正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

here's how things have progressed since codex gpt-5 last year. this takes fable about 11 minutes. identical simple prompt, just asking for a minimal but playable roguelite deckbuilder.

Tenobrus

36,787 subscribers

26,752 次观看 • 3 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

6 条评论

Tenobrus 的头像

Tenobrus3 个月前

obviously it looks much better, albeit still minimal in many ways. also has more cards, relics, elites, branching paths, rest sites, a boss fight, enemies have actual abilities, meta-progression, etc etc.

Tumbles 的头像

Tumbles10 天前

lol it gave you adrenaline on floor one and an energy relic on floor 2, SNORE so much for agi this shit aint balanced

Habanero 的头像

Habanero3 个月前

It’s a very honest comparison. But obviously the more interesting one would be Codex (5.5 + imagen) vs just GPT5. Basically a product comparison instead of a pure model comparison. Codex vs Codex. App vs cli.

Seventh 的头像

Seventh3 个月前

how much $$$?

Tenobrus 的头像

Tenobrus3 个月前

$16

Matar Paneer 的头像

Matar Paneer9 天前

Since when was making prototypes comparable to any real world use?

相关视频

this is f**king insane Fable 5 goes away in 24 hours from Claude Code and someone just figured out how to get fable 5 reasoning in GPT 5.6 Sol with one prompt you have less than 24 hours to set this up as this takes away 20% of your usage limit here is how: 1) Paste the prompt and ask it to "make an operating manual" 2) Go the Codex App > Settings > Personalisation > Custom Instructions 3) Use GPT 5.5 / GPT 5.6 and now you have Fable 5 reasoning at 1/3 th the price save and bookmark it no matter what

this is f**king insane Fable 5 goes away in 24 hours from Claude Code and someone just figured out how to get fable 5 reasoning in GPT 5.6 Sol with one prompt you have less than 24 hours to set this up as this takes away 20% of your usage limit here is how: 1) Paste the prompt and ask it to "make an operating manual" 2) Go the Codex App > Settings > Personalisation > Custom Instructions 3) Use GPT 5.5 / GPT 5.6 and now you have Fable 5 reasoning at 1/3 th the price save and bookmark it no matter what

Avid

57,544 次观看 • 2 个月前

This test shows clearly why GPT 5.6 Sol wins I asked the simplest prompt ever : > Create a gmail clone, the nearest possible to the real gmail ui You can see the result, GPT 5.6 Sol and Fable make a 100% perfect But here's the price difference: → GPT 5.6 Terra: $1.04 - 8 minutes → GPT 5.6 Luna: $0.44 - 10 minutes → GPT 5.6 Sol: $6.72 - 20 minutes → Claude Fable 5: $25.09 - 40 minutes Fable is 3.7x more expensive than Sol for "the same result"

This test shows clearly why GPT 5.6 Sol wins I asked the simplest prompt ever : > Create a gmail clone, the nearest possible to the real gmail ui You can see the result, GPT 5.6 Sol and Fable make a 100% perfect But here's the price difference: → GPT 5.6 Terra: $1.04 - 8 minutes → GPT 5.6 Luna: $0.44 - 10 minutes → GPT 5.6 Sol: $6.72 - 20 minutes → Claude Fable 5: $25.09 - 40 minutes Fable is 3.7x more expensive than Sol for "the same result"

Melvyn • Builder

22,254 次观看 • 2 个月前

Someone figured out how to run Claude Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 together inside ChatGPT Codex and the setup takes 5 minutes. Two commands get you started: → codex plugin marketplace add Cjbuilds/Codex-Orchestration → codex plugin add codex-orchestration@codex-orchestration From there you set an advisor model for the expensive thinking and an executor model for the cheaper implementation. Paste the workflow prompt, describe the task and both models handle their side automatically. Fable 5 plans. A cheaper model executes. You get the best of both without paying flagship prices for every token.

Someone figured out how to run Claude Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 together inside ChatGPT Codex and the setup takes 5 minutes. Two commands get you started: → codex plugin marketplace add Cjbuilds/Codex-Orchestration → codex plugin add codex-orchestration@codex-orchestration From there you set an advisor model for the expensive thinking and an executor model for the cheaper implementation. Paste the workflow prompt, describe the task and both models handle their side automatically. Fable 5 plans. A cheaper model executes. You get the best of both without paying flagship prices for every token.

0xMarioNawfal

56,586 次观看 • 2 个月前

ive been running the oneshot roguelite deckbuilder test for over a year now. here's astra's. relative to fable: - natively uses imagegen for art - builds a full three act structure plus three different characters / cardsets - is the first model to play and record its own demo after making the game is it a step change from fable? no, not really. it's pretty impressively cohesive and contentful but i think fable's showed noticeably more visual flare, despite the programatic sprites rather than generated images. but still it's... a lot, and i'm quite sure it could make massive improvements with small amounts of feedback, and it generated the images and published the game as a playable site i can share and recorded a demo of it playing it all in one shot. it's an extremely complete package. comparing this to what we had a year ago is truly fucking remarkable

ive been running the oneshot roguelite deckbuilder test for over a year now. here's astra's. relative to fable: - natively uses imagegen for art - builds a full three act structure plus three different characters / cardsets - is the first model to play and record its own demo after making the game is it a step change from fable? no, not really. it's pretty impressively cohesive and contentful but i think fable's showed noticeably more visual flare, despite the programatic sprites rather than generated images. but still it's... a lot, and i'm quite sure it could make massive improvements with small amounts of feedback, and it generated the images and published the game as a playable site i can share and recorded a demo of it playing it all in one shot. it's an extremely complete package. comparing this to what we had a year ago is truly fucking remarkable

Tenobrus

16,096 次观看 • 10 天前

Models like GPT 5.6 or Fable 5 are accelerating the commodification of software. For instance, I gave Fable a screenshot of the Stripe, OpenAI, and Anthropic websites with a simple prompt: “Create a pixel-perfect reproduction of this website.” It took only seconds and a simple prompt to duplicate the design. This is exciting because there are so many poorly designed websites, but now they are just a prompt away from achieving world-class design!!

Models like GPT 5.6 or Fable 5 are accelerating the commodification of software. For instance, I gave Fable a screenshot of the Stripe, OpenAI, and Anthropic websites with a simple prompt: “Create a pixel-perfect reproduction of this website.” It took only seconds and a simple prompt to duplicate the design. This is exciting because there are so many poorly designed websites, but now they are just a prompt away from achieving world-class design!!

Nicolas Bustamante

37,754 次观看 • 2 个月前

KIMI K3 IS A NIGHTMARE FOR CLAUDE FABLE-5 AND GPT-5.6-SOL FOR GAME DEVELOPMENT Tried building a playable MMORPG with Kimi K3 featuring horse riding, rooftop parkour, combat and an explorable open world. The whole thing took about 55 minutes from a single prompt and cost exactly $9.37 to generate.

KIMI K3 IS A NIGHTMARE FOR CLAUDE FABLE-5 AND GPT-5.6-SOL FOR GAME DEVELOPMENT Tried building a playable MMORPG with Kimi K3 featuring horse riding, rooftop parkour, combat and an explorable open world. The whole thing took about 55 minutes from a single prompt and cost exactly $9.37 to generate.

aditya

98,073 次观看 • 2 个月前

OFFICIALLY SAYING KIMI K3 IS BETTER THAN CLAUDE FABLE-5 AND GPT-5.6-SOL FOR FRONTEND DEVELOPMENT Tried building a macOS-style UI for an AI operating system with Kimi K3. This whole thing took about 15 minutes from a single prompt.

OFFICIALLY SAYING KIMI K3 IS BETTER THAN CLAUDE FABLE-5 AND GPT-5.6-SOL FOR FRONTEND DEVELOPMENT Tried building a macOS-style UI for an AI operating system with Kimi K3. This whole thing took about 15 minutes from a single prompt.

aditya

555,861 次观看 • 2 个月前

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua

Chris

250,919 次观看 • 2 个月前

New Fable 5.1 absolutely crushed Fable 5 at making a racing game👾🔥 Claude just dropped Fable 5.1, so we gave both models the same prompt to build a playable racing game from scratch in Godot with BlenderMCP Tasks: - Make car and environment models using BlenderMCP - A big map for long driving sessions - Realistic car handling - Simple HUD for speed and controls Outputs: Fable 5.1: 1.2M tokens, 123.98$, 59.8 minutes Fable 5: 897K tokens, 95.87, 57.3 minutes Fable 5.1's models are far more detailed and the game runs smooth, the world feels alive while you drive. Fable 5 finished all three tasks and its HUD and controls work, but its models are plain and the game feels stiff

New Fable 5.1 absolutely crushed Fable 5 at making a racing game👾🔥 Claude just dropped Fable 5.1, so we gave both models the same prompt to build a playable racing game from scratch in Godot with BlenderMCP Tasks: - Make car and environment models using BlenderMCP - A big map for long driving sessions - Realistic car handling - Simple HUD for speed and controls Outputs: Fable 5.1: 1.2M tokens, 123.98$, 59.8 minutes Fable 5: 897K tokens, 95.87, 57.3 minutes Fable 5.1's models are far more detailed and the game runs smooth, the world feels alive while you drive. Fable 5 finished all three tasks and its HUD and controls work, but its models are plain and the game feels stiff

atomic.chat

21,216 次观看 • 14 天前

Made a video on how I decide between models right now. Still trying to figure out the exact way to describe these things, especially as the agents get more capable, but at least for now this is how I'm thinking about things (80% GPT-5.6 Sol, 15% Fable, 5% everything else)

Made a video on how I decide between models right now. Still trying to figure out the exact way to describe these things, especially as the agents get more capable, but at least for now this is how I'm thinking about things (80% GPT-5.6 Sol, 15% Fable, 5% everything else)

Ben Davis

11,684 次观看 • 1 个月前

If you've ever had to wait minutes for simple changes to be handled by your ai agent, I encourage you to give this XML Edit workflow a try! It's great for rapid iteration, but it's also excellent for a first pass implementation with GPT-5 Pro. Here's how it works 👇

If you've ever had to wait minutes for simple changes to be handled by your ai agent, I encourage you to give this XML Edit workflow a try! It's great for rapid iteration, but it's also excellent for a first pass implementation with GPT-5 Pro. Here's how it works 👇

eric provencher

36,621 次观看 • 1 年前

How much have things changed since 1999? Here's what celebrity row looked like for Game 4 of the Finals - the last year the Knicks made it that far until 2026

How much have things changed since 1999? Here's what celebrity row looked like for Game 4 of the Finals - the last year the Knicks made it that far until 2026

Velodus✨

2,321,116 次观看 • 3 个月前

Claude Opus 5 just made the best Remotion video I have ever seen. Perfect transitions. Music timing locked to the frame. Branding nailed without me asking. Fable 5 held this crown for months. Opus 5 took it in one prompt. Opus 5 significantly outperforms Fable 5 at marketing videos, and it is not close. Watch this and remember Opus 5 made it.

Claude Opus 5 just made the best Remotion video I have ever seen. Perfect transitions. Music timing locked to the frame. Branding nailed without me asking. Fable 5 held this crown for months. Opus 5 took it in one prompt. Opus 5 significantly outperforms Fable 5 at marketing videos, and it is not close. Watch this and remember Opus 5 made it.

BridgeMind

188,558 次观看 • 1 个月前

nobody is talking about this setup. Claude + FullEnrich MCP = search, verify and export leads without opening a tab. takes 5 minutes to connect. here's how 🧵

nobody is talking about this setup. Claude + FullEnrich MCP = search, verify and export leads without opening a tab. takes 5 minutes to connect. here's how 🧵

Muhammad Ayan

16,201 次观看 • 1 个月前

this is f**king gold someone just figured out how to run Claude Fable 5 and GPT 5.6 Sol in the same loop gpt-5.6 came out yesterday. fable 5 leaves in 48 hours. this window has never existed before and never will again. here is how to use it: 1. open claude code. install openai's codex plugin 2. type /model. choose fable 5. 3. drop one ROUTING.md in your repo root (full file in comments). 4.paste the prompt (in comments), write what feature you want. boom. save and bookmark this no matter what. it will be the most productive thing you do this weekend

this is f**king gold someone just figured out how to run Claude Fable 5 and GPT 5.6 Sol in the same loop gpt-5.6 came out yesterday. fable 5 leaves in 48 hours. this window has never existed before and never will again. here is how to use it: 1. open claude code. install openai's codex plugin 2. type /model. choose fable 5. 3. drop one ROUTING.md in your repo root (full file in comments). 4.paste the prompt (in comments), write what feature you want. boom. save and bookmark this no matter what. it will be the most productive thing you do this weekend

Avid

140,849 次观看 • 2 个月前

i recreated this with GPT 5.6 Sol & it costed me ~$5 only & 2 prompts >GPT 5.6 Sol Ultra as the main agent, admin & orchestrator >GPT 5.6 Luna Max as sub-agents >used the Codex app >used about 20% of my weekly limit on $100 plan ($100/4 * 20%) some bugs, and improvements would take another prompt but pretty good for $5!

i recreated this with GPT 5.6 Sol & it costed me ~$5 only & 2 prompts >GPT 5.6 Sol Ultra as the main agent, admin & orchestrator >GPT 5.6 Luna Max as sub-agents >used the Codex app >used about 20% of my weekly limit on $100 plan ($100/4 * 20%) some bugs, and improvements would take another prompt but pretty good for $5!

anul agarwal

16,411 次观看 • 1 个月前

GPT-6 Astra (max) created this incredible war scene in Three.js, in a single turn (no examples, basic prompt only). Just look at the detail! On the ship models, on how things interact with the water... And this was only 50K tokens, done in about 12 minutes.

GPT-6 Astra (max) created this incredible war scene in Three.js, in a single turn (no examples, basic prompt only). Just look at the detail! On the ship models, on how things interact with the water... And this was only 50K tokens, done in about 12 minutes.

leo 🐾

52,777 次观看 • 11 天前

here's a 5 minute CODEX 101 to help you understand WTF it is and why its going to completely disrupt sillicon valley (and the world) - ESPECIALLY IF YOU ARE A SOLO DEV/TEAM I'll be making a longer video soon but I just wanted to get this one out since people have been asking 🙏

here's a 5 minute CODEX 101 to help you understand WTF it is and why its going to completely disrupt sillicon valley (and the world) - ESPECIALLY IF YOU ARE A SOLO DEV/TEAM I'll be making a longer video soon but I just wanted to get this one out since people have been asking 🙏

Techguyver

90,266 次观看 • 1 年前

this is f**king dangerous someone just figured out how to get fable 5 reasoning in opus 4.8 with one prompt you have less than 24 hours to set this up as this takes away 20% of your usage limit here is how: 1) Paste the prompt and ask it to "make an operating manual" 2) Create a New Claude Project and "Add this .md in Project instructions 3) Use Opus 4.8 High/Max and now you have Fable 5 reasoning at 1/5th the price save and bookmark it no matter what

this is f**king dangerous someone just figured out how to get fable 5 reasoning in opus 4.8 with one prompt you have less than 24 hours to set this up as this takes away 20% of your usage limit here is how: 1) Paste the prompt and ask it to "make an operating manual" 2) Create a New Claude Project and "Add this .md in Project instructions 3) Use Opus 4.8 High/Max and now you have Fable 5 reasoning at 1/5th the price save and bookmark it no matter what

Avid

952,819 次观看 • 2 个月前