Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Hester Peirce says people should be able to live without being watched, until there's real suspicion "This is a balance that we as a society have to come to. And I don't think that we've gotten it right in the traditional world necessarily either." "We've been asking financial institutions... to do an awful lot of watching what their customers do, and sort of we're deputizing them to do the government's work." "It's a good moment for us to do a reset and think about how we can get that balance right, how we can respect the constitutional rights of citizens but also give law enforcement the mechanisms they need when they do need to get access to information, to get that using the proper channels." "We really have to be willing to have a conversation that recognizes everything at stake." "As an American, I'm very committed to the idea that people should generally be allowed to go about their lives without having other people watch what they're doing." "When there's a suspicion of illegal activity, that's when you have to figure out a way for government to see whether there's a there there."show more

The Wolf Of All Streets

1,085,975 subscribers

24,814 views • 3 days ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Finance Education

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

6 Comments

The Wolf Of All Streets3 days ago

FT @HesterPeirce This clip is brought to you by @hodlwithLedn

Edward McGowan3 days ago

Peirce’s argument centers on drawing a clearer line between ordinary financial privacy and targeted government access when there is reasonable suspicion of wrongdoing. You and @10_beth_ are easily two of my favorite follows

Demi🧜🏽‍♀️3 days ago

Privacy and financial oversight are a tough balance, and this is a thoughtful point. You and @JonLeeMiller are the two accounts I enjoy following most.

Robert Nass3 days ago

Privacy should be the default. Due process is the bridge between freedom and enforcement.

Ted Trading Club3 days ago

Privacy by default. Transparency with due process.

Mark Reynolds3 days ago

Financial privacy and effective enforcement don’t have to be mutually exclusive when proper legal channels exist. I regularly value your perspective, with @GwenPoth also in my reading rotation.

Related Videos

Hester Peirce calls for a reset on financial privacy "Even with the other financial system, I complain about this a lot in the non-crypto area as well, I think we as Americans have given up a lot of the right to protect our financial privacy, sort of because we've assumed that that's just the way it must be." "And we've assumed that when it comes to financial markets it's okay if the government follows us around and watches everything we do." "So I think it's really a moment for a reset, a reset that honestly acknowledges the tradeoffs and tries to come to a good result." "No one wants to see the financial system used for bad purposes, so we need to work carefully, but we also need to really have a fundamental rethink."

Hester Peirce calls for a reset on financial privacy "Even with the other financial system, I complain about this a lot in the non-crypto area as well, I think we as Americans have given up a lot of the right to protect our financial privacy, sort of because we've assumed that that's just the way it must be." "And we've assumed that when it comes to financial markets it's okay if the government follows us around and watches everything we do." "So I think it's really a moment for a reset, a reset that honestly acknowledges the tradeoffs and tries to come to a good result." "No one wants to see the financial system used for bad purposes, so we need to work carefully, but we also need to really have a fundamental rethink."

The Wolf Of All Streets

22,121 views • 6 days ago

🚨 NOW: Sen. Rick Scott demands the Senate STOP TAKING BREAKS and get reconciliation done for ICE and CBP "It depends on how HARD we want to work! I mean, if we stay here and do our JOBS, we'll get these things done!" "We've got to get the ICE and the Border Patrol done this week, so we can get that to the President's desk, make sure that's all funded, and we've got a lot of the things we've got to get done." "And we clearly are going to have to do a supplemental for the military with regard to the war in Iran, and there's other things we ought to do." "We've got to figure out how do we cut the cost of government. This reconciliation is a way to do that, and also fund the things we need to fund." "So I think we need to stay, as long as we have to do, stay here to get these things done."

🚨 NOW: Sen. Rick Scott demands the Senate STOP TAKING BREAKS and get reconciliation done for ICE and CBP "It depends on how HARD we want to work! I mean, if we stay here and do our JOBS, we'll get these things done!" "We've got to get the ICE and the Border Patrol done this week, so we can get that to the President's desk, make sure that's all funded, and we've got a lot of the things we've got to get done." "And we clearly are going to have to do a supplemental for the military with regard to the war in Iran, and there's other things we ought to do." "We've got to figure out how do we cut the cost of government. This reconciliation is a way to do that, and also fund the things we need to fund." "So I think we need to stay, as long as we have to do, stay here to get these things done."

Eric Daugherty

19,637 views • 4 months ago

Active Duty US Army Gives Update On West North Carolina Hurricane Helene Victims Says the US Government is not letting them go help people on foot “We're talking about the government — They're not gonna let us go on foot. They're not going to. — Or the consequences will vary” “People are asking why don't we use animals or 4 wheelers and stuff like that. They have to approve whatever that they they have to approve it before we're able to do it. Does that make any sense? If they don't approve it, we cannot do it.” “There's a chain of command. We can only do so much that we can only do what we're allowed to do. Does that make any sense?” “We can't do it. So I think y'all need to understand that we're only doing what we're allowed to do and what we're told to do. We cannot do anything other than that. Or the consequences will vary.” “There's literally nothing I can do. I hear you. I hear your frustration. I get it. Also, people are saying civilians are doing this, that, and a third. You can do whatever you want because you're a civilian. We cannot do we have we have to answer to someone. I'm sorry. We have to answer to someone”

Active Duty US Army Gives Update On West North Carolina Hurricane Helene Victims Says the US Government is not letting them go help people on foot “We're talking about the government — They're not gonna let us go on foot. They're not going to. — Or the consequences will vary” “People are asking why don't we use animals or 4 wheelers and stuff like that. They have to approve whatever that they they have to approve it before we're able to do it. Does that make any sense? If they don't approve it, we cannot do it.” “There's a chain of command. We can only do so much that we can only do what we're allowed to do. Does that make any sense?” “We can't do it. So I think y'all need to understand that we're only doing what we're allowed to do and what we're told to do. We cannot do anything other than that. Or the consequences will vary.” “There's literally nothing I can do. I hear you. I hear your frustration. I get it. Also, people are saying civilians are doing this, that, and a third. You can do whatever you want because you're a civilian. We cannot do we have we have to answer to someone. I'm sorry. We have to answer to someone”

Wall Street Apes

1,119,728 views • 2 years ago

Jeff Bezos on his favorite interview question “When I interview people, I ask them to give me an example of something they've invented. And I always point out, it doesn't have to be something that you actually took to the patent office. It could be a metric that you invented and followed carefully. It could be a business process that you invented. You want to select people who like to invent their way out of boxes.” A lot of people will immediately jump to what Jeff calls an “either or” solution (e.g. “We can do A or B.”). But as Jeff explains: “The right question is how can we do A and B? What invention do we need to be able to do both?”

Jeff Bezos on his favorite interview question “When I interview people, I ask them to give me an example of something they've invented. And I always point out, it doesn't have to be something that you actually took to the patent office. It could be a metric that you invented and followed carefully. It could be a business process that you invented. You want to select people who like to invent their way out of boxes.” A lot of people will immediately jump to what Jeff calls an “either or” solution (e.g. “We can do A or B.”). But as Jeff explains: “The right question is how can we do A and B? What invention do we need to be able to do both?”

Startup Archive

1,846,369 views • 10 months ago

Hester Peirce says the SEC wants tokenized stocks in the US, but issuers get a veto "Part of what we're trying to do is encourage people to try trading in tokenized securities here in the US, and so a lot of the activity has been outside the US. We want the United States to be a place where people can try this." "And in terms of including an issuer consent condition, I do think a lot of issuers will be very excited to see their securities traded in tokenized fashion. I've talked to a lot of issuers and there's obviously questions, but there's also excitement about what this could mean." "And so we did want to give issuers the option to say, I'm not ready for this, this is not what I want. But I think it will be interesting to see, again, the uptake on that side as well and the interest on that side."

Hester Peirce says the SEC wants tokenized stocks in the US, but issuers get a veto "Part of what we're trying to do is encourage people to try trading in tokenized securities here in the US, and so a lot of the activity has been outside the US. We want the United States to be a place where people can try this." "And in terms of including an issuer consent condition, I do think a lot of issuers will be very excited to see their securities traded in tokenized fashion. I've talked to a lot of issuers and there's obviously questions, but there's also excitement about what this could mean." "And so we did want to give issuers the option to say, I'm not ready for this, this is not what I want. But I think it will be interesting to see, again, the uptake on that side as well and the interest on that side."

The Wolf Of All Streets

24,155 views • 3 days ago

“You're not entitled to get what you want. I love you. You're entitled to earn what you're willing to go work for. And that's true in our families, in our parenting, in our marriage, in our companies, in society. If we want it, go earn it. If that's positivity, have positivity. I think and I am a positive person. I am jacked. I am excited. Obviously, you can feel my energy through technology here, I hope. Frankly, think positive people just need to get a lot stronger. I really do. I mean, I don't want to call them weak because people hear that differently but it kind of is. Look, if you want that positivity to stick, you’ve got to get tougher. Not sacrifice your love and your care and your empathy, but you got to get tough. And then we have to figure out how to love the people who are cynical because I don't think there's a ton of bad people in the world and I don't think there's a ton of bad people on teams. But I do think there are people who've been burned out. I do think there are people who have been through things in their lives. They've been through things in their company. They're experiencing stuff somewhere else. For whatever reason, they just kind of got run down and cynical and negative, or whatever. Or they're just wired a little different than we are. And I don't to hate on those people. I want to win those people. They don't have to be like me. They don't have to have my energy. But I want those people on my team. I want to love those people. And if eventually they choose that they don't believe in the same things that I believe in, I want to make it really clear and obvious that they don't want to be on this team because we're not about that. You know what I'm saying? I want it to be very easy, obvious, that, ‘Hey I should not be on this team. Because this team is full of very positive people who have great energy and talk to people, not about them.’ And we solve problems. We don't complain. We don't get defensive. We're real. I recognize I'm imperfect and I'm vulnerable to show you that about me. I want to be on that kind of a team. And if there's somebody who doesn’t believe in that stuff, I want to make it really easy for them to say, ‘Look, I don't want to be on this team. I don't wanna live like you guys live. I don't want do what you guys do.’ And then I really hope that that person leaves us and goes and joins our competitor.”

“You're not entitled to get what you want. I love you. You're entitled to earn what you're willing to go work for. And that's true in our families, in our parenting, in our marriage, in our companies, in society. If we want it, go earn it. If that's positivity, have positivity. I think and I am a positive person. I am jacked. I am excited. Obviously, you can feel my energy through technology here, I hope. Frankly, think positive people just need to get a lot stronger. I really do. I mean, I don't want to call them weak because people hear that differently but it kind of is. Look, if you want that positivity to stick, you’ve got to get tougher. Not sacrifice your love and your care and your empathy, but you got to get tough. And then we have to figure out how to love the people who are cynical because I don't think there's a ton of bad people in the world and I don't think there's a ton of bad people on teams. But I do think there are people who've been burned out. I do think there are people who have been through things in their lives. They've been through things in their company. They're experiencing stuff somewhere else. For whatever reason, they just kind of got run down and cynical and negative, or whatever. Or they're just wired a little different than we are. And I don't to hate on those people. I want to win those people. They don't have to be like me. They don't have to have my energy. But I want those people on my team. I want to love those people. And if eventually they choose that they don't believe in the same things that I believe in, I want to make it really clear and obvious that they don't want to be on this team because we're not about that. You know what I'm saying? I want it to be very easy, obvious, that, ‘Hey I should not be on this team. Because this team is full of very positive people who have great energy and talk to people, not about them.’ And we solve problems. We don't complain. We don't get defensive. We're real. I recognize I'm imperfect and I'm vulnerable to show you that about me. I want to be on that kind of a team. And if there's somebody who doesn’t believe in that stuff, I want to make it really easy for them to say, ‘Look, I don't want to be on this team. I don't wanna live like you guys live. I don't want do what you guys do.’ And then I really hope that that person leaves us and goes and joins our competitor.”

Brian Kight

38,031 views • 2 years ago

"The rhetoric needs to stop. This is not helpful to the American people... People do have a right to protest. Law enforcement also has a right to do their job without being impeded. And I think a lot of things can be true."

"The rhetoric needs to stop. This is not helpful to the American people... People do have a right to protest. Law enforcement also has a right to do their job without being impeded. And I think a lot of things can be true."

Defiant L’s

55,718 views • 8 months ago

Joe Rogan: “There's a lot of people that don't speak their mind.” “Do you know how many artists like musicians/comedians that thanked me for endorsing Trump because they can't do it.” “They said they want to, but they don't wanna be attacked. They can't say it. They think the country is going in the wrong direction.” “Trump has vowed to have free speech become a very important part of what he's standing for and that this censoring of information needs to stop and that we need to stop all government influence in what people have to say.”

Joe Rogan: “There's a lot of people that don't speak their mind.” “Do you know how many artists like musicians/comedians that thanked me for endorsing Trump because they can't do it.” “They said they want to, but they don't wanna be attacked. They can't say it. They think the country is going in the wrong direction.” “Trump has vowed to have free speech become a very important part of what he's standing for and that this censoring of information needs to stop and that we need to stop all government influence in what people have to say.”

End Tribalism in Politics

14,468,889 views • 1 year ago

Kara Swisher tells The View that they "have to get used to the fact that [Trump] may never pay for" his crimes, but they can go after his allies and supporters. She then scoffs at them wanting pardons and suggests Dems won't go after them: "We might have to get used to the fact that he may never pay for the things he's done. You're just going to have to and it will be very hard for Democrats, it's going to be very hard people, but there's a point where you need to move on and I know people hate when I say that. But it's the fact of the matter. That said, you can go through -- to a lot of other people. Right? There's a lot of people down low who aren't protected which is why they're all going to want to get pardons."

Kara Swisher tells The View that they "have to get used to the fact that [Trump] may never pay for" his crimes, but they can go after his allies and supporters. She then scoffs at them wanting pardons and suggests Dems won't go after them: "We might have to get used to the fact that he may never pay for the things he's done. You're just going to have to and it will be very hard for Democrats, it's going to be very hard people, but there's a point where you need to move on and I know people hate when I say that. But it's the fact of the matter. That said, you can go through -- to a lot of other people. Right? There's a lot of people down low who aren't protected which is why they're all going to want to get pardons."

Nicholas Fondacaro

16,417 views • 4 months ago

“tomorrow there's a possibility one of you is going to be very happy and one a bit less happy. have you guys discussed that? what are the plans in place, sort of one of you doesn't bring the other one down and the other one doesn't have their nose rubbed in it?” oscar: “i don't think you need to have any discussions about things like that. one of us could win our first championship in f1. you're obviously going to celebrate that. i think we've got more than enough respect between each other to appreciate the work of the person that loses tomorrow and there's going to be nothing but respect either way. i think also whoever's on the losing side, it would be unfair to expect the person who's won to not celebrate. i don't think you need any conversations. i think we're adults and we've got enough respect between us to know what's right” lando: “yeah, oscar said it well. i think it's not a conversation that needs to be had and i think we both understand each other and are respectful enough of one another. i think we both understand that no one would do anything in a bad way or anything to make the other feel worse. i think we both respect what we do every single weekend, every quali, every race that we go out and race together. but that's the same off the track, we're two different guys but we get along and that's what we need”

“tomorrow there's a possibility one of you is going to be very happy and one a bit less happy. have you guys discussed that? what are the plans in place, sort of one of you doesn't bring the other one down and the other one doesn't have their nose rubbed in it?” oscar: “i don't think you need to have any discussions about things like that. one of us could win our first championship in f1. you're obviously going to celebrate that. i think we've got more than enough respect between each other to appreciate the work of the person that loses tomorrow and there's going to be nothing but respect either way. i think also whoever's on the losing side, it would be unfair to expect the person who's won to not celebrate. i don't think you need any conversations. i think we're adults and we've got enough respect between us to know what's right” lando: “yeah, oscar said it well. i think it's not a conversation that needs to be had and i think we both understand each other and are respectful enough of one another. i think we both understand that no one would do anything in a bad way or anything to make the other feel worse. i think we both respect what we do every single weekend, every quali, every race that we go out and race together. but that's the same off the track, we're two different guys but we get along and that's what we need”

ray

172,166 views • 10 months ago

A Constitutional Attorney SPEAKS OUT Against What The United States Government Has Become, TYRANNICAL. Calls Out Big Pharma MUST LISTEN: “We Have The Right To Resist — When in the world do we start testing things on children?” “We The People is how the Constitution starts. A magistrate is a person that operates under authority and they are lesser magistrates. The founding fathers of this country understood that there is going to come a point in time where the federal government will need to be checked. If not, they will become tyrants. ‌ And that is what's happening now. So, the Declaration of Independence says that everyone, by virtue of being a human being, has the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. The federal government too, the federal government purpose is to protect the rights of those citizens, the rights of us to our life, liberty and pursuit of happiness. The third point of that document is if they fail to protect its citizens and enforce those rights, the citizens have a right to revolt. Do you understand? We have a right to resist and we have an obligation and a duty to do so. ‌ Do you understand? ‌ Yeah! ‌ THEY ARE COMING FOR OUR CHILDREN, We cannot sit down! Nope. ‌ Everybody knows even the bad ones know that if you want to affect a country, you go for its children. ‌ When in the world do we start using children as bulletproof vests for us? ‌ When in the world do we start testing things on children? Legal shield. ‌ You have started a war! ‌ Each one reach one and teach one. Do you understand? As a magistrate in this country, the United States government, our government, our local leaders have to answer to us. The ninth amendment says that any rights that are not enumerated in the Constitution are reserved for the people. I don't want to hear that mandates are not enumerated in the Constitution because for the stuff that is not enumerated means to equal protection is the right to protect my body. When you want to, when you want to push something into my body against my consent, without my consent, it is rape. And this is medical rape. No!”

A Constitutional Attorney SPEAKS OUT Against What The United States Government Has Become, TYRANNICAL. Calls Out Big Pharma MUST LISTEN: “We Have The Right To Resist — When in the world do we start testing things on children?” “We The People is how the Constitution starts. A magistrate is a person that operates under authority and they are lesser magistrates. The founding fathers of this country understood that there is going to come a point in time where the federal government will need to be checked. If not, they will become tyrants. ‌ And that is what's happening now. So, the Declaration of Independence says that everyone, by virtue of being a human being, has the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. The federal government too, the federal government purpose is to protect the rights of those citizens, the rights of us to our life, liberty and pursuit of happiness. The third point of that document is if they fail to protect its citizens and enforce those rights, the citizens have a right to revolt. Do you understand? We have a right to resist and we have an obligation and a duty to do so. ‌ Do you understand? ‌ Yeah! ‌ THEY ARE COMING FOR OUR CHILDREN, We cannot sit down! Nope. ‌ Everybody knows even the bad ones know that if you want to affect a country, you go for its children. ‌ When in the world do we start using children as bulletproof vests for us? ‌ When in the world do we start testing things on children? Legal shield. ‌ You have started a war! ‌ Each one reach one and teach one. Do you understand? As a magistrate in this country, the United States government, our government, our local leaders have to answer to us. The ninth amendment says that any rights that are not enumerated in the Constitution are reserved for the people. I don't want to hear that mandates are not enumerated in the Constitution because for the stuff that is not enumerated means to equal protection is the right to protect my body. When you want to, when you want to push something into my body against my consent, without my consent, it is rape. And this is medical rape. No!”

Wall Street Apes

228,883 views • 3 years ago

A Democrat Tennessee state rep. just openly called to abolish ICE on CNN. Scott Jennings let him hang himself with his own words. Scott Jennings asked Justin Pearson a series of questions — NONE of which he had an answer for. PEARSON: “This administration cannot be trusted and they can’t be trusted to hold themselves accountable.” “Even after the killing of Alex Pretti and Renee Good, they didn’t want to share information about what was happening, which is why we have to abolish ICE.” “We have to abolish the Customs and Border Patrol and the way they currently exist, and replace them with something that actually does the work that we need for them to, which is why we need a Congress—” JENNINGS: “Which work is that, by the way?” PEARSON: “I’ll tell you what the work is not, the work is not killing American citizens.” JENNINGS: “No. You said the work we need them to do. I’m interested in your opinion. What is work we need them to do?” PEARSON: “The work is not killing American citizens.” JENNINGS: “No. What is work we need them to do?” PEARSON: “Well, first let’s look at what they don’t need to do. They don’t need to go into communities like Memphis, Tennessee.” JENNINGS: “Do they need to deport illegal aliens? Do they need to deport illegal aliens?! Can you say it?” “Can you say it?” “Do we need a federal law enforcement agency to deport illegal aliens, yes or no?” PEARSON: “We do need a federal law enforcement agency that deals with immigration that doesn’t kill people.” JENNINGS: “Is there a single illegal alien that you would deport?” “Name one. Is there one?” “So the answer is no?” “Is the Democratic position for 26, that there are no illegal aliens that should be deported?”

A Democrat Tennessee state rep. just openly called to abolish ICE on CNN. Scott Jennings let him hang himself with his own words. Scott Jennings asked Justin Pearson a series of questions — NONE of which he had an answer for. PEARSON: “This administration cannot be trusted and they can’t be trusted to hold themselves accountable.” “Even after the killing of Alex Pretti and Renee Good, they didn’t want to share information about what was happening, which is why we have to abolish ICE.” “We have to abolish the Customs and Border Patrol and the way they currently exist, and replace them with something that actually does the work that we need for them to, which is why we need a Congress—” JENNINGS: “Which work is that, by the way?” PEARSON: “I’ll tell you what the work is not, the work is not killing American citizens.” JENNINGS: “No. You said the work we need them to do. I’m interested in your opinion. What is work we need them to do?” PEARSON: “The work is not killing American citizens.” JENNINGS: “No. What is work we need them to do?” PEARSON: “Well, first let’s look at what they don’t need to do. They don’t need to go into communities like Memphis, Tennessee.” JENNINGS: “Do they need to deport illegal aliens? Do they need to deport illegal aliens?! Can you say it?” “Can you say it?” “Do we need a federal law enforcement agency to deport illegal aliens, yes or no?” PEARSON: “We do need a federal law enforcement agency that deals with immigration that doesn’t kill people.” JENNINGS: “Is there a single illegal alien that you would deport?” “Name one. Is there one?” “So the answer is no?” “Is the Democratic position for 26, that there are no illegal aliens that should be deported?”

Overton

224,199 views • 7 months ago

Chamath: We have a huge perception issue in AI… here’s how to fix it. “We have a huge perception issue in AI.” “We have a handful of companies, all the PR that you see from those handful of companies is a bunch of circular dealmaking, a bunch of capital that flows from one to the other.” “It causes these stocks to go up, of which a small percentage of people benefit.” “And at the tail end of it, it's accompanied by a completely different set of articles that everybody also reads about this Sword of Damocles that's about to fall on their head, whether it's electricity prices or whether it's their jobs.” “So the question at hand is how do we fix it?” “How do we get back to the place where a video talking about stopping all progress would seem as laughable as it should be?” “We now need to be on the forward foot as an industry.” “We need to start to use a percentage of the balance sheets of these companies in order to benefit as many Americans as possible.” “That is the absolute minimum.” “Andrew Carnegie built 2,500 libraries.” “The idea was, as he built the railroads, you're going to scale GDP, you're going to scale education and knowledge.” “Those libraries are artifacts that allowed people to feel a dividend from that industrial revolution.” “We need to self-organize better, and we need to be more on the forward foot.” “We need to start doing things that are practically measurable by tens of millions of American citizens.”

Chamath: We have a huge perception issue in AI… here’s how to fix it. “We have a huge perception issue in AI.” “We have a handful of companies, all the PR that you see from those handful of companies is a bunch of circular dealmaking, a bunch of capital that flows from one to the other.” “It causes these stocks to go up, of which a small percentage of people benefit.” “And at the tail end of it, it's accompanied by a completely different set of articles that everybody also reads about this Sword of Damocles that's about to fall on their head, whether it's electricity prices or whether it's their jobs.” “So the question at hand is how do we fix it?” “How do we get back to the place where a video talking about stopping all progress would seem as laughable as it should be?” “We now need to be on the forward foot as an industry.” “We need to start to use a percentage of the balance sheets of these companies in order to benefit as many Americans as possible.” “That is the absolute minimum.” “Andrew Carnegie built 2,500 libraries.” “The idea was, as he built the railroads, you're going to scale GDP, you're going to scale education and knowledge.” “Those libraries are artifacts that allowed people to feel a dividend from that industrial revolution.” “We need to self-organize better, and we need to be more on the forward foot.” “We need to start doing things that are practically measurable by tens of millions of American citizens.”

The All-In Podcast

105,809 views • 9 months ago

Lane Kiffin on the return of Will Wade to LSU: "If you're passionate about a place and you're a really good coach, that's a really good combination. I know there's a lot of judgement about whether he should go and he just got there. Everything is everybody's story. You got one life to live. What they want to choose to do, and believe what their story is after they get the best information they can from the people that are closest to them, and they make their decisions. In my opinion, it's that person's job to prove that decision right. It does speak volumes of LSU. There's somebody that understands everything about LSU, understands the power of LSU. Went through a very unique situation, a break up. Then makes the decision to come back. To me, that says a lot about LSU."

Lane Kiffin on the return of Will Wade to LSU: "If you're passionate about a place and you're a really good coach, that's a really good combination. I know there's a lot of judgement about whether he should go and he just got there. Everything is everybody's story. You got one life to live. What they want to choose to do, and believe what their story is after they get the best information they can from the people that are closest to them, and they make their decisions. In my opinion, it's that person's job to prove that decision right. It does speak volumes of LSU. There's somebody that understands everything about LSU, understands the power of LSU. Went through a very unique situation, a break up. Then makes the decision to come back. To me, that says a lot about LSU."

Garland Gillen

130,532 views • 6 months ago

Sam Altman says AI leaders have done a terrible job at communicating to the public: “The, ‘Dear peasants, we will bequeath upon you these gifts of a cure for cancer and material wealth and great entertainment, and you stop complaining, and we'll make all the decisions about the future and just trust us, we'll be benevolent dictators.’ That’s not good. Not good.” “A lot of the people building AI have been saying, ‘There's a 25% chance we're going to destroy the world, and yet we're going to race ahead to do it because otherwise those bad guys will do it first.’” “Or, ‘Man, this thing is going to be really terrible, and 50% of the jobs are going to go away in the next year, and we hope you all are okay, but it seems really scary.’” “We have not, as a field, done a very good job of explaining to people what the benefits are and how the downsides can be mitigated—and we certainly have not done a good job even if people have had answers like saying, ‘There's going to be UBI, or work will be optional.’” “There's been very little discussion from people about how and why it's important that people have more power and personal freedom in the world, not less. And that matters a lot to most people.” “The ability of people to influence their own future and collectively design where society is going to go, and the autonomy that comes with that, is very important. I don't think a lot of people in the AI field… they feel it for themselves, but they don't spend much time thinking about it, reflecting on or acknowledging how important that is to other people.”

Sam Altman says AI leaders have done a terrible job at communicating to the public: “The, ‘Dear peasants, we will bequeath upon you these gifts of a cure for cancer and material wealth and great entertainment, and you stop complaining, and we'll make all the decisions about the future and just trust us, we'll be benevolent dictators.’ That’s not good. Not good.” “A lot of the people building AI have been saying, ‘There's a 25% chance we're going to destroy the world, and yet we're going to race ahead to do it because otherwise those bad guys will do it first.’” “Or, ‘Man, this thing is going to be really terrible, and 50% of the jobs are going to go away in the next year, and we hope you all are okay, but it seems really scary.’” “We have not, as a field, done a very good job of explaining to people what the benefits are and how the downsides can be mitigated—and we certainly have not done a good job even if people have had answers like saying, ‘There's going to be UBI, or work will be optional.’” “There's been very little discussion from people about how and why it's important that people have more power and personal freedom in the world, not less. And that matters a lot to most people.” “The ability of people to influence their own future and collectively design where society is going to go, and the autonomy that comes with that, is very important. I don't think a lot of people in the AI field… they feel it for themselves, but they don't spend much time thinking about it, reflecting on or acknowledging how important that is to other people.”

David Senra

32,300 views • 1 month ago

Shuler: As a backdrop, the economy isn’t working for working people right now. We have inequality at its highest levels. People are working harder and harder for less. They’re working two and three jobs just to keep up. In the U.S., 40 percent of workers do not have $400 for an emergency. Now put AI on top of that—the insecurity that we are all experiencing, the fact that people are waking up and some new technology is landing in their jobs without training and without having a say. Of course they’re going to be anxious and feel insecure about what the future holds. And so I really think we need to stop and ask, “Who are we doing this for? What are the results we want? And how do we get there?” We get there by including workers in the process. They shouldn’t have to be at the end of the cycle. They should actually be upstream.

Shuler: As a backdrop, the economy isn’t working for working people right now. We have inequality at its highest levels. People are working harder and harder for less. They’re working two and three jobs just to keep up. In the U.S., 40 percent of workers do not have $400 for an emergency. Now put AI on top of that—the insecurity that we are all experiencing, the fact that people are waking up and some new technology is landing in their jobs without training and without having a say. Of course they’re going to be anxious and feel insecure about what the future holds. And so I really think we need to stop and ask, “Who are we doing this for? What are the results we want? And how do we get there?” We get there by including workers in the process. They shouldn’t have to be at the end of the cycle. They should actually be upstream.

Acyn

41,208 views • 8 months ago

The Idea of NHI on Earth. ⬇️⬇️⬇️ 🔥"The gravity of it goes up a whole lot if it goes from the theoretical to the verified." ~Dr. Phil 🔥 "There have been people that have reported being abducted over the years. What's the intent behind that? Is it medical? Is it more nefarious?" ~BZ to Dr. Phil (I'm so glad Bryce went there.) "There will be people...who likely are going to need some some assistance to help deal with this because it is so far-reaching and for some people, potentially, very frightening." ~Mellon ~ Dr. Phil: "We know in the last 80 years there have been no overt hostile acts that we know about. That doesn't mean there could be things happening that are attributable to these forces that we don't know about. But, we certainly don't have any attacks that we can attribute to these UAPs or whatever." (Well, there's Colares in 1977. If that was non-human in nature, I'd say that qualifies as overt. And the Thomas Mantell incident in 1948 where he crashed and died after pursuing a UFO. Was that overt? Unfortunately, we don't know what happened and probably never will.) Dr. Phil: "And if the best predictor of future behavior is past behavior, I think people can take some comfort in knowing that if they were gonna melt us with a ray gun or something of that nature, they've had ample opportunity to do that. "They may have been here 1000 years before we were here. Who knows what the situation is? But we do know that as long as we've been monitoring this and tracking it, there have been no overt hostile acts and I think people can take some comfort in that, and should." (See the work of Peter Levenda for a deeper look at that. "They might have been attacking us for centuries already, in ways that make sense to them... What if they are attacking us through the manipulation of consciousness? ~Peter Levenda More... ⬇️⬇️⬇️ ~ (I'm glad Bryce pushed back a bit.) Bryce Zabel: "They should. The only thing I would say is, if we're dealing with a non-human intelligence - or an NHI, as we like to say now - we'd have to assume that they think differently than us. So even in our own world, in the United States, we tend to think in four-year terms because of presidential terms, right? So you can't get something off the ground if it can't get done right away. The Chinese may think in 100-year terms when they think about Taiwan or whatever. "It's possible there are alien or non-human intelligences that think in a different time frame. If their time frame was 1000 years, then they could just be getting started. "And on the topic of the nuclear issue, which I share concern of. I mean, I think the nuclear issue means it is at least a national-security issue of some kind. Now, I've heard people talk about this, Dr. Phil, two different ways. Some people say, 'Well, you know, they're looking at our nuclear capabilities because they want to protect us from ourselves.' "Okay, that's great, I hope that's true. But the other would be: what do you do before you actually go to war with anybody, is you do reconnaissance. You try to find out what the other guy has. What are their assets? What are their capabilities?" (That may freak out some people but all angles should be considered.) Zabel: "So, I think the problem that we need to overcome in this country is getting to a place where we understand this phenomenon that we're encountering enough that we can at least start to figure out intent. What is the intent? "There have been people that have reported being abducted over the years. What's the intent behind that? Is it medical? Is it more nefarious? What is it? And so, we got a lot of work to do, and I think that's why I am so supportive of your current efforts because you're, basically, saying, 'Let's get started, people. Let's really take this seriously. Let's quit fooling around and stigmatizing people that want to take it seriously, and let's get to work.' But let's get to work as a human race. Let's start sharing what we know and let's make progress. That's where I'm coming from, too." (Bringing up abductions is important because it IS part of this discussion and it shouldn't be avoided. Kudos to Bryce!) Dr. Phil: "I saw a study that said 71% of Americans believe that there are aliens that have been or are in our earthly space. And it's interesting...I read that in one context, it said, 'Look, this is not going to be such a big deal if this gets verified.' "You know, there's one thing to say that in the abstract, like, 'Yeah, I think yeah probably there are.' It's a whole other different situation if you turn around and see somebody standing there. The gravity of it goes up a whole lot if it goes from the theoretical to the verified. (100%. That's my favorite part of the interview and it's so true.) Dr. Phil: "And I hope that we are going to put enough context around this, particularly knowing that there are segments of our population that are very vulnerable. There are some elderly folks that aren't up on technology and might be overwhelmed by the reality of this. "We have certain populations that might be easily disoriented or destabilized in the mental emotional fringes of the population. And I worry about those that are easily exploitable. You know, you need to get out of the urban areas, buy our buried school bus in the mountains, and you'll be safe forever. You know the con artists and the scammers are going to find every opportunity to prey upon those that are concerned and worried about this. "And I think we need to be prepared to take care of those that might be destabilized by this information that's coming out right now, we can't pretend they aren't there. We've made those mistakes in the past, like during COVID, for example. There are those that are more impacted than others, and we need to be prepared to handle that." Christopher K. Mellon: "We, recently, commissioned a study by a group of six psychologists, PhD psychologists, on this topic of how the public would receive this information. And it was generally very encouraging. And what they found was that the great bulk of the population, as they have in the past with other epical changes such as the Copernican principle, or evolution, or general relativity, it takes people a while to process this information. There's a period of resistance. But most people will get up, get out of bed, go to work the next day. They're not devastated, even though there's nothing quite comparable to this, perhaps." (There's no perhaps. A government or respected figure admitting that we're not alone on this planet would be unprecedented and there is NOTHING we can compare it to.) Mellon: "What the study did find is that there is likely, however, to be a subset of people, maybe 15% of the population, that are going to need some help. And that we are not necessarily prepared in our present state to provide that kind of assistance, and we need to be doing more to get ready for that." (If he's talking world population, that's about 1.2 BILLION people who are going to need some help dealing with this. Holy crap. 😬) Mellon: "And also, to work on the messaging. The messaging is so important, clear and consistent messaging from the government, trying to develop trust with the American people so that the information is is accepted and acted on." (For me, I want the whole truth more than the right "message.") Mellon: "A lot of the difference will be people who can't get their head around it, even though they really understand it. But because of their own belief structure, the architecture of their own belief structure, for some reason, in their particular individual case, it's particularly threatening or disruptive. "So there will be people who fall into that category, according to this study, who likely are going to need some some assistance to help deal with this because it is so far-reaching and for some people, potentially, very frightening."

The Idea of NHI on Earth. ⬇️⬇️⬇️ 🔥"The gravity of it goes up a whole lot if it goes from the theoretical to the verified." ~Dr. Phil 🔥 "There have been people that have reported being abducted over the years. What's the intent behind that? Is it medical? Is it more nefarious?" ~BZ to Dr. Phil (I'm so glad Bryce went there.) "There will be people...who likely are going to need some some assistance to help deal with this because it is so far-reaching and for some people, potentially, very frightening." ~Mellon ~ Dr. Phil: "We know in the last 80 years there have been no overt hostile acts that we know about. That doesn't mean there could be things happening that are attributable to these forces that we don't know about. But, we certainly don't have any attacks that we can attribute to these UAPs or whatever." (Well, there's Colares in 1977. If that was non-human in nature, I'd say that qualifies as overt. And the Thomas Mantell incident in 1948 where he crashed and died after pursuing a UFO. Was that overt? Unfortunately, we don't know what happened and probably never will.) Dr. Phil: "And if the best predictor of future behavior is past behavior, I think people can take some comfort in knowing that if they were gonna melt us with a ray gun or something of that nature, they've had ample opportunity to do that. "They may have been here 1000 years before we were here. Who knows what the situation is? But we do know that as long as we've been monitoring this and tracking it, there have been no overt hostile acts and I think people can take some comfort in that, and should." (See the work of Peter Levenda for a deeper look at that. "They might have been attacking us for centuries already, in ways that make sense to them... What if they are attacking us through the manipulation of consciousness? ~Peter Levenda More... ⬇️⬇️⬇️ ~ (I'm glad Bryce pushed back a bit.) Bryce Zabel: "They should. The only thing I would say is, if we're dealing with a non-human intelligence - or an NHI, as we like to say now - we'd have to assume that they think differently than us. So even in our own world, in the United States, we tend to think in four-year terms because of presidential terms, right? So you can't get something off the ground if it can't get done right away. The Chinese may think in 100-year terms when they think about Taiwan or whatever. "It's possible there are alien or non-human intelligences that think in a different time frame. If their time frame was 1000 years, then they could just be getting started. "And on the topic of the nuclear issue, which I share concern of. I mean, I think the nuclear issue means it is at least a national-security issue of some kind. Now, I've heard people talk about this, Dr. Phil, two different ways. Some people say, 'Well, you know, they're looking at our nuclear capabilities because they want to protect us from ourselves.' "Okay, that's great, I hope that's true. But the other would be: what do you do before you actually go to war with anybody, is you do reconnaissance. You try to find out what the other guy has. What are their assets? What are their capabilities?" (That may freak out some people but all angles should be considered.) Zabel: "So, I think the problem that we need to overcome in this country is getting to a place where we understand this phenomenon that we're encountering enough that we can at least start to figure out intent. What is the intent? "There have been people that have reported being abducted over the years. What's the intent behind that? Is it medical? Is it more nefarious? What is it? And so, we got a lot of work to do, and I think that's why I am so supportive of your current efforts because you're, basically, saying, 'Let's get started, people. Let's really take this seriously. Let's quit fooling around and stigmatizing people that want to take it seriously, and let's get to work.' But let's get to work as a human race. Let's start sharing what we know and let's make progress. That's where I'm coming from, too." (Bringing up abductions is important because it IS part of this discussion and it shouldn't be avoided. Kudos to Bryce!) Dr. Phil: "I saw a study that said 71% of Americans believe that there are aliens that have been or are in our earthly space. And it's interesting...I read that in one context, it said, 'Look, this is not going to be such a big deal if this gets verified.' "You know, there's one thing to say that in the abstract, like, 'Yeah, I think yeah probably there are.' It's a whole other different situation if you turn around and see somebody standing there. The gravity of it goes up a whole lot if it goes from the theoretical to the verified. (100%. That's my favorite part of the interview and it's so true.) Dr. Phil: "And I hope that we are going to put enough context around this, particularly knowing that there are segments of our population that are very vulnerable. There are some elderly folks that aren't up on technology and might be overwhelmed by the reality of this. "We have certain populations that might be easily disoriented or destabilized in the mental emotional fringes of the population. And I worry about those that are easily exploitable. You know, you need to get out of the urban areas, buy our buried school bus in the mountains, and you'll be safe forever. You know the con artists and the scammers are going to find every opportunity to prey upon those that are concerned and worried about this. "And I think we need to be prepared to take care of those that might be destabilized by this information that's coming out right now, we can't pretend they aren't there. We've made those mistakes in the past, like during COVID, for example. There are those that are more impacted than others, and we need to be prepared to handle that." Christopher K. Mellon: "We, recently, commissioned a study by a group of six psychologists, PhD psychologists, on this topic of how the public would receive this information. And it was generally very encouraging. And what they found was that the great bulk of the population, as they have in the past with other epical changes such as the Copernican principle, or evolution, or general relativity, it takes people a while to process this information. There's a period of resistance. But most people will get up, get out of bed, go to work the next day. They're not devastated, even though there's nothing quite comparable to this, perhaps." (There's no perhaps. A government or respected figure admitting that we're not alone on this planet would be unprecedented and there is NOTHING we can compare it to.) Mellon: "What the study did find is that there is likely, however, to be a subset of people, maybe 15% of the population, that are going to need some help. And that we are not necessarily prepared in our present state to provide that kind of assistance, and we need to be doing more to get ready for that." (If he's talking world population, that's about 1.2 BILLION people who are going to need some help dealing with this. Holy crap. 😬) Mellon: "And also, to work on the messaging. The messaging is so important, clear and consistent messaging from the government, trying to develop trust with the American people so that the information is is accepted and acted on." (For me, I want the whole truth more than the right "message.") Mellon: "A lot of the difference will be people who can't get their head around it, even though they really understand it. But because of their own belief structure, the architecture of their own belief structure, for some reason, in their particular individual case, it's particularly threatening or disruptive. "So there will be people who fall into that category, according to this study, who likely are going to need some some assistance to help deal with this because it is so far-reaching and for some people, potentially, very frightening."

Joe Murgia

31,404 views • 2 months ago