Here's another example of a fire causing a skyacraper to collapse into it's footprint.

People don’t seem to realize the engineers also designed how the towers would collapse in the event of their destruction to minimize collateral damage. The towers did exactly as they were designed

This was a shitty concrete building in Brazil - 26 stories and the entire building was on fire and it STILL stood longer than the steel frame WTC buildings, 80 minutes. Nice try though, keep shilling for our criminal overlords.

The fire was at the base of the building though.. you’re still assuming pancake theory which the engineer that designed the towers said isn’t plausible

Here's an example of a controlled demolition

That wasn't a steel frame building.

That fire is at the base, obviously different Have some counter examples

So you’re comparing a building in fucking Brazil that was completely engulfed in flames to the World Trade Towers. Hmmmm

Wow. Looks absolutely like nothing that happened on 911

Was it a steel-framed building? Give the location so we can check.

The bottom is on fire numb nuts..

@lsferguson Cool story but that’s not made of steel I-beams and the fire is at the bottom! Show a STEEL skyscraper, burning collapse

@lsferguson Looks nothing like the towers falling.

Wow, look at all that FIRE we did not observe on 9/11/01

Massive damage "... and they had to pull it. So thats when they pulled it and building came down." -Larry Silverstein

this fire is a little different from the scattered office fires in bldg 7, but you go with that

Ok except that was actually on fire. Not a single image of fire like that on 9/11. Just smoke

That’s not a simple fire. That building is literally ablaze.

Most building fires don’t burn totally uncontained for 7 hours.

(A) That's not a steel frame building (B) That's a fire that started at the base (C) That's an old Brazilian building (D) Multiple survivors report hearing bombs at the base of the Twin Towers, and Building 7, on September 11th.

@lsferguson That building was deteriorated and abandoned and the entire thing was ablaze before it collapsed. Not even close bro.

nah lmao that bulding wasnt even steel was old and was never maintained because homeless squatters and crackheads dilled it for years nothing close to wtc buildings

Hey @grok was this a steel high-rise?

Apples and oranges asshole and the base was not hit with a temperature change. Try again.

Did they hear « boom » at every floor as it was walking down?

partial, non-global collapse of a glass framed not steel framed building. nice try tho

That building was 26 floors, not a skyscraper, and not steel framed.

Not even close to the same

The fire was at the foot of the building Not the top floors. What happens if you have a deck of card and take the bottom out?

Building 7 looked just like that, so did the world trade centers.

Is the bottom of fire or the top?

The Wilton Paes de Almeida building in São Paulo was a reinforced concrete structure, not a steel-framed one

@grok how long was the building on fire before it collapsed ?

Yep...controlled demolition here too. Buildings don't fall in on their own footprint, unless they have help with explosives.