Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Hey Twitter, remember the “unnecessary roughness” call that changed the FSU-UF game and had Mike Norvell out to midfield to argue? The NCAA has already put it on a training video. 😘🤣 “I’m not sure what the center judge is doing here, this is not a foul”

1,014,183 просмотров • 2 лет назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 10

Фото профиля Agamemnole
Agamemnole2 лет назад

That's a great find. Who is this narrating?

Фото профиля Bud Elliott
Bud Elliott2 лет назад

NCAA head of officials Steve Shaw

Фото профиля Ken Brewer
Ken Brewer2 лет назад

Do you think that video could matriculate down to the ACC Officials Office??? 😂

Фото профиля sean
sean2 лет назад

So in reality they scored zero touchdowns

Фото профиля Emily Duda Buckley
Emily Duda Buckley2 лет назад

Hopefully they wrapped the training video up with a bow and sent it to the ACC for Christmas

Фото профиля Robbie Andrew
Robbie Andrew2 лет назад

He clubbed the QB in the face with his arm. The QB's head snaps back. Seen plenty of weaker hits called for it. That would be my guess as to why they called the penalty.

Фото профиля LeBron da GOAT
LeBron da GOAT2 лет назад

This gave UF they only TD too 🤦🏽‍♂️

Фото профиля Vanessa Coniglio
Vanessa Coniglio2 лет назад

@skipfoster That play changed the game and Tates late run/slide and hit to the head may not have been needed if not for that crap call. Worst call ever.

Фото профиля Jmac125
Jmac1252 лет назад

Do the officials get held accountable at all? I’m being serious and honestly curious. I officiate football, basketball and baseball at most levels and it’s a tough job. And yes there many missed calls. But this was horrendous!! Or do they just say o well we missed it

Фото профиля Unconquered Talk
Unconquered Talk2 лет назад

@Jaswiberg Love all the Gator and Cane fans jumping in here telling the head NCAA official he doesn’t know the rules. LOL. 😂

Похожие видео

BREAKING.🚨 Judge Merchan has instructed the jury they do not need to have a *UNANIMOUS* verdict in order to convict former President Donald J. Trump. "One thing in particular that the judge said the jurors could do. He delivered what is being called really the pinnacle of all of this. There is no need to agree on what has occurred. They can disagree on what the crime was among the three choices." "This means they could split 4-4-4 and the judge would still treat them unanimously. What does that mean?" "Outrageous. In a normal criminal case every statutory crime has what we call elements of the offense. Like in a bank robbery case you have to rob – it has to be a financial institution, you have to show intent," said former prosecutor Andrew McCarthy. "Those are the things the jury has to agree on unanimously that they were proved beyond a reasonable doubt. Here what we’re doing is taking the element that actually makes this a felony, because remember falsification of records is normally a misdemeanor in New York. What makes it a felony is that you are concealing or committing another crime." "And here the judge is telling them they don’t have to agree about what the other crime is under circumstances where that not only is what makes this a felony, makes it a four-year potential prison penalty rather than a year or less, but it is also what gets us into the courtroom." "If this had been a misdemeanor, the time to bring this case would have lapsed in 2019. The only reason they are still able to bring this case is because it’s a felony allegedly and yet now the judge is saying you know, you don’t have to agree on what the felony is." The jury has now gone to deliberations.

Kyle Becker

5,835,051 просмотров • 2 лет назад