Here’s a segment that someone pulled from that great interview

I always imagined there must be a guiding/driving power, because the rate of increase for ways that a valid mutation can be destroyed is greater than the rate of creation of positive mutations. Entropy and decay is everywhere around us, growing at a faster rate, yet life miraculously perseveres.

There are approx 10 to the 80th power of atoms in the universe. If you pick one atom at random, the likelihood of picking that same atom again when repeated is roughly the same likelihood for a meaningful protein sequence to occur

You might like Rupert Sheldrake

Fascinating. No?

Hi Justin around 12 years ago I started to learn from those guys (Michael Behe too) so I spend hundreds of hours every night until late in the morning because I was so captivated. Their ways or their theory is much more cartesian than what we have been taught at school.

Fascinating conversation.

Darwinian evolution is insulting to the thinking man. It’s very convenient to believe that everything just evolved by chance. When you consider the consequences of your beliefs, it’s easy to see how someone could be motivated to believe Darwinian evolution.

It's an extreme outlier that any species would be able to evolve. Math literally proves divine design

Thanks for sharing! Keep it up. I’m convinced that the secular philosophy of Darwinism is at the core of the rot of the world today.

But they still believe in evolution, just not Darwinian/random evolution. So what’s the big deal?