Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🚨 HOLY SMOKES. Rep. AOC just SELF-DESTRUCTED while trying to represent America in Germany "Should the US commit troops to defend Taiwan?" AOC: "Um, you know, I think that, uhh, eh, this is such a, uh, you know, I th-I think that this is a, umm, this is of...

2,260,696 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Tucker Carlson on Pat Buchanan: "Well, I mean, you know, it's perfectly valid to to question America's relationship with Israel. Israel has a lobby. It's perfectly fair, as far as I'm concerned, to beat up on Israel's lobby. Um, but that's I don't think that's the reason that Buchanan is being labeled an anti-semite. this kind of, as I've said, this this relentless um this relentless bringing up topics related to uh Judaism. I mean, famously Pat, you know, always beats up on Goldman Sachs, but never Morgan Stanley. I mean, it's it's really hard to there is no point at which Pat Buchanan has held a press conference and said, you know, I really don't like the Jews, I think they're a sinister force in America. But I think um and it took me years to come to this uh to this position. I mean, I'm not throwing the the term anti-semite around. Um, but you you reach a point when you say, "Well, gee, you know, here's a guy who has gone out of his way to to defend Myanuk and other accused um Nazi war criminals, who's constantly attacked Israel, who's attacked uh American Jews for supporting Israel unduly, who's implied that American Jews push America into wars in which non-Jews die. There really is um and again I'm not hysterical on this subject but I do believe uh that there is a pattern um with Pat Buchanan of needling the Jews. Is that anti-Semitic? Yeah. I mean after a while you conclude it is in some sense anti-semitic. I mean Pat Buchanan obviously has a lot of personal and affectionate relationships with people who are Jewish. Um so on a personal level perhaps he's not, but on a different maybe thematic level I think he probably is." - Tucker Carlson on C-SPAN Washington Journal September 24, 1999. Every single word of this applies to 2025 Tucker. He knows exactly what he's doing.

Yehuda Teitelbaum

59,376 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

AOC on the biggest foreign policy change in America: " Well, I think zooming out beyond just this presidential administration, I think that what we are seeing is between President trump's first administration pulling out of longstanding international agreements, then you have President Biden who is opting in back into some of them, such E.G., with the Paris Climate Accords, um. And then you have President Trump that's elected again. I think what we are seeing now is this idea that US foreign policy is and some of our more basic and foundational values, based commitments seem to be enacted based on the partisanship of whoever is elected. That we play hokey pokey with USAID, with the Paris Climate Agreement, with ah, with many of our commitments, and I don't think that that is good for the country. Ah, I think that what is best is for when we sign an agreement and when we're a part of it, we stay in it, um, so that they know that our commitments are reflective of our nation's values in a way that transcends, ah, partisanship. And so I think that instability is one, but then the other. I think it it, it is hand in hand with the volatility. On one hand, it goes far beyond just agreements, and it goes into real aberrations. I think are in in interventionism, I think, a turning back on our commitment on human rights, um, as well as super charging an economic regime that fuels the 1 % um. And I think that that that piece is the most concerning for everyday people."

Winter

40,728 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten