I make an observation of the magnet falling in slow motion. I thought critically about. I get a new idea. Once the new idea passes muster, I allow my self to make a prediction for a scenario that hasn't been tried yet. Worked it out in my mind to see if it was viable. But then I needed to test it. I didn't have the ability to spin a copper rod at a high enough RPM that I theorized would be needed. So I communicated with my friend Josh Toms We had been talking about different experiments for quite a while. Josh is a real experimenter and a good man. He tests things before he speaks on them and when he speaks, it's with an informed opinion. He sent me a copper sphere about 2 inches in diameter and taught me some cool stuff about eddy currents I hadn't seen when sending each other clips of experiments we were working on. I explained the concept of the "frictionless flywheel" and my prediction that the magnets would levitate and stabilize around the copper rod if it was fast enough. So Josh built a platform using an angle grinder as a motor to spin a copper rod. He put very strong NdFeB magnets around the 1 inch diameter copper rod. IT WORKED! Josh brought this platform to the Tesla Technology Conference in Albuquerque, NM in 2010 where we met up. I filmed the demonstration of the platform you see in this video. There was a young boy who was fascinated by some of the magnet demonstrations I and others were giving at the conference. So I was explaining the process of what was happening to the inquisitive kid. Again.. what you notice here is that the eddy currents act as a force field to prevent friction between the magnets and copper. There is a stable gap and "magnetic cushion" that forms after a certain RPM. (Dependent upon the mass/gauss of the magnet in relation to the diamagnetic quality/mass of the copper or material in motion.) And what is super interesting to me is that once again... you can violently shake the entire platform and it WILL NOT disturb the magnets. The will not touch that copper after a certain RPM. You could make violent 90˚ turns and from the perspective of the magnets... it's just moving in slow motion relative to the copper. Just like how the magnet falls in slow motion relative to the copper down the tube. But this is just at a higher velocity relative to a stationary observer viewing the rotating system. But it doesn't matter if it's a centripetally rotating system at a constant velocity or linear acceleration in a particular direction... those eddy currents act as a force field to protect whatever is relative to the magnets and/or copper in those moments. So the claim and prediction that a frictionless flywheel effect and magnetic bearing would take place between a ring magnet and spinning copper rod DEMONSTRATED to be true. Now "PROVING" this scenario means to derive mathematical equations to justify an explanation of how the end results arise. Spinning magnets on a copper rod doesn't prove anything. In science... proof is math. Experiments can never prove anything. Experiments never provide equations or numbers or variables. Experiments provide evidence. You collect the evidence FIRST... AFTER doing real-world, hands-on experimentation. Anything else is just armchair research and talk. You write the proofs on paper to describe how you think things happen. And your proofs must abide by the constraints of the model you use. Sure... you can use a mathematical artifice like Lorentz invariance (relativity) to prove the end results arise because of: dark matter accumulating between the magnet and copper. Or that it must be space-time curvature bending... Or that it must be because of the aether rippling and vortexing... Or because of the dynamic casimir effect or zero point energy. Or anti-gravity. NOPE! None of those things are needed in the explanations I offer for any experiments and real-world data collected. I use the framework of what I call GALILEAN VARIANCE. Good ol' classical physics in 3D Euclidean space. No 4th dimension. No space-time. No aether. No nonsense. Only Newtonian Mechanics and elementary math.... but with a twist! ... and under.. "a new light". I have a completely different interpretation as to what gravity is and the mechanism of how it arises. Issac Newton never claimed to have a theory for the CAUSE of gravity. Newton's brilliant work and optics describes the behavior of matter and energy within a gravitational field. But he never claimed to know what causes gravity. "I have not as yet been able to discover the reason for these properties of gravity from phenomena, and I do not form any hypotheses." - Newton However... I do claim to have an explanation for the cause and mechanism of gravity. And it means a total abandonment of relativity and half of QED. Gravity IS a force! (and an emission) Eddy currents are not gravity. Magnetism is not gravity. And the kicker... gravity is not electric either. It's an illusion. Gravity is not an illusion. But the illusion is that people think gravity is electric. It's not. I have a completely different take. And boy has it gotten me in a lot of trouble and banned from speaking time and time again. But... if the information is valid... then trying to suppress it is like trying to hold an inflated basketball under water. Your arms are gonna get tired eventually and things are gonna come up to the surface with spring-loaded force. Equal to the amount people tried holding it back. The Rebirth of Classical Physics: Time, Light & Gravity

TheRealVerbz (Jason Verbelli)

45,879 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Talking Again in 2025 I started eating again in 2024. After 11 years not eating a crumb of food or even drinking a drop of water. I got all fluids and nutrition from tubes inserted into my body. For 11 years. In 2025 I have another big improvement to announce. I have started ‼️ TALKING ‼️ again after 12 years of not saying a word to anyone! What will 2026 bring❓ Talking has been truly AMAZING. A slow process, it started when I slowly started feeling like I could talk again, but my stress response was still very high about it and it was hard to breach that stress wall and say the first words to someone. I first talked to my best friend, who I am really close with, comfortable with and feel very safe with so my stress levels are lower with her. I practiced talking to her on calls and video calls for about 6 months before talking to anyone else. Then I moved on with a few more close friends. It was hardest with my parents and caregiver because of the incredibly high stress I have been through with them in the past during my sickest years - my stress response seems to still be high with them - sensing danger likely due to a PTSD response mixed with the messed up fight or flight response in ME/CFS. But I am now talking to everyone! It is sooo much easier with my caregiver to just tell her what I need instead of pantomiming every little thing for sometimes a long time until she figures it out. What a relief! And I can have conversations with friends and loved ones! I just said goodbye to a lifelong friend who is dying and I got to talk to her on the phone and tell her how much she means to me, the impact she has had on my life, how wonderful she is; And then say goodbye. It was profoundly sad, but it meant the world to me that I got to talk to her and say goodbye at all. She is not online and does not text, so it would have been so devastating not to have that last connection with her… Read, watch or listen to the whole post on my blog! ================= ================= #mecfs #chronicillness #pwME #LongCovid #Disability

Talking Again in 2025 I started eating again in 2024. After 11 years not eating a crumb of food or even drinking a drop of water. I got all fluids and nutrition from tubes inserted into my body. For 11 years. In 2025 I have another big improvement to announce. I have started ‼️ TALKING ‼️ again after 12 years of not saying a word to anyone! What will 2026 bring❓ Talking has been truly AMAZING. A slow process, it started when I slowly started feeling like I could talk again, but my stress response was still very high about it and it was hard to breach that stress wall and say the first words to someone. I first talked to my best friend, who I am really close with, comfortable with and feel very safe with so my stress levels are lower with her. I practiced talking to her on calls and video calls for about 6 months before talking to anyone else. Then I moved on with a few more close friends. It was hardest with my parents and caregiver because of the incredibly high stress I have been through with them in the past during my sickest years - my stress response seems to still be high with them - sensing danger likely due to a PTSD response mixed with the messed up fight or flight response in ME/CFS. But I am now talking to everyone! It is sooo much easier with my caregiver to just tell her what I need instead of pantomiming every little thing for sometimes a long time until she figures it out. What a relief! And I can have conversations with friends and loved ones! I just said goodbye to a lifelong friend who is dying and I got to talk to her on the phone and tell her how much she means to me, the impact she has had on my life, how wonderful she is; And then say goodbye. It was profoundly sad, but it meant the world to me that I got to talk to her and say goodbye at all. She is not online and does not text, so it would have been so devastating not to have that last connection with her… Read, watch or listen to the whole post on my blog! ================= ================= #mecfs #chronicillness #pwME #LongCovid #Disability

Whitney Dafoe

256,345 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

This week we’re getting GPT 5.5 and I couldn’t be more excited to see the first new pre train base in a while Before Spud releases, here’s the last video you need to watch - Greg Brockman perfectly indicated to us 3 important things that perfectly encapsulate the lineage of OpenAI and the mission. 1.This is the culmination of 2 years of research and is a fresh base pre-train that we haven’t gotten for a long time. 2.This is an “exciting release” and it will bring new capabilities (sort of a given but still very grateful nonetheless) & that it is AN EARLY VERSION of what we have coming - meaning they have a lot of RL to do to make this model even better since it’s a fresh pre-train. 3.THIS IS THE BEGINNING OF THE FLYWHEEL. As he said toward the end, “we have this engine of progress that just moves faster and faster and Spud is just one step along the way.” Depending on the capabilities we see this week from Spud, we may be able to map out if AGI will be sooner rather than later, judging by how much recursive work can exist within this model and the harness. In other words, the flywheel.

This week we’re getting GPT 5.5 and I couldn’t be more excited to see the first new pre train base in a while Before Spud releases, here’s the last video you need to watch - Greg Brockman perfectly indicated to us 3 important things that perfectly encapsulate the lineage of OpenAI and the mission. 1.This is the culmination of 2 years of research and is a fresh base pre-train that we haven’t gotten for a long time. 2.This is an “exciting release” and it will bring new capabilities (sort of a given but still very grateful nonetheless) & that it is AN EARLY VERSION of what we have coming - meaning they have a lot of RL to do to make this model even better since it’s a fresh pre-train. 3.THIS IS THE BEGINNING OF THE FLYWHEEL. As he said toward the end, “we have this engine of progress that just moves faster and faster and Spud is just one step along the way.” Depending on the capabilities we see this week from Spud, we may be able to map out if AGI will be sooner rather than later, judging by how much recursive work can exist within this model and the harness. In other words, the flywheel.

Chris

103,198 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Language has its own special genres. And your toddler is working to master them all. Not long ago, I shared a fantastic video example of a toddler engaged in a pretend phone call. He took conversational turns, laughed at his imaginary partner’s joke, and knew to end the call with a goodbye and pressing the “end call” button on his toy telephone. At less than 2 years old, he had the phone call genre down pat. Here’s another amazing example (shared to IG by walking_faith_4u): the bedtime story. Watch as this little one takes over “reading” duties - turning the tables on her adoring dad. I’ve shared lots of reading videos before, but this one is notable in its complexity. Listen as she uses variegated babbling (which combines a wide variety of syllables and sounds) to recount a lengthy story for dad. Listen as well to the tone and rhythm of her voice. It’s the same soft, flowy, and expressive style he uses to help calm her as she begins preparing to drift off to sleep post story. I’d say this little one has the “bedtime story” genre on lock. Isn’t it amazing to see how children concurrently learn not just language, but the different contexts and styles of its use? Just fantastic.

Language has its own special genres. And your toddler is working to master them all. Not long ago, I shared a fantastic video example of a toddler engaged in a pretend phone call. He took conversational turns, laughed at his imaginary partner’s joke, and knew to end the call with a goodbye and pressing the “end call” button on his toy telephone. At less than 2 years old, he had the phone call genre down pat. Here’s another amazing example (shared to IG by walking_faith_4u): the bedtime story. Watch as this little one takes over “reading” duties - turning the tables on her adoring dad. I’ve shared lots of reading videos before, but this one is notable in its complexity. Listen as she uses variegated babbling (which combines a wide variety of syllables and sounds) to recount a lengthy story for dad. Listen as well to the tone and rhythm of her voice. It’s the same soft, flowy, and expressive style he uses to help calm her as she begins preparing to drift off to sleep post story. I’d say this little one has the “bedtime story” genre on lock. Isn’t it amazing to see how children concurrently learn not just language, but the different contexts and styles of its use? Just fantastic.

Dan Wuori

83,901 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

[💬] A classmate of Cha Eunwoo from the Theatre & Film Department at Sungkyunkwan University praises him on her Instagram account: — CEW classmate: “The greatest achievement of my life? Being classmates with #ChaEunwoo” Friends: “Tell us a story about how he looks in real life” CEW classmate: “When I first entered the Theatre & Film department, I had a close younger friend who went to Hanlim Arts High School. And she told me” Younger friend: “Unnie, now that you're entering school, one of your classmates is going to be insanely handsome. Like a literal God” CEW classmate: “But, you know, guys in Theatre & Film… they’re all good-looking. Honestly, that department is full of handsome people. When you see too many good-looking people, it just stops being impressive. Before enrollment, our school makes you come two weeks early. And you’re not allowed to wear makeup. We had to tie our hair back and look totally plain. Only about 20 people were in our class and we stood in a line by attendance number. My surname is Lee, and Cha Eunwoo’s real name is Lee Dongmin. So he was standing right next to me. And seriously, even standing beside me, his visuals were unreal. Usually, if someone looks that good, you want to get their number, talk to them… something, right? But with him, none of that. He felt untouchable. I just thought, ‘Wow, someone like this is actually my classmate?’” “And we had to wear training clothes, no makeup whatsoever. Even celebrities had to follow the same rule. They came bare-faced, in sweatpants, just like us. I have never in my life seen someone with skin that good. His skin tone was unreal. It looked like flour—bright and flawless. After he debuted, he became a literal “face genius,” and when he came back the next year, he looked even more handsome—just a complete celebrity. (A god descended) I haven’t seen him since 2017, so I can’t even imagine how handsome he is now” Friends: “Right, right~” Friends: “So, is Cha Eunwoo the most handsome man you’ve seen in your life?” CEW classmate: “Yeah. He’s also incredibly upright and has a good personality” — CEW classmate: “The greatest achievement of my life is being classmates with Cha Eunwoo” Friends: “Does he have good character too?” CEW classmate: “Yeah~!” CEW classmate: “Here’s a story. Back in our first year, when someone shouted ‘Gather!’, everyone had to run immediately. One time, I was tying my shoelaces and tried to open the door, but I couldn’t because my hands were full. Then Dongmin suddenly opened the door for me from behind and told me, ‘Go first’” “The key moment is—someone held the door for me. Of course I’d look back like, ‘Huh? Who was that?’ And when I looked, it was like everything went into slow motion. When you're a freshman, if someone is late, the entire class gets punished because of that person. But even in that situation, he told me, ‘Go first, hurry.’ I bet Dongmin doesn't even remember it” © mimi.hari_ #차은우 #チャウヌ #车银优 #ชาอึนอู #車銀優

[💬] A classmate of Cha Eunwoo from the Theatre & Film Department at Sungkyunkwan University praises him on her Instagram account: — CEW classmate: “The greatest achievement of my life? Being classmates with #ChaEunwoo” Friends: “Tell us a story about how he looks in real life” CEW classmate: “When I first entered the Theatre & Film department, I had a close younger friend who went to Hanlim Arts High School. And she told me” Younger friend: “Unnie, now that you're entering school, one of your classmates is going to be insanely handsome. Like a literal God” CEW classmate: “But, you know, guys in Theatre & Film… they’re all good-looking. Honestly, that department is full of handsome people. When you see too many good-looking people, it just stops being impressive. Before enrollment, our school makes you come two weeks early. And you’re not allowed to wear makeup. We had to tie our hair back and look totally plain. Only about 20 people were in our class and we stood in a line by attendance number. My surname is Lee, and Cha Eunwoo’s real name is Lee Dongmin. So he was standing right next to me. And seriously, even standing beside me, his visuals were unreal. Usually, if someone looks that good, you want to get their number, talk to them… something, right? But with him, none of that. He felt untouchable. I just thought, ‘Wow, someone like this is actually my classmate?’” “And we had to wear training clothes, no makeup whatsoever. Even celebrities had to follow the same rule. They came bare-faced, in sweatpants, just like us. I have never in my life seen someone with skin that good. His skin tone was unreal. It looked like flour—bright and flawless. After he debuted, he became a literal “face genius,” and when he came back the next year, he looked even more handsome—just a complete celebrity. (A god descended) I haven’t seen him since 2017, so I can’t even imagine how handsome he is now” Friends: “Right, right~” Friends: “So, is Cha Eunwoo the most handsome man you’ve seen in your life?” CEW classmate: “Yeah. He’s also incredibly upright and has a good personality” — CEW classmate: “The greatest achievement of my life is being classmates with Cha Eunwoo” Friends: “Does he have good character too?” CEW classmate: “Yeah~!” CEW classmate: “Here’s a story. Back in our first year, when someone shouted ‘Gather!’, everyone had to run immediately. One time, I was tying my shoelaces and tried to open the door, but I couldn’t because my hands were full. Then Dongmin suddenly opened the door for me from behind and told me, ‘Go first’” “The key moment is—someone held the door for me. Of course I’d look back like, ‘Huh? Who was that?’ And when I looked, it was like everything went into slow motion. When you're a freshman, if someone is late, the entire class gets punished because of that person. But even in that situation, he told me, ‘Go first, hurry.’ I bet Dongmin doesn't even remember it” © mimi.hari_ #차은우 #チャウヌ #车银优 #ชาอึนอู #車銀優

CHA EUNWOO 차은우 INTERNATIONAL

60,211 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Language has its own special genres. And your toddler is working to master them all. Yesterday I shared a fantastic video example of a toddler engaged in a pretend phone call. He took conversational turns, laughed at his imaginary partner’s joke, and knew to end the call with a goodbye and pressing the “end call” button on his toy telephone. At less than 2 years old, he had the phone call genre down pat. Today here’s another amazing example: the bedtime story. Watch as this little one takes over “reading” duties - turning the tables on her adoring dad. I’ve shared lots of reading videos before, but this one is notable in its complexity. Listen as she uses variegated babbling (remember this from two weeks ago… it’s babbling that combines a wide variety of syllables and sounds) to recount a lengthy story for dad. Listen as well to the tone and rhythm of her voice. It’s the same soft, flowy, and expressive style he uses to help calm her as she begins preparing to drift off to sleep post story. I’d say this little one has the “bedtime story” genre on lock. Isn’t it amazing to see how children concurrently learn not just language, but the different contexts and styles of its use? Just fantastic. This amazing little storyteller was shared to IG by walking_faith_4u.

Language has its own special genres. And your toddler is working to master them all. Yesterday I shared a fantastic video example of a toddler engaged in a pretend phone call. He took conversational turns, laughed at his imaginary partner’s joke, and knew to end the call with a goodbye and pressing the “end call” button on his toy telephone. At less than 2 years old, he had the phone call genre down pat. Today here’s another amazing example: the bedtime story. Watch as this little one takes over “reading” duties - turning the tables on her adoring dad. I’ve shared lots of reading videos before, but this one is notable in its complexity. Listen as she uses variegated babbling (remember this from two weeks ago… it’s babbling that combines a wide variety of syllables and sounds) to recount a lengthy story for dad. Listen as well to the tone and rhythm of her voice. It’s the same soft, flowy, and expressive style he uses to help calm her as she begins preparing to drift off to sleep post story. I’d say this little one has the “bedtime story” genre on lock. Isn’t it amazing to see how children concurrently learn not just language, but the different contexts and styles of its use? Just fantastic. This amazing little storyteller was shared to IG by walking_faith_4u.

Dan Wuori

53,783 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

VEO 2 by Google DeepMind : MY CHEAT SHEET Alright, so after 500h-ish spent on VEO and giving birth to both "Kitsune" and "Banished", tons of people asked for a making-of. Instead, I decided to give you what I actually know of VEO 2 to this day. Please share! it's made to be spread around! 1/ If you're not using a LLM (Gemini, ChatGPT, whatever), you're doing it wrong. VEO 2 currently has a sweet spot when it comes to prompt length: too short is poor, too long drops information, action, description etc. I did a lot of back and forth to find my sweet spot, but once I got in a place I thought felt right, I used a LLM to help me keep my structure, length, and help me draft actions. I would then spent an extensive amount of time tweaking, iterating, removing words, changing order, adding others, but the draft would come from a LLM and a conversation I built and trained to understand what my structure looked like, what was a success, or a failure. I would also share the prompts working well for further reference, and sharing the failures also for further reference. This would ensure my LLM conversation became a true companion. 2/ Structure, structure, structure Structure is important. Each recipe is different but same as any GenAI text-to something, it looks like the "higher on the prompt has more weight" rule applies. So, in my case I would start by describing the aesthetics I am looking for, time of day, colors, mood, then move to camera, subject, action, and all the rest. Once again, you might have a different experience but what is important is to stick to whatever structure you have as you move forward. Keeping it organized also makes it easier to edit later. 3/ Only describe what you see in the frame If you have a character you want to keep consistent, but you want a close-up on the face for example, your reflex will be to describe the character from head to toe and then mention you want a close-up...It's not that simple. If I tell VEO I want a face close-up but then proceed to describe the character's feet, the close-up mention will be dropped by VEO... Once again, the LLM can help you in this by giving it the instruction to only describe what is in the frame. 4/ Patience Well, it can get costly to be patient, but even if you repeat the same structure, sometimes changing one word can still throw the entire thing out and totally change the aesthetics of your scene. It is by nature extremely consistent if you conserve most words, but sometimes it happens. In those situations, trace your steps back and try to figure out which words are triggering a larger change. 5/ Documenting When I started "Kitsune" (and did the same for all others), the first thing I did was start a Figjam file so I could save the successful prompts and come back to them for future reference. Why Figjam? So I could also upload 1 to 4 generations from this prompt, and browse through them in the future. 6/ VEO is the Midjourney of video Currently, no text-to-video tool (Minimax being the closest behind) gave me a feeling I could provide strong art directions and actually get them. I have been a designer for nearly 20 years, and art direction to me has been one of the strongest foundations of most of my work. Dark, light, happy, sad, colorful or not, it doesn't matter as long as you have a point of view and please...have a point of view. Recently watched a great video about the slow death of art direction in film (link in comments) and oh boy, did VEO 2 deliver on giving me the feeling I was listened. Try starting your prompts with different kinds of medium (watercolor for example), the mood you are trying to achieve, the kind of lighting you want, the dust in the rays of light, etc... which gets me to the next one 7/ You can direct your colors in VEO It's as simple as mentioning the hues you want to have in the final result, in which quantity, and where. When I direct shots, I am constantly describing colors for two reasons: 1. Well, having a point of view and 2. reaching better consistency through text-to-video. If I have a strong and consistent mood but my character is slightly different because of text-to-video, the impact won't be dramatic because a strong art direction helps a lot with consistency. 8/ Describe your life away Some people asked me how I achieved a good consistency between shots knowing it's only text-to-video and the answer is simple: I describe my characters, their unique traits, their clothing, their haircut, etc..anything which could help someone visually impaired have a very precise mental representation of the subject. 9/ But don't describe too much either... It would be magical if you could stuff 3000 words in the window and have exactly what you asked for, right? Well, it turns out VEO is amazing with its prompt adherence, but there is always a moment where it starts dropping animations or visual elements when your prompt stretches for a tad too long. This actually happens way before the character limit allowed by VEO is reached, so don't overdo it, it's no use and will play against the results. For info, 200-250 words seems like a sweet spot! 10/ Natural movements but... VEO is great with natural movements and this is also one of the reasons why I used it so extensively: people walking don't walk in slow-motion. That being said, don't try to be too ambitious on some of the expected movements: multiple camera movements won't work, full 360 revolutions around a subject won't work, anime-style crazy camera movements won't work, etc... what it can do is already great, but there are still some limitations...

VEO 2 by Google DeepMind : MY CHEAT SHEET Alright, so after 500h-ish spent on VEO and giving birth to both "Kitsune" and "Banished", tons of people asked for a making-of. Instead, I decided to give you what I actually know of VEO 2 to this day. Please share! it's made to be spread around! 1/ If you're not using a LLM (Gemini, ChatGPT, whatever), you're doing it wrong. VEO 2 currently has a sweet spot when it comes to prompt length: too short is poor, too long drops information, action, description etc. I did a lot of back and forth to find my sweet spot, but once I got in a place I thought felt right, I used a LLM to help me keep my structure, length, and help me draft actions. I would then spent an extensive amount of time tweaking, iterating, removing words, changing order, adding others, but the draft would come from a LLM and a conversation I built and trained to understand what my structure looked like, what was a success, or a failure. I would also share the prompts working well for further reference, and sharing the failures also for further reference. This would ensure my LLM conversation became a true companion. 2/ Structure, structure, structure Structure is important. Each recipe is different but same as any GenAI text-to something, it looks like the "higher on the prompt has more weight" rule applies. So, in my case I would start by describing the aesthetics I am looking for, time of day, colors, mood, then move to camera, subject, action, and all the rest. Once again, you might have a different experience but what is important is to stick to whatever structure you have as you move forward. Keeping it organized also makes it easier to edit later. 3/ Only describe what you see in the frame If you have a character you want to keep consistent, but you want a close-up on the face for example, your reflex will be to describe the character from head to toe and then mention you want a close-up...It's not that simple. If I tell VEO I want a face close-up but then proceed to describe the character's feet, the close-up mention will be dropped by VEO... Once again, the LLM can help you in this by giving it the instruction to only describe what is in the frame. 4/ Patience Well, it can get costly to be patient, but even if you repeat the same structure, sometimes changing one word can still throw the entire thing out and totally change the aesthetics of your scene. It is by nature extremely consistent if you conserve most words, but sometimes it happens. In those situations, trace your steps back and try to figure out which words are triggering a larger change. 5/ Documenting When I started "Kitsune" (and did the same for all others), the first thing I did was start a Figjam file so I could save the successful prompts and come back to them for future reference. Why Figjam? So I could also upload 1 to 4 generations from this prompt, and browse through them in the future. 6/ VEO is the Midjourney of video Currently, no text-to-video tool (Minimax being the closest behind) gave me a feeling I could provide strong art directions and actually get them. I have been a designer for nearly 20 years, and art direction to me has been one of the strongest foundations of most of my work. Dark, light, happy, sad, colorful or not, it doesn't matter as long as you have a point of view and please...have a point of view. Recently watched a great video about the slow death of art direction in film (link in comments) and oh boy, did VEO 2 deliver on giving me the feeling I was listened. Try starting your prompts with different kinds of medium (watercolor for example), the mood you are trying to achieve, the kind of lighting you want, the dust in the rays of light, etc... which gets me to the next one 7/ You can direct your colors in VEO It's as simple as mentioning the hues you want to have in the final result, in which quantity, and where. When I direct shots, I am constantly describing colors for two reasons: 1. Well, having a point of view and 2. reaching better consistency through text-to-video. If I have a strong and consistent mood but my character is slightly different because of text-to-video, the impact won't be dramatic because a strong art direction helps a lot with consistency. 8/ Describe your life away Some people asked me how I achieved a good consistency between shots knowing it's only text-to-video and the answer is simple: I describe my characters, their unique traits, their clothing, their haircut, etc..anything which could help someone visually impaired have a very precise mental representation of the subject. 9/ But don't describe too much either... It would be magical if you could stuff 3000 words in the window and have exactly what you asked for, right? Well, it turns out VEO is amazing with its prompt adherence, but there is always a moment where it starts dropping animations or visual elements when your prompt stretches for a tad too long. This actually happens way before the character limit allowed by VEO is reached, so don't overdo it, it's no use and will play against the results. For info, 200-250 words seems like a sweet spot! 10/ Natural movements but... VEO is great with natural movements and this is also one of the reasons why I used it so extensively: people walking don't walk in slow-motion. That being said, don't try to be too ambitious on some of the expected movements: multiple camera movements won't work, full 360 revolutions around a subject won't work, anime-style crazy camera movements won't work, etc... what it can do is already great, but there are still some limitations...

Henry Daubrez 🌸💀

30,841 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

🚨 Videos don’t lie. So here is slow-motion footage shows ICE agents illegally detaining a U.S. citizen in Minneapolis… and shooting her as she tries to drive away. Watch closely: she never drove toward an agent. The agents attempted to aggressively force her out of her car illegally, even though she wasn’t blocking traffic… in fact, she was letting cars pass. When she reversed to avoid them, she turned her wheels away from the agent in front of her. One agent then leaned over the front of her car with his gun drawn… he begins slipping on ice as she tries to drive forward, possibly being the cause of the first shot being fired. • First shot: fired while his feet were on the side of her car, slipping on ice. • Second shot: fired when the car was nowhere near him. • Final shot: fired as she was already driving away. She never tried to hit anyone. She was turning away the entire time. They shot her because she was trying to drive away from an unlawful detention. And this isn’t the first time ICE has used deadly force against someone simply for drive away. It’s just the first time we have video evidence. This is why filming ICE is crucial… and why they don’t want you to. This abuse has to end, now. How many more people will have to die before the government stops ICE from illegally detaining, assaulting, and shooting U.S. citizens?

🚨 Videos don’t lie. So here is slow-motion footage shows ICE agents illegally detaining a U.S. citizen in Minneapolis… and shooting her as she tries to drive away. Watch closely: she never drove toward an agent. The agents attempted to aggressively force her out of her car illegally, even though she wasn’t blocking traffic… in fact, she was letting cars pass. When she reversed to avoid them, she turned her wheels away from the agent in front of her. One agent then leaned over the front of her car with his gun drawn… he begins slipping on ice as she tries to drive forward, possibly being the cause of the first shot being fired. • First shot: fired while his feet were on the side of her car, slipping on ice. • Second shot: fired when the car was nowhere near him. • Final shot: fired as she was already driving away. She never tried to hit anyone. She was turning away the entire time. They shot her because she was trying to drive away from an unlawful detention. And this isn’t the first time ICE has used deadly force against someone simply for drive away. It’s just the first time we have video evidence. This is why filming ICE is crucial… and why they don’t want you to. This abuse has to end, now. How many more people will have to die before the government stops ICE from illegally detaining, assaulting, and shooting U.S. citizens?

Jesus Freakin Congress

1,237,742 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Wow. The guys at Columbia War Machine were so done with Harley-Davidson after finding out that Harley went woke that Columbia War Machine decided to DESTROY his Harley in protest. You’re gonna wanna watch the whole video to see how this one ends. It’s legendary. 🧨💥 If Harley wants to fix this, here’s a roadmap: • A public statement apologizing for falling out of alignment with the expectations of Harley riders. Do not gaslight them in the statement. Tell us you recognize now that to live up to ‘United We Ride’, you realize that the company can’t push anything that will divide people. • End all donations to divisive social causes, including pride events. • Stop participating in woke social credit score systems like the HRC CEI score. • Fire CEO Jochen Zeitz. He’s the person who allowed this to happen at the company and riders don’t trust him to fix it. It’s clear from his past interviews that he’s committed to wokeness, not Harley-Davidson. • End all ERG groups that divide employees based on race or sexual preferences. Replace ERG’s with unifying events for all employees. • End support for the Equality Act which has nothing to do with Equality and in fact would result in biological men being allowed in our daughter’s bathrooms and sports teams. • Drop all trainings that refer to Diversity, Equity and Inclusion and drop the white male focused diversity training. Do not gaslight about this. • End supplier diversity programs which in reality behave like quotas and focus solely on procuring the best suppliers based on merit. • Drop plans to produce some US motorcycles in Thailand. You want to be America’s brand? Then you better make it in America. • Exit any professional associations based on race or sexual preference. Do all of this and Harley bikers will forgive the brand and move on. Be silent, defiant or give corporate word salad and riders will never forgive the brand, resulting in the slow death of a once great American icon. If you’re sick or wokeness and you’re a Harley rider or were considering buying a bike, make your voice heard here with one click: Watch the full 13 minute video in all of its glory here (I hope they post the full video on X too!):

Robby Starbuck

753,172 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

🚨SHOCKING: Jesse On Fire Just VALIDATED The PETN Shirt EXPLOSION Thesis—The "LONE SHOOTER" Narrative Is Officially DEAD. 🎤💥 Jesse On Fire just dedicated a massive segment to covering our investigation into the explosive device hidden under Charlie Kirk's shirt. While Jesse and I fundamentally disagree on the ultimate conclusion (he believes Charlie is alive and in hiding; I am adamant that Charlie is dead), we are now 100% aligned on the mechanics of what actually happened on that stage. If you look at the footage Jesse broke down from our findings, the official "lone shooter from the Losee building with a 30-06" narrative is completely destroyed. Here is what everyone is finally waking up to: 1. THE COMPRESSED AIR & THE SHIRT PUFF If you watch the footage in slow motion, right before the chaos starts, there is a massive, unnatural puff of air that forcefully escapes from underneath Charlie's shirt collar and sleeve. A distant rifle round does not cause a localized, pressurized puff of air from underneath a garment before the impact is even visible. That is the unmistakable signature of energy being released from a small, localized detonation—specifically, a micro-explosive device (like PETN) triggered from within his own equipment. 2. THE CORD AND THE CONTRAMPTION Jesse highlighted that there is a visible hose/wire running up Charlie’s back, connecting directly to the area where the explosion occurs. The location of the blast lines exactly up with where his mic receiver was clipped onto his belt on his left side. 3. CANDACE'S DREAM AND "THE LEFT" This all ties back to the chilling detail Candace Owens revealed about her vivid dream. In the dream, Charlie told her: "They are hiding what happened to my left." What was on his left? The mic receiver. The exact location of the localized explosion that took his life. 4. THE SECURITY TEAM ANOMALIES Jesse pointed out the glaring anomalies with the security team that we have been screaming about for weeks: Why was the security team receiving signals right before it happened? Why did his Chief of Staff (Mikey McCoy) and others immediately walk away before the chaos even registered? Why was there a total lack of blood on the hands, clothes, and shoes of the security team who supposedly jumped on top of a man bleeding out from a catastrophic neck wound? THE BOTTOM LINE Whether you believe Charlie is alive (like Jesse) or dead (like me), the physical evidence on that stage proves one undeniable fact: Charlie Kirk was not shot by a distant sniper. using a 30.06 round. He was taken out by a localized explosive device planted in his own equipment, and the people closest to him knew it was coming. The entire federal narrative is a fabricated cover-up. 🇺🇸⚓️ FOLLOW 🔥Jesse ON FIRE🔥 and watch his FULL video below. 👇

🚨SHOCKING: Jesse On Fire Just VALIDATED The PETN Shirt EXPLOSION Thesis—The "LONE SHOOTER" Narrative Is Officially DEAD. 🎤💥 Jesse On Fire just dedicated a massive segment to covering our investigation into the explosive device hidden under Charlie Kirk's shirt. While Jesse and I fundamentally disagree on the ultimate conclusion (he believes Charlie is alive and in hiding; I am adamant that Charlie is dead), we are now 100% aligned on the mechanics of what actually happened on that stage. If you look at the footage Jesse broke down from our findings, the official "lone shooter from the Losee building with a 30-06" narrative is completely destroyed. Here is what everyone is finally waking up to: 1. THE COMPRESSED AIR & THE SHIRT PUFF If you watch the footage in slow motion, right before the chaos starts, there is a massive, unnatural puff of air that forcefully escapes from underneath Charlie's shirt collar and sleeve. A distant rifle round does not cause a localized, pressurized puff of air from underneath a garment before the impact is even visible. That is the unmistakable signature of energy being released from a small, localized detonation—specifically, a micro-explosive device (like PETN) triggered from within his own equipment. 2. THE CORD AND THE CONTRAMPTION Jesse highlighted that there is a visible hose/wire running up Charlie’s back, connecting directly to the area where the explosion occurs. The location of the blast lines exactly up with where his mic receiver was clipped onto his belt on his left side. 3. CANDACE'S DREAM AND "THE LEFT" This all ties back to the chilling detail Candace Owens revealed about her vivid dream. In the dream, Charlie told her: "They are hiding what happened to my left." What was on his left? The mic receiver. The exact location of the localized explosion that took his life. 4. THE SECURITY TEAM ANOMALIES Jesse pointed out the glaring anomalies with the security team that we have been screaming about for weeks: Why was the security team receiving signals right before it happened? Why did his Chief of Staff (Mikey McCoy) and others immediately walk away before the chaos even registered? Why was there a total lack of blood on the hands, clothes, and shoes of the security team who supposedly jumped on top of a man bleeding out from a catastrophic neck wound? THE BOTTOM LINE Whether you believe Charlie is alive (like Jesse) or dead (like me), the physical evidence on that stage proves one undeniable fact: Charlie Kirk was not shot by a distant sniper. using a 30.06 round. He was taken out by a localized explosive device planted in his own equipment, and the people closest to him knew it was coming. The entire federal narrative is a fabricated cover-up. 🇺🇸⚓️ FOLLOW 🔥Jesse ON FIRE🔥 and watch his FULL video below. 👇

Project Constitution

32,087 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce