Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Here's my conversation with the founding team of Cursor, a popular code editor (based on VSCode) that specializes in AI-assisted programming. This is a super technical conversation that is bigger than just about one code editor. It's about the future of programming and, in general, the future of human-AI...

1,261,340 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

10 Comments

Lex Fridman's profile picture
Lex Fridman1 year ago

Here's the links for my conversation with the Cursor team: YouTube: Transcript: Podcast:

💫Shamara💫's profile picture
💫Shamara💫1 year ago

Interesting 💯🖤

BitVanguard's profile picture
BitVanguard1 year ago

Please do a follow up with @const_reborn and @shibshib89 about the importance of decentralized AI!

Dr. Daniel Bender's profile picture
Dr. Daniel Bender1 year ago

Want a short summary before you listen to 2.5 hours? Here you go (done with Claude 3.5 Sonnet for free in another coding editor named Zed): Here's a concise summary of the key points from the podcast transcript: 1. Main topic: The role of AI in programming and the future of human-AI collaboration in software development 2. Key points: - Cursor is a code editor based on VS Code that adds powerful AI-assisted coding features - The team discusses various AI models and techniques used in Cursor, including GPT-4, Claude, and custom models - They explore challenges in scaling, prompt engineering, and optimizing model performance - The importance of speed and user experience in AI-assisted coding tools is emphasized 3. Significant insights: - The team believes human programmers will remain in the "driver's seat" for the foreseeable future, with AI enhancing productivity - They predict programming will become more focused on high-level design decisions and less on boilerplate code - The skills required for programming may shift towards creativity and system design rather than low-level implementation 4. Important facts/statistics: - Cursor uses a mix of large language models and custom-trained models for different tasks - The team discusses various techniques to improve model performance, such as caching, speculative decoding, and synthetic data generation 5. Overall conclusion: The future of programming will likely involve close human-AI collaboration, with AI tools enhancing programmer productivity and creativity. While AI capabilities will continue to advance, human judgment and decision-making will remain crucial in software development.

Punisher ττ's profile picture
Punisher ττ1 year ago

Sir, your interest in the AI-human future should encourage you to get in touch with the great minds working on Bittensor. @const @shibshib89 @JosephJacks_ @mogmachine I invite you to watch the documentary dedicated to Bittensor.

Brucephalus's profile picture
Brucephalus1 year ago

I got an email from the CEO offering a refund when I cancelled. Really impressed me. They clearly believe in the future of their product. I just cancelled because I was working on something that AI was not always so helpful. Definitely better than VSCode + co-pilot for me.

Fred Miskawi's profile picture
Fred Miskawi1 year ago

Software we build today will be replaced/regenerated next year. Makes investment decisions tricky.

Tomas Hernando Kofman's profile picture
Tomas Hernando Kofman1 year ago

Daily user of Cursor—cool to see the question on routing. We've built a SOTA router that determines when to send queries to o1 vs when to use a weaker model: oss option also available ❤️ cc @mntruell, @amanrsanger, @sualehasif996, @ArVID220u

Jeff • FREESITES_com•FREE Finance AI Tips & Tools's profile picture
Jeff • FREESITES_com•FREE Finance AI Tips & Tools1 year ago

FREE Course on the Future of AI- Human Collaboration Super Technical And Worth It @lexfridman

Jimmy Morris's profile picture
Jimmy Morris1 year ago

might be interesting to talk to the folks over at @zeddotdev too. They've built an editor from the ground up, almost like a graphics engine for ultimate performance

Related Videos

Here's my conversation with Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, the company that created Claude, one of the best AI systems in the world. We talk about scaling, AI safety, regulation, and a lot of super technical details about the present and future of AI and humanity. It's a 5+ hour conversation in total. Amanda Askell and Chris Olah (Chris Olah) join us for an hour each to talk about Claude's character and mechanistic interpretability, respectively. This was a fascinating, wide-ranging, super-technical, and fun conversation! First 4 hours are here on X (4 hours is current limit), and is up on everywhere else in full. Links in comment. Timestamps: 0:00 - Introduction 3:14 - Scaling laws 12:20 - Limits of LLM scaling 20:45 - Competition with OpenAI, Google, xAI, Meta 26:08 - Claude 29:44 - Opus 3.5 34:30 - Sonnet 3.5 37:50 - Claude 4.0 42:02 - Criticism of Claude 54:49 - AI Safety Levels 1:05:37 - ASL-3 and ASL-4 1:09:40 - Computer use 1:19:35 - Government regulation of AI 1:38:24 - Hiring a great team 1:47:14 - Post-training 1:52:39 - Constitutional AI 1:58:05 - Machines of Loving Grace 2:17:11 - AGI timeline 2:29:46 - Programming 2:36:46 - Meaning of life 2:42:53 - Amanda Askell - Philosophy 2:45:21 - Programming advice for non-technical people 2:49:09 - Talking to Claude 3:05:41 - Prompt engineering 3:14:15 - Post-training 3:18:54 - Constitutional AI 3:23:48 - System prompts 3:29:54 - Is Claude getting dumber? 3:41:56 - Character training 3:42:56 - Nature of truth 3:47:32 - Optimal rate of failure 3:54:43 - AI consciousness 4:09:14 - AGI 4:17:52 - Chris Olah - Mechanistic Interpretability 4:22:44 - Features, Circuits, Universality 4:40:17 - Superposition 4:51:16 - Monosemanticity 4:58:08 - Scaling Monosemanticity 5:06:56 - Macroscopic behavior of neural networks 5:11:50 - Beauty of neural networks

Lex Fridman

1,375,630 views • 1 year ago