Video yükleniyor...
Video Yüklenemedi
Here's NASA having no problem camera-tracking the Artemis II astronauts falling back down to Earth at over 25,000 MPH. For reference, that's about 14x the velocity of a speeding sniper bullet. Does this make sense? They couldn't even track the rocket launch moving <100 MPH...
72,707 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce •via X (Twitter)
45 Yorum

Hey, "trust the science"

AI occasionally lets the truth sneak out...even the one owned by the most notorious space fraudster on earth

To be honest, I trust SuperGrok less than NASA, they both lie and stretch the truth, but you won't believe how many ppl have attached me for posting this. This is Gold😎

Flerfs just keep failing science

Here's a scientific experiment for you: Go take a video of a sniper rifle bullet flying through the air (this is 1/14 the speed of the object you're seeing in the video)

Do I get to use Nasas equipment at that distance? Or are you just dumb

It makes me sad that you guys can vote.

Don't worry, I avoid things that are a waste of my time

That’s actually not bad

We have self driving cars We have rockets that come back to the launch pad We have direct energy weapons Yet NASA had ZERO HD cameras or telescopes that could steadily track the re-entry & decent 🤣 And they’re still farting around in the ocean 40 mins after splash down 🤣🤣🤣

I saw more pixel glitches than HD video

The transmission glitches were impressive 🤣 That HD feed sure was something

I tracked them from launch and out to the moon and back.

Must have used the bulge and and the slope to maximize the videography.

Just trust bro, NASA said so

It looked fake

You are using your God-given discernment.

I wonder how many people have woken to this

Posting a poll soon to find out...

And then slow down to somehow 17 mph for a safe parachute launch 😂

"ALL THE WORLDS ..A STAGE" FOR "GLOBE-SUCKERNAUGHTS"

It’s over an hr after splashdown and still no extractions. ?????

you cant track a car going 200 mph on the road next to you but you can easily track a plane going 500 mph 30,000 feet in the air. this is even further up little bro.

It's amazing what extreme distance and computer assisted tracking can do....

Minutes after takeoff, they couldn't continue filming them. Now that they're returning at 40,000 km/h, they're filming them in space. And the thrust they're supposed to feel at that speed—the Najash fans will say, "You don't feel it in space"—but what about when they re-enter the atmosphere?

So you’re retarded. Got it

very

Nope.

I’ve heard some ordinary people with no special equipment or training can track aircraft that are traveling close to the speed of sound with their cameras. Isn’t that amazing?

When something is far away, it makes it easier to follow.

At what point do you figure out we don’t care about your commentary?

maybe when 74,500 people including you unfollow me, i will CONSIDER the possibility

@upsssco1732 It’s a bot

@benwehrman You’re a dope

Yup

Awwww, math is hard isnt it

@Tess____444 Have you never skipped a stone across water?

Why don’t they zoom in?

Why don’t conspiracy theorists understand scale

It’s all theatrics.

They're supposedly traveling FOUR TIMES as fast as this hypersonic rocket sled which is going a mere 6,453 mph. Man, that's funny!! 😂😂

Read a book

60k tweet reach 800 retweets 🤔 Shadow banners @x we know!

It doesn't make any sense. It's a SCAM. It's always been a SCAM.

Explain airplanes. Far away plane, easy to track. Up close plane hard to track.




