Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

🚨 HOLY CRAP! The Supreme Court's ruling against Voting Rights Act race-based districts throws as many as 20 HOUSE SEATS into question Democrats are now panicking. "States may SCRAMBLE to redraw maps." The 6-3 decision struck down Louisiana's district drawn for black people, and Sam Alito TORCHED IT: "No... show more

Eric Daugherty

1,135,399 subscribers

60,338 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨 NOW: Democrats are MELTING DOWN over the Supreme Court ruling race-based Congressional Districts are UNCONSTITUTIONAL Some estimates show they could IMMINENTLY lose up to 19 DEMOCRAT SEATS in districts that were drawn specifically for black voters. START DRAWING NEW MAPS, SOUTHERN STATES!

🚨 NOW: Democrats are MELTING DOWN over the Supreme Court ruling race-based Congressional Districts are UNCONSTITUTIONAL Some estimates show they could IMMINENTLY lose up to 19 DEMOCRAT SEATS in districts that were drawn specifically for black voters. START DRAWING NEW MAPS, SOUTHERN STATES!

Nick Sortor

1,205,811 views • 3 months ago

.Mollie explains how the Supreme Court's gerrymandering decision could transform the country by declaring ALL of the Democrats' race-based districts unconstitutional: “Alito wrote this masterful, major opinion, saying the Constitution forbids racism. The Voting Rights Act was not written and could not be written to oppose what the Constitution says. And so Section 2, which some people had interpreted as requiring racist maps, that's clearly not the meaning. The racism is ENDED. Democrats have exploited these federal rulings to create these very racial maps that have given them an undue advantage in certain states. So ruling these congressional districts as unconstitutional and contrary to the Voting Rights Act itself means they’ll all be going away.”

.Mollie explains how the Supreme Court's gerrymandering decision could transform the country by declaring ALL of the Democrats' race-based districts unconstitutional: “Alito wrote this masterful, major opinion, saying the Constitution forbids racism. The Voting Rights Act was not written and could not be written to oppose what the Constitution says. And so Section 2, which some people had interpreted as requiring racist maps, that's clearly not the meaning. The racism is ENDED. Democrats have exploited these federal rulings to create these very racial maps that have given them an undue advantage in certain states. So ruling these congressional districts as unconstitutional and contrary to the Voting Rights Act itself means they’ll all be going away.”

Glenn Beck

28,957 views • 3 months ago

🚨 BOOM! SUPREME COURT DROPS A MASSIVE 6-3 BOMB ON RACIAL GERRYMANDERING IN LOUISIANA! The U.S. Supreme Court just ruled — non-minority voters WIN. Louisiana drew up a second majority-minority congressional district to boost Black voters. Non-Black plaintiffs sued, saying it was straight-up racial gerrymandering that violated the 14th and 15th Amendments. The Court agreed. In a 6-3 decision, the majority said: “Because the Voting Rights Act did NOT require Louisiana to create an additional majority/minority district, no compelling interest justified the state’s use of race in drawing these two new districts. That map is an unconstitutional gerrymander.” Exactly as expected: Conservatives (6) vs. the liberal bloc (Kagan, Sotomayor, and Jackson dissenting). Thomas and Gorsuch even dropped a concurrence. This isn’t just about Louisiana. Shannon Bream noted this could open the door to challenges against 20+ other districts across the country — mostly in the South — that were drawn primarily on the basis of race. Huge potential implications for the midterms. The left’s fear of the Voting Rights Act getting gutted? Not fully there yet… but this is a major shot across the bow against race-based map drawing. No more treating the Constitution like a suggestion just to engineer racial outcomes. The Supreme Court just reminded everyone: race cannot be the dominant factor in drawing districts. Big win for colorblind justice.

🚨 BOOM! SUPREME COURT DROPS A MASSIVE 6-3 BOMB ON RACIAL GERRYMANDERING IN LOUISIANA! The U.S. Supreme Court just ruled — non-minority voters WIN. Louisiana drew up a second majority-minority congressional district to boost Black voters. Non-Black plaintiffs sued, saying it was straight-up racial gerrymandering that violated the 14th and 15th Amendments. The Court agreed. In a 6-3 decision, the majority said: “Because the Voting Rights Act did NOT require Louisiana to create an additional majority/minority district, no compelling interest justified the state’s use of race in drawing these two new districts. That map is an unconstitutional gerrymander.” Exactly as expected: Conservatives (6) vs. the liberal bloc (Kagan, Sotomayor, and Jackson dissenting). Thomas and Gorsuch even dropped a concurrence. This isn’t just about Louisiana. Shannon Bream noted this could open the door to challenges against 20+ other districts across the country — mostly in the South — that were drawn primarily on the basis of race. Huge potential implications for the midterms. The left’s fear of the Voting Rights Act getting gutted? Not fully there yet… but this is a major shot across the bow against race-based map drawing. No more treating the Constitution like a suggestion just to engineer racial outcomes. The Supreme Court just reminded everyone: race cannot be the dominant factor in drawing districts. Big win for colorblind justice.

Gunther Eagleman™

74,797 views • 3 months ago

🚨 BREAKING: The Supreme Court has ruled that drawing Congressional districts based on race under the Voting Rights Act is UNCONSTITUTIONAL, 6-3 This is a HUGE win, and could have MASSIVE ramifications for the 2026 midterms Democrats for YEARS have sued over and over again to FORCE states like Louisiana to create black majority districts Louisiana's map has now been thrown out. If SCOTUS ends up gutting the act, a DOZEN Democrat districts could flip red overnight.

🚨 BREAKING: The Supreme Court has ruled that drawing Congressional districts based on race under the Voting Rights Act is UNCONSTITUTIONAL, 6-3 This is a HUGE win, and could have MASSIVE ramifications for the 2026 midterms Democrats for YEARS have sued over and over again to FORCE states like Louisiana to create black majority districts Louisiana's map has now been thrown out. If SCOTUS ends up gutting the act, a DOZEN Democrat districts could flip red overnight.

Nick Sortor

4,438,768 views • 3 months ago

🚨 BREAKING: The Supreme Court has ruled that drawing Congressional districts based on race under the Voting Rights Act is UNCONSTITUTIONAL, 6-3 This is a HUGE win, and could have MASSIVE ramifications for the 2026 midterms Democrats for YEARS have sued over and over again to FORCE states like Louisiana to create black majority districts Louisiana's map has now been thrown out. If SCOTUS ends up gutting the act, a DOZEN Democrat districts could flip red overnight.

🚨 BREAKING: The Supreme Court has ruled that drawing Congressional districts based on race under the Voting Rights Act is UNCONSTITUTIONAL, 6-3 This is a HUGE win, and could have MASSIVE ramifications for the 2026 midterms Democrats for YEARS have sued over and over again to FORCE states like Louisiana to create black majority districts Louisiana's map has now been thrown out. If SCOTUS ends up gutting the act, a DOZEN Democrat districts could flip red overnight.

Jennifer Joanna Aniston

437,174 views • 3 months ago

🚨 JUST IN: The red state of ALABAMA is now moving to get a new Congressional map drawn by asking the Supreme Court to step in following the anti-racial gerrymandering ruling Alabama has districts that are CLEARLY racially drawn! SCOTUS should step in and let ALL states with these unconstitutional districts redraw for 2026 🔥 "Expedited consideration is necessary to afford Alabama the same opportunity as other States to use a lawfully enacted congressional map free of an injunction that cannot be reconciled with Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act “as properly construed.” Callais, Slip Op. 3." "...vacate the injunctions and judgments below in light of this Court’s decision in Callais, remand the cases to the district court, and immediately issue its judgments."

🚨 JUST IN: The red state of ALABAMA is now moving to get a new Congressional map drawn by asking the Supreme Court to step in following the anti-racial gerrymandering ruling Alabama has districts that are CLEARLY racially drawn! SCOTUS should step in and let ALL states with these unconstitutional districts redraw for 2026 🔥 "Expedited consideration is necessary to afford Alabama the same opportunity as other States to use a lawfully enacted congressional map free of an injunction that cannot be reconciled with Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act “as properly construed.” Callais, Slip Op. 3." "...vacate the injunctions and judgments below in light of this Court’s decision in Callais, remand the cases to the district court, and immediately issue its judgments."

Eric Daugherty

339,051 views • 3 months ago

🚨 JUST IN: SUPREME COURT INVALIDATES ALABAMA'S RACE-BASED HOUSE DISTRICTS *100%* of Alabama's blue seats are racially drawn, and the Supreme Court, 6-3, has just NULLIFIED a previous court ruling that required them Now Alabama is set to use a new House map for the midterms LET'S GO!!! 🔥 The new map is likely to be 6R-1D, but they SHOULD go for gold and make it 7R-0D 🇺🇸

🚨 JUST IN: SUPREME COURT INVALIDATES ALABAMA'S RACE-BASED HOUSE DISTRICTS 100% of Alabama's blue seats are racially drawn, and the Supreme Court, 6-3, has just NULLIFIED a previous court ruling that required them Now Alabama is set to use a new House map for the midterms LET'S GO!!! 🔥 The new map is likely to be 6R-1D, but they SHOULD go for gold and make it 7R-0D 🇺🇸

Eric Daugherty

359,641 views • 3 months ago

Members of the Supreme Court's conservative majority appeared open Wednesday to raising the bar for successfully challenging voting maps under a key pillar of the Voting Rights Act, a decision that would weaken the landmark law and limit the consideration of race in the drawing of congressional districts.

Members of the Supreme Court's conservative majority appeared open Wednesday to raising the bar for successfully challenging voting maps under a key pillar of the Voting Rights Act, a decision that would weaken the landmark law and limit the consideration of race in the drawing of congressional districts.

CBS Evening News

18,142 views • 10 months ago

🚨 JUST NOW: Supreme Court Justice SAM ALITO has just been asked to IMMEDIATELY issue the court's opinion against Louisiana's race-based gerrymandering to make way for 2026 REDISTRICTING Any delays could throw into question a map taking effect for the midterms in an orderly fashion. The District Court requires jurisdiction to help get this done — which requires the Supreme Court GOOD! MAKE IT HAPPEN, draw out those cheated in Dem seats! 🔥

🚨 JUST NOW: Supreme Court Justice SAM ALITO has just been asked to IMMEDIATELY issue the court's opinion against Louisiana's race-based gerrymandering to make way for 2026 REDISTRICTING Any delays could throw into question a map taking effect for the midterms in an orderly fashion. The District Court requires jurisdiction to help get this done — which requires the Supreme Court GOOD! MAKE IT HAPPEN, draw out those cheated in Dem seats! 🔥

Eric Daugherty

247,085 views • 3 months ago

The Voting Rights Act of 1965 ended intentional racial discrimination in voting and districts. Democrats misconstrued it. They twisted it into a license for racial discrimination in congressional districts. The Supreme Court corrected that today. Democrats don't get to carve out DEI districts based on race. These racial districts violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Thanks for having me, Benny Johnson.

The Voting Rights Act of 1965 ended intentional racial discrimination in voting and districts. Democrats misconstrued it. They twisted it into a license for racial discrimination in congressional districts. The Supreme Court corrected that today. Democrats don't get to carve out DEI districts based on race. These racial districts violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Thanks for having me, Benny Johnson.

🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸

22,348 views • 3 months ago

🚨 IT'S OFFICIAL: Red southern states are GUNNING to redistrict their 2026 Congressional maps after the Supreme Court's ruling - Florida just got it done - Louisiana - Tennessee - Alabama - South Carolina MISSISSIPPI should try as well! PLAY HARDBALL, GOP. 🔥 "President Donald Trump is urging Republican states to move quickly. Louisiana is delaying primaries for house races after the Supreme Court ruled its map unconstitutional since lawmakers used race while drawing a district. Now other red states are reacting to the ruling." — Fox

🚨 IT'S OFFICIAL: Red southern states are GUNNING to redistrict their 2026 Congressional maps after the Supreme Court's ruling - Florida just got it done - Louisiana - Tennessee - Alabama - South Carolina MISSISSIPPI should try as well! PLAY HARDBALL, GOP. 🔥 "President Donald Trump is urging Republican states to move quickly. Louisiana is delaying primaries for house races after the Supreme Court ruled its map unconstitutional since lawmakers used race while drawing a district. Now other red states are reacting to the ruling." — Fox

Eric Daugherty

60,215 views • 3 months ago

WATCH: Sen. Ted Cruz breaks down the 6-3 Supreme Court ruling in Louisiana v. Callais: “The court concluded is that it is not permissible for elected politicians to gerrymander based on race, to draw a black seat or a white seat or an Hispanic seat, that when government draws distinctions based on race, that is contrary to the Constitution.” Cruz explained: “The Supreme Court issued a 6-3 decision. Justice Alito wrote the majority opinion. And in that opinion, the court vindicated the Constitution of the United States. And in particular the 14th Amendment that ensures that all persons in the United States are entitled to equal protection of the laws, and also the 15th Amendment which protects the right to vote regardless of race. And what the court concluded is that it is not permissible for elected politicians to gerrymander based on race, to draw a black seat or a white seat or an Hispanic seat, that when government draws distinctions based on race, that is contrary to the Constitution. I think that question is absolutely correct. Uh as Chief Justice Roberts wrote in a previous case, it is a sorted business this divying us up by race. He also said the best way to stop discriminating on race is to stop discriminating based on race. And and I think the court's decision here says our government should be blind to color. We should be colorblind. We should not discriminate in favor of or against any race. I think the Supreme Court is correct and and and that uh that is the result of decades of litigation to to to get these racial gerrymanders struck down.”

WATCH: Sen. Ted Cruz breaks down the 6-3 Supreme Court ruling in Louisiana v. Callais: “The court concluded is that it is not permissible for elected politicians to gerrymander based on race, to draw a black seat or a white seat or an Hispanic seat, that when government draws distinctions based on race, that is contrary to the Constitution.” Cruz explained: “The Supreme Court issued a 6-3 decision. Justice Alito wrote the majority opinion. And in that opinion, the court vindicated the Constitution of the United States. And in particular the 14th Amendment that ensures that all persons in the United States are entitled to equal protection of the laws, and also the 15th Amendment which protects the right to vote regardless of race. And what the court concluded is that it is not permissible for elected politicians to gerrymander based on race, to draw a black seat or a white seat or an Hispanic seat, that when government draws distinctions based on race, that is contrary to the Constitution. I think that question is absolutely correct. Uh as Chief Justice Roberts wrote in a previous case, it is a sorted business this divying us up by race. He also said the best way to stop discriminating on race is to stop discriminating based on race. And and I think the court's decision here says our government should be blind to color. We should be colorblind. We should not discriminate in favor of or against any race. I think the Supreme Court is correct and and and that uh that is the result of decades of litigation to to to get these racial gerrymanders struck down.”

Steve Guest

115,581 views • 3 months ago

🚨 MASSIVE NEWS: The Republican South is set to GAIN GOP Congressional seats if and when the Supreme Court's conservative majority strikes down the VRA race-drawn districts for Democrats "There will be a trickle-down effect in other southern states...it could shift more than a DOZEN Congressional seats to Republicans!" Decision can come at ANY time by June. The sooner, the better, so we can REDRAW before 2026!

🚨 MASSIVE NEWS: The Republican South is set to GAIN GOP Congressional seats if and when the Supreme Court's conservative majority strikes down the VRA race-drawn districts for Democrats "There will be a trickle-down effect in other southern states...it could shift more than a DOZEN Congressional seats to Republicans!" Decision can come at ANY time by June. The sooner, the better, so we can REDRAW before 2026!

Eric Daugherty

179,304 views • 10 months ago

Republican officials in several Southern states are racing to redraw their congressional maps, reacting to the seismic Supreme Court decision that weakened a section of the Voting Rights Act about majority-minority districts. As CBS News’ Ed O'Keefe reports, Alabama is the latest state moving to revise its congressional lines ahead of the November midterm elections.

Republican officials in several Southern states are racing to redraw their congressional maps, reacting to the seismic Supreme Court decision that weakened a section of the Voting Rights Act about majority-minority districts. As CBS News’ Ed O'Keefe reports, Alabama is the latest state moving to revise its congressional lines ahead of the November midterm elections.

CBS News

14,057 views • 3 months ago

“States like Ohio, Texas and Florida already did partisan gerrymandering in 2021. They drew as many Republican seats as they could without being racist. And so what they are now doing with the second bite of the apple is drawing racist districts under the expectation that the supreme court will strike the racial discrimination prohibitions of the Voting Rights Act…It is the white house pushing these maps onto different states to try to steal as many seats as possible.” - Rep Dave Min on new gerrymandering pre-midterm

“States like Ohio, Texas and Florida already did partisan gerrymandering in 2021. They drew as many Republican seats as they could without being racist. And so what they are now doing with the second bite of the apple is drawing racist districts under the expectation that the supreme court will strike the racial discrimination prohibitions of the Voting Rights Act…It is the white house pushing these maps onto different states to try to steal as many seats as possible.” - Rep Dave Min on new gerrymandering pre-midterm

Jim Sciutto

181,359 views • 10 months ago

🚨 BREAKING: SCOTUS Justice Clarence Thomas takes a BLOW TORCH to Voting Rights Act districts that favor Democrats on the basis of race Thomas successfully makes the point that the "black" district WOULD NOT EXIST in Louisiana without being forced to by the courts to consider race. Louisiana's Solicitor General says that they would not have drawn up the district without being forced to draw it under SB 8. THOMAS: "What role did Robinson [forced Louisiana to draw another race district] play in SB 8? [Louisiana's map]" AGUINAGA: We drew it because the courts told us to! We'd NEVER pass SB 8 without Robinson! They said a majority black district was required. And our legislature saw the marching order. Clarence Thomas is the GOAT! He knows the VRA is ridiculous!

🚨 BREAKING: SCOTUS Justice Clarence Thomas takes a BLOW TORCH to Voting Rights Act districts that favor Democrats on the basis of race Thomas successfully makes the point that the "black" district WOULD NOT EXIST in Louisiana without being forced to by the courts to consider race. Louisiana's Solicitor General says that they would not have drawn up the district without being forced to draw it under SB 8. THOMAS: "What role did Robinson [forced Louisiana to draw another race district] play in SB 8? [Louisiana's map]" AGUINAGA: We drew it because the courts told us to! We'd NEVER pass SB 8 without Robinson! They said a majority black district was required. And our legislature saw the marching order. Clarence Thomas is the GOAT! He knows the VRA is ridiculous!

Eric Daugherty

1,123,453 views • 10 months ago

Republican Charlotte Bergmann may potentially win the redistricted congressional district in Tennessee following the new map that was just approved by the state’s lawmakers. This would give Republicans all nine U.S. House seats for Tennessee. The redistricting came following the Supreme Court ruling related to Louisiana and the Voting Rights Act. The district is currently represented by Rep. Steve Cohen (D-TN). Bergmann has a plausible path to represent district (TN-9) as a result of the redraw. (Video: AI)

Republican Charlotte Bergmann may potentially win the redistricted congressional district in Tennessee following the new map that was just approved by the state’s lawmakers. This would give Republicans all nine U.S. House seats for Tennessee. The redistricting came following the Supreme Court ruling related to Louisiana and the Voting Rights Act. The district is currently represented by Rep. Steve Cohen (D-TN). Bergmann has a plausible path to represent district (TN-9) as a result of the redraw. (Video: AI)

Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸

29,940 views • 3 months ago

MSNOW guest Mara Gay says that white supremacy is what drives Republicans to push for more congressional map redraws after SCOTUS struck down racial gerrymandering. When Democrats have no policy or legal ground left, they scream racism. The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that Louisiana could not create an extra majority-Black district, as the Voting Rights Act did not require it and race had unconstitutionally driven the map. Tennessee redrew its map accordingly, spreading Memphis across district lines. Not a single voter lost any of their constitutionally protetected rights. The panic coming from Democrats reveals the truth: they need court-mandated racial packing to win seats, not genuine voter support. Falling back on racism is their surrender flag.

MSNOW guest Mara Gay says that white supremacy is what drives Republicans to push for more congressional map redraws after SCOTUS struck down racial gerrymandering. When Democrats have no policy or legal ground left, they scream racism. The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that Louisiana could not create an extra majority-Black district, as the Voting Rights Act did not require it and race had unconstitutionally driven the map. Tennessee redrew its map accordingly, spreading Memphis across district lines. Not a single voter lost any of their constitutionally protetected rights. The panic coming from Democrats reveals the truth: they need court-mandated racial packing to win seats, not genuine voter support. Falling back on racism is their surrender flag.

Media Lies

47,965 views • 3 months ago

🚨 JUST IN: President Trump celebrates MASSIVE SUPREME COURT VICTORY and personally THANKS Justice Samuel Alito for authoring the 6-3 opinion, striking down racial gerrymandering in Congressional districts Big blow to the left's cheating! "Today's 6-3 Supreme Court decision in the Callais case is a BIG WIN for Equal Protection under the Law, as it returns the Voting Rights Act to its Original Intent, which was to protect against intentional Racial Discrimination. Thank you to brilliant Justice Samuel Alito for authoring this important and appropriate Opinion. Congratulations! President DONALD J. TRUMP" 🔥🔥

🚨 JUST IN: President Trump celebrates MASSIVE SUPREME COURT VICTORY and personally THANKS Justice Samuel Alito for authoring the 6-3 opinion, striking down racial gerrymandering in Congressional districts Big blow to the left's cheating! "Today's 6-3 Supreme Court decision in the Callais case is a BIG WIN for Equal Protection under the Law, as it returns the Voting Rights Act to its Original Intent, which was to protect against intentional Racial Discrimination. Thank you to brilliant Justice Samuel Alito for authoring this important and appropriate Opinion. Congratulations! President DONALD J. TRUMP" 🔥🔥

Eric Daugherty

55,052 views • 3 months ago

🚨 NOW: Speaker Johnson MIC DROPS the race-baiting Democrats accusing MAGA of "Jim Crow 2.0" because racial gerrymandering was struck down by SCOTUS Q: What is your message to black Americans? JOHNSON: "They stated the OBVIOUS! Drawing congressional lines must be FAIR. You cannot draw lines on the basis of race and that's what was done in Louisiana." "So they declared it to be an unconstitutional gerrymander and it was." "This is brings back fairness and certainty to the system. And I think a lot of states are looking to make sure that their maps are not unconstitutional like Louisiana's was." Perfectly said, Speaker Mike Johnson

🚨 NOW: Speaker Johnson MIC DROPS the race-baiting Democrats accusing MAGA of "Jim Crow 2.0" because racial gerrymandering was struck down by SCOTUS Q: What is your message to black Americans? JOHNSON: "They stated the OBVIOUS! Drawing congressional lines must be FAIR. You cannot draw lines on the basis of race and that's what was done in Louisiana." "So they declared it to be an unconstitutional gerrymander and it was." "This is brings back fairness and certainty to the system. And I think a lot of states are looking to make sure that their maps are not unconstitutional like Louisiana's was." Perfectly said, Speaker Mike Johnson

Eric Daugherty

63,146 views • 3 months ago