Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

HOLY MOLY! partial diffusion!! had no idea you could do this, just stumbled into it accidentally I asked ChatGPT for an improved version of a jailbreak output and got a refusal with a blurred-out image (which is normal) but it turns out if you’re on mobile and drag that...

542,502 views • 6 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

All these demo videos make HEAD SWAPPING with Nano Banana look so easy, but then you give it a try and you're like... uh... what? Why didn't that work? Here's what I've found. Nano Banana reads your image, almost literally, so if you write on the image, it reads the text. This is how Higgsfield AI 🧩 has capitalized on the tech: "Write on the image" and give it direction, right? Totally true, but you don't need Higgi to write on your image. Nano Banana will understand your direction regardless of where you write on your image. On one hand, Higgi is really smart, because they're hranessing the tech in a unique way, but the whole "Higgsfield's Banana Placement" is a bit of a misnomer. It's more of a "Banana Placement" and Higgi is just giving you a sort of basic Photoshop-type tool to work with (again, pretty smart), but the real tech is the Banana. 🍌 This is how I head swapped heads in Runway, but Nano Banana maintains the aesthetic qualities of your image almost perfectly, whereas Runway Reference spits out a very Gen-4 looking image. I like using Nano in Freepik (now Magnific), mainly because it's fast and I can get 4 gens at a time, and you need to gen a dozen times of so before you get a winner (most of the time). I was pumped when I saw Freepik introduce the @ reference feature, just like Runway has, but it doesn't seem to work for head swapping. My guess is because that's not really how Nano Banana tech works... ideally. Marco is the person I saw using this "A" and "B" method, back when Nano was on LM Arena, and man-oh-man, it just works... like a charm. You need experiment with how much of the face you blot out, and the angle and facial expression of your new head if you want the blend to be perfect. All of the results in this video are 100% Nano Banana. I did not do any Photoshop work to the images after the fact. I really hope this helps. Let me know if you have any questions. I'm happy to help. And I'll keep posting videos like this if you guys find them useful. Let me know! And if you want more serious, one-on-one AI consultation you can throw something on the books here:

Jordan Daniel Chesney

61,803 views • 9 months ago

'See if you can spot this one.' This was the last sentence formed by Clapton before the start of a ground-breaking rebirth of a worldwide hit, Layla. The background story is quite interesting for this rendition of Layla and it has a lot to reveal. Let's break it down together. On January 16, 1992, Clapton, along with Andy Fairweather Low, Steve Ferrone, Chuck Leavell, Ray Cooper, and Nathan East, gathered at Bray Film Studios in Windsor, England. Performing in front of an intimate audience of around 300 people, they set out to film a live concert for MTV’s Unplugged series. At the time, no one could have predicted that this recording would become the best-selling live album of all time, moving over 26 million copies worldwide. In fact, Clapton himself even bet $100 with one of the band members, confident that the album would never become popular. The key to its success? A completely reimagined acoustic version of Layla—so different and fresh that Clapton famously teased the crowd with, “See if you can spot this one.”. As mentioned, the initial goal of the concert was simply to film a TV show for MTV. However, for Eric Clapton, this also felt like the perfect opportunity to debut some of the new, deeply personal songs he had written, including Tears in Heaven. I had a need to perform these new songs about my son, and I really believed that they were meant to help not just me, but anybody who had or would suffer such extraordinary loss. The opportunity to showcase them came in the guise of an Unplugged TV show for MTV. I had been approached to do it, and wasn’t sure, but now it seemed like the ideal platform. Eric Clapton knew he wanted to include Layla in the Unplugged set, but there was a challenge: the original version required him to sing in a high range, which didn’t suit the relaxed, acoustic vibe of the concert. The energetic, high-tempo rock version wouldn’t work in this setting, so Eric came up with a solution—slow the song down and drop it an octave. I just thought I should try this as a “shuffle”. Because I love that thing of changing tempos, it’s a good way of looking at something from a different angle. Because of the key – it’s very high to sing if you do it in the “rock” version. It’s at the top of my range. Well I thought you can’t play it like that, and so you’ll have to sing an octave down. Kind of thought – we’ll actually that sounds quite nice and sort of “jazzy”. By slowing down the tempo and lowering the vocal pitch, Clapton kept Layla in its original key but tamed it for the acoustic setting. This decision not only made it easier for him to sing but also gave the song a fresh, jazzy feel that resonated with the Unplugged audience. Bassist Nathan East, who performed that night, captured the essence of playing unplugged perfectly: You can’t hide behind an amplified sound or a fuzz tone. You’re not relying on production. This is just everybody’s fingers connected to the instrument. Pure heart. Despite all of Eric Clapton’s initial concerns, the acoustic version of Layla turned out to be a massive success. Not only did audiences embrace the reimagined version, but the band members themselves thoroughly enjoyed performing it—and even listening to it afterward.

Rock'n Roll of All

27,546 views • 11 months ago

"Abel Ferrara's 'Bad Lieutenant' (1992) is among the greatest pictures made about a man’s descent in search of redemption." --- Martin Scorsese Full Excerpt: "I thought 'Bad Lieutenant' (1992) was a key film. It’s the kind of film that I wanted 'The Last Temptation of Christ' (1988) to be. But maybe it was because I dealt with the iconography of Jesus directly that I was not able to get certain aspects that I wanted. Harvey Keitel really felt that it’s what he was aiming for all his life; we had stumbled around it ourselves in the movies we made together, Keitel and myself. And we tried to get it directly in 'The Last Temptation of Christ', but it’s better the way Ferrara and he got it here — especially the confrontation with the image of Jesus in the church. And not just the obviously shocking part of it; it’s when he breaks down and cries and says he’s bad. There’s this beautiful ending with the boy leaving, then Keitel being shot in the car. And there’s the use of Pledging My Love by Johnny Ace, which we had in 'Mean Streets' (1973). In any event, it’s an exceptional movie, extraordinary — I mean, it’s not to everybody’s taste. I loved the themes, and the way Ferrara’s style is so straightforward. You cut into a scene with two women, and they’re naked and music is playing, and then suddenly Keitel is naked, in a sort of trance. Then you cut and you’re into another scene. It’s so strong you don’t need a style. Another example: he goes and gets shot up with some heroin from a woman who is obviously a junkie — it must be for real. So what do you need to know? If you dare, follow him through till the end of the night. It’s among the greatest pictures made about a man’s descent in search of redemption." ('Projections 7', edited by John Boorman and Walter Donohue, 1997)

DepressedBergman

42,563 views • 4 months ago