Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Highlight Queens: She Really Tried to Argue THAT Elbow 👀😂 Alyssa Thomas gets hit with a clear offensive foul after throwing that elbow… but she’s completely not having it 😭💥 Refs called it, replay backs it, fans are losing it - Yet she’s still acting like nothing happened 👀🔥... show more

Caitlin Clark News (Fan Account)

22,645 subscribers

43,411 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Pirsani Aquatic: Caitlin Clark: Did She Really Make Contact? 🤔 A Controversial Moment During The Indiana Fever Vs. Las Vegas Aces Game Has Fans Talking. From This Angle, It Appears Caitlin Clark May Not Have Made Clear Contact With Chelsea Gray Before The Whistle. However, Close Plays Can Look Different From The Officials' Perspective. The Las Vegas Aces Went On To Defeat The Indiana Fever 86-84 In A Thrilling Finish. What Do You Think? Was It The Right Call? Let Us Know In The Comments! Link: #CC22 #CaitlinClark #FeverRising #NowYouKnow #FromAnywhere #IndianaFever #WNBA

Pirsani Aquatic: Caitlin Clark: Did She Really Make Contact? 🤔 A Controversial Moment During The Indiana Fever Vs. Las Vegas Aces Game Has Fans Talking. From This Angle, It Appears Caitlin Clark May Not Have Made Clear Contact With Chelsea Gray Before The Whistle. However, Close Plays Can Look Different From The Officials' Perspective. The Las Vegas Aces Went On To Defeat The Indiana Fever 86-84 In A Thrilling Finish. What Do You Think? Was It The Right Call? Let Us Know In The Comments! Link: #CC22 #CaitlinClark #FeverRising #NowYouKnow #FromAnywhere #IndianaFever #WNBA

Caitlin Clark News (Fan Account)

56,901 views • 16 days ago

The KSS girl has now turned off her comments on TikTok because of the massive backlash. She’s clearly going through cancel-culture. Almost all her comments were negative, and that raises a serious question how are brands supposed to work with her? Brands don’t just want numbers. They want positive engagement, influence, and trust, and right now she doesn’t even have 1% of that What it really means; She’s losing public trust, She’s losing reputation online, Brands don’t like influencers who bring controversies unless they are specifically selling shock value, Negative comments scare advertisers. She’s really losing it, and at this point her mental health is also on the line

The KSS girl has now turned off her comments on TikTok because of the massive backlash. She’s clearly going through cancel-culture. Almost all her comments were negative, and that raises a serious question how are brands supposed to work with her? Brands don’t just want numbers. They want positive engagement, influence, and trust, and right now she doesn’t even have 1% of that What it really means; She’s losing public trust, She’s losing reputation online, Brands don’t like influencers who bring controversies unless they are specifically selling shock value, Negative comments scare advertisers. She’s really losing it, and at this point her mental health is also on the line

Maqcoy Reports

56,118 views • 8 months ago

in the wise words of taylor swift, “a man is allowed to react, a woman can only overreact.” they cut the camera to her while she was still in shock & she took a sip of her drink. that is not even a reaction. this whole situation has blown out of proportion throughout the media. you’d think things would’ve gotten better for women in the past five years since she said this, but that’s not the case. this has made one thing abundantly clear, women are not allowed to react when they are blatantly disrespected. even if they don’t react, they’re still overreacting, since there is this perpetuating stereotype that women are “dramatic & emotional.” she’s just sitting there trying to enjoy her night that she was attending because of HER accomplishments & the records she broke with her movie about her life-changing, record-smashing tour. yet, she was only mentioned once, only ten minutes in, to be devalued to her relationship & to poke fun at the ways the media has been tormenting her for years. you can not tell me that is funny. she’s been through hell throughout her career, she’s heard these jokes a million times—she’s over it. she shouldn’t have to laugh at a joke that offended her to appease anyone. personally, i’m extremely proud of her for not feeling it was necessary to be a people pleaser & laugh, which is what she typically would’ve done int the past. that shows growth, that shows that she finally recognizes her worth. she finally realized that she doesn’t have to put up being painfully disrespected. she’s allowed to think a rude joke isn’t funny, it just made her uncomfortable. if she looks uncomfortable, it means he crossed the line, regardless of if you think it was funny or not. it’s evident that this was an under reaction. she kept her composure & responded to the situation perfectly. however, even though she responded perfectly, she’s still getting tremendous amounts of hate for this. this makes it abundantly clear that men in this society will always have it out for women who are successful—especially when that success was created all on their own, since women are not allowed to be successful in their eyes. that is blatant misogyny, just like the joke they think she is a horrible person for not laughing at. of course they think the joke was funny, they’re a bunch of misogynists themselves.

in the wise words of taylor swift, “a man is allowed to react, a woman can only overreact.” they cut the camera to her while she was still in shock & she took a sip of her drink. that is not even a reaction. this whole situation has blown out of proportion throughout the media. you’d think things would’ve gotten better for women in the past five years since she said this, but that’s not the case. this has made one thing abundantly clear, women are not allowed to react when they are blatantly disrespected. even if they don’t react, they’re still overreacting, since there is this perpetuating stereotype that women are “dramatic & emotional.” she’s just sitting there trying to enjoy her night that she was attending because of HER accomplishments & the records she broke with her movie about her life-changing, record-smashing tour. yet, she was only mentioned once, only ten minutes in, to be devalued to her relationship & to poke fun at the ways the media has been tormenting her for years. you can not tell me that is funny. she’s been through hell throughout her career, she’s heard these jokes a million times—she’s over it. she shouldn’t have to laugh at a joke that offended her to appease anyone. personally, i’m extremely proud of her for not feeling it was necessary to be a people pleaser & laugh, which is what she typically would’ve done int the past. that shows growth, that shows that she finally recognizes her worth. she finally realized that she doesn’t have to put up being painfully disrespected. she’s allowed to think a rude joke isn’t funny, it just made her uncomfortable. if she looks uncomfortable, it means he crossed the line, regardless of if you think it was funny or not. it’s evident that this was an under reaction. she kept her composure & responded to the situation perfectly. however, even though she responded perfectly, she’s still getting tremendous amounts of hate for this. this makes it abundantly clear that men in this society will always have it out for women who are successful—especially when that success was created all on their own, since women are not allowed to be successful in their eyes. that is blatant misogyny, just like the joke they think she is a horrible person for not laughing at. of course they think the joke was funny, they’re a bunch of misogynists themselves.

kira ♡🐞

657,586 views • 2 years ago

Pay attention to how the officer comforts Lindsay Clancy and then they let her pause court when it gets “too hard” This is the woman who took the lives of her 3 young children in brutal fashion. The craziest part, however, is that there are millions of women still defending her. On TikTok (yes, really) there is a massively popular growing theory that her husband did it and then gaslit her somehow into thinking she did. She literally admitted to doing it, the evidence is overwhelming, and there is footage proving he was not even at the home when it happened. Yet the top comment on many of the videos, with hundreds of thousands of likes in some cases, is that he did it and she is innocent. The level of delusion on TikTok has now reached levels that are literally dangerous.

Pay attention to how the officer comforts Lindsay Clancy and then they let her pause court when it gets “too hard” This is the woman who took the lives of her 3 young children in brutal fashion. The craziest part, however, is that there are millions of women still defending her. On TikTok (yes, really) there is a massively popular growing theory that her husband did it and then gaslit her somehow into thinking she did. She literally admitted to doing it, the evidence is overwhelming, and there is footage proving he was not even at the home when it happened. Yet the top comment on many of the videos, with hundreds of thousands of likes in some cases, is that he did it and she is innocent. The level of delusion on TikTok has now reached levels that are literally dangerous.

Matt Wallace

60,299 views • 16 days ago

⚠️ HER FACE IS HUMAN. HER ARMS AREN’T. HER CONVERSATION FORGOT TO MENTION THAT. Real face, long blonde hair, expressions that track a conversation in real time. Then the frame drops to silver, fully mechanical arms and legs — no attempt to hide what’s underneath. That contrast is the entire point of this generation of androids. Not “can it talk,” that’s been solved for years. It’s “does the pause before it answers feel like processing or like thinking.” At a tech expo, surrounded by cameras, she’s not performing a script. She’s holding a conversation with a stranger, unscripted, in real time. The body still says machine. The exchange doesn’t. That gap used to be decades wide. Right now it’s just a matter of everyone getting used to seeing it.

⚠️ HER FACE IS HUMAN. HER ARMS AREN’T. HER CONVERSATION FORGOT TO MENTION THAT. Real face, long blonde hair, expressions that track a conversation in real time. Then the frame drops to silver, fully mechanical arms and legs — no attempt to hide what’s underneath. That contrast is the entire point of this generation of androids. Not “can it talk,” that’s been solved for years. It’s “does the pause before it answers feel like processing or like thinking.” At a tech expo, surrounded by cameras, she’s not performing a script. She’s holding a conversation with a stranger, unscripted, in real time. The body still says machine. The exchange doesn’t. That gap used to be decades wide. Right now it’s just a matter of everyone getting used to seeing it.

DN_DEGEN

72,348 views • 14 days ago

🚨 THE BITCOIN BOTTOM IS CLOSE. BUT NOT HERE YET. Look at the cycle ROI chart. Every cycle takes time to fully bottom out. The give back phase does not end in a single candle. It grinds. We are inside that phase now, but the cycles show there is still road left before the real low prints. That is not bad news. It is time. Time to prepare. Time to position.

🚨 THE BITCOIN BOTTOM IS CLOSE. BUT NOT HERE YET. Look at the cycle ROI chart. Every cycle takes time to fully bottom out. The give back phase does not end in a single candle. It grinds. We are inside that phase now, but the cycles show there is still road left before the real low prints. That is not bad news. It is time. Time to prepare. Time to position.

Crypto Rover

77,741 views • 1 month ago

She’s been pushing that whole “bullying” narrative since week 1. Lied & tried to paint Thandeka as a bully just like she lied about the ladies of Syamosha having it out for her. Forever the victim. I love how she’s the only one this season who has a strike for actual bullying…we know who the real bully is #ThandekaTshabalala #BBMzansiS6

She’s been pushing that whole “bullying” narrative since week 1. Lied & tried to paint Thandeka as a bully just like she lied about the ladies of Syamosha having it out for her. Forever the victim. I love how she’s the only one this season who has a strike for actual bullying…we know who the real bully is #ThandekaTshabalala #BBMzansiS6

WE JUST ARRIVED

23,084 views • 5 months ago

Candace Owens continues to prove how gullible her low IQ fans are. Just a couple of weeks ago the conspiracy was that nobody called 911 after Charlie was shot. Her minions went crazy over it for a few days. Now that conspiracy is stale. So the new conspiracy is that they did call 911 but now somehow thats a bad thing. When just a couple of weeks ago the talking points were that it was bad that no one called 911. This is just another example of how Candace constantly lies and contradicts herself from week to week. She cries and accuses people of being paid to attack her when they debunk her fake conspiracies meanwhile she’s constantly debunking her own conspiracies with new ones.

Candace Owens continues to prove how gullible her low IQ fans are. Just a couple of weeks ago the conspiracy was that nobody called 911 after Charlie was shot. Her minions went crazy over it for a few days. Now that conspiracy is stale. So the new conspiracy is that they did call 911 but now somehow thats a bad thing. When just a couple of weeks ago the talking points were that it was bad that no one called 911. This is just another example of how Candace constantly lies and contradicts herself from week to week. She cries and accuses people of being paid to attack her when they debunk her fake conspiracies meanwhile she’s constantly debunking her own conspiracies with new ones.

Cinema Shogun

42,220 views • 27 days ago

🇺🇸 🇮🇷 THE BIG QUESTION: SHOULD TRUMP FINALLY HIT IRAN'S INFRASTRUCTURE? History does not repeat, but it rhymes loud enough to hear. In 1945, Japan was finished. Its navy was gone. Its cities were burning. Its war machine could not replace what it lost. And still the leadership would not surrender. Iran today looks eerily familiar. Its radar sites keep getting flattened. Its small boats keep getting sunk. Its missile stockpiles keep getting hit. And still Tehran keeps shooting, mining, and lying its way through every ceasefire it signs. To be clear, nobody is talking about the weapon that finally ended Japan's war. Trump is not dropping a nuclear bomb on Iran, and nobody serious is suggesting he would. That is not the parallel. The parallel is the dilemma itself. What do you do with an enemy that is beaten by every rational measure, yet refuses to act like it? Trump has tried to solve that puzzle the hard way, the careful way. Hit the drone depots. Hit the coastal radar. Leave the power plants standing. Leave the water desalination facilities alone. Spare the bridges and highways ordinary families use every day. He said it himself. He does not want to punish a population for the sins of a regime they never chose, and he does not want American taxpayers footing the bill to rebuild a country we did not break in the first place. But restraint only works on an enemy capable of reading the signal. Iran keeps proving it cannot, or will not. So the real question is not whether Iran is beaten. It clearly is. The real question is what finally convinces a regime that will not admit defeat, without turning millions of ordinary Iranians into collateral damage for their leaders' stubbornness. That is the needle Trump has to thread. Escalate enough to end this, without becoming the very thing his restraint was designed to avoid. The world will be watching which targets he chooses next as closely as it watches whether Iran ever really surrenders at all.

🇺🇸 🇮🇷 THE BIG QUESTION: SHOULD TRUMP FINALLY HIT IRAN'S INFRASTRUCTURE? History does not repeat, but it rhymes loud enough to hear. In 1945, Japan was finished. Its navy was gone. Its cities were burning. Its war machine could not replace what it lost. And still the leadership would not surrender. Iran today looks eerily familiar. Its radar sites keep getting flattened. Its small boats keep getting sunk. Its missile stockpiles keep getting hit. And still Tehran keeps shooting, mining, and lying its way through every ceasefire it signs. To be clear, nobody is talking about the weapon that finally ended Japan's war. Trump is not dropping a nuclear bomb on Iran, and nobody serious is suggesting he would. That is not the parallel. The parallel is the dilemma itself. What do you do with an enemy that is beaten by every rational measure, yet refuses to act like it? Trump has tried to solve that puzzle the hard way, the careful way. Hit the drone depots. Hit the coastal radar. Leave the power plants standing. Leave the water desalination facilities alone. Spare the bridges and highways ordinary families use every day. He said it himself. He does not want to punish a population for the sins of a regime they never chose, and he does not want American taxpayers footing the bill to rebuild a country we did not break in the first place. But restraint only works on an enemy capable of reading the signal. Iran keeps proving it cannot, or will not. So the real question is not whether Iran is beaten. It clearly is. The real question is what finally convinces a regime that will not admit defeat, without turning millions of ordinary Iranians into collateral damage for their leaders' stubbornness. That is the needle Trump has to thread. Escalate enough to end this, without becoming the very thing his restraint was designed to avoid. The world will be watching which targets he chooses next as closely as it watches whether Iran ever really surrenders at all.

Bill Mitchell

33,676 views • 1 month ago

🚨 WOMAN REVEALS SHE’S BEEN PREGNANT FOR 17 DIFFERENT YEARS — AND THE INTERNET IS COMPLETELY MELTING DOWN “People say I’m addicted to being pregnant.” A woman is going viral after posting a video revealing just how many years of her life she’s spent pregnant…. and people genuinely cannot believe the timeline. The years start flashing across the screen: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2022 2023 2024 2025 That means she’s spent portions of SEVENTEEN different calendar years pregnant. Now the comments are completely exploding: • “is that your hobby?” • “Pregnancy addiction is a real thing” • “Giiiiiiirl period ain’t that bad 😫😫” • “Not the flex you think it is” • “The doctor every year: ‘welcome back’” • “You were actually pregnant my whole life 😭💔” Others are defending her hard, arguing society has become so anti-family that people now treat large families like something abnormal. Now the internet is completely divided: Is this beautiful devotion to motherhood… or does this actually sound like an addiction? 📹: TikTok/thebradleybunch

Sensitive content

🚨 WOMAN REVEALS SHE’S BEEN PREGNANT FOR 17 DIFFERENT YEARS — AND THE INTERNET IS COMPLETELY MELTING DOWN “People say I’m addicted to being pregnant.” A woman is going viral after posting a video revealing just how many years of her life she’s spent pregnant…. and people genuinely cannot believe the timeline. The years start flashing across the screen: 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2022 2023 2024 2025 That means she’s spent portions of SEVENTEEN different calendar years pregnant. Now the comments are completely exploding: • “is that your hobby?” • “Pregnancy addiction is a real thing” • “Giiiiiiirl period ain’t that bad 😫😫” • “Not the flex you think it is” • “The doctor every year: ‘welcome back’” • “You were actually pregnant my whole life 😭💔” Others are defending her hard, arguing society has become so anti-family that people now treat large families like something abnormal. Now the internet is completely divided: Is this beautiful devotion to motherhood… or does this actually sound like an addiction? 📹: TikTok/thebradleybunch

HustleBitch

55,204 views • 3 months ago

This woman rented an Airbnb while in Portugal. She’s from the states and is used to turning the key to the right to unlock the doors. However when she tried doing this here, it wouldn’t work because you use to turn the key to the left. Other people are criticizing her and blaming her for not knowing how to open a door. But as with many things when going abroad, we don’t think about something as simple as that. Should the owner have at least showed her how to do it knowing she’s not from around there?

This woman rented an Airbnb while in Portugal. She’s from the states and is used to turning the key to the right to unlock the doors. However when she tried doing this here, it wouldn’t work because you use to turn the key to the left. Other people are criticizing her and blaming her for not knowing how to open a door. But as with many things when going abroad, we don’t think about something as simple as that. Should the owner have at least showed her how to do it knowing she’s not from around there?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

232,518 views • 5 months ago

Jeff Bezos just described AI in three words that make most of the economy temporary. Bezos: “AI is real and it is going to change every industry. In fact it’s a very unusual technology in that regard in that it’s a horizontal enabling layer.” Horizontal enabling layer. Not a product. Not a platform. Not a feature. A layer. Underneath everything. Everyone is asking which AI company wins. Bezos is telling you that is the wrong question entirely. A horizontal layer does not produce winners. It produces a new floor. Everything standing on the old one either gets rebuilt or gets erased. This has happened exactly twice in modern history. Electricity. The internet. Both times the same pattern. The new layer appeared. The old economy kept running above it. Revenue held. Careers continued. Everything looked normal. Then quietly and permanently the entire structure reorganized around the new substrate. The people who did not move were not outcompeted. They were made structurally irrelevant. Not because they were wrong. Because the ground they stood on stopped being ground. Bezos is telling you it is happening a third time. Not with a product. Not with a platform. With intelligence itself becoming infrastructure. A horizontal layer does not compete with the expert. It makes expertise free. It hands a 22 year old with zero credentials the same cognitive output you spent a decade and a quarter million dollars learning to produce. For $20 a month. That is not disruption. Disruption replaces a product with a better product. This dissolves the scarcity your entire career was priced on. Not because the work disappeared. Because the wall around it did. Every profession that exists because knowledge is hard to acquire. Every company that profits because analysis takes time. Every industry that survives because complexity locks outsiders out. All of it rests on a single assumption. That cognition is scarce. AI does not challenge that assumption. It retires it. The people who understand this are already rebuilding. Quietly. Deliberately. While everyone else argues about whether the thing underneath them is real. Bezos did not give you a prediction. He gave you a position on a map. You are either above the new layer or beneath it.

Jeff Bezos just described AI in three words that make most of the economy temporary. Bezos: “AI is real and it is going to change every industry. In fact it’s a very unusual technology in that regard in that it’s a horizontal enabling layer.” Horizontal enabling layer. Not a product. Not a platform. Not a feature. A layer. Underneath everything. Everyone is asking which AI company wins. Bezos is telling you that is the wrong question entirely. A horizontal layer does not produce winners. It produces a new floor. Everything standing on the old one either gets rebuilt or gets erased. This has happened exactly twice in modern history. Electricity. The internet. Both times the same pattern. The new layer appeared. The old economy kept running above it. Revenue held. Careers continued. Everything looked normal. Then quietly and permanently the entire structure reorganized around the new substrate. The people who did not move were not outcompeted. They were made structurally irrelevant. Not because they were wrong. Because the ground they stood on stopped being ground. Bezos is telling you it is happening a third time. Not with a product. Not with a platform. With intelligence itself becoming infrastructure. A horizontal layer does not compete with the expert. It makes expertise free. It hands a 22 year old with zero credentials the same cognitive output you spent a decade and a quarter million dollars learning to produce. For $20 a month. That is not disruption. Disruption replaces a product with a better product. This dissolves the scarcity your entire career was priced on. Not because the work disappeared. Because the wall around it did. Every profession that exists because knowledge is hard to acquire. Every company that profits because analysis takes time. Every industry that survives because complexity locks outsiders out. All of it rests on a single assumption. That cognition is scarce. AI does not challenge that assumption. It retires it. The people who understand this are already rebuilding. Quietly. Deliberately. While everyone else argues about whether the thing underneath them is real. Bezos did not give you a prediction. He gave you a position on a map. You are either above the new layer or beneath it.

Dustin

104,086 views • 1 month ago

JoJo Siwa is setting the record straight, making it clear she’s not straight. In a 7 April interview with Us Weekly, the 22-year-old opened up about the confusion and backlash she faced after entering a relationship with Chris Hughes last year, explaining that her identity hasn’t changed, even if her current relationship has. “I clearly am not a straight human being. I could never say that I’m straight. Am I in a straight relationship? Yes. Am I in love with a man? Yes! Do I want to spend the rest of my life with him? Absolutely. But does that discredit my past? Absolutely not. Zero,” she said. Siwa reflected on first coming out at 17 and emphasised that her experiences, including past relationships with women and nonbinary people, remain a core part of who she is. She described the reaction to her current relationship as “confusing,” noting that some people who were previously supportive of her turned critical because she’s now with a man. Still, she says she’s committed to continuing to share her journey openly and advocate as a member of the LGBTQ+ community. While she’s happy in her relationship, Siwa also leaned into broader labels that better reflect her identity, saying, “Queer, pansexual, bisexual, plus the other terms that I could name, but those three, really relate to me. And if I had to put a label on it, just to basically shut people down, yeah, I would say I’m probably pansexual.”

JoJo Siwa is setting the record straight, making it clear she’s not straight. In a 7 April interview with Us Weekly, the 22-year-old opened up about the confusion and backlash she faced after entering a relationship with Chris Hughes last year, explaining that her identity hasn’t changed, even if her current relationship has. “I clearly am not a straight human being. I could never say that I’m straight. Am I in a straight relationship? Yes. Am I in love with a man? Yes! Do I want to spend the rest of my life with him? Absolutely. But does that discredit my past? Absolutely not. Zero,” she said. Siwa reflected on first coming out at 17 and emphasised that her experiences, including past relationships with women and nonbinary people, remain a core part of who she is. She described the reaction to her current relationship as “confusing,” noting that some people who were previously supportive of her turned critical because she’s now with a man. Still, she says she’s committed to continuing to share her journey openly and advocate as a member of the LGBTQ+ community. While she’s happy in her relationship, Siwa also leaned into broader labels that better reflect her identity, saying, “Queer, pansexual, bisexual, plus the other terms that I could name, but those three, really relate to me. And if I had to put a label on it, just to basically shut people down, yeah, I would say I’m probably pansexual.”

PinkNews

43,917 views • 4 months ago

OMG, this is NOT what it looks like! 😭😭 Her name is Megha. She’s been with Mitchell since her university days, they dated for almost 3–4 years before they got married. I know the video makes it seem like she just pulled a fast one on a veteran for a green card, but that’s completely wrong. This is a real relationship. Both of them took real time to get to know each other’s families before they tied the knot. And honestly, she's extremely career-driven. She doesn’t need to marry anyone for papers. She did it for love.😒

OMG, this is NOT what it looks like! 😭😭 Her name is Megha. She’s been with Mitchell since her university days, they dated for almost 3–4 years before they got married. I know the video makes it seem like she just pulled a fast one on a veteran for a green card, but that’s completely wrong. This is a real relationship. Both of them took real time to get to know each other’s families before they tied the knot. And honestly, she's extremely career-driven. She doesn’t need to marry anyone for papers. She did it for love.😒

Saynotolibrandu

139,552 views • 17 days ago

WHEN SHE’S NOT ATTRACTED TO YOU.. See His wife is attracted to Jalen Hurts He got the light skin He young he got the full head of hair He in shape all that.. See Jalen could smash her for free Without tricking off But her husband he had to pay for it And still gets disrespected Because she’s not really attracted to him But he’s a provider.. Men constantly make this mistake Because they want a trophy wife

Sensitive content

WHEN SHE’S NOT ATTRACTED TO YOU.. See His wife is attracted to Jalen Hurts He got the light skin He young he got the full head of hair He in shape all that.. See Jalen could smash her for free Without tricking off But her husband he had to pay for it And still gets disrespected Because she’s not really attracted to him But he’s a provider.. Men constantly make this mistake Because they want a trophy wife

MASTER STUDENT🤲🏾

628,178 views • 1 year ago

It wasn’t public. I got access to a Stake Mines setup through a streamer colleague who’s been around that ecosystem for a while. At first it didn’t look like anything special. No crazy wins. No “10x sessions.” Just sessions that looked… the same every time. That’s what caught my attention 👀 After going through it, one thing became clear: It’s not a predictor. It doesn’t try to guess where mines are — everything is already defined before the round starts. → how many tiles to open → where to stop → how to react after wins/losses No decisions in the moment 🧠 Most people don’t lose because of bad luck. They lose because of how they play. Chasing losses. Increasing risk after wins. Staying in too long. This removes that layer completely ⚙️ Still testing it, but the concept itself is interesting. Not about beating the game — just removing chaos from how it’s played. #Stake #Mines #CryptoCasino #RiskManagement #Stakepredictor

It wasn’t public. I got access to a Stake Mines setup through a streamer colleague who’s been around that ecosystem for a while. At first it didn’t look like anything special. No crazy wins. No “10x sessions.” Just sessions that looked… the same every time. That’s what caught my attention 👀 After going through it, one thing became clear: It’s not a predictor. It doesn’t try to guess where mines are — everything is already defined before the round starts. → how many tiles to open → where to stop → how to react after wins/losses No decisions in the moment 🧠 Most people don’t lose because of bad luck. They lose because of how they play. Chasing losses. Increasing risk after wins. Staying in too long. This removes that layer completely ⚙️ Still testing it, but the concept itself is interesting. Not about beating the game — just removing chaos from how it’s played. #Stake #Mines #CryptoCasino #RiskManagement #Stakepredictor

0xGhostrk

11,172 views • 4 months ago